We hope you'll consider supporting Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thanks!
  • Macy's50% off Benefit Boxes of Powder, ends 10/20.
  • TarteFree Shipping + 17% off almost everything with code HAPPY17, ends 10/20.

MAC Saucy Miss Blush

MAC Saucy Miss Blush
MAC Saucy Miss Blush

MAC Saucy Miss Blush ($16.00 for 0.05 oz.) is described as a “bright blue pink [with a Matte finish].” It’s a bold, bright, medium-dark magenta with cool undertones and a matte finish. Surratt Beauty Se Pomponner (P, $32.00) is more shimmery, darker (95% similar). MAC Heavenly (LE, $22.00) is glossier (95% similar). MAC Bright Pink (P, $16.00) is brighter (90% similar). LORAC Unashamed (LE, ) is lighter (90% similar). Colour Pop Pie (DC, $8.00) is darker, warmer (90% similar). Make Up For Ever B216 (P, $23.00) is warmer (90% similar). Colour Pop Homie (DC, $8.00) is darker (90% similar). LORAC Vivid (P, $23.00) is more shimmery (90% similar). MAC This Could Be Fun (LE, $23.00) is darker, more muted, warmer (90% similar). NARS Starscape (LE, $30.00) is warmer (90% similar). Urban Decay Savage (P, ) is darker (85% similar). Sephora I'm Shocked (09) (P, $14.00) is darker (85% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

This is one of five new blush shades being added to the permanent range, but worth noting is that they are being added as a Small Powder Blush (the same size as MAC’s eyeshadows). I’m not sure if it will be available in pan-form or not (my guess is yes, since it is permanent) at this time. The formula is the same as their regular Powder Blush range, though, other than the size (and price). The new five are supposed to be pigmented with an even, smooth texture. Saucy Miss had good pigmentation–not quite as intense as the other shades but still packs a punch of color–with a very thin texture that was fairly blendable but does need some extra care and love to manipulate into an evenly, gradually diffuse blush color. On me, it wore well for eight and a half hours before fading slightly.

Saucy Miss
Saucy Miss
8.5
Product
9
Pigmentation
8.5
Texture
9
Longevity
4.5
Application
88%
Total

See more photos & swatches!

We hope you'll consider supporting Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thanks!

Makeup Geek Blind Date Blush

Makeup Geek Blind Date Blush
Makeup Geek Blind Date Blush

Makeup Geek Blind Date Blush ($10.00 for 0.15 oz.) is a light-medium, peachy-pink with warm undertones and a matte finish.. MAC Fun Ending (LE, $23.00) is warmer (95% similar). MAC Spellbinder (LE, $23.00) is more shimmery, warmer (90% similar). Guerlain Ors et Merveilles #6 (LE, ) is darker (90% similar). Kat Von D Delilah (Light) (P, ) is darker (90% similar). Colour Pop Trickery (DC, $8.00) is warmer (90% similar). NARS Angel Pride I (LE, $30.00) is darker, warmer (90% similar). Chanel Sakura (87) (LE, $45.00) is darker (90% similar). LORAC Enchanted (LE, $23.00) is warmer (90% similar). MAC What I Fancy (LE, $23.00) is darker, cooler (90% similar). Makeup Geek Spell Bound (P, $10.00) is darker, more muted, cooler (85% similar). KIKO 109 Candy Rose (P, $12.00) is darker, more muted (85% similar). Guerlain Gold Palette #7 (LE, ) is darker, warmer (85% similar). Colour Pop Holiday (P, $8.00) is darker, brighter, cooler (85% similar). Tom Ford Beauty Frantic Pink (Discontinued) (DC, $60.00) is more shimmery, darker (85% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

The formula is supposed to be pigmented, long-wearing, and blendable (for more on how it compares to the previous formula, check out this post). It had nice color payoff that was easy to work with as the texture was soft, smooth, and finely-milled without being dusty or too thin. The blush darkened just slightly against my bare skin, which isn’t uncommon with more matte blushes for me. I had no trouble blending and diffusing the color on the skin, and it didn’t make my skin look dry, though it is matte, so did look a little flat overall. It lasted for seven and a half hours before I noticed slight fading.

Blind Date
Blind Date
9
Product
10
Pigmentation
9
Texture
8
Longevity
5
Application
91%
Total

See more photos & swatches!

Marc Jacobs Beauty Lush & Libido (500) Air Blush

Marc Jacobs Beauty Lush & Libido (500) Air Blush
Marc Jacobs Beauty Lush & Libido (500) Air Blush

Marc Jacobs Beauty Lush & Libido (500) Air Blush ($42.00 for 0.28 oz.) is a bright, medium peony pink with subtle, cool undertones and a satiny sheen. The lighter color is warmer and a little more shimmery, appearing as a soft petal pink, while the deeper shade is more of a slightly muted fuchsia pink with blue undertones and a true satin finish. Tarte Dollface (P, $28.00) is less shimmery, lighter (90% similar). MAC Young at Heart (P, $22.00) is less shimmery, darker, glossier (90% similar). Makeup Geek Head Over Heels (DC, $9.99) is less shimmery, lighter (90% similar). theBalm Down Boy (P, $21.00) is less shimmery, lighter (90% similar). Too Faced Justify My Love (P, $26.00) is less shimmery (90% similar). MAC Pure Femininity (LE, $23.00) is less shimmery, darker (90% similar). KIKO 110 Bright Pink (P, $12.00) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (90% similar). Colour Pop Olive (LE, $8.00) is less shimmery, lighter (90% similar). Make Up For Ever B212 (P, $23.00) is warmer (90% similar). MAC I'm a Lover (P, $23.50) is lighter (90% similar). Givenchy It-Girl Purple (P, $44.00) is less shimmery, lighter (85% similar). Maybelline Pink Fever (20) (P, $8.99) is cooler (85% similar). Clinique Plum Pop (04) (P, $21.00) is darker (85% similar). MAC Well Dressed (P, $23.00) is lighter (85% similar). LORAC Vivid (P, $23.00) is darker (85% similar). Urban Decay Quickie (P, $26.00) is less shimmery, darker, cooler (85% similar). By Terry Tan & Flash Cruise #3 (LE, ) is darker, cooler (85% similar). MAC Into the Pink (P, $27.00) is more shimmery, warmer (85% similar). Bobbi Brown Maui (P, $38.00) is darker, more muted, warmer (80% similar). Pretty Vulgar Mirror Mirror (P, $26.00) is more shimmery, darker, more muted (80% similar). Top 20 dupes listed, see the rest. See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

According to the brand, Air Blush is supposed to offer buildable coverage with a “luminous finish” that wears for “24-hours.” Each shade consists of a lighter and deeper shade, designed to be used together (each section of product is quite narrow, so it’s not feasible to use a blush or highlighting brush to get a single color). In general, I found the lighter color to have more shimmer/luminosity and acted as the “highlighting” shade within the palette, even though some variations are such that both shades are more blush-like in color and depth.

The texture was dense but soft, and the powder itself was finely-milled and sat well on the skin with a luminous sheen that didn’t read shimmery nor shiny. Of the five blushes, this was the only shade that could have blended more easily on the skin. It had medium, buildable coverage that can be easily sheered out or applied more lightly or layered for richer payoff. I thought the denser, firmer texture might not work well with very soft brushes, but I had no issues using some of my softest brushes with it.

I was extremely surprised at the wear of the product, as it still looked good on my normal-to-dry skin after 16 hours of wear with barely noticeable fading starting around 18 hours of wear. It’s pretty hard to test a cheek product for 24-hours, since inevitably, most of it will end up on my sheets if I go to sleep, and I can’t tell you if or when I’ve ever pulled an all-nighter on purpose. To that end, I am rating based on how it looked and what (if any) break down of product occurred between 14 and 18 hours of wear to extrapolate for the remaining time, which seemed to indicate solid 20-hour wear. This shade, at the very least, was extremely long-wearing and was one of the longer-wearing powder blushes I’ve tested.

Worth noting, during July, 25% of sales of Air Blush will be donated to amfAR when purchased through Marc Jacobs Beauty. (I wouldn’t use it as an excuse to purchase something you’re not interested in but would consider purchasing directly vs. through another retailer if you were planning to buy. I have ordered direct from MJB a few times, and they have always packed well and shipped efficiently–no complaints!)

9
Product
10
Pigmentation
8.5
Texture
9
Longevity
4.5
Application
91%
Total

See more photos & swatches!

We hope you'll consider supporting Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thanks!

NARS Dual-Intensity Blush Palette

NARS Summer 2016 Dual-Intensity Blush Palette
NARS Summer 2016 Dual-Intensity Blush Palette

NARS Summer 2016 Dual-Intensity Blush Palette ($59.00 for 0.32 oz.) includes four, limited edition powder blushes (one is more of a highlighter shade for most skin tones). The three blushes shades are richer shades, and two of the shades are quite deep, so I can see this working on a variety of skin tones. When working with the formula dry, I find it easy to apply and blend out, and they perform well overall. Damp application is harder to work with on my skin, as it doesn’t blend out as easily; it is better patted on with a damp fingertip or on bare skin (something about the damp brush/powder seems to disturb any base products more often than not for me). The wear ranged from seven to nine hours for me with damp application lasting longer overall.

I reached out to NARS recently for clarification with respect to the formula, because summer’s duos had contrary claims compared to the permanent duos. So, per that conversation: the Dual Intensity Blush formula is a wet/dry formulation that yields a “natural looking glow” with a dry application, whereas as damp application gives a “high-impact finish,” and the more water you have on your brush, the more “watercolor-like” the pigment will appear and with less water, it is “more saturated.” It seems like 1) the finish is more metallic/frosted with damp/wet application, and 2) the color will sheer out with a lot of water but appear more intense if just used with a damp brush. The best I can interpret is that there is just more leeway now with damp application not being specifically sheer/translucent from the get-go. I tried, and you really have to have a near-sopping wet brush before the blushes start resembling watercolors. My experience remains: it really is just medium to full coverage with a more frosted/shimmery finish applied dry, and then richer, deeper, and often more opaque color with a smoother sheen applied damp.

Summer Dual Intensity Blush I is a pale, silvery pink with cool, iridescent shimmer. It had semi-sheer coverage applied dry, and semi-opaque applied damp, while the finish goes from frosted to metallic. It wore well for seven and a half hours dry, eight and a half hours damp. I think the lighter color and sheerer nature of this shade made it easy to apply even damp. NYX Snow Rose (P, $7.99) is darker (95% similar). Giorgio Armani No. 07 (P, $62.00) is cooler (95% similar). NYX Ice Queen (P, $5.00) is less shimmery (95% similar). Laura Geller Charming Pink (P, $26.00) is darker (95% similar). Burberry No. 01 White (LE, $68.00) is lighter, warmer (95% similar). Wet 'n' Wild Where the Dreamers Go (LE, $2.99) is less shimmery (95% similar). L'Oreal Ice (P, $12.99) is more shimmery, lighter, brighter (90% similar). Looxi Beauty Pandora (P, $7.50) is more shimmery (90% similar). Urban Decay Aura (P, $26.00) is cooler (90% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Summer Dual Intensity Blush II is a slightly muted, medium-dark rosy plum with warm undertones and gold, frosted shimmer. It is like a deeper, richer take on the brand’s signature Orgasm blush (but it is warmer, less pink-based). It had opaque coverage both wet and dry, but damp application had a stronger metallic finish and appeared darker. It wore well for eight hours dry and nine hours damp. MAC Love Thing (P, $27.00) is less shimmery (95% similar). MAC Sweet Vision (LE, $28.00) is more shimmery, lighter (90% similar). MAC Gleeful (P, $27.00) is less shimmery, warmer (90% similar). NARS Realm of the Senses (Together) (LE, $30.00) is lighter, brighter, warmer (90% similar). MAC Simmer (LE, $27.00) is less shimmery, lighter, brighter (90% similar). Stila Berry Shimmer (LE, ) is darker, cooler (90% similar). Laura Geller Tropic Hues (P, $28.00) is lighter (90% similar). MAC Sweet Samba (LE, $27.00) is less shimmery, darker (90% similar). MAC Cheeky Bits (P, $27.00) is lighter, brighter, warmer (90% similar). Tom Ford Beauty Pink Glow #5 (LE, $60.00) is darker (90% similar). Sephora + Pantone Universe Bridal Rose (LE, ) is more muted, warmer (85% similar). Becca Snapdragon (P, $34.00) is lighter, warmer (85% similar). Benefit Bella Bamba (Palette) (P, $29.00) is lighter (85% similar). Make Up For Ever 9 Coral (P, $21.00) is more shimmery, cooler (85% similar). NARS Panic (Right) (P, ) is brighter, warmer (85% similar). Ciate Matchmaker (P, $26.00) is less shimmery, lighter (85% similar). Laura Geller Pink Buttercream (P, $28.00) is lighter, warmer (85% similar). NARS Soulshine (Together) (LE, $30.00) is warmer (85% similar). Surratt Beauty De Cherubique (P, $32.00) is lighter, warmer (85% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Summer Dual Intensity Blush III is a deep, fuchsia-berry with cool undertones and a frosted sheen with slight sparkle. It is slightly sheerer and more muted applied dry than it is damp, though I find they look similar once blended on the cheeks. The texture of this shade was firmer and denser, and it seemed to make blending it out harder, so this one took some effort to even out on the skin, even dry. It wore well for eight hours dry, nine hours damp. By Terry Tropical Sunset #3 (LE, ) is less shimmery (90% similar). MAC Supernova (LE, $27.00) is warmer (90% similar). Laura Geller Plumberry (P, $26.00) is darker (90% similar). NARS Panic (Left) (P, ) is lighter, brighter (90% similar). MAC Rosy Cheeks (P, $27.00) is lighter (90% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Summer Dual Intensity Blush IV is a medium-dark, rosy brown with warm undertones and a frosted sheen. It was richly pigmented both dry and damp, but the damp application made the color appear a few shades darker and more metallic. The consistency was very smooth and blendable dry, and it was fairly blendable damp, but it did need extra effort/patience. This shade lasted for eight hours applied dry and closer to nine hours applied damp. By Terry Savannah Love #5 (LE, ) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (85% similar). NARS Fervor (Right) (P, ) is brighter, warmer (85% similar). Chanel Alezane (260) (P, $45.00) is more muted (85% similar). Clinique Fig Pop (P, $21.00) is lighter, brighter (85% similar). Charlotte Tilbury The Climax (P, $40.00) is lighter, warmer (85% similar). Laura Geller Golden Apricot (P, $28.00) is lighter, warmer (85% similar). MAC Love Joy (P, $27.00) is less shimmery, lighter (85% similar). NARS Cheek Studio III (LE, $30.00) is lighter, warmer (85% similar). NYX Bronzed (P, $6.50) is lighter, warmer (85% similar). Edward Bess Ciao (P, $45.00) is lighter (80% similar). Tarte Muse (LE, $30.00) is lighter (80% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

See more photos & swatches!

Also In This Review

Makeup Geek Heart Throb Blush

Makeup Geek Heart Throb Blush
Makeup Geek Heart Throb Blush

Makeup Geek Heart Throb Blush ($10.00 for 0.15 oz.) is a muted, medium coral-brown with warmer undertones and a satin finish. Laura Geller Boysenberry (P, $28.00) is darker, cooler (90% similar). Sephora Shame On You (01) (P, $14.00) is lighter (90% similar). Estee Lauder Lover's Blush (P, $34.00) is lighter (90% similar). Estee Lauder Sensuous Rose (P, $34.00) is warmer (90% similar). Divergent Misty Rose (LE, ) is darker, cooler (90% similar). Guerlain Petrouchka #7 (LE, ) is warmer (90% similar). Kevyn Aucoin Capri (P, $58.00) is lighter (85% similar). Charlotte Tilbury Ecstasy (P, $40.00) is darker, warmer (85% similar). theBalm Balm Springs (P, $21.00) is darker, cooler (85% similar). Chanel Innocence (160) (P, $45.00) is lighter, cooler (90% similar). LORAC See Beyond (LE, $23.00) is more shimmery, lighter, cooler (85% similar). Becca Wisteria (LE, $32.00) is cooler (85% similar). Kevyn Aucoin Dolline (P, $37.00) is less shimmery, lighter (85% similar). Urban Decay Streak Blush (-, ) is less shimmery, lighter, brighter (80% similar). KIKO 108 Orange Coral (DC, $12.00) is lighter, brighter, cooler (80% similar). Colour Pop Between the Sheets (P, $8.00) is less shimmery, warmer (80% similar). Makeup Geek Bliss (DC, $9.99) is lighter, warmer (80% similar). Hourglass Diffused Heat (P, $35.00) is lighter, brighter, warmer (80% similar). Tom Ford Beauty The Afternooner (Blush) (LE, ) is brighter (80% similar). The Estee Edit Coy Coral (02) (P, $28.00) is less shimmery, warmer (80% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

The formula is supposed to be pigmented, long-wearing, and blendable (for more on how it compares to the previous formula, check out this post). This shade was richly pigmented, which made it easy to apply and get visible color out of, and it should work for several skin tones. The color darkened just slightly, as it had a soft, slightly dusty consistency, on the skin. It had a finely-milled, smooth feel to it, and it blended out beautifully on the skin with the satiny sheen becoming more prominent as the blush was buffed and diffused on the skin. On my normal-to-dry skin, it wore well for eight hours.

9
Product
10
Pigmentation
9
Texture
8.5
Longevity
5
Application
92%
Total

See more photos & swatches!

Makeup Geek Rendezvous Blush

Makeup Geek Rendezvous Blush
Makeup Geek Rendezvous Blush

Makeup Geek Rendezvous Blush ($10.00 for 0.15 oz.) is a bold, bright, medium-dark pinky-plum with subtle, cool undertones and a mostly matte finish. Colour Pop Thames (LE, $8.00) is warmer (95% similar). Urban Decay Nooner (Blush) (P, ) is lighter (90% similar). Sephora Hey Jealousy (17) (P, $14.00) is darker, brighter (90% similar). NARS Angelika (P, $30.00) is more shimmery, lighter, brighter (90% similar). MAC Bred for Beauty (LE, ) is brighter, less pigmented (90% similar). MAC Let's Be Friends (LE, $23.00) is lighter, brighter (90% similar). Bobbi Brown Pink Rose (P, $26.00) is darker (90% similar). Makeup Geek Rendezvous (DC, $9.99) is lighter, cooler (90% similar). Clinique Berry Pop (03) (P, $21.00) is brighter (90% similar). Sephora I'm Quite Tipsy (08) (P, $14.00) is lighter, cooler (90% similar). Edward Bess Bed of Roses (P, $43.00) is lighter, warmer (90% similar). Milani Love Potion (07) (P, $8.99) is brighter (90% similar). Urban Decay Naked on the Run Blush (-, ) is more shimmery, lighter (90% similar). MAC Prom Princess (LE, $23.00) is darker (90% similar). MAC Peaches & Cream (LE, $23.00) is brighter (90% similar). Makeup Geek Hanky Panky (DC, $9.99) is lighter, cooler (85% similar). Guerlain Cherry (02) (LE, $42.00) is lighter, cooler (85% similar). Kat Von D Morticia (Shade) (P, ) is warmer (85% similar). Colour Pop Pegacorn (DC, $8.00) is more shimmery, lighter, brighter (80% similar). NARS Coeur Battant (LE, $30.00) is brighter, cooler (80% similar). Top 20 dupes listed, see the rest. See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

The formula is supposed to be pigmented, long-wearing, and blendable (for more on how it compares to the previous formula, check out this post). It had nearly opaque pigmentation, so a little went a long way. If you tend to have a heavy-hand and prefer sheerer coverage, I’d look elsewhere, but if you love very pigmented, deep blushes, this one might appeal to you. The texture was fairly soft and blendable, but it could have been easier to diffuse and blend out on the cheeks; I found the best way to apply this was with a light hand to try and build it up as gradually as possible. This shade wore well for eight and a half hours before fading on me. As a note, this shade is much deeper and brighter (and not quite as blue-based) as it was in the original formulation.

8.5
Product
9.5
Pigmentation
8
Texture
9
Longevity
4.5
Application
88%
Total

See more photos & swatches!