Charlotte Tilbury Tan/Dark (6.5) Hollywood Flawless Filter Review & Swatches
Charlotte Tilbury Tan Dark (6.5) Hollywood Flawless Filter ($44.00 for 1 oz.) is a medium brown with moderate, warm undertones and a luminous sheen. It was less red-orange compared to Dark (7) and more golden-orange, which appeared a little lighter when applied and blended out.
The product had a fluid, more gel-like consistency that made it easy to spread across larger areas (like a primer), mixed in with base products (like moisturizers or foundations), or patted on the high points of the face as a standalone highlighter (or as a bronzer for my skin tone). It had sheerer coverage that was less impactful when mixed in with products, as expected, and more medium, buildable coverage when applied as a standalone product.
The finish was glowing but not overtly shimmery, so it didn’t emphasize my skin’s natural texture. It stayed on well for nine hours before fading a bit as a standalone product and didn’t impact the wear (longer or shorter) of base products but helped foundation apply a bit more consistently and smoothly.
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
- Fenty Beauty Macchiato (P, $32.00) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (95% similar).
- elf Tan-Deep (P, $14.00) is darker (95% similar).
- Anastasia Caramel (P, $35.00) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (90% similar).
- Salt New York Medium (P, $16.00) is less shimmery, darker, warmer (90% similar).
- Salt New York Light (P, $16.00) is less shimmery, lighter (90% similar).
- Iconic London Golden Hour (P, $27.00) is less shimmery, less glossy (90% similar).
- Becca Borealis (5.5) (-, $30.00) is darker (90% similar).
- REFY Tan (P, $26.00) is less shimmery, darker (90% similar).
- Fenty Beauty Hunnie Glaze (P, $32.00) is less shimmery, darker, warmer (90% similar).
- Makeup by Mario Medium (P, $30.00) is less shimmery, warmer (90% similar).
$44.00/1 oz. - $44.00 Per Ounce
The formula is supposed to be a "customizable complexion booster" that can be used as a primer, highlighter, or mixed with base products. The line includes seven shades, like a more typical foundation or concealer range, but they have sheerer coverage and fine pearl, so there is some flexibility, though for added luminosity (but not altering color) all-over, one would want to choose a shade closer to their actual skin tone.
It has a jumbo-sized, doe-foot applicator, which I preferred for spot highlighting and priming but isn't as functional for mixing in with base products (compared to a pump). I find that the lighter shades look very similar when mixed with foundation or layered under it, so the shade range is more flexible than it might seem (for some skin tones).
The texture was smooth and lightweight, like a thin gel-based primer in feel, so the product easily spread across my skin for an all-over application (worn as primer, per the brand), and it made my skin look radiant. I can see one person finding that finish to look "oily," and another person to feel like it looks beautifully glowing--it's definitely very radiant on its own, so I'd recommend strategically applying it over bare skin, like a very diffused highlighter, or mixing it in with moisturizer if you're someone who wants glow but not full-on dewiness.
I also liked to gently swiped the product on using the included doe-foot applicator on the high planes of my face, diffused and blended (over a greater area than I would have if using it specifically to highlight my cheekbones) and gently dabbed foundation over it. I recommend using a sheer to medium coverage foundation over something full coverage, because full coverage will work better when it's mixed in otherwise the coverage level will tamp down the luminosity quite a bit.
As a standalone highlighter, it gave me a lit-from-within-glow that was luminous but not tacky or truly glossy, just looked dewy on my skin. It worked as well over bare skin as it did blended on top of foundation for me. On its own, it lasted well for nine hours with minimal fading and no migration as a cheek highlighter. As a primer, it seemed to help my makeup go on more smoothly but I didn't notice any extension of wear (but no shortening either); though the brand made no claim about it extending longevity, only that it would improve the finish and give skin a glow (so I didn't rate it down for not extending the wear).
Browse all of our Charlotte Tilbury Hollywood Flawless Filter swatches.
AQUA/WATER/EAU, HYDROGENATED DIDECENE, MICA, GLYCERIN, PROPANEDIOL, SQUALANE, CETYL PEG/PPG-10/1 DIMETHICONE, ISOAMYL LAURATE, HYDROGENATED STYRENE/ISOPRENE COPOLYMER, SODIUM CHLORIDE, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, HYDROXYACETOPHENONE, POLYGLYCERYL-4 ISOSTEARATE, 1,2-HEXANEDIOL, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL, TRISODIUM ETHYLENEDIAMINE DISUCCINATE, GLYCOSAMINOGLYCANS, HOYA LACUNOSA FLOWER EXTRACT, [+/- IRON OXIDES (CI 77491, CI 77492, CI 77499), BISMUTH OXYCHLORIDE (CI 77163), TITANIUM DIOXIDE (CI 77891)].
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Comments on this post are closed.
I’m just happy that she extended her range of Hollywood Flawless Filters to be more inclusive not just for depth, but also for undertones. I could easily use this during summer to add a bronzey glow without adding much depth.
Nancy, I agree!