Natasha Denona Sunset (2018) Eyeshadow Palette Review & Swatches
Sunset (2018)
Natasha Denona Sunset (2018) 15-Pan Eyeshadow Palette ($129.00 for 1.20 oz.) returned recently with some hullabaloo because the formula has been changed. Just a glance through the ingredient lists between shades from the original release and the permanent, going-forward release shows significant differences (both in exclusions and inclusions as well as order). I compared the two palettes by applying shades from each respective release on an eye, so that I could understand any differences in application as well as color.
Overall, the application wasn’t very different between the two palettes, but I did find some key color differences that change how the color scheme comes together due to the changes in a few shades (Panjin, Horizon, Terra, Mandarine).
The current version of the palette, particularly the mattes, seem to be richer, slightly deeper or even more pigmented, while the shimmers seemed to be slightly finer and not as thick/cream-like in texture but looked similar applied. The other aspect that was improved was the wear–I do find that Natasha Denona’s current shimmer formula holds up better on my lids than the more oily/creamier version of the brand’s shimmers–and I did notice that the mattes seemed to stay true-to-color a little longer as well. The previous matte formula may seem more user-friendly and a little easier to work with, especially deeper hues, as the updated formula’s pigmentation seemed to stretch further.
Ingredients
Looks Using this Product
Sunset (2018)
PPermanent. $129.00.
Atmosphere (120M)
Atmosphere (120M) is a medium-dark copper with warm, brown undertones and a metallic finish. It had opaque pigmentation with a smooth, slightly dense consistency that was still soft enough that it yielded product onto my brush with ease. The eyeshadow applied evenly and blended out nicely along the edges without losing its shine and intensity. It wore well for nine hours on me before fading slightly. It was slightly brighter/more shimmery (more reflective) compared to the original release.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- Natasha Denona Crest (267M) (LE, $29.00) is lighter, warmer (95% similar).
- MAC Arriba (LE, $17.00) is darker (95% similar).
- Charlotte Tilbury Smokey Eyes are Forever Happy Eyes Enhance (LE, ) is less shimmery, lighter (95% similar).
- Smashbox Outfoxed (PiP, ) is more shimmery (95% similar).
- Huda Beauty Blood Moon (PiP, ) is more shimmery (95% similar).
- ColourPop DJ (LE, $6.00) is less shimmery (95% similar).
- MAC Coppering (P, $17.00) is more shimmery, lighter (95% similar).
- ColourPop Bling (PiP, $4.50) is more shimmery, lighter (95% similar).
- LORAC Rust (LE, $19.00) is warmer (95% similar).
- Milani Sunsets by the Beach (PiP, $5.99) is cooler (95% similar).
Formula Overview
$29.00/0.08 oz. - $362.50 Per Ounce
The majority of the brand's eyeshadows are quite pigmented, blendable, and long-wearing. The eyeshadows have improved over time, particularly with respect to longevity (without a primer). The original formula often creased on me within seven to eight hours, whereas the more current formula wears eight to nine hours with fading (instead of full-on creasing). The more matte finishes tend to be a bit more velvety, substantial, and less dry/powdery compared to prior iterations.
The metallic finish is often the creamiest, slightly denser in feel, but has excellent pigmentation, adhesion, and blendability. The sparkling shades can have some fallout, depending on how they're applied and how sparkly they are, so they sometimes work better with fingertips or a dampened brush; they can also run sheerer compared to other finishes.
Cream-Powders are the more unique formulation and tend to have firmer, almost stiff, consistencies and more semi-opaque, watercolor-esque coverage. They are longer-wearing, but they can take a few uses to learn how to use. This formula has also improved compared to when it first debuted--it is a bit more yielding now.
Browse all of our Natasha Denona Metallic Eye Shadow swatches.
Ingredients
Mica, Zinc Stearate, Dimethicone, Octyldodecyl Stearoyl Stearate, Caprylyl Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Calcium Aluminum Borosilicate, Synthetic Fluorphlogopite, Calcium Sodium Borosilicate, Silica, Tin Oxide;. May Contain (+/-): Titanium Dioxide (Ci 77891), Iron Oxides (Ci 77491, Ci 77499), Carmine (Ci 75470).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Atmosphere (120M)
PiPPermanent in Palette. $29.00.
Sinai (121CM) (2018)
Sinai (121CM) (2018) is a medium brown with warm undertones and a matte finish. It had rich color coverage paired with a smooth, velvety texture that was dense enough to have good adhesion to bare skin but was still very blendable on my skin. It was darker, more reddish than orange-based and was more matte compared to the original release. It stayed on well for eight and a half hours on me before fading slightly.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- ColourPop GNO (PiP, $4.50) is lighter (95% similar).
- Coloured Raine Empress (DC, $6.99) is brighter (95% similar).
- Make Up For Ever M705 Canyon (P, $17.00) is lighter (90% similar).
- Sephora Terracotta (LE, ) is lighter (90% similar).
- ColourPop Walking Dream (LE, $4.50) is more shimmery, darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Natasha Denona Sinai (121CM) (PiP, ) is more shimmery, cooler (90% similar).
- Natasha Denona Horizon (127CM) (PiP, ) is more shimmery, lighter (90% similar).
- Wet 'n' Wild Rose in the Air #10 (PiP, ) is lighter (90% similar).
- Sephora Sand Dunes (327) (P, $9.00) is lighter (85% similar).
- Anastasia Saturn (LE, $12.00) is cooler (85% similar).
Formula Overview
-
The majority of the brand's eyeshadows are quite pigmented, blendable, and long-wearing. The eyeshadows have improved over time, particularly with respect to longevity (without a primer). The original formula often creased on me within seven to eight hours, whereas the more current formula wears eight to nine hours with fading (instead of full-on creasing). The more matte finishes tend to be a bit more velvety, substantial, and less dry/powdery compared to prior iterations.
The metallic finish is often the creamiest, slightly denser in feel, but has excellent pigmentation, adhesion, and blendability. The sparkling shades can have some fallout, depending on how they're applied and how sparkly they are, so they sometimes work better with fingertips or a dampened brush; they can also run sheerer compared to other finishes.
Cream-Powders are the more unique formulation and tend to have firmer, almost stiff, consistencies and more semi-opaque, watercolor-esque coverage. They are longer-wearing, but they can take a few uses to learn how to use. This formula has also improved compared to when it first debuted--it is a bit more yielding now.
Browse all of our Natasha Denona Creamy Matte Eye Shadow swatches.
Sinai (121CM) (2018)
PiPPermanent in Palette.
Ice Gold (122K)
Ice Gold (122K) is a pale, white gold with warm, yellowish undertones and a sparkling, metallic sheen. It was intensely pigmented with a soft, blendable texture that wasn’t too firmly nor too softly pressed in the pan. It was noticeably less powdery/dusty with less of a chalky, white base compared to the original release, and it seemed to have more shimmer, though the original release had a shinier finish. The eyeshadow lasted nicely for eight and a half hours on me before fading noticeably.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- LORAC Gluten Free (LE, $19.00) is darker (95% similar).
- Milani Bella Diamond (30) (P, $4.49) is less shimmery (95% similar).
- Becca Pearl (LE, ) is darker (95% similar).
- MAC Bright Moon (LE, $17.00) is warmer (95% similar).
- Too Faced Unicorn (LE, $16.00) is darker, more muted (95% similar).
- Coloured Raine Clutch Pearls (DC, $6.99) is less shimmery (95% similar).
- Viseart Yves (PiP, ) is more shimmery (95% similar).
- KVD Beauty Skulls (LE, ) is more shimmery (95% similar).
- Pretty Vulgar Break Free (PiP, ) is less shimmery (95% similar).
- Buxom Diamond Darling (P, $12.00) is more shimmery, brighter (95% similar).
Formula Overview
-
The majority of the brand's eyeshadows are quite pigmented, blendable, and long-wearing. The eyeshadows have improved over time, particularly with respect to longevity (without a primer). The original formula often creased on me within seven to eight hours, whereas the more current formula wears eight to nine hours with fading (instead of full-on creasing). The more matte finishes tend to be a bit more velvety, substantial, and less dry/powdery compared to prior iterations.
The metallic finish is often the creamiest, slightly denser in feel, but has excellent pigmentation, adhesion, and blendability. The sparkling shades can have some fallout, depending on how they're applied and how sparkly they are, so they sometimes work better with fingertips or a dampened brush; they can also run sheerer compared to other finishes.
Cream-Powders are the more unique formulation and tend to have firmer, almost stiff, consistencies and more semi-opaque, watercolor-esque coverage. They are longer-wearing, but they can take a few uses to learn how to use. This formula has also improved compared to when it first debuted--it is a bit more yielding now.
Browse all of our Natasha Denona Crystal Eye Shadow swatches.
Ingredients
Mica, Zinc Stearate, Dimethicone, Octyldodecyl Stearoyl Stearate, Caprylyl Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Calcium Aluminum Borosilicate, Synthetic Fluorphlogopite, Calcium Sodium Borosilicate, Silica, Tin Oxide;. May Contain (+/-): Titanium Dioxide (Ci 77891), Iron Oxides (Ci 77491, Ci 77499), Carmine (Ci 75470).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Looks Using this Product
Ice Gold (122K)
PiPPermanent in Palette.
Mandarine (123DC)
Mandarine (123DC) is a bright, tangerine orange with warm, golden shimmer and a metallic finish. The eyeshadow was richly pigmented and had a smooth, lightly creamy texture that was soft and yielding without being too soft in the pan. It applied evenly to bare skin, blended out with ease, and wore well for eight and a half hours on me. The original release was deeper (more orange) as it seemed to be less golden/shimmery.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- Makeup Geek Sin City (DC, $6.00) is lighter (95% similar).
- ColourPop Starshine (LE, $4.50) is lighter (95% similar).
- Clionadh Molten (P, $5.25) is darker (95% similar).
- ColourPop Three's a Cloud (LE, $6.00) is less shimmery (95% similar).
- MAC Chessa (LE, $17.00) is less shimmery, darker (95% similar).
- Obsessive Compulsive Cosmetics Mimosa (DC, $14.00) is less shimmery (95% similar).
- ColourPop Chauffeur (P, $4.50) is less shimmery (95% similar).
- Dior Lucky Star #1 (LE, ) is less shimmery, more muted (90% similar).
- ColourPop Bahama Mama (LE, $4.50) is less shimmery, darker (90% similar).
- MAC Gingerluxe #2 (LE, ) is lighter, more muted (90% similar).
Formula Overview
$29.00/0.08 oz. - $362.50 Per Ounce
The majority of the brand's eyeshadows are quite pigmented, blendable, and long-wearing. The eyeshadows have improved over time, particularly with respect to longevity (without a primer). The original formula often creased on me within seven to eight hours, whereas the more current formula wears eight to nine hours with fading (instead of full-on creasing). The more matte finishes tend to be a bit more velvety, substantial, and less dry/powdery compared to prior iterations.
The metallic finish is often the creamiest, slightly denser in feel, but has excellent pigmentation, adhesion, and blendability. The sparkling shades can have some fallout, depending on how they're applied and how sparkly they are, so they sometimes work better with fingertips or a dampened brush; they can also run sheerer compared to other finishes.
Cream-Powders are the more unique formulation and tend to have firmer, almost stiff, consistencies and more semi-opaque, watercolor-esque coverage. They are longer-wearing, but they can take a few uses to learn how to use. This formula has also improved compared to when it first debuted--it is a bit more yielding now.
Browse all of our Natasha Denona Duo-Chrome Eyeshadow swatches.
Ingredients
Mica, Isononyl Isononanoate, Synthetic Fluorphlogopite, Dimethicone, Talc, Caprylyl Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Trimethylsiloxysilicate, Tin Oxide, Zinc Stearate, Titanium Dioxide (Ci 77891), Iron Oxides (Ci 77491), Carmine (Ci 75470), Yellow 5 Lake (Ci 19140).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Looks Using this Product
Mandarine (123DC)
PiPPermanent in Palette. $29.00.
Bronzage (124K)
Bronzage (124K) is a medium copper with warm, rusty red undertones and a metallic sheen. The texture was smooth, lightly creamy, and dense without being too thick or too stiff in the pan. It yielded rich color coverage in a single layer that applied evenly to bare skin. It seemed slightly brighter and more metallic compared to the original release but was very comparable. This shade stayed on well for nine hours on me before creasing faintly.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- Makeup Geek Grandstand (P, $9.99) is more shimmery, warmer (95% similar).
- YSL Scandal #4 (LE, ) is more shimmery (95% similar).
- Natasha Denona Bronzage (120M) (PiP, $29.00) is more shimmery, darker, better quality (95% similar).
- Viseart Fiery (Minx #5) (P, ) is more shimmery, darker, warmer (90% similar).
- Anastasia Wine (P, $12.00) is darker, warmer (90% similar).
- Too Faced Adore (PiP, ) is lighter (90% similar).
- Anastasia Copper Shimmer (P, $12.00) is darker, warmer (90% similar).
- Viseart Marais (PiP, ) (90% similar).
- Viseart Petit Pro #7 (LE, ) is more shimmery, darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Viseart Melonie (PiP, ) is lighter (90% similar).
Formula Overview
-
The majority of the brand's eyeshadows are quite pigmented, blendable, and long-wearing. The eyeshadows have improved over time, particularly with respect to longevity (without a primer). The original formula often creased on me within seven to eight hours, whereas the more current formula wears eight to nine hours with fading (instead of full-on creasing). The more matte finishes tend to be a bit more velvety, substantial, and less dry/powdery compared to prior iterations.
The metallic finish is often the creamiest, slightly denser in feel, but has excellent pigmentation, adhesion, and blendability. The sparkling shades can have some fallout, depending on how they're applied and how sparkly they are, so they sometimes work better with fingertips or a dampened brush; they can also run sheerer compared to other finishes.
Cream-Powders are the more unique formulation and tend to have firmer, almost stiff, consistencies and more semi-opaque, watercolor-esque coverage. They are longer-wearing, but they can take a few uses to learn how to use. This formula has also improved compared to when it first debuted--it is a bit more yielding now.
Browse all of our Natasha Denona Crystal Eye Shadow swatches.
Ingredients
Mica, Talc, Octyldodecyl Stearoyl Stearate, Diisostearyl Malate, Calcium Titanium Borosilicate, Caprylyl Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, PTFE, Zinc Stearate, Titanium Dioxide (Ci 77891), Iron Oxides (Ci 77491, Ci 77492).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Looks Using this Product
Bronzage (124K)
PiPPermanent in Palette.
Vulcano (125CM)
Vulcano (125CM) is a deep, plummy brown with subtle, warm undertones and a matte finish. It had an incredibly soft, velvety consistency that wasn’t too softly nor too firmly pressed in the pan, which made it blendable without being powdery or prone to fallout. The pigmentation was opaque in a single layer and adhered evenly to bare skin. It lasted for just over eight and a half hours on me before starting to fade noticeably. The current release was very similar in color and feel to the original.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- ColourPop French Kiss (PiP, $4.50) is lighter (95% similar).
- ColourPop Feisty (LE, $4.50) is cooler (95% similar).
- Coloured Raine Moments (DC, $6.99) is lighter (95% similar).
- Smashbox Miss Chili (PiP, ) is more muted (95% similar).
- ColourPop Oh Fudge (LE, $4.50) is darker (95% similar).
- Melt Cosmetics Hammered (PiP, ) is cooler (95% similar).
- Natasha Denona Nude Vino (139CM) (DC, ) is lighter (90% similar).
- Makeup Geek Cabin Fever (DC, $6.00) is lighter (95% similar).
- Ciate Queen Bee (LE, ) is darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Urban Decay Whiplash (LE, $19.00) is cooler (90% similar).
Formula Overview
-
The majority of the brand's eyeshadows are quite pigmented, blendable, and long-wearing. The eyeshadows have improved over time, particularly with respect to longevity (without a primer). The original formula often creased on me within seven to eight hours, whereas the more current formula wears eight to nine hours with fading (instead of full-on creasing). The more matte finishes tend to be a bit more velvety, substantial, and less dry/powdery compared to prior iterations.
The metallic finish is often the creamiest, slightly denser in feel, but has excellent pigmentation, adhesion, and blendability. The sparkling shades can have some fallout, depending on how they're applied and how sparkly they are, so they sometimes work better with fingertips or a dampened brush; they can also run sheerer compared to other finishes.
Cream-Powders are the more unique formulation and tend to have firmer, almost stiff, consistencies and more semi-opaque, watercolor-esque coverage. They are longer-wearing, but they can take a few uses to learn how to use. This formula has also improved compared to when it first debuted--it is a bit more yielding now.
Browse all of our Natasha Denona Creamy Matte Eye Shadow swatches.
Ingredients
Synthetic Fluorphlogopite, Zinc Stearate, Dimethicone, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Caprylyl Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, HDI/Trimethylol Hexyllactone Crosspolymer, Silica, Mica. May Contain (+/-): Titanium Dioxide (Ci 77891), Iron Oxides (Ci 77491, Ci 77492, Ci 77499), Carmine (Ci 75470), Yellow 5 Lake (Ci 19140).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Vulcano (125CM)
PiPPermanent in Palette.
Aubade (126K)
Aubade (126K) is a light-medium, golden copper with warm, orange undertones and a metallic sheen. It had opaque color coverage paired with a smooth, lightly creamy texture that was denser but not too thick or too stiff in the pan that it was hard to work with. The eyeshadow applied evenly to bare skin and blended out well. It wore well for eight and a half hours on me before creasing faintly. There was slightly finer sparkle in this shade compared to the original release but was very similar in color and finish overall.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- ColourPop Uninhibited (PiP, $4.50) is less shimmery (95% similar).
- MAC Warm Wash #2 (LE, ) is lighter (95% similar).
- Too Faced Friendspiration (LE, $16.00) is less shimmery, darker, more muted (95% similar).
- BH Cosmetics Foil Eyes 2 #3 (PiP, ) is less shimmery (95% similar).
- LORAC Illusion (LE, $19.00) is less shimmery, darker (95% similar).
- Zoeva Pure Ganache (PiP, ) is less shimmery (90% similar).
- Ardency Inn Copper (DC, $21.00) is less shimmery, warmer (95% similar).
- Tarte Vintage (P, $14.00) is less shimmery, darker (95% similar).
- Too Faced Butterscotch (LE, $16.00) is less shimmery, darker (90% similar).
- MAC A Glimmer of Gold #3 (PiP, $21.00) is lighter, brighter, warmer (90% similar).
Formula Overview
-
The majority of the brand's eyeshadows are quite pigmented, blendable, and long-wearing. The eyeshadows have improved over time, particularly with respect to longevity (without a primer). The original formula often creased on me within seven to eight hours, whereas the more current formula wears eight to nine hours with fading (instead of full-on creasing). The more matte finishes tend to be a bit more velvety, substantial, and less dry/powdery compared to prior iterations.
The metallic finish is often the creamiest, slightly denser in feel, but has excellent pigmentation, adhesion, and blendability. The sparkling shades can have some fallout, depending on how they're applied and how sparkly they are, so they sometimes work better with fingertips or a dampened brush; they can also run sheerer compared to other finishes.
Cream-Powders are the more unique formulation and tend to have firmer, almost stiff, consistencies and more semi-opaque, watercolor-esque coverage. They are longer-wearing, but they can take a few uses to learn how to use. This formula has also improved compared to when it first debuted--it is a bit more yielding now.
Browse all of our Natasha Denona Crystal Eye Shadow swatches.
Ingredients
Talc, Mica, Calcium Sodium Borosilicate, Octyldodecyl Stearoyl Stearate, Diisostearyl Malate, Caprylyl Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Silica, Tin Oxide, PTFE, Zinc Stearate, Calcium Titanium Borosilicate, Synthetic Fluorphlogopite, Aluminum Calcium Sodium Silicate. May Contain (+/-): Titanium Dioxide (Ci 77891), Iron Oxides (Ci 77491, Ci 77492, Ci 77499), Bronze Powder (Ci 77400).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Aubade (126K)
PiPPermanent in Palette.
Horizon (127CM)
Horizon (127CM) is a burnt orange with warm, reddish undertones and a matte finish. The pigmentation was fantastic with opaque coverage in a single layer that adhered evenly and smoothly to bare skin. The color stayed intense even when the edges were blended, but it was so pigmented that I would recommend using a lighter hand with it to avoid over-application. This shade was darker and noticeably less orange compared to the original release, which I did feel affected the way it looked overall. It stayed on nicely for eight and a half hours on me before I noticed slight fading.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- ColourPop Dig It (LE, $4.50) is less shimmery, warmer (95% similar).
- ColourPop Thic (LE, $4.50) is cooler (95% similar).
- ColourPop Palms Away (LE, $4.50) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (95% similar).
- ColourPop Dynamite (LE, $4.50) is lighter (95% similar).
- Wet 'n' Wild Not a Basic Peach #4 (PiP, ) is lighter (95% similar).
- Huda Beauty Topaz #3 (LE, ) is less shimmery, darker (95% similar).
- KVD Beauty Analogue (LE, ) is darker (95% similar).
- MAC Rule (P, $17.00) is lighter, warmer (95% similar).
- Natasha Denona Sinai (121CM) (PiP, ) is darker (85% similar).
- ColourPop Snug as a Bug (PiP, $4.50) is less shimmery, lighter (90% similar).
Formula Overview
-
The majority of the brand's eyeshadows are quite pigmented, blendable, and long-wearing. The eyeshadows have improved over time, particularly with respect to longevity (without a primer). The original formula often creased on me within seven to eight hours, whereas the more current formula wears eight to nine hours with fading (instead of full-on creasing). The more matte finishes tend to be a bit more velvety, substantial, and less dry/powdery compared to prior iterations.
The metallic finish is often the creamiest, slightly denser in feel, but has excellent pigmentation, adhesion, and blendability. The sparkling shades can have some fallout, depending on how they're applied and how sparkly they are, so they sometimes work better with fingertips or a dampened brush; they can also run sheerer compared to other finishes.
Cream-Powders are the more unique formulation and tend to have firmer, almost stiff, consistencies and more semi-opaque, watercolor-esque coverage. They are longer-wearing, but they can take a few uses to learn how to use. This formula has also improved compared to when it first debuted--it is a bit more yielding now.
Browse all of our Natasha Denona Creamy Matte Eye Shadow swatches.
Ingredients
Synthetic Fluorphlogopite, Zinc Stearate, Dimethicone, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Caprylyl Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, HDI/Trimethylol Hexyllactone Crosspolymer, Silica, Mica. May Contain (+/-): Titanium Dioxide (Ci 77891), Iron Oxides (Ci 77491, Ci 77492, Ci 77499), Carmine (Ci 75470), Yellow 5 Lake (Ci 19140).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Looks Using this Product
Horizon (127CM)
PiPPermanent in Palette.
Sundazed (128K)
Sundazed (128K) is a light-medium gold with strong, warm undertones and a sparkling, metallic finish. The texture was more loosely pressed, which resulted in some fallout when applied to my lid initially. When I pressed and patted the shade on, I had less fallout (minimal but still a bit). It was lighter and brighter than the original release with more shimmer and a touch less sparkle but was also more pigmented as there seemed to be more of a base pigment coming through. The eyeshadow lasted for eight and a half hours before creasing but had slight fallout over that time period.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- Anastasia Sunny (LE, $12.00) is lighter (95% similar).
- Chanel Signe Particulier #4 (LE, ) is lighter (95% similar).
- Sydney Grace Bask (Deep) (PiP, $6.25) is less shimmery, cooler (95% similar).
- MAC Bao Bao's Jewels #2 (LE, ) is more shimmery (95% similar).
- Tarte Up to No Gold (LE, ) is less shimmery (95% similar).
- Natasha Denona Aurum (PiP, $29.00) is less shimmery, lighter, cooler (90% similar).
- Sydney Grace Treasure Hunter (P, $6.25) is less shimmery, cooler (90% similar).
- ColourPop Droid (LE, $4.50) is less shimmery, lighter, cooler (90% similar).
- Urban Decay Baked Cowboy (DC, $19.00) is less shimmery, warmer (90% similar).
- Buxom Gold Status (P, $12.00) is less shimmery (90% similar).
Formula Overview
-
The majority of the brand's eyeshadows are quite pigmented, blendable, and long-wearing. The eyeshadows have improved over time, particularly with respect to longevity (without a primer). The original formula often creased on me within seven to eight hours, whereas the more current formula wears eight to nine hours with fading (instead of full-on creasing). The more matte finishes tend to be a bit more velvety, substantial, and less dry/powdery compared to prior iterations.
The metallic finish is often the creamiest, slightly denser in feel, but has excellent pigmentation, adhesion, and blendability. The sparkling shades can have some fallout, depending on how they're applied and how sparkly they are, so they sometimes work better with fingertips or a dampened brush; they can also run sheerer compared to other finishes.
Cream-Powders are the more unique formulation and tend to have firmer, almost stiff, consistencies and more semi-opaque, watercolor-esque coverage. They are longer-wearing, but they can take a few uses to learn how to use. This formula has also improved compared to when it first debuted--it is a bit more yielding now.
Browse all of our Natasha Denona Crystal Eye Shadow swatches.
Ingredients
Talc, Calcium Aluminum Borosilicate, Octyldodecyl Stearoyl Stearate, Silica, Diisostearyl Malate, Mica, Caprylyl Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Tin Oxide, PTFE, Zinc Stearate, Titanium Dioxide (Ci 77891), Iron Oxides (Ci 77491, Ci 77492), Bronze Powder (Ci 77400).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Sundazed (128K)
PiPPermanent in Palette.
Terra (129CM) (2018)
Terra (129CM) (2018) is a medium-dark brown with soft, warm undertones and a matte finish. It had rich pigmentation in a single layer that applied evenly and smoothly to bare skin with good adhesion. The consistency was soft, velvety, and blendable without being powdery. It was lighter and warmer, less red-based, and also more matte than the original release. This shade wore well for eight and a half hours before fading noticeably.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- ColourPop Hot Glam (LE, $4.50) is darker (95% similar).
- Natasha Denona Antique (276CP) (LE, ) is darker (90% similar).
- ColourPop Fur (P, $4.50) is darker, cooler (90% similar).
- ColourPop Sea Stars (P, $4.50) is lighter, warmer (90% similar).
- Sephora Auburn (LE, ) is lighter (90% similar).
- Anastasia Eccentric (LE, $12.00) is lighter, warmer (90% similar).
- Urban Decay Confidential (LE, $19.00) is cooler (90% similar).
- Too Faced Coffee First (LE, $16.00) is lighter, warmer (90% similar).
- Urban Decay Elemental (LE, $19.00) is lighter (90% similar).
- Huda Beauty Sandalwood (LE, ) is lighter, warmer (90% similar).
Formula Overview
-
The majority of the brand's eyeshadows are quite pigmented, blendable, and long-wearing. The eyeshadows have improved over time, particularly with respect to longevity (without a primer). The original formula often creased on me within seven to eight hours, whereas the more current formula wears eight to nine hours with fading (instead of full-on creasing). The more matte finishes tend to be a bit more velvety, substantial, and less dry/powdery compared to prior iterations.
The metallic finish is often the creamiest, slightly denser in feel, but has excellent pigmentation, adhesion, and blendability. The sparkling shades can have some fallout, depending on how they're applied and how sparkly they are, so they sometimes work better with fingertips or a dampened brush; they can also run sheerer compared to other finishes.
Cream-Powders are the more unique formulation and tend to have firmer, almost stiff, consistencies and more semi-opaque, watercolor-esque coverage. They are longer-wearing, but they can take a few uses to learn how to use. This formula has also improved compared to when it first debuted--it is a bit more yielding now.
Browse all of our Natasha Denona Creamy Matte Eye Shadow swatches.
Terra (129CM) (2018)
PiPPermanent in Palette.
Bermuda (130CM)
Bermuda (130CM) is a bright coral with warm undertones and a matte finish. The color payoff was fantastic, while the texture was soft, smooth, and velvety without being too powdery nor too firmly-pressed in the pan. The eyeshadow blended out easily (but did not lose its coverage too readily) and stayed on well for eight and a half hours on me.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- ColourPop Champs (PiP, $4.50) is lighter (95% similar).
- Natasha Denona Vega (111CM) (PiP, ) is darker (95% similar).
- KVD Beauty Fringe (LE, ) is lighter (90% similar).
- ColourPop Flutterbye (LE, $4.50) is cooler (95% similar).
- ColourPop Big Spoon (LE, $4.50) is more muted (90% similar).
- ColourPop Go With the Flow (PiP, $4.50) (85% similar).
- Urban Decay Reflection (LE, $19.00) is lighter, cooler (90% similar).
- ColourPop Paper Straw (PiP, $4.50) is darker, cooler (90% similar).
- ColourPop Gnarly (PiP, $4.50) is warmer (90% similar).
- Too Faced Peaches and Cream (PiP, $16.00) is lighter (90% similar).
Formula Overview
-
The majority of the brand's eyeshadows are quite pigmented, blendable, and long-wearing. The eyeshadows have improved over time, particularly with respect to longevity (without a primer). The original formula often creased on me within seven to eight hours, whereas the more current formula wears eight to nine hours with fading (instead of full-on creasing). The more matte finishes tend to be a bit more velvety, substantial, and less dry/powdery compared to prior iterations.
The metallic finish is often the creamiest, slightly denser in feel, but has excellent pigmentation, adhesion, and blendability. The sparkling shades can have some fallout, depending on how they're applied and how sparkly they are, so they sometimes work better with fingertips or a dampened brush; they can also run sheerer compared to other finishes.
Cream-Powders are the more unique formulation and tend to have firmer, almost stiff, consistencies and more semi-opaque, watercolor-esque coverage. They are longer-wearing, but they can take a few uses to learn how to use. This formula has also improved compared to when it first debuted--it is a bit more yielding now.
Browse all of our Natasha Denona Creamy Matte Eye Shadow swatches.
Ingredients
Synthetic Fluorphlogopite, Zinc Stearate, Dimethicone, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Caprylyl Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, HDI/Trimethylol Hexyllactone Crosspolymer, Silica, Mica. May Contain (+/-): Titanium Dioxide (Ci 77891), Iron Oxides (Ci 77491, Ci 77492, Ci 77499), Carmine (Ci 75470), Yellow 5 Lake (Ci 19140).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Bermuda (130CM)
PiPPermanent in Palette.
Morgana (131DC)
Morgana (131DC) is a deep coral with warm, orange undertones and a metallic sheen. The pigmentation was opaque in a single layer, while the consistency was smooth, dense but not thick, and blendable without any fallout. It wore well for nine hours on me before creasing faintly. The original release was very similar in color but had a creamier, thicker consistency.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- ColourPop Louie (PiP, $4.50) is less shimmery, more muted (95% similar).
- ColourPop As You Wave (P, $6.00) is less shimmery (95% similar).
- ColourPop High Society (P, $4.50) is lighter (95% similar).
- ColourPop Pecking Order (LE, $4.50) is less shimmery, lighter, cooler (90% similar).
- ColourPop Hotness (LE, $4.50) is cooler (90% similar).
- Sephora Mrs. Baily (LE, ) is less shimmery, lighter (85% similar).
- Makeup Geek Cosmopolitan (DC, $6.00) is lighter, more muted (90% similar).
- MAC Expensive Pink (P, $17.00) is less shimmery, lighter (85% similar).
- Melt Cosmetics Alegria (PiP, ) is less shimmery, darker, cooler (85% similar).
- Wet 'n' Wild Not a Basic Peach #9 (PiP, ) is cooler (85% similar).
Formula Overview
$29.00/0.08 oz. - $362.50 Per Ounce
The majority of the brand's eyeshadows are quite pigmented, blendable, and long-wearing. The eyeshadows have improved over time, particularly with respect to longevity (without a primer). The original formula often creased on me within seven to eight hours, whereas the more current formula wears eight to nine hours with fading (instead of full-on creasing). The more matte finishes tend to be a bit more velvety, substantial, and less dry/powdery compared to prior iterations.
The metallic finish is often the creamiest, slightly denser in feel, but has excellent pigmentation, adhesion, and blendability. The sparkling shades can have some fallout, depending on how they're applied and how sparkly they are, so they sometimes work better with fingertips or a dampened brush; they can also run sheerer compared to other finishes.
Cream-Powders are the more unique formulation and tend to have firmer, almost stiff, consistencies and more semi-opaque, watercolor-esque coverage. They are longer-wearing, but they can take a few uses to learn how to use. This formula has also improved compared to when it first debuted--it is a bit more yielding now.
Browse all of our Natasha Denona Duo-Chrome Eyeshadow swatches.
Ingredients
Mica, Isononyl Isononanoate, Synthetic Fluorphlogopite, Dimethicone, Talc, Caprylyl Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Trimethylsiloxysilicate, Tin Oxide, Zinc Stearate, Titanium Dioxide (Ci 77891), Iron Oxides (Ci 77491), Carmine (Ci 75470), Yellow 5 Lake (Ci 19140).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Looks Using this Product
Morgana (131DC)
PiPPermanent in Palette. $29.00.
Panjin (132CM)
Panjin (132CM) is a medium-dark red with subtle, cool undertones and a matte finish. It had rich pigmentation that applied evenly and smoothly to bare skin. The consistency was velvety and finely-milled without any dryness or graininess, which was more present in the original release. The biggest difference, though, was that this was much deeper and darkened noticeably on my skin compared to the other shade, which appeared brighter and a bit more true-red on my lid, so the effect of it in practice was remarkable. This shade lasted nicely for nine hours on me before fading a touch.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- ColourPop Dynasty (PiP, $6.00) is cooler (90% similar).
- Natasha Denona Sakura (191CM) (PiP, ) is less shimmery, lighter, cooler (90% similar).
- Huda Beauty Ruby #4 (LE, ) is darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Huda Beauty Saffron (PiP, ) is warmer (90% similar).
- Huda Beauty Mauve #9 (PiP, ) is more muted, cooler (90% similar).
- MAC 25 (LE, $17.00) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (90% similar).
- Melt Cosmetics Corazon (PiP, ) is less shimmery, lighter, cooler (90% similar).
- Glaminatrix Bauxite (P, $7.30) is lighter, cooler (90% similar).
- Huda Beauty Mauve #6 (PiP, ) is lighter (90% similar).
- ColourPop Daiquiri (PiP, $4.50) is less shimmery, lighter, cooler (90% similar).
Formula Overview
-
The majority of the brand's eyeshadows are quite pigmented, blendable, and long-wearing. The eyeshadows have improved over time, particularly with respect to longevity (without a primer). The original formula often creased on me within seven to eight hours, whereas the more current formula wears eight to nine hours with fading (instead of full-on creasing). The more matte finishes tend to be a bit more velvety, substantial, and less dry/powdery compared to prior iterations.
The metallic finish is often the creamiest, slightly denser in feel, but has excellent pigmentation, adhesion, and blendability. The sparkling shades can have some fallout, depending on how they're applied and how sparkly they are, so they sometimes work better with fingertips or a dampened brush; they can also run sheerer compared to other finishes.
Cream-Powders are the more unique formulation and tend to have firmer, almost stiff, consistencies and more semi-opaque, watercolor-esque coverage. They are longer-wearing, but they can take a few uses to learn how to use. This formula has also improved compared to when it first debuted--it is a bit more yielding now.
Browse all of our Natasha Denona Creamy Matte Eye Shadow swatches.
Ingredients
Synthetic Fluorphlogopite, Zinc Stearate, HDI/Trimethylol Hexyllactone Crosspolymer, Dimethicone, Caprylyl Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, HDI/Trimethylol Hexyllactone Crosspolymer, Silica, Mica, Iron Oxides (Ci 77491, Ci 77492, Ci 77499), Carmine (Ci 75470), Yellow 5 Lake (Ci 19140).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Panjin (132CM)
PiPPermanent in Palette.
Igneous (133CM)
Igneous (133CM) is a deep brown with neutral-to-warm undertones and a matte finish. It had nearly opaque pigmentation in a single layer, which was buildable to full coverage with less than half of a layer on top. The consistency was soft, smooth, and velvety without being dry or dusty. It was more finely-milled and slightly more pigmented than the previous release but was close overall. It wore well for eight and a half hours on me before fading a touch.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- Tarte Don't Turn A-Brown (LE, ) is lighter (95% similar).
- ColourPop Drama Mama (PiP, $4.50) is cooler (95% similar).
- Sydney Grace Romance (PiP, $5.25) is warmer (95% similar).
- Inglot #363 (P, $6.00) is cooler (95% similar).
- Natasha Denona Log (Igneous) (PiP, ) is warmer (90% similar).
- Inglot #329 (P, $6.00) is darker (95% similar).
- KVD Beauty Shadow Box (DC, ) is lighter (95% similar).
- Persona Fearless (PiP, ) is lighter (95% similar).
- Pretty Vulgar Victory (PiP, ) is lighter, warmer (90% similar).
- Anastasia Rich Brown (P, $12.00) is lighter (90% similar).
Formula Overview
-
The majority of the brand's eyeshadows are quite pigmented, blendable, and long-wearing. The eyeshadows have improved over time, particularly with respect to longevity (without a primer). The original formula often creased on me within seven to eight hours, whereas the more current formula wears eight to nine hours with fading (instead of full-on creasing). The more matte finishes tend to be a bit more velvety, substantial, and less dry/powdery compared to prior iterations.
The metallic finish is often the creamiest, slightly denser in feel, but has excellent pigmentation, adhesion, and blendability. The sparkling shades can have some fallout, depending on how they're applied and how sparkly they are, so they sometimes work better with fingertips or a dampened brush; they can also run sheerer compared to other finishes.
Cream-Powders are the more unique formulation and tend to have firmer, almost stiff, consistencies and more semi-opaque, watercolor-esque coverage. They are longer-wearing, but they can take a few uses to learn how to use. This formula has also improved compared to when it first debuted--it is a bit more yielding now.
Browse all of our Natasha Denona Creamy Matte Eye Shadow swatches.
Ingredients
Synthetic Fluorphlogopite, Zinc Stearate, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Caprylyl Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, HDI/Trimethylol Hexyllactone Crosspolymer, Dimethicone, Silica, Iron Oxides (Ci 77491, Ci 77492, Ci 77499), Carmine (Ci 75470).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Igneous (133CM)
PiPPermanent in Palette.
Sol (134CM)
Sol (134CM) is a bright, medium yellow with warm undertones and a matte finish. The eyeshadow had rich color coverage that applied well to bare skin. It had a velvety, smooth texture that wasn’t too softly nor too firmly pressed in the pan, so it didn’t have a lot of powderiness but still blended out nicely. It was a touch brighter than the original release but seemed more pigmented. It stayed on well for eight and a half hours on me.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- Anastasia D1 (Norvina Vol. 1) (LE, $12.00) (100% similar).
- Coloured Raine Lemon Drop (PiP, $6.99) is lighter (95% similar).
- Anastasia Phresh (LE, $12.00) (100% similar).
- ColourPop Mischief (PiP, $4.50) is lighter (95% similar).
- ColourPop Take Flight (P, $4.50) is lighter (95% similar).
- ColourPop Oh Beehave (PiP, $4.50) is lighter (95% similar).
- Sydney Grace Geese a Laying (P, $5.25) is lighter, more muted (95% similar).
- Huda Beauty Tiger #1 (LE, ) is lighter (95% similar).
- Anastasia E4 (Norvina Vol. 3) (LE, $12.00) is less pigmented (95% similar).
- Viseart Bright Editorial #7 (PiP, ) is lighter (95% similar).
Formula Overview
-
The majority of the brand's eyeshadows are quite pigmented, blendable, and long-wearing. The eyeshadows have improved over time, particularly with respect to longevity (without a primer). The original formula often creased on me within seven to eight hours, whereas the more current formula wears eight to nine hours with fading (instead of full-on creasing). The more matte finishes tend to be a bit more velvety, substantial, and less dry/powdery compared to prior iterations.
The metallic finish is often the creamiest, slightly denser in feel, but has excellent pigmentation, adhesion, and blendability. The sparkling shades can have some fallout, depending on how they're applied and how sparkly they are, so they sometimes work better with fingertips or a dampened brush; they can also run sheerer compared to other finishes.
Cream-Powders are the more unique formulation and tend to have firmer, almost stiff, consistencies and more semi-opaque, watercolor-esque coverage. They are longer-wearing, but they can take a few uses to learn how to use. This formula has also improved compared to when it first debuted--it is a bit more yielding now.
Browse all of our Natasha Denona Creamy Matte Eye Shadow swatches.
Ingredients
Synthetic Fluorphlogopite, Zinc Stearate, Dimethicone, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Caprylyl Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, HDI/Trimethylol Hexyllactone Crosspolymer, Silica, Mica. May Contain (+/-): Titanium Dioxide (Ci 77891), Iron Oxides (Ci 77491, Ci 77492, Ci 77499), Carmine (Ci 75470), Yellow 5 Lake (Ci 19140).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
I feel like this trend has come and gone, so I don’t understand bringing it back, but I’m sure people will still buy it. I’m content with my Colourpop dupe; however, if this version had been released first I probably would have kept it. I returned the original version because the mattes weren’t that vibrant on my skin tone.
They made it permanent shortly after it was released, but I guess it took longer to get it produced again.
Good on the brand for making such improvements. This looks fantastic.
It is a nice palette!
Thank you so much for doing this comparison! I too noticed the huge ingredient changes and was somewhat taken aback when I saw talc back on the ingredient listing as I remember this being a huge selling feature when the star palette came out a few years back…I think it’s great to always strive for improvement, but I struggle understanding why you would completely overhaul one of your best selling products?
Out of curiosity, if you had to choose between the new or the old version, which one would you go for?
I’d say this one, mostly because it wears longer for me and I think there’s a little more differentiation between the shades overall. I will say that Panjin’s change was substantial that if you wanted a brighter, more vibrant “sunset” look, then it’s not quite the same in the new palette – Panjin ends up a little more berry-esque and as a result, just a more common shade.
My guess is more to be in line with the current offerings they have – e.g. to have consistency between the eyeshadows they release going forward, purchase the same ingredients, etc.
Thanks Christine! Good to know that the new palette surpasses the old one in quality and performance š
The shades are so similar to one another. Maybe it is just my screen, but it seems like more variety is needed to justify the price tag on this palette. Then again, I don’t know what I’d do with one orange, much less four.
Long time lurker but you look amazing with your hair down! The palette looks good too!
Thanks!
There is something a bit strange about a brand that keeps reformulating their original palettes. If they had done the job properly in the first place it would not have been necessary. Bad luck to all those who bought the original.
There are a few shades (of the bronze variety) that are quite close to one another and all are eminently dupable. Mandarin seems to be the most original shade there.
Alternatively, they are improving it – I don’t think there’s anything wrong with reformulating as long as it is in the right direction. It is not as if the original was bad!
I donāt mind a reformulation but Iām honestly sad because i own the original. I canāt justify buying the new version so itās kind of unfair for them to improve it so much. I wish they offered some sort of trade in discount lol.
Do you have issues with yours? Are you unhappy with what you have? We’re still talking incremental differences in terms of quality – it’s not like the original was an F and this is an A! And if you use primer for longevity, then that solves for the biggest difference in quality, IMO!
Hi Christine!
I wouldn’t say unhappy, but some of the changes you noted sounded like they are more inline with my preferences. ie. Smoother less cream like shimmers, and I do wish I had the newer version of Panjin since I do prefer my reds a tiny bit darker.
Yeah, I get that they want to improve their product for the customers, but at the same time, it doesn’t really help the people who bought the original palette. And it’s not like they’re even re-formulating a particularly old palette or anything.
Itās cool the did promote the formula change. Still one of the more rounded palettes the brand offers.
ND seems to tweak her formulas over time (there seem to be a fair difference between what she originally launched vs. now), though I wonder how that will work in the long-run – kind of a double-edged sword.
Good to see that the quality is so solid, and that any notable difference in some specific shades only made them look better. If I were to ever use up my little ColourPop dupe, I’m happy to see that this is a possibe option if I still feel like rocking a colorful sunset eye!
It is hard to justify this palette when Yes, Please is so good, though!
i have no interest in this palette (not a huge fan of orangey colors) but just wanted to say how much i appreciate all the extra work you do to give us a detailed comparison of the difference in formula!
My pleasure, Joy! At first, I thought it was going to be mostly a color-to-color comparison but the ingredient lists read so differently that it became apparent that I needed to do formula, too!
While neither the original nor the updated palettes interest me (and even if they did, ND is hilariously outside my budget), I nevertheless appreciate your through comparison of the two!
In many ways, this is the quintessential offering for this color scheme, and kudos to ND for seeking to improve it. It seems a good addition to the permanent line up. These red-oranges have exploded and held on since MR. As an oldbie, canāt help but feeling that fiery shades are beginning to look dated. So 2Kteen. Not nec a bad thing, but highly dupable, etc. Does give me hope for the matte Safari palette.
I have the original palette and enjoy it. Since I respect your opinion, I’d love to know if you think that the changes in the second palette warrant a purchase IF you already own the first.
Personally, I’m not sure why someone would purchase a second one if they haven’t finished the first? There is a lot of overlap between the colors so it’s pretty redundant! Nothing to do with quality – just because something is good quality doesn’t mean you need to have two of the same thing!
I really want to buy this palette because I love the color scheme, but I can’t justify the price. I can create two versions of this palette with the shades I currently own, including yellow.
At least they changed the palette for the better.
Just no for me – more of those colours that seem to be ubiquitous. They do fit in with the name of the palette but they’re just not for me.
You’re right and there is no need to have a backup of this, as nice as it is. I was only wondering if the difference between the two palettes was significant, but as you pointed out there is overlap. Thanks for letting me know your thoughts!
Christine, can you tell me what./where the differences are in the ingredient list? I just bought a palette from Sephora and I’m wondering if I got the old or new formula. My yellow does not seem as vibrant as the one you swatched from the 2018 palette. I’d like to know what the differences are so I can quickly scan my box and see if I have the old or new version.
Hi Xina,
The ingredient lists are posted in each palette’s review!
Hi Christine,
Sorry to comment rather belatedly on an old post, but I just picked up the new Sunset Palette at Sephora and noticed that mine (like yours, based on your photos) has these bizarre grease/oil stains around the shades Morgana and Mandarine.
I’m not sure what this might be caused from (perhaps the new shadow formulation for these two shades has more oil content?), but I’m debating if this palette should be returned due to that factor. I noticed that photos of the OG Sunset Palette did not have those grease/oil stains, so this is unique to the re-released palettes.
Curious to hear if the grease/oil stains on your new Sunset Palette have changed over time–have they stayed the same? Gotten bigger? Smaller?
Did you ever reach out to Natasha Denona about this? Have you heard anyone else mention this issue with the new Sunset Palette?
Thanks for your help, and keep up all of the amazing work you do here! I love coming to your blog for your helpful reviews!
Sorry, Harriet, I did not reach out as it was not something I considered an issue that needed to be looked into? I guess. Like I just assumed it was based on the creaminess of the formula and just didn’t register as a concern for me. It looks like there’s still some residual oiliness surrounding those two shades.
The ingredient lists are pretty different between the two palettes, so since it’s likely ingredient-related, it would make sense that it didn’t occur in the original.
Thanks so much for your response, Christine! Iām thinking this is a result of the new formula, too. And honestly, given how beautiful these colors look and how well-reviewed they are by you, I think more-than-likely this palette is honestly still a keeper for me! Thanks again for all of your amazing work!