Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills (262) Eyeshadow Quad Review, Photos, Swatches

Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills (262) Les 4 Ombres Eyeshadow Quad
Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills (262) Les 4 Ombres Eyeshadow Quad

Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills (262) Les 4 Ombres Eyeshadow Quad ($61.00 for 0.04 oz.) is a new palette that was released with the spring collection. It wasn’t originally available when I purchased pieces to review from the launch, but I saw it a couple of weeks ago when they released Les Sautoirs de Coco. It’s a fairly brighter, more colorful set of hues for Chanel, and if you tend to like your colors really bold and rich, I would look elsewhere. I have had better luck with the newer Chanel quads, but this was a miss for me, and it seemed to wear and crease faster than usual, too, which was unexpected.

Tisse Beverly Hills #1 is a light-medium, pinky lavender with subtle, cool undertones and a pearly sheen. It had semi-sheer color payoff with a lightly dusty consistency that didn’t do so well on bare skin. This one needs a really good, more opaque/light-toned base to pop. On me, it creased after six hours. MAC Triple Impact (LE, $20.00) is less shimmery (95% similar). Kat Von D Astrological (LE, ) is less shimmery (95% similar). MAC Ghost Story (LE, $17.00) is lighter (95% similar). Stila Frosted Lavender (LE, $18.00) is darker, more muted (90% similar). Inglot #440 (P, $7.00) is darker (90% similar). Colour Pop Steele (LE, $5.00) is lighter (90% similar). NARS Pulp Fiction #4 (PiP, $19.00) is less shimmery, lighter (90% similar). Kat Von D Amethyst (PiP, ) is more shimmery, lighter (90% similar). Colour Pop Eye Candy (P, $5.00) is warmer (90% similar). Sephora Magnolia Garden (341) (P, $8.00) is warmer (90% similar). MAC Crystal (DC, $17.00) is lighter, more muted, cooler (90% similar). Make Up For Ever 5 Frozen Purple (P, $21.00) is less shimmery, lighter (90% similar). Coloured Raine Chameleon (P, $6.99) is lighter (90% similar). Fyrinnae Unicorn (P, $9.00) is lighter (90% similar). Make Up For Ever D914 Crystalline Mauve (DC, $21.00) is lighter (85% similar). Tarina Tarantino Diamond Dusk #1 (DC, ) is cooler (85% similar). Urban Decay Aura #2 (LE, $19.00) is lighter (85% similar). LORAC Smoothie (LE, $19.00) is darker, warmer (85% similar). Buxom La-La-Lavish (P, $12.00) is darker (85% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Tisse Beverly Hills #2 is a muted, light beige with neutral-to-cool undertones and a soft, frosted finish. The eyeshadow had good color payoff, but it was rather powdery and prone to falling out during application. The color wore well for seven hours before fading. NARS Give In Take I (LE, $29.00) is lighter (90% similar). LORAC Sugar (LE, $19.00) is lighter (90% similar). Inglot #395 (P, $7.00) is more shimmery, lighter (85% similar). Chanel Poesie #2 (LE, ) is lighter (85% similar). NARS Abyssinia (DC, $25.00) is lighter (85% similar). Smashbox Flirt (PiP, ) is warmer (85% similar). bareMinerals Air (PiP, ) is warmer (85% similar). Charlotte Tilbury The Rock Chick #1 (PiP, ) is darker, warmer (85% similar). Buxom Satin Seduction (P, $12.00) is lighter (80% similar). MAC Fashion Beat (LE, $17.00) is darker, warmer (80% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Tisse Beverly Hills #3 is a slightly muted, medium-dark blue with lightly cool undertones paired with a satin sheen. It is a “warmer” blue, but it isn’t so warm that it becomes teal. It had semi-opaque coverage with a lightly dusty texture. This shade seemed to fade almost instantly after applying it; I could never mimic the rich blue color for long, as it would fade to a duller, bluish-green on me. It started to fade after six hours. Natasha Denona Petroleum Blue (92M) (P, $29.00) is more shimmery (90% similar). MAC Denim Genes (PiP, ) is less shimmery, brighter, cooler (90% similar). Kat Von D Bukowski (LE, ) is lighter (90% similar). MAC Blue Mesa (LE, $17.00) is less shimmery, lighter (85% similar). Urban Decay Peace (P, $19.00) is lighter, brighter (85% similar). Tom Ford Beauty TFX8 (LE, $36.00) is more shimmery, cooler (85% similar). Makeup Geek Poolside (P, $6.00) is lighter, brighter (85% similar). Colour Pop Coconut (P, $5.00) is darker, warmer (80% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Tisse Beverly Hills #4 is a blackened purple with a fine dusting of silver micro-shimmer over a mostly matte base. It was incredibly powdery and dry, which made it prone to sheering out and difficult to build-up in color. The texture made it messy to use, and it looked patchy on my skin when I tried to blend and diffuse it into the crease. On me, it had noticeably gathered into the crease after six hours of wear. Too Faced Huckleberry (LE, $16.00) is more shimmery, warmer (95% similar). Chanel Oiseaux de Nuit #3 (LE, ) is warmer (95% similar). MAC Video Emotions (LE, $17.00) is lighter (95% similar). LORAC Boots (LE, $19.00) is more shimmery, darker (95% similar). Tarte Play Nice (LE, ) is lighter (95% similar). MAC Pinkluxe #5 (PiP, ) is more shimmery (90% similar). Tarte Glamorous (LE, ) is lighter (90% similar). MAC Shadowy Lady (LE, $17.00) is brighter (90% similar). Too Faced Jungle Love (LE, $16.00) is more shimmery, lighter (90% similar). Dior Eclectic #5 (LE, ) is lighter, warmer (90% similar). bareMinerals Center Stage (PiP, ) is lighter (90% similar). Colour Pop Chopper (LE, $4.50) is less shimmery, lighter (90% similar). NARS Arabian Nights #1 (DC, $25.00) is more shimmery (90% similar). Colour Pop Straight Trippin' (LE, $5.00) is warmer (85% similar). Pat McGrath Xtreme Aubergine (PiP, $25.00) is less shimmery, warmer (85% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

We hope you'll consider supporting Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thanks!

See more photos & swatches!

Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills (262) Les 4 Ombres Eyeshadow Quad
Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills (262) Les 4 Ombres Eyeshadow Quad

Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills (262) Les 4 Ombres Eyeshadow Quad
Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills (262) Les 4 Ombres Eyeshadow Quad

Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills (262) Les 4 Ombres Eyeshadow Quad
Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills (262) Les 4 Ombres Eyeshadow Quad

Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills (262) Les 4 Ombres Eyeshadow Quad
Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills (262) Les 4 Ombres Eyeshadow Quad

Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills #1 Eyeshadow
Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills #1 Eyeshadow

Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills #1 Eyeshadow
Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills #1 Eyeshadow

Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills #2 Eyeshadow
Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills #2 Eyeshadow

Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills #2 Eyeshadow
Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills #2 Eyeshadow

Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills #3 Eyeshadow
Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills #3 Eyeshadow

Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills #3 Eyeshadow
Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills #3 Eyeshadow

Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills #4 Eyeshadow
Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills #4 Eyeshadow

Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills #4 Eyeshadow
Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills #4 Eyeshadow

Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills (262) Les 4 Ombres Eyeshadow Quad
Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills (262) Les 4 Ombres Eyeshadow Quad

Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills (262) Les 4 Ombres Eyeshadow Quad
Chanel Tisse Beverly Hills (262) Les 4 Ombres Eyeshadow Quad

We hope you'll consider supporting Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thanks!

Product Availability

Chanel Les 4 Ombres Multi-Effect Quadra Eyeshadow $62.00/0.07 OZ.
When you purchase through our links above, you help support Temptalia. Thank You!

About the Reviewer

Reviewer

Christine has normal-to-dry skin with areas of dryness (cheeks, nose, and under the eyes). She has a light-medium skintone with subtle, warmer yellow undertones. Her best foundation matches include: Tarte Rainforest of the Sea in Light-Medium Neutral (best match), Estee Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Makeup in Desert Beige 2N1, Giorgio Armani Maestro Glow in 4.0, Hourglass Warm Ivory Vanish Seamless Finish, Laura Mercier Candleglow Soft Luminous in Dusk, MAC NC20/NC25, Make Up For Ever Ultra HD Liquid in Y305 (140). For more matches, please read our full Foundation FAQ. For more information on our review process, please read our Review FAQ.

Compare Any Two Swatches

Curious how two shades compare to each other? Type in the shades below to get instant side-by-side swatches!

44 Comments

Comments that do not adhere to our comment policy may be removed. Discussion and debate are highly encouraged but we expect community members to participate respectfully. Please keep discussion on-topic, and if you have general feedback, a product review request, an off-topic question, or need technical support, please contact us!

Please help us streamline the comments' section and be more efficient: double-check the post above for more basic information like pricing, availability, and so on to make sure your question wasn't answered already. Comments alerting us to typos or small errors in the post are appreciated (!) but will typically be removed after errors are fixed (unless a response is needed).

We appreciate enthusiasm for new releases but ask readers to please hold questions regarding if/when a review will be posted as we can't commit to or guarantee product reviews. We don't want to set expectations and then disappoint readers as even products that are swatched don't always end up being reviewed due to time constraints and changes in priorities! Thank you for understanding!

Comments on this post are closed.

I swatched this in store -was NOT impressed. Even the SA looked a little embarrassed. The Sautoirs de Coco quad was even worse, 4 of the pastel shades were so sheer they would all look the same on my light/light medium skin. I think Dior and Chanel are competing to see who can do the sheerest shadows for spring. I was SO disappointed, as I have Chanel Tisse Smokey and D’Automnes, and I know Chanel can do better than this

The original release of the new(er) quads was pretty good – like Tisse Rivoli – but the seasonal LE/additions have been more hit or miss.

Could channel the glitz and glam of Rodeo drive and do glittery golds and bronzes, or take inspiration from the palm trees – glittery gold, dark taupe, mint green and forest green. I think they make more sense. You live in LA, you know what I’m talking about! 🙂

I had high hopes for this as I want a good 80s-style palette. I was at Von Maur when I swatched it, and it was very chalky and the blue was HORRID. Urban Decay has better blues than that one!

On top of everything else, this just looks like a really strange colour combination. I sort of wonder if they’re trying to make a subtle statement about Beverly Hills in general!

I think if the purple shade ran a little cooler, it might be easier to put together – the purple is almost so dark that it can act as a black eyeshadow in a way, but with the varying degrees of payoff, I don’t think they end up working well together!

Yikes, such a disappointment, considering the stellar releases with this formula in the last year. Would you be able to get some use out of it by using them wet? (Not that you should have to at this price!)

Damp brush would help for sure, but the application issues of the blue/purple shade aren’t fully resolved (they can still be harder to blend)!

That’s exactly what I was thinking. I feel like I just dodged a bullet. How could they stand to put something so underwhelming out like it was really worth the money when they knew better? Like wow Chanel.

To be honest, when I first saw this online, I thought it looked cheap and nasty. The colour combinations were weird – that bright blue with dark brown and pink? OK in a large palette, but in a quad, where the colours are meant to co-ordinate with each other – what was Chanel thinking? And somehow the colours did not come across as being pigmented either…
So I am not surprised at all with your review Christine – but I am with Chanel. Tisse D’Automnes was much better than this.

Oh hey look it’s a cool-toned palette that performs poorly! (Sigh :/). Well, at least it seems like cooler colors are starting to make a comeback, so progress, I guess?

lol, aww, Julie! 🙁 I’m laughing, but it’s mostly one of those half-laughs, half-sobs. It’s pretty miraculous that not a single mainstream brand has really done a cool-toned palette justice.

I would, too! I think this would be hard to justify unless you had a very specific desire for the faded quality of the end result + used primer.

The colors are pretty and I would have bought it but it has so many bad reviews. I’m so happy to see these light, bright colors for spring- smokey is lovely for fall/winter but it’s overkill when it’s hot & humid out. Your eye look is beautiful Christine- perfect with your eye color!

Yeowch!!! D+ tells me that this quad is outright terrible! Thank goodness for having similar enough shades that IF I wanted to wear purple with bright aqua blue, I could. Typically, I’ve done something a bit similar: purples with a mint or sage-y green. But this combo looks good with your eye color, probably blue or brown eyes, too. What a shame, this could have been a nifty quad.

The idea of this palette and the looks I immediately dreamed up was nice. Pity it didn’t live up to expectations. A big step back to what I think chanel eyeshadows used to be. (Not good.)

I passed on this one, too. And I had such high hopes for it, as the colours are so pretty (especially that blue *swoon*). Kudos to you though, Christine; you managed to do a gorgeous look with this one. WOWZA 😉

We try to approve comments within 24 hours (and reply to them within 72 hours) but can sometimes get behind and appreciate your patience! 🙂 If you have general feedback, product review requests, off-topic questions, or need technical support, please contact us directly. Thank you for your patience!