Charlotte Tilbury Super Fabulous & Supermodel Matte Revolution Lipsticks Reviews & Swatches
Super Fabulous
Charlotte Tilbury Super Fabulous Matte Revolution Lipstick ($34.00 for 0.12 oz.) is a muted, medium brown with subtle, warm undertones and a satin finish. It had rich pigmentation paired with a smooth, lightly velvety texture that was lightweight, thin without feeling clingy.
The product applied evenly and fluidly across my lips, but it settled noticeably into my lip lines, which worsened a bit over time, though I was able to press my lips and smooth most of it back out. It stayed on well for four hours and felt lightly moisturizing over time.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- MAC Taupe (P, $19.00) is lighter (90% similar).
- Sephora Blaze of Glory (76) (P, $14.00) is lighter, less glossy (90% similar).
- NARS Slow Ride (P, $26.00) is warmer (90% similar).
- NARS Pigalle (P, $26.00) is cooler (90% similar).
- NARS Tonka (P, $26.00) is darker (90% similar).
- MAC Ultimate Diva (LE, $21.00) is warmer (90% similar).
- Anastasia Hudson (LE, $20.00) is lighter (85% similar).
- Chanel Chestnut (122) (P, $40.00) is darker, warmer (85% similar).
- ColourPop Brat Pack (LE, $7.00) is lighter, warmer (85% similar).
- Bite Beauty Molasses (DC, $26.00) is lighter, warmer (85% similar).
Formula Overview
$37.00/0.12 oz. - $308.33 Per Ounce
The formula is supposed to have "long-lasting color" that's "buildable" with "glowing pigments" that give the "illusion of wider, fuller lips." Some shades are buildable while others are fairly pigmented in one stroke. The consistency was more velvety, lightweight, and thin without being clingy or drying over time. I found that some shades were flattering on, as they didn't emphasize lip texture or get into my lip lines, while other shades gravitated into my lip lines. They wore between three and five hours and were typically non-drying. There was no discernible scent or taste.
Browse all of our Charlotte Tilbury Matte Revolution Lipstick swatches.
Ingredients
NEOPENTYL GLYCOL DICAPRYLATE/DICAPRATE, TRIMETHYLOLPROPANE TRIISOSTEARATE, DIMETHICONE, CERA MICROCRISTALLINA/MICROCRYSTALLINE WAX/CIRE MICROCRISTALLINE, POLYETHYLENE, POLYBUTENE, DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER, SILICA, DICALCIUM PHOSPHATE, MICA, ETHYL VANILLIN, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, TOCOPHERYL ACETATE, CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS (SAFFLOWER) SEED OIL, ZEA MAYS (CORN) OIL, PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRA-DI-T-BUTYL HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMATE, CARICA PAPAYA (PAPAYA) FRUIT EXTRACT, PHALAENOPSIS AMABILIS EXTRACT, BIXA ORELLANA SEED EXTRACT, CALCIUM ALUMINUM BOROSILICATE, ALUMINUM CALCIUM SODIUM SILICATE, CALCIUM TITANIUM BOROSILICATE, ALUMINA, CALCIUM SODIUM BOROSILICATE, SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE, TIN OXIDE, [+/- TITANIUM DIOXIDE (CI 77891), IRON OXIDES (CI 77491, CI 77492), RED 7 LAKE (CI 15850), BLUE 1 LAKE (CI 42090), YELLOW 5 LAKE (CI 19140)].
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Super Fabulous
PPermanent. $37.00.
Super Model
Charlotte Tilbury Super Model Matte Revolution Lipstick ($34.00 for 0.12 oz.) is a muted, medium-dark rosy brown with subtle warmth paired with a semi-matte to satin finish. It had light shine but that worn down within an hour to reveal a more semi-matte finish.
It had opaque color coverage in a single layer, which applied evenly to my lips but was prone to pulling away at my deeper lip lines and settling into them from the get-go. This worsened slightly over the four hours it lasted for, though the formula was lightly hydrating while worn.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- KVD Beauty Lolita II (DC, $21.00) is lighter (95% similar).
- NARS Bondage (LE, $27.00) is warmer (95% similar).
- Anastasia Spice (P, $18.00) is warmer (90% similar).
- Urban Decay Fade (P, $22.00) is warmer, less glossy (90% similar).
- ColourPop CA Love (P, $10.00) is lighter, warmer (90% similar).
- Chanel Ambiguite (834) (P, $45.00) is less pigmented, warmer (85% similar).
- NARS Pigalle (P, $26.00) is darker, warmer (85% similar).
- KVD Beauty Lolita II (P, $20.00) is lighter, warmer, less glossy (85% similar).
- Kaleidos Dune (P, $12.00) is lighter, warmer (80% similar).
- ColourPop On Film (P, $8.00) is lighter, less pigmented, warmer (80% similar).
Formula Overview
$37.00/0.12 oz. - $308.33 Per Ounce
The formula is supposed to have "long-lasting color" that's "buildable" with "glowing pigments" that give the "illusion of wider, fuller lips." Some shades are buildable while others are fairly pigmented in one stroke. The consistency was more velvety, lightweight, and thin without being clingy or drying over time. I found that some shades were flattering on, as they didn't emphasize lip texture or get into my lip lines, while other shades gravitated into my lip lines. They wore between three and five hours and were typically non-drying. There was no discernible scent or taste.
Browse all of our Charlotte Tilbury Matte Revolution Lipstick swatches.
Ingredients
Neopentyl Glycol Dicaprylate/Dicaprate, Trimethylolpropane Triisostearate, Dimethicone, Microcrystalline Wax/Cera Microcristallina/Cire Microcristalline, Polyethylene, Polybutene, Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Silica, Mica, Ethyl Vanillin, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Tocopherol, Carthamus Tinctorius (Safflower) Seed Oil, Zea Mays (Corn) Oil, Pentaerythrityl Tetra-Di-T-Butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate, Carica Papaya (Papaya) Fruit Extract, Phalaenopsis Amabilis Extract, Bixa Orellana Seed Extract, Bht, Dicalcium Phosphate, Tocopheryl Acetate, Tin Oxide, [+/- Titanium Dioxide (Ci 77891), Iron Oxides (Ci 77491, Ci 77492), Red 7 Lake (Ci 15850), Blue 1 Lake (Ci 42090), Red 6 (Ci 15850), Yellow 5 Lake (Ci 19140)].
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Am I the only one who is really put off by the shape of these lipstick bullets? They just look so strange to me and it’s actually enough to keep me from buying any of them.
No you are not Mariella. I was just thinking when I saw the shape of the lipsticks about how you would apply them.
No, you’re not! 😀
Retro style but not in a good way, IMHO…
As someone who’s been around for a really long time, I can tell you that lipsticks in the 50’s, 60’s or 70’s looked nothing like this, so it’s not retro style, it’s just weirdly offputting and strange! I’m glad I’m not alone (and my antipodean twin shares my feelings)!
Right. None like this in way back decades. Another thing I haven’t heard since the way back decades is someone using ‘antipodean.’ Must be that lovely redhead. The Besame tube is oddly fashioned….for a purpose. I see this tip shape as causing goofs. Not big on ct formula, anyway.
Ah, sorry for misunderstanding! I can’t speak English very well but I should get it when you said “the bullet”. I meant the packaging, you know? 🙂
And I can be the only one who doesn’t like it (’cause I saw many people raving about the packaging of this product). 😀
The bullet itself is very strange, indeed. It seems like they were just trying to be edgy, but edgy does not always equal to good or practical. 🙂
Wow, the colors don’t look at all what I expected on the lip. I would have liked them the same color (darker). They look nice though.
Both look gorgeous! Then again, these are my kind of “nude” or MLBB lipstick shades as I already have at least one dupe per shade: Sephora Blaze Of Glory and because PML’s She’s Heaven is duped by Blaze Of Glory, that makes two for the first shade, plus I have PML’s Omi for the other.
Super Fabulous is my favourite out of these two, but they both look pretty good to me.