Archived Post

Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder Review, Photos, Swatches

Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder
Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder

Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powders for Eyes and Cheeks

Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder< ($95.00 for 0.53 oz.) is described as a highlighter for both cheeks and eyes. It’s part of the online exclusive (and at select boutiques) Las Vegas de Chanel collection and easily the pricest piece of the launch! It has six stripes of color, though the medium orange and gold shades seem to have been done twice, which resulted in four unique shades.

When blended together, the result is a warm, orange-tinted gold with a glowy shimmer-sheen. It looks a lot like Guerlain Terracotta Sun in the City, actually! Perhaps not quite as dark, but when blended out, the differences nearly disappear. Lucky Stripes has a less metallic finish. Chanel Shimmering Tweed is more golden, less orange. MAC Sun Rush is similar but in liquid form. Chanel Empreinte de Chanel also is similar, perhaps a little less golden.

There’s a medium-dark brown with red-orange undertones and a subtle satiny sheen. Urban Decay Chopper is similar but slightly redder. NARS Isolde is deeper. MAC One to Watch is a touch lighter. Bare Escentuals Fire is similar but a little more orange.  To the right of that is a medium orange with a golden shimmer-sheen. MAC Fresh Daily is darker, more intense. Dolce & Gabbana Cocoa is similar but a bit darker and matte. Inglot #368 is lighter.

Next, there’s a medium yellow gold with gold shimmer–it’s actually not quite as refined, soft, or as pigmented as the other shades. It’s similar to golds like MAC Goldmine, Urban Decay Blunt, and Bare Escentuals Remix. The last shade is a pale white with larger white shimmer. It’s similar to MAC Winterscape and MAC White Frost.

It adds a warm, golden reflective quality to the cheek without emphasizing the skin’s texture.  More glowy than metallic, but it’s still a more noticeable highlighter overall (which may or may not be to your liking!).  I think it performs best as a cheek product, but it can be used on the eyes, too.  There it blends out too easily; the colors seem to disappear as you blend, which can be frustrating.  The texture of the powder is soft, finely-milled, and not at all powdery.  On cheeks, it wore for seven hours and looked patchy after eight hours.  On eyes, without a primer, it wore for seven hours with some fading, but with a primer, I didn’t have any wear issues.

I cannot figure out just what about this powder gave Chanel the gall to price this at $95. It’s like with every ultra limited edition launch, they tack on another $10 (and it may just feel that way). There’s nothing about this powder that feels different than other Chanel highlighting powders (or other high-end/designer powders for that matter). It’s gorgeous to be sure, and it’s a pretty design on the interior, but it’s still a plastic black compact on the outer edge. Hey, at least Dior and Guerlain will often give you limited edition, specially-designed packaging with their high price tags! (Dior often has signature limited edition pieces that come out in the $80+ range, and Guerlain has debuted similar products in the $60+ range.)

Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder
Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder

Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder
Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder

Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder
Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder

Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder
Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder

Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder
Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder

Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder
Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder (Diffused/Bounced Flash)

Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder
Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder (Studio “Natural” Light)

Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder
Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder (Diffused/Bounced Flash)

Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder
Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder (Studio “Natural” Light)

Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder
Chanel Lucky Stripes Iridescent Powder

48 Comments

Comments that do not adhere to our comment policy may be removed. Discussion and debate are highly encouraged but we expect community members to participate respectfully. Please keep discussion on-topic, and if you have general feedback, a product review request, an off-topic question, or need technical support, please contact us!

Please help us streamline the comments' section and be more efficient: double-check the post above for more basic information like pricing, availability, and so on to make sure your question wasn't answered already. Comments alerting us to typos or small errors in the post are appreciated (!) but will typically be removed after errors are fixed (unless a response is needed).

We appreciate enthusiasm for new releases but ask readers to please hold questions regarding if/when a review will be posted as we can't commit to or guarantee product reviews. We don't want to set expectations and then disappoint readers as even products that are swatched don't always end up being reviewed due to time constraints and changes in priorities! Thank you for understanding!

Comments on this post are closed.
Sarah S. Avatar

It does look lovely on you, but yeah $95… I’d rather get two LE things from a high-end brand that makes special packaging! Anyway, I really am commenting because I wanted to say Tom Ford Spanish Fly is absolutely stunning on you, Christine!

baby in a corner Avatar

I love my high end cosmetics but this is insanely priced!! can I ask are you planning any reviews of the new Tom Ford line? I would love to hear your opinions on some more of the products? Thanks.

timothybcat Avatar

This really looks beautiful on you, Christine. But how many people can actually wear it well? Not many, methinks. Not worth $95.00, IMHO!!!

Anne Avatar

I think that they are just being greedy! They know that there are die-hard Chanel powder collectors, so they uber-hike the price & bloody get away with it. Naughty!

Grace Avatar

Christine, is the Tom Ford lipstick actually Spanish Pink? I don’t see Spanish Fly as a TF lipstick, just an old MAC one. It’s gorgeous on you!

Mile Avatar

Thank you for your honesty 🙂 it does look beautiful but I guess it’s being advertised for wealthy people only.

You look beautiful as always 🙂

Melissa Avatar

Beautiful but not $95 beautiful–if I’m going to get a piece of makeup to stare at, I think I’d rather spend a bit less and pick up NARS Hanamichi.

Emily Avatar

Hmm… doesn’t look any different from other bronzy/gold/white eyeshadows that also double has highlighters in a pinch. Beautiful, but not worth the trouble. lol

Dinitchka Avatar

It really is pretty (I am a SUCKER for pretty packaging and ‘artsy’ printed product) but I think I’ll be skipping it. But GARSH, it sure is pretty!

*Christine, thanks so much for getting rid of the petty stuff from earlier!! I was at work browsing your blog and was *mouth wide open* and then *sad face*

Beckie Avatar

Saw this before at nordstroms online but never noticed the price… LOVE it but won’t can’t bear to purchase something that pricey… after my guerlain $150+ powder, will be my only HIGH HIGH end product!

blueraccoon Avatar

I realize this is an old conversation, but I have a question about the product – I have the opportunity to buy from a friend who no longer wants it, for a reduced price, but I’m afraid it would be too warm for me -I’m either NW15 or paler, I’m not sure, and I’m very cool toned. Do you think this might work or am I better passing it by?

blueraccoon Avatar

 @Christine (Temptalia) that’s about what I figured, but it’s *so* pretty. Sigh. I’ll save my money for the holiday pretties 🙂 thank you!

We try to approve comments within 24 hours (and reply to them within 72 hours) but can sometimes get behind and appreciate your patience! 🙂 If you have general feedback, product review requests, off-topic questions, or need technical support, please contact us directly. Thank you for your patience!