Dior Devilish High Fidelity Eyeshadow Palette Review & Swatches
Devilish
Dior Devilish High Fidelity Colours & Effects Eyeshadow Palette ($63.00 for 0.24 oz.) is a limited edition set of five shades that released earlier in the year as part of the fall collection. The formula was decent but certainly not the best I’ve tried, by Dior or otherwise, though I’ll say it was certainly a more interesting color combination. (Personally, that paler pink did not incorporate well with the other four to me due to the undertone of the pink.) It’s still available at some retailers, and as holiday season winds down, I had a moment to finally test this one!
Ingredients
Look Using this Product
Devilish
LELimited Edition. $63.00.
Devilish #1
Devilish #1 is a medium gold with strong, warm yellow undertones and a soft, pearly sheen. It had opaque pigmentation with a smooth, denser consistency that wasn’t too firmly-pressed in the pan but also didn’t feel that cream-like. It applied evenly and blended out well along the edges. This shade stayed on nicely for eight hours on me.
Top Dupes
- MAC Gilded Night #2 (LE, $21.00) is more shimmery, cooler (95% similar).
- NARS Privilege (DC, $25.00) is more shimmery, lighter, cooler (95% similar).
- Sleek MakeUP Sunset #5 (PiP, $9.99) is more shimmery, cooler (90% similar).
- Givenchy Palette Ors Audacieux #1 (LE, ) is more shimmery, darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Chanel Signe Particulier #4 (LE, ) is more shimmery, cooler (90% similar).
- Make Up For Ever Famed (LE, ) is less shimmery, lighter, cooler (90% similar).
- Makeup Geek Casino (DC, $6.00) is more shimmery, darker (90% similar).
- Too Faced Twinkie (LE, $16.00) (90% similar).
- ColourPop Sixth Sense (LE, $6.00) is more shimmery, darker, cooler (90% similar).
- LORAC Unlimited (PiP, $19.00) is more shimmery, cooler (90% similar).
Look Using this Product
Devilish #1
LELimited Edition.
Devilish #2
Devilish #2 is a pale pink with subtle, cool undertones and a satin sheen. It had semi-opaque, buildable pigmentation with a slightly dusty, drier texture that was more prone to sheering out when applied to my eye area. It lasted well for seven and a half hours on me before fading noticeably.
Top Dupes
- Chanel Signe Particulier #1 (LE, ) is less shimmery, cooler (95% similar).
- Too Faced Poodle (LE, $16.00) is warmer (95% similar).
- ColourPop Sugar Plum (LE, $6.00) is less shimmery, cooler (95% similar).
- Chanel Tisse Rhapsodie #2 (LE, ) is more shimmery (95% similar).
- Guerlain Tonka Imperiale #1 (DC, ) is less shimmery, warmer (95% similar).
- Sephora Rose Quartz (LE, ) is more shimmery (90% similar).
- Sephora Ex-boyfriend (LE, ) is more shimmery, warmer (90% similar).
- Too Faced Pink Frosting (LE, $16.00) is more shimmery, brighter (90% similar).
- Dior Rose Garden #3 (LE, ) is more shimmery, cooler (90% similar).
- Too Faced Peach Ice (PiP, $16.00) is more shimmery, warmer (90% similar).
Look Using this Product
Devilish #2
LELimited Edition.
Devilish #3
Devilish #3 is a faded, medium-dark gold with hints of warm, olive undertones and a satin sheen. It had semi-opaque pigmentation that was more muted than it appeared in the pan; the only way to get true-to-pan color was to use it with a dampened brush, which also helped it to adhere more evenly as I felt I had to pack and press it on a bit more when I tried to use it with a dry brush. It wore well for seven and a half hours on me before I noticed fading.
Top Dupes
- Makeup Atelier Amazon #2 (P, ) is more shimmery, lighter (90% similar).
- Sephora Trance (PiP, ) is more shimmery, cooler (85% similar).
- Sephora + Pantone Universe Kelp (LE, ) is more shimmery, darker, cooler (85% similar).
- ColourPop Mirage (LE, $6.00) is more shimmery, cooler (85% similar).
- Viseart Sage (PiP, ) is more shimmery, cooler (85% similar).
- Viseart Alien (GPV2 #13) (P, ) is more shimmery, darker, cooler (80% similar).
- Sleek MakeUP Fig (PiP, $9.99) is more shimmery, lighter, cooler (80% similar).
- Givenchy Tentation #1 (PiP, ) is more shimmery, darker, cooler (80% similar).
- Ciate Chartreuse (LE, ) is more shimmery, lighter, cooler (80% similar).
- Sephora Druzy (PiP, ) is more shimmery, more muted (80% similar).
Look Using this Product
Devilish #3
LELimited Edition.
Devilish #4
Devilish #4 is a medium-dark reddened plum with subtle, warm undertones and a semi-matte finish. It had good color coverage that adhered well to bare skin and blended out easily along the edges, though I felt like the brightness muted as it sat on my lid for a few minutes. The texture was smooth to the touch, firm but not stiff to work with, and had no powderiness. It stayed on well for seven and a half hours on me.
Top Dupes
- NARS Get Hot (LE, $19.00) is less shimmery, lighter (95% similar).
- NABLA Cosmetics Fahrenheit (P, $8.00) is less shimmery, lighter, more muted (90% similar).
- Natasha Denona Phoenix (113CM) (PiP, ) is warmer (90% similar).
- Chanel Candeur et Seduction #3 (PiP, ) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (90% similar).
- Huda Beauty Mauve #9 (PiP, ) is less shimmery, darker, warmer (90% similar).
- Bad Habit Hestia (PiP, ) is warmer (90% similar).
- MAC More Amour (DC, $21.00) is less shimmery (90% similar).
- Jouer Orchid (LE, ) is less shimmery (85% similar).
- Natasha Denona Rebellion (403CP) (PiP, ) is less shimmery, warmer (90% similar).
- Fenty Beauty Saffron (PiP, ) is less shimmery (90% similar).
Look Using this Product
Devilish #4
LELimited Edition.
Devilish #5
Devilish #5 is a muted, dark plummy brown with subtle,w arm undertones and a satin finish. It had excellent pigmentation with a soft, smooth texture that was firmer and denser but not thick or stiff in the pan. It applied well to bare skin and blended out nicely along the edges. It lasted well for eight hours before fading noticeably on me.
Top Dupes
- Chanel Trait de Caractere #3 (LE, ) is less shimmery (95% similar).
- Dior Lucky Star #5 (LE, ) is less shimmery, cooler (90% similar).
- ColourPop In Bold (LE, $4.50) is less shimmery, lighter (90% similar).
- Wet 'n' Wild Rose in the Air #7 (PiP, ) is less shimmery, warmer (90% similar).
- Dior Earthy Canvas #3 (LE, ) is more shimmery, warmer (90% similar).
- MAC Schemer (LE, ) is less shimmery, lighter (90% similar).
- Huda Beauty Coco (LE, ) is less shimmery (90% similar).
- Inglot J317 Eggplant (LE, $10.00) is more shimmery, lighter (90% similar).
- Clarins Rosewood #4 (PiP, ) is warmer (90% similar).
- ColourPop Teddy Bare (PiP, $4.50) is less shimmery (90% similar).
Oh, wow. And not in a good way. Thought Dior had really tweaked up their 5-pan formula last year, but that isn’t so evident in this quint. Except for shades #1, #4 and #5. Not good enough to drop $63 on, though.
I quite like the color combo.
When Dior gets their shadows right, I’m always so happy. This one though – not so great and I find the colour grouping to be really quite odd. I like #3 and #5 but that’s all.
Love the color combo.
I don’t like the colour combination at all, why two golds in a 5 pan? The pink shade is definitely the odd one out too – I agree with you Christine. And the performance of a few of the shades is average. Nope Dior.
Pretty color combination but the swatches look like it has weak-fair pigmentation. For the price they should be all popping!
Yes, that pale pink is very odd. I think a green would’ve been much better, it will go well with the brown and gold shadows. And with ed and green in the same palette, would look very Christmassy
Yeah, I think it’s an interesting color combo but the pink doesn’t seem to work to my eye… even having an open mind etc. about color pairings.
The colours remind me of my beloved ‘Harmonie du Soir’ quad from Chanel from 6 years ago. But that one is, even now, still better quality then this Dior quint, from what I can tell.
I really love this color combination, but it wouldn’t work on me, which is good, because it’s too expensive anyway!
(I also love the way it’s designed to look like sewn leather.)
I love the pressed pattern quite a lot.
Very “pretty” color scheme, don’t see how the name fits it though. The pigmentation doesn’t come through on the look though, so for the price this is a easy “NO-GO” for me.