Powder Blush

MAC

1 of 10
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush
MAC Powder Blush

MAC Powder Blush is a blush that retails for $24.00 and contains 0.21 oz. ($114.29 per ounce). There are 223 shades in our database.

Editor's Review

Per the brand, the formula is supposed to "provide fantastic colour with ease and consistency" that "applies evenly, adheres lightly to skin." There are five distinct finishes within the range: Frost ("iridescent, lightly shimmering color"), Matte ("flat, matte finish... builds well"), Satin ("adds subtle highlights to the skin"), Sheertone ("sheer-on micro-refined powder ... that goes on faint"), and Sheertone Shimmer ("just enough shimmer to make light dance on your cheeks"). Their permanent blushes are available in compact form as well as pan-only (the latter will be cheaper).

The following overview has been updated to reflect the most current iteration of the brand's permanent range (whether or not there's been any official change) as I repurchased the majority of the permanent... Read More.

Per the brand, the formula is supposed to "provide fantastic colour with ease and consistency" that "applies evenly, adheres lightly to skin." There are five distinct finishes within the range: Frost ("iridescent, lightly shimmering color"), Matte ("flat, matte finish... builds well"), Satin ("adds subtle highlights to the skin"), Sheertone ("sheer-on micro-refined powder ... that goes on faint"), and Sheertone Shimmer ("just enough shimmer to make light dance on your cheeks"). Their permanent blushes are available in compact form as well as pan-only (the latter will be cheaper).

The following overview has been updated to reflect the most current iteration of the brand's permanent range (whether or not there's been any official change) as I repurchased the majority of the permanent shades as of June 2018. I make a point to say that because I felt that the textures of several shades, particularly the frost finish shades, was noticeably different; they were much smoother and had more slip but were less shimmery/frosted (on average) and seemed to be a bit weaker in pigmentation (but still buildable). Some of the mattes felt like I've encountered in the past (a little drier, pigmented, and fairly blendable), while some felt more velvety and finely-milled.

MAC has a solid blush range but some shades are harder than others to blend out or diffuse, and as it does for most formulas (from any brand), it really comes down to some shades falling shy of expectations. The matte finish had a tendency to darken on my skin within five minutes of application; for most shades, I would recommend applying over a powdered face and/or avoiding applying on still-drying complexion products to make blending the easiest. The matte shades seemed to be semi-opaque to opaque, buildable, and long-wearing (about eight hours).

Only a few of the shades in the permanent range seemed to be particularly frosted/metallic on the skin; most shades that had shimmer appeared more softly luminous or pearlescent on the skin to the point where there was little sheen/reflection captured by my camera (I did a double take for a few and re-did swatches only to find the same finish captured yet again!). The Sheertone Shimmer performed most consistently with this: very subtle sheen, more "my skin but better" with having a slightly more noticeable sheen than matte. There were a few shades that had a strong sheen on the skin (like Peachykeen), though. The Frost finish just seemed to have stronger, larger shimmer in it, but the effect on the skin ranged being subtle to moderate. The same was true with Satin--some were more satin-like and some seemed more like a Frost (like Modern Mandarin).

Most shades were blendable, while pigmentation varied from sheer to opaque depending on the shade, but most had decent, builable coverage. The textures were firmer than the average powder blush of current times, but they don't have excess product kicked up in the pan at all. The wear ranged between seven and nine hours with deeper, intense mattes (like Fever or Film Noir) lasted longer.

Claims / Ingredients

Designed by and for professionals. Formulated to provide fantastic colour with ease and consistency. Applies evenly, adheres lightly to skin to achieve a natural-looking application of colour that stays put all day. Five finishes -- Frost. An iridescent, lightly shimmering color that adds highlights and a frosted bloom to your cheeks. Matte. A flat, matte finish that goes on lightly, builds well and blends with the skin. Satin. A light-refractive sheen-style finish that adds subtle highlights to the skin. Sheertone. A sheer-on micro-refined powder with a non-transparent finish that goes on faint and looks real. Sheertone Shimmer. A jet-milled and micro-fine powder with just enough shimmer to make light dance on your cheeks.

TALC, OCTYLDODECYL STEAROYL STEARATE, ZINC STEARATE, ISOSTEARYL NEOPENTANOATE, TOCOPHERYL ACETATE, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL, HEXYLENE GLYCOL, PHENOXYETHANOL. MAY CONTAIN: SILICA, MICA, TITANIUM DIOXIDE (CI 77891), IRON OXIDES (CI 77491, CI 77492, CI 77499), BISMUTH OXYCHLORIDE (CI 77163), BLUE 1 LAKE (CI 42090), CARMINE (CI 75470), CHROMIUM HYDROXIDE GREEN (CI 77289), CHROMIUM OXIDE GREENS (CI 77288), FERRIC FERROCYANIDE (CI 77510), MANGANESE VIOLET (CI 77742), RED 6 (CI 15850), RED 6 LAKE (CI 15850), RED 7 LAKE (CI 15850), RED 28 LAKE (CI 45410), RED 30 LAKE (CI 73360), ULTRAMARINES (CI 77007), YELLOW 5 LAKE (CI 19140), YELLOW 6 LAKE (CI 15985).

Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.

40 Written Reviews

By Holly 10 years ago.

I use this as a contour shade. It looks perfectly natural because it is so subtle and blends so well! I love it and plan to buy an extra. However, this is clearly only a contour shade for fair skin. It actually appears lighter than my skin tone when swatched on my wrist, but somehow turns into a perfect soft shadow color on my face. Makeup magic.

1 out of 1 user found this review helpful.
Skin Type: Normal - Skin Tone: Lightest - Undertone: Neutral

By Deb 11 years ago.

Full of Joy is such a pretty shade. It's a pastel, cool lavender but it's not stark or weird-looking on my skin. It would look good on cool skin tones of all shades.

1 out of 1 user found this review helpful.
Skin Type: Combination - Skin Tone: Very Light - Undertone: Pink

By Tia 11 years ago.

Given by a friend with a lighter cooler skintone. It was instant love! For me it's a cross between bronzer and blush, so it's my quick go-to color especially for everyday colors.

Skin Type: Combination - Skin Tone: Light Medium - Undertone: Pink

By Julie 11 years ago.

On my NW35 skin this is not a blusher at all, but does work to help get that Jo Lo glow, the Miami bronzed glowing skin look on tan skin that is so pretty. It is a fairly sheer golden frosty powder and blends out easily, leaving a glowing gold look to the skin. I am not sure how it would look on a lighter skin tone, I think on medium to darker tones this would give a beautiful glow to the skin without a ton of actual color, just a light gold that will blend in well with the skin giving is radiance. It did emphasize pores a bit, it is shimmery and that is expected, but it worked well across my forehead, bridge of nose and cheekbones in place of bronzer. I will probably never use this enough to purchase again, but I am not sorry it is in my collection. I recommend for medium to dark skin tones, and will revise this if I ever get to use it on someone fair skinned and like it!

1 out of 1 user found this review helpful.
Skin Type: Normal-to-Dry - Skin Tone: Light Medium - Undertone: Pink

By Mariella 11 years ago.

It's a real shame that this blush isn't permanent because it would be a huge hit and there must be loads of people who never got the chance to try it. It is almost terrifyingly bright in the pan but applied lightly and with a fluffy, soft brush, it gives the prettiest "walking in the cold" flush to the cheeks and looks unbelievably pretty against fair skin. Even though I've sort of migrated to Tarte and Bobbi Brown blushes, I am still so happy I have this beauty.

Skin Type: Normal-to-Dry - Skin Tone: Very Light - Undertone: Pink

By Mariella 12 years ago.

I love the Sheertone Shimmer finish from MAC and so had high hopes for this blush. It is powdery - when I pick up product with my brush, I can see bits of powder flying around - and it's not very pigmented but it can be built up easily if you want a more dense shade. The fact that it's not very pigmented helps it look natural but I find it doesn't last as long as most of my other MAC blushes; it fades much more quickly.

Skin Type: Normal-to-Dry - Skin Tone: Very Light - Undertone: Pink

By Mshel 12 years ago.

I have and have had only the regular blush version of Strada. I think it is more nude, with a touch of pink. Wonderful for contour for pale and light skinned ladies - just use light hand. The LE version of Strada seems to be a different formula as well as slightly different color.

Skin Type: Normal-to-Dry - Skin Tone: Lightest - Undertone: Pink

By Rad 12 years ago.

I have a medium/ olive skintone with yellow undertones. Although the colour of this blusher is fairly light, it does give a radiant peachy glow. I've been very impressed with all three blushers. This one in particular is subtle enough to wear every day with a brighter lipstick like Tangerine Dream.

Skin Type: Normal-to-Dry - Skin Tone: Light Tan - Undertone: Olive

By Rad 12 years ago.

I have a medium/ olive skintone with yellow undertones. This is a pretty colour! Gives a nice coral glow. Very impressed with all three blushers. This one in particular would work perfect with bronzer and the sushi kiss lipstick

Skin Type: Normal-to-Dry - Skin Tone: Light Tan - Undertone: Olive

By Rad 12 years ago.

I have a medium/ olive skintone with yellow undertones. Beautiful beautiful colour! So impressed with all three blushers. This one in particular gave a sweet girlie glow. Perfect! I would reccommend this with razzledazzler or tart and trendy lipstick.

Skin Type: Normal-to-Dry - Skin Tone: Light Tan - Undertone: Olive

By Nicole 12 years ago.

I have been lusting after this blush for a long time, and after getting it in my Christmas stocking, I have to say, I am in LOVE. “Desert Rose” as described by Mac is a matte soft reddish-burgundy. I wouldn’t say that it is quite as dark and dramatic as they make it seem, because when you apply it with a light hand it can be used on a wide variety of skin tones. I’m SUPERUBER pale and when this is applied and blended out on me it looks fantastic (which is something I rarely say). I would describe it more as a deep mauve rose, because it’s not as dark and frightening as it looks in the pan. Because this is a matte blush, it doesn’t give off any sheen, however it is incredibly pigmented. A little bit of this goes a long way and literally requires just a DAB of your brush. This is my first mac blush, and although I’ve tried many other brands, this one has lasted the longest on my cheeks throughout the day. (Without having to look like a walking doll in the morning) I strongly suggest that next time you’re at a mac counter, or a mac store to give this blush a try.

3 out of 3 users found this review helpful.
Skin Type: Combination - Skin Tone: Lightest - Undertone: Neutral

By Jen 12 years ago.

I bought this since it was LE even though Christine said it was very similar to Nars Gaiety..... and she was right. If you have Gaiety you definitely don't need this. That being said, it is still a great blush and very beautiful. Very smooth and easy to blend.

1 out of 1 user found this review helpful.
Skin Type: Oily - Skin Tone: Very Light - Undertone: Pink

By Jen 12 years ago.

I wish I liked this color a little more but I just find it to be kinda boring. I find myself hardly ever reaching for it. If you are looking for something natural, I would say this blush is a good fit. The consistency and texture are great.

1 out of 1 user found this review helpful.
Skin Type: Oily - Skin Tone: Very Light - Undertone: Pink

By Jen 12 years ago.

I am fair skinned and wear this blush way more than I ever thought I would. It gives this beautiful luminous raspberry wash to my cheeks that I LOVE. A light hand and some good blending really brings out the luminosity. I have never regretted buying this shade and would recommend this to anyone regardless of complexion color.

Skin Type: Oily - Skin Tone: Very Light - Undertone: Pink

By Ellen 12 years ago.

Peachykeen is a pretty, shimmery blush from MAC. It's easy to work with and blendable. My only complaint is the wear time is really short and I often find a shimmery finish on my hands from the transfer of blush if I happen to touch my face.

1 out of 1 user found this review helpful.
Skin Type: Very Oily - Skin Tone: Very Light - Undertone: Neutral