Natasha Denona Glam (Light) Face Palette Review & Swatches
Glam (Light)
Natasha Denona Glam (Light) Face Palette ($59.00 for 0.45 oz.) is a new (seemingly permanent) cheek and eye palette. It includes a cream blush, powder highlighter, and five eyeshadows (three mattes, two shimmers). Overall, everything was easy enough to work with — pigmented, blendable eyeshadows with the two shimmers being more prone to fallout during application, while the highlighter was superb.
The issue I had was with the texture of the cream blush, which felt more like a dried-out cream blush than a cream blush, so it was difficult to pick up product and made it harder to work with on top of other products in particular.
Look Using this Product
Glam (Light)
PPermanent. $62.00.
Glam Light (412KS)
Glam Light (412KS) is a bright, golden peach with warmer undertones and a sparkling, metallic finish. The texture was drier to the touch compared to most of the brand’s shimmer eyeshadows–and it was a new finish–but still very finely-milled and smooth to the touch.
I found it was more prone to fallout, though, so it was best applied with a dampened brush if one doesn’t want fallout but had full coverage and a smooth application applied with a dry brush or fingertip. It wore well for nine hours before fading a bit and had light fallout over time.
Top Dupes
- Give Me Glow Just Peachy (P, $7.00) is lighter, cooler (95% similar).
- Fenty Beauty She Bubbly (LE, ) is lighter, warmer (90% similar).
- Anastasia Dreamer (LE, $12.00) is less shimmery (90% similar).
- Anastasia Soleil (LE, $12.00) is less shimmery, lighter, cooler (90% similar).
- MAC Feast Your Eyes (LE, $25.00) is darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Clionadh Honeycomb (P, $6.25) is darker, warmer (85% similar).
- ColourPop Sailor (P, $6.00) is less shimmery, warmer (85% similar).
- Charlotte Tilbury Mesmerising Maroon #1 (LE, ) is darker, cooler (85% similar).
- Anastasia B1 (Norvina Vol. 4) (LE, $12.00) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (85% similar).
- Dominique Cosmetics Eternal Light (PiP, ) is darker (85% similar).
Ingredients
CALCIUM SODIUM BOROSILICATE, OCTYLDODECYL STEAROYL STEARATE, MICA, DIISOSTEARYL MALATE, SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, HYDROGENATED POLYCYCLOPENTADIENE, ISODODECANE, POLYETHYLENE, SILICA, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL, PHENOXYETHANOL, COPERNICIA CERIFERA CERA (COPERNICIA CERIFERA (CARNAUBA) WAX / CIRE DE CARNAUBA), TIN OXIDE, HEXYLENE GLYCOL, TOCOPHEROL +/- CI 77891 (TITANIUM DIOXIDE), CI 77491 (IRON OXIDES), CI 77499 (IRON OXIDES), CI 77492 (IRON OXIDES).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Look Using this Product
Glam Light (412KS)
PiPPermanent in Palette.
Glam Light (413CM)
Glam Light (413CM) is a light, rosy brown with muted, warm undertones and a matte finish. It had opaque pigmentation in a single layer, which applied evenly to bare skin and blended out effortlessly. The texture was smooth, velvety, and soft with minimal powderiness in the pan. It lasted nicely for eight and a half hours before fading visibly.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- Tom Ford Beauty Sous Le Sable #3 (PiP, ) is lighter (95% similar).
- ColourPop Le Chic (LE, $4.50) is lighter (95% similar).
- Tom Ford Beauty Forbidden Pink #1 (LE, ) is darker, cooler (90% similar).
- ColourPop Comment If (LE, $4.50) is lighter (90% similar).
- Clarins Fairy Tale #4 (PiP, ) is brighter, warmer (85% similar).
- Sydney Grace Juliet (Deep) (PiP, $5.25) is warmer (85% similar).
- ColourPop Old Growth (LE, $4.50) is lighter, warmer (85% similar).
- Huda Beauty Teddy (PiP, ) is darker (80% similar).
Formula Overview
-
The majority of the brand's eyeshadows are quite pigmented, blendable, and long-wearing. The eyeshadows have improved over time, particularly with respect to longevity (without a primer). The original formula often creased on me within seven to eight hours, whereas the more current formula wears eight to nine hours with fading (instead of full-on creasing). The more matte finishes tend to be a bit more velvety, substantial, and less dry/powdery compared to prior iterations.
The metallic finish is often the creamiest, slightly denser in feel, but has excellent pigmentation, adhesion, and blendability. The sparkling shades can have some fallout, depending on how they're applied and how sparkly they are, so they sometimes work better with fingertips or a dampened brush; they can also run sheerer compared to other finishes.
Cream-Powders are the more unique formulation and tend to have firmer, almost stiff, consistencies and more semi-opaque, watercolor-esque coverage. They are longer-wearing, but they can take a few uses to learn how to use. This formula has also improved compared to when it first debuted--it is a bit more yielding now.
Browse all of our Natasha Denona Creamy Matte Eye Shadow swatches.
Ingredients
MICA, ZINC STEARATE, TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE, SILICA, CAPRYLYL METHICONE, LAUROYL LYSINE, DIMETHICONE, TRIETHOXYCAPRYLYLSILANE, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL, PHENOXYETHANOL, SODIUM DEHYDROACETATE, DIMETHICONOL, HEXYLENE GLYCOL +/- CI 77891 (TITANIUM DIOXIDE), CI 77491 (IRON OXIDES), CI 77492 (IRON OXIDES), CI 77499 (IRON OXIDES).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Look Using this Product
Glam Light (413CM)
PiPPermanent in Palette.
Glam Light (414CM)
Glam Light (414CM) is a medium, yellowy brown with warm undertones and a matte finish. The texture was smooth to the touch, finely-milled and blendable without being too firmly nor too loosely-pressed into the pan. It had full color coverage that stayed on well for nine hours before fading a bit.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- ColourPop Clink Clink (LE, $4.50) is darker (95% similar).
- Tarte Starry (LE, ) is warmer (95% similar).
- Anastasia Ginger (LE, $12.00) is warmer (95% similar).
- ColourPop She Got Game (PiP, $4.50) is warmer (95% similar).
- Coloured Raine Satin (PiP, $6.99) is warmer (95% similar).
- Charlotte Tilbury Happy Glow (Smoke) (LE, ) is lighter, warmer (95% similar).
- Kaja Toffee (PiP, ) is darker, warmer (90% similar).
- Urban Decay New Riff (P, $19.00) is darker, warmer (90% similar).
- KKW Beauty Miami (LE, ) is warmer (90% similar).
- ColourPop Palm Tree (LE, $4.50) is more shimmery, lighter, cooler (85% similar).
Formula Overview
-
The majority of the brand's eyeshadows are quite pigmented, blendable, and long-wearing. The eyeshadows have improved over time, particularly with respect to longevity (without a primer). The original formula often creased on me within seven to eight hours, whereas the more current formula wears eight to nine hours with fading (instead of full-on creasing). The more matte finishes tend to be a bit more velvety, substantial, and less dry/powdery compared to prior iterations.
The metallic finish is often the creamiest, slightly denser in feel, but has excellent pigmentation, adhesion, and blendability. The sparkling shades can have some fallout, depending on how they're applied and how sparkly they are, so they sometimes work better with fingertips or a dampened brush; they can also run sheerer compared to other finishes.
Cream-Powders are the more unique formulation and tend to have firmer, almost stiff, consistencies and more semi-opaque, watercolor-esque coverage. They are longer-wearing, but they can take a few uses to learn how to use. This formula has also improved compared to when it first debuted--it is a bit more yielding now.
Browse all of our Natasha Denona Creamy Matte Eye Shadow swatches.
Ingredients
CALCIUM SODIUM BOROSILICATE, OCTYLDODECYL STEAROYL STEARATE, MICA, DIISOSTEARYL MALATE, SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, HYDROGENATED POLYCYCLOPENTADIENE, ISODODECANE, POLYETHYLENE, SILICA, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL, PHENOXYETHANOL, COPERNICIA CERIFERA CERA (COPERNICIA CERIFERA (CARNAUBA) WAX / CIRE DE CARNAUBA), TIN OXIDE, HEXYLENE GLYCOL, TOCOPHEROL +/- CI 77891 (TITANIUM DIOXIDE), CI 77491 (IRON OXIDES), CI 77499 (IRON OXIDES), CI 77492 (IRON OXIDES).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Look Using this Product
Glam Light (414CM)
PiPPermanent in Palette.
Glam Light (415KS)
Glam Light (415KS) is a bright, lighter rosy copper with moderate, warm undertones and an intense, sparkly shine. It had opaque color payoff paired with a smooth, finely-milled texture that was slightly drier/thinner with less glide compared to the typical shimmer from the brand. I found that while it looked beautiful on, it was a lot more prone to fallout, so doing eyes first or using it damp would be necessary to cure it. This shade wore well for nine hours with light fallout over time.
Top Dupes
- Huda Beauty Crave (PiP, ) is lighter, warmer (90% similar).
- Charlotte Tilbury Love Glow (Prime) (LE, ) is less shimmery, warmer (90% similar).
- ColourPop Can't Stop (LE, $4.50) is lighter (90% similar).
- LORAC Stardust (PiP, ) is less shimmery, darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Pat McGrath Huetopia (LE, $25.00) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (85% similar).
- ColourPop Luster (PiP, $4.50) is brighter, warmer (85% similar).
- Dominique Cosmetics Crème Brulee (PiP, ) is lighter, warmer (85% similar).
- Charlotte Tilbury Legendary Muse #1 (LE, ) is less shimmery, lighter, more muted (85% similar).
- Chanel Tender #3 (PiP, ) is less shimmery, lighter (85% similar).
- LORAC Rose Gold (LE, $19.00) is less shimmery, darker, warmer (85% similar).
Ingredients
CALCIUM SODIUM BOROSILICATE, OCTYLDODECYL STEAROYL STEARATE, MICA, DIISOSTEARYL MALATE, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, HYDROGENATED POLYCYCLOPENTADIENE, ISODODECANE, SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE, POLYETHYLENE, SILICA, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL, PHENOXYETHANOL, COPERNICIA CERIFERA CERA (COPERNICIA CERIFERA (CARNAUBA) WAX), TIN OXIDE, HEXYLENE GLYCOL, TOCOPHEROL +/- CI 77891 (TITANIUM DIOXIDE), CI 77491 (IRON OXIDES)
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Look Using this Product
Glam Light (415KS)
PiPPermanent in Palette.
Glam Light (416CM)
Glam Light (416CM) is a medium-dark brown with moderate, warm undertones that leaned slightly redder than orange/yellow paired with a matte finish. The eyeshadow was richly pigmented, while the texture was soft, blendable, and smooth without being too powdery, so it was easy to work with. It lasted well for nine hours before fading noticeably.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- Fenty Beauty Sherry Fairy (LE, ) is lighter, warmer (95% similar).
- Chanel Ombres de Lune #4 (LE, ) is darker, warmer (90% similar).
- Tom Ford Beauty Sous Le Sable #4 (PiP, ) is lighter, cooler (90% similar).
- Wayne Goss Imperial Topaz #5 (PiP, ) is lighter, cooler (90% similar).
- ColourPop Tipsy (LE, $4.50) is darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Huda Beauty Hard (PiP, ) is darker, cooler (90% similar).
- ColourPop Mode (LE, $4.50) is darker, cooler (90% similar).
- ColourPop Flaunt It (PiP, $4.50) is warmer (90% similar).
- ColourPop Depart (LE, $4.50) is darker, cooler (85% similar).
- ColourPop Ch-ch-changes (LE, $4.50) is lighter, warmer (85% similar).
Formula Overview
-
The majority of the brand's eyeshadows are quite pigmented, blendable, and long-wearing. The eyeshadows have improved over time, particularly with respect to longevity (without a primer). The original formula often creased on me within seven to eight hours, whereas the more current formula wears eight to nine hours with fading (instead of full-on creasing). The more matte finishes tend to be a bit more velvety, substantial, and less dry/powdery compared to prior iterations.
The metallic finish is often the creamiest, slightly denser in feel, but has excellent pigmentation, adhesion, and blendability. The sparkling shades can have some fallout, depending on how they're applied and how sparkly they are, so they sometimes work better with fingertips or a dampened brush; they can also run sheerer compared to other finishes.
Cream-Powders are the more unique formulation and tend to have firmer, almost stiff, consistencies and more semi-opaque, watercolor-esque coverage. They are longer-wearing, but they can take a few uses to learn how to use. This formula has also improved compared to when it first debuted--it is a bit more yielding now.
Browse all of our Natasha Denona Creamy Matte Eye Shadow swatches.
Ingredients
CALCIUM SODIUM BOROSILICATE, OCTYLDODECYL STEAROYL STEARATE, MICA, DIISOSTEARYL MALATE, SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, HYDROGENATED POLYCYCLOPENTADIENE, ISODODECANE, POLYETHYLENE, SILICA, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL, PHENOXYETHANOL, COPERNICIA CERIFERA CERA (COPERNICIA CERIFERA (CARNAUBA) WAX / CIRE DE CARNAUBA), TIN OXIDE, HEXYLENE GLYCOL, TOCOPHEROL +/- CI 77891 (TITANIUM DIOXIDE), CI 77491 (IRON OXIDES), CI 77499 (IRON OXIDES), CI 77492 (IRON OXIDES).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Look Using this Product
Glam Light (416CM)
PiPPermanent in Palette.
Glam Light (Cream Blush)
Glam Light (Cream Blush) is a bright, deeper reddish-coral with barely-there gold micro-sparkle over a matte finish. It was incredibly dense, almost stiff and dried out to the touch. I tried to really work the top layer to get to fresher product, but the texture was a lot drier than I’ve seen from the brand in their past cream blush releases.
I roughly swirled a brush through the pan, and I was able to get sheer to semi-sheer coverage, which was buildable to medium coverage. With a fingertip, I was able to get medium coverage, but the formula wasn’t as spreadable as it needed to be to avoid unevenness during application (and it was very prone to lifting up base products with fingertip application). It stayed on well for eight and a half hours before fading visibly.
Top Dupes
- Cover FX Spiced Cinnamon (Left) (PiP, ) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (95% similar).
- Phytosurgence Singe (P, $17.07) is less shimmery, warmer, glossier (90% similar).
- theBalm Balm Springs (P, $21.00) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (90% similar).
- Kaja Atmosphere (P, $19.00) is lighter, warmer (90% similar).
- ColourPop Hotline (P, $7.00) is less shimmery (85% similar).
- ColourPop Holiday (2019) (P, $8.00) is lighter, brighter, warmer (85% similar).
- NARS Showdown (LE, $30.00) is more shimmery, lighter, warmer (85% similar).
- Gucci Beauty Bright Coral (04) (P, $49.00) is lighter, warmer (80% similar).
- Rare Beauty Hope (P, $23.00) is less shimmery, lighter, cooler (80% similar).
- ColourPop Aloha Honey (LE, $12.00) is less shimmery, lighter, brighter (80% similar).
Ingredients
ISOSTEARYL NEOPENTANOATE, MICA, POLYURETHANE 44, COPERNICIA CERIFERA CERA / COPERNICIA CERIFERA (CARNAUBA) WAX / CIRE DE CARNAUBA, CANDELILLA CERA / EUPHORBIA CERIFERA (CANDELILLA) WAX / CIRE DE CANDELILLA, SILICA, DIMETHICONE, TRIETHOXYCAPRYLYLSILANE, SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE, ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE +/- CI 77891 / TITANIUM DIOXIDE, CI 77492 / IRON OXIDES, CI 77491 / IRON OXIDES, CI 15850 / RED 7 LAKE, CI 77499 / IRON OXIDES, CI 75470 / CARMINE, CI 42090 / BLUE 1 LAKE, CI 19140 / YELLOW 5 LAKE.
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Glam Light (Cream Blush)
PiPPermanent in Palette.
Glam Light (Star Glow)
Glam Light (Star Glow) is a light-medium, peachy gold with strong, warm undertones and a sparkling, metallic sheen. It had mostly opaque, buildable color payoff with a smooth, finely-milled consistency that felt almost wet to the touch it was that smooth. The highlighter applied evenly to bare skin, blended out well, and didn’t emphasize my skin’s natural texture. This shade showed signs of fading after eight and a half hours of wear.
Top Dupes
- MAC Lunar Lights (LE, $42.00) is less shimmery (95% similar).
- Makeup by Mario Golden (P, $28.00) is less shimmery, cooler (95% similar).
- Clinique Gold Celebration Pop (LE, $25.00) is less shimmery, brighter (95% similar).
- Marc Jacobs Beauty Sunlit (P, $32.00) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (95% similar).
- ColourPop Strobe Globe (P, $7.00) is more shimmery, darker (95% similar).
- Chanel Camelia de Chanel (LE, $80.00) is darker (95% similar).
- ColourPop Fine Line (PiP, $12.00) is more shimmery, darker, warmer (95% similar).
- Sol Body Star Light (LE, $12.00) is lighter, cooler (90% similar).
- Tom Ford Beauty Incandescent (Top) (PiP, $75.00) is less shimmery, darker (90% similar).
- Melt Cosmetics Stargazer (P, $39.00) is less shimmery (90% similar).
Ingredients
SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE, CALCIUM SODIUM BOROSILICATE, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, OCTYLDODECYL STEAROYL STEARATE, BORON NITRIDE, ZINC STEARATE, HDI/TRIMETHYLOL HEXYLLACTONE CROSSPOLYMER, NYLON-12, DIMETHICONE, DIISOSTEARYL MALATE, HYDROGENATED POLYCYCLOPENTADIENE, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL, SILICA, PHENOXYETHANOL, POLYETHYLENE, TIN OXIDE, COPERNICIA CERIFERA CERA (COPERNICIA CERIFERA (CARNAUBA) WAX / CIRE DE CARNAUBA), HEXYLENE GLYCOL, TOCOPHEROL +/- CI 77891 (TITANIUM DIOXIDE), CI 77491 (IRON OXIDES), CI 77492 (IRON OXIDES), CI 77499 (IRON OXIDES).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Your eye look is gorgeous here! It’s very soft yet subtle. I’m surprisingly more tempted by the light palette despite being on the medium tan side of the color spectrum – I love a soft look with some sparkle when I want to make an every day look more fun.
Christine, if you don’t mind me asking – you mentioned the highlighters are buildable. Do you think they can be relatively toned down for more everyday looks? A lot of reviews so far have shown how high impact they can be.
Yes, I think so, but I mean… it is hard to say what ‘everyday’ translates to some – like a subtle highlighter to me may still be “intense” to someone else. I’ve definitely experienced a situation where one person’s highlighter that is subtle isn’t visible to me (in person, that is) and they think it is “a lot,” lol.
Fair point lol! I might take a chance – if I change my mind and get the Dark palette it’s enough of a contrast that it can probably work as an eyeshadow. I believe the cream blush is the only shade that’s not recommended for eyes so I should be good there.
Weird that the cream blushes are losers in both palettes! She must have changed something for the worse.
This is a lovely palette, marred by that bright red blush that would definitely not suit light complexions. The shimmers are gorgeous and the mattes performed well. The highlighter is beautiful too.
I’m passing on the light palette. I think it is very pretty and would be a terrific workhorse for someone who requires or prefers less contrast than I do. I think I have chosen wisely with the darker palette. I really like 413cm.. it is so understated and yet interesting. For s&g’s, I am going to look at dupes and see where I come out, but highly unlikely I will grab this.
As beautiful as this one looks, I think that I would still prefer the Dark version over this. Mostly because these shades seem more easy to dupe? I could be wrong there!
My dark palette was supposed to come today but surprise it didn’t! I’m glad I went with the dark one as I can use a light hand when I want to do a lighter look.
My light palette was slated to arrive Monday, then Tuesday. Now it’s Wednesday, let’s see.
Mine came today finally, and the outer box looked used so I was expecting the worst, but it was fine inside. I hope yours comes today!
I just ordered this one as it came back in stock at Sephora & grabbed it 20% off … but Christine I did notice however that these palettes are listed as limited edition on Sephora … I wonder if they are really permanent ? Just thought I’d make mention of that unless these palettes are in fact permanent … I’ll prob get the dark palette as well ❤️😅
That’s a shame about the blush since it would only get worse and drier over time, I’d think.
I was initially excited about this and then less so, figuring I could dupe all the colours fairly easily but it turns out I can’t. And the reason is that almost all of them are far warmer than they looked in their pans and that’s not a great thing for me. I thought for sure that UD Nymeria would be a dupe for 414CM, but it’s not and that’s because 414CM is so much more “orange”. And the other thing – I still HATE that numbering system. Does “CM” mean “creamy matte” or something similar? And why does she use “placement” rather than her own numbering system on the front of the palette? She did the same in the Glam palette and it still throws me off because something in me makes me hesitant to use the “center of lid” shade all over my mobile lid or just on the outer corner….isn’t that silly? But it really is the case!
I think the thought process was trying to make it “easier” for someone who didn’t have a good understanding of where they wanted to place each shade, but I agree that it’s limiting and a bigger issue is some shade placements are skin tone dependent.
Yes, CM = creamy matte! I have no idea what KS stands for, though.
“Krazy Shimmer”, “Krystal Shimmer”? Gosh – if you – the guru of all things eyeshadow – don’t know, the company really isn’t being very informative at all!
I have written twice in the past to ND customer ‘service’, and BOTH times received no answer. All other brands answer with varying degrees of helpfulness, but nothing from ND. Sorta tells you something.
Hi, Christine–
You mentioned one time that a really great way to use ND cream blushes was with a damp Beauty Blender sponge. How did the too-dry blush formula work with that, if you don’t mind my asking? I’m on the fence about buying but probably will for those great super-bright shadows…
It is workable – better than fingers but I think a synthetic blush brush was better at really digging through/jabbing/breaking through the surface. A sponge sheered it out even more, so while it picked up more evenly and was more forgiving transferring product, it was a very sheer effect so it had to be built up a lot more.
THANKS for the fast reply (as always!)
Thank you Christine for this review! I bought it after reading your review and love it! Question I was hoping you could answer: is it okay to use the highlighter as eyeshadow? Is it safe to use on the eyelids?