Chanel Marlene, Suzy, Romy Rouge Coco Lipsticks Reviews, Photos, Swatches
Chanel Marlene (458) Rouge Coco Lipstick
Chanel Marlene (458) Rouge Coco Lipstick ($37.00 for 0.12 oz.) is a muted, medium pink-coral with warm undertones and a luminous sheen. It had semi-opaque color payoff with a lightweight, thin texture that had moderate slip and wore for three hours on me. It was neither hydrating nor drying. MAC Only You (LE, $19.00) is lighter, cooler (90% similar). MAC Bare Hug (LE, $20.00) is lighter, warmer (90% similar). Marc Jacobs Beauty Have We Met? (108) (P, $30.00) is more shimmery (90% similar). MAC I'm In (LE, $20.00) is warmer, glossier (90% similar). MAC A Sprinkle of Magic (LE, $19.00) is lighter (85% similar). Tarte Romantic (LE, $24.00) is darker, warmer (85% similar). NARS Rosecliff (DC, $28.00) is lighter (85% similar). MAC Nippon (P, $19.00) is darker (85% similar). Tom Ford Beauty Carriacou (LE, $55.00) is lighter (85% similar). ColourPop Crunch (LE, $7.00) is warmer (85% similar). Chanel Mademoiselle (434) (P, $37.00) is darker, warmer (90% similar). Tom Ford Beauty Austin (P, $36.00) is lighter (85% similar). Chanel Saga (P, $37.00) is brighter, warmer (80% similar). MAC Marque (P, $23.00) is more shimmery, darker, warmer (80% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.
Chanel Suzy (460) Rouge Coco Lipstick ($37.00 for 0.12 oz.) is a medium-dark, orange-coral with warm undertones and a luminous sheen. It had good pigmentation, though not fully opaque, with a lightweight, lightly emollient texture that applied without tugging and was comfortable to wear. It lasted for four hours and was lightly hydrating over time. Cle de Peau Camellia (P, $65.00) is more shimmery, glossier (95% similar). MAC Understanding (LE, $19.00) is warmer (95% similar). MAC Lady at Play (P, $25.00) is lighter, warmer (90% similar). Chanel Pygmalion (LE, $37.00) is lighter, glossier (90% similar). Tom Ford Beauty Something Wild (46) (P, $57.00) is brighter (90% similar). NYX Rags to Riches (P, $6.00) is more shimmery, darker (90% similar). ColourPop Frenemie (LE, $7.00) is lighter, brighter (85% similar). MAC Pretty Boy (P, $19.00) is lighter (85% similar). Christian Louboutin Beaute Miss Loubi (P, $90.00) is lighter, brighter, cooler (85% similar). Guerlain Rouge Kiss (325) (P, $37.00) is lighter, brighter (85% similar). Bobbi Brown Pink Guava (DC, $37.00) is lighter, brighter (85% similar). Chanel Amant (DC, $34.00) is darker (80% similar). Tom Ford Beauty Les Mepris (LE, $52.00) is lighter, brighter (80% similar). Tom Ford Beauty Adriano (LE, $36.00) is lighter, brighter, warmer (80% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.
Chanel Romy (462) Rouge Coco Lipstick ($37.00 for 0.12 oz.) is a medium-dark fuchsia pink with cool, blue undertones and a lightly glossy finish. It had mostly opaque coverage with a lightweight, emollient texture that glided across the lips easily. The color applied smoothly and evenly, while the formula was lightly hydrating and comfortable to wear over the four and a half hours it lasted. Marc Jacobs Beauty Voila! (120) (DC, $30.00) is darker, brighter (95% similar). Dior Ultra Atomic (660) (P, $37.00) is less shimmery, lighter (95% similar). Tom Ford Beauty Aphrodite (LE, $52.00) is lighter, warmer (90% similar). MAC Full Fuchsia (P, $19.00) is more shimmery, lighter (90% similar). Bobbi Brown Hot Rose (DC, $37.00) is darker, warmer (90% similar). MAC Feeling Amorous? (LE, $20.00) is warmer (90% similar). Tom Ford Beauty Electrique (P, $57.00) is brighter (90% similar). Urban Decay Phone Call (LE, $18.00) is more muted (90% similar). Guerlain Cherry Cape (067) (P, $32.00) is lighter, less pigmented (90% similar). Bite Beauty Palomino (DC, $24.00) is darker (90% similar). Tom Ford Beauty Otranto (P, $55.00) is less shimmery, lighter (90% similar). Guerlain Berry Beret (066) (P, $32.00) is warmer (90% similar). Burberry Bright Pink (233) (P, $34.00) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (90% similar). Hourglass Leader (P, $32.00) is darker (95% similar). Guerlain Pink Bangle (064) (P, $32.00) is darker, warmer (90% similar). Bobbi Brown Raspberry Pink (DC, $37.00) is darker (90% similar). Tom Ford Beauty Logan (P, $36.00) is more shimmery, darker (90% similar). Marc Jacobs Beauty Roll the Dice (118) (DC, $30.00) is lighter, brighter (90% similar). Make Up For Ever C208 (DC, $22.00) is cooler (90% similar). Tom Ford Beauty Ashley (LE, $36.00) is darker (95% similar). Top 20 dupes listed, see the rest. See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.
Marlene (458)
PPermanent. $37.00.
Suzy (460)
LELimited Edition. $37.00.
Romy (462)
PPermanent. $37.00.
See more photos & swatches!
Chanel Marlene (458) Rouge Coco Lipstick
Chanel Marlene (458) Rouge Coco Lipstick
Chanel Marlene (458) Rouge Coco Lipstick
Chanel Marlene (458) Rouge Coco Lipstick
Chanel Marlene (458) Rouge Coco Lipstick
Chanel Marlene (458) Rouge Coco Lipstick
Chanel Suzy (460) Rouge Coco Lipstick
Chanel Suzy (460) Rouge Coco Lipstick
Chanel Suzy (460) Rouge Coco Lipstick
Chanel Suzy (460) Rouge Coco Lipstick
Chanel Suzy (460) Rouge Coco Lipstick
Chanel Suzy (460) Rouge Coco Lipstick
Chanel Romy (462) Rouge Coco Lipstick
Chanel Romy (462) Rouge Coco Lipstick
Chanel Romy (462) Rouge Coco Lipstick
Chanel Romy (462) Rouge Coco Lipstick
Chanel Romy (462) Rouge Coco Lipstick
Chanel Romy (462) Rouge Coco Lipstick
I’ve been on the hunt for a good sheer orange toned hydrating lipstick for ages! Looks like Suzy is the perfect one!
Fingers crossed 😀
IDK, not feeling these. The first two look underwhelming in pigmentation, and the third one looks ok, but dupe-able, and too pricey for $ 37. I feel like I can do better with the Revlon Lip Butters
Totally understand!
I quite like Suzy and that it isn’t as fully opaque. It will be easier to wear to class for sure than if it was opaque! I think I’ll go check it out at a counter.
Awesome! Let me know what you think after you’ve checked it out, Aj!
I think Suzy and Romy both look really good. Wearable brights. Especially love how Romy seems to be more hydrating and smooth. I may not be the biggest cool pink or cool fuchsia wearer, but this one is a nicer version!
They do! I can see this being popular for those who like brights but find them hard to wear.
Ah, subtle.. I like Suzy. 🙂
Yay!
Too sheer for me, but Suzy is a pretty color.
Suzy seems to be the fave!
the shade suzy is really really so beautiful!
It is!
I love the color of Suzy! Such a pretty wearable coral. I feel like spring is all about corals. Romy is pretty too, though I feel kind of oversaturated with fuchsias lately. I’ve never owned a Chanel lipstick before-I’m kind of dreading the next time I go to the mall because I know I’ll be tempted into Belk and from there to the Chanel counter. I’ll have to keep Suzy in mind for that inevitable visit!
There are plenty of fuchsias on the market, so it’s easy to get tired of them!
Romy is my favorite but I bet all 3 will be popular. These would be perfect for “popsicle” lips. I like Suzy but with it’s sheer color it would either be lost on my darker lips or create a new and potentially unflattering shade. Shades like that sometimes create magic though. It’s hard to tell.
Hope you get a chance to check ’em out soon, Erin!
Suzy looks a lot like MAC See Sheer.
Thanks for sharing, Rachel!
These look very spring Chanel’ish.. for the past few years they always seem to have a nude, bright pink and an orange.
Haha, I know exactly what you mean.
I actually like Marlene color-wise, but I do wish it was a little more opaque.
I can understand that!
Like them all but Romy is my favourite.
Yay!
All three are very pretty! I’d have to try Suzy on to see if it has enough pink in it to work on me. I love Romy, but already have (and love) one if its dupes (Bobbi Brown Raspberry Pink).
Raspberry Pink is better <3
I love it!
I do not agree
I saw the Romy on your blog, after swatching it in person I new it had to be mine. I usually do not buy the rouge coco because I find it a bit dry but this one is so smooth and easy to apply and gave me very good wearing time. It such a gorgeous color for spring and summer. For me an A+!