Chanel Fantaisie de Chanel Illuminating Powder Review & Swatches
Fantaisie de Chanel
Chanel Fantaisie de Chanel Illuminating Powder ($80.00 for 0.24 oz.) is a soft, medium rosy pink with subtle, warm undertones and a luminous sheen with fine pearl.
- Semi-opaque, buildable coverage
- Finely-milled, smooth consistency, not too powdery
- Applied evenly and blended well
- Long-wearing (8.5 hours)
Top Dupes
- Kevyn Aucoin Rose Cliff #2 (PiP, ) is more shimmery, darker (95% similar).
- ColourPop Gummy More (LE, $8.00) is lighter (90% similar).
- Lethal Cosmetics Plan 9 (P, $15.50) is more shimmery, lighter (90% similar).
- NARS Orgasm (P, $30.00) is more shimmery (90% similar).
- Dior Rose Frisson (353) (LE, $48.00) is lighter, cooler (90% similar).
- Clinique Garnet Pop (06) (P, $26.50) is more shimmery, lighter (90% similar).
- ColourPop Iced (LE, $8.00) is more shimmery, darker, warmer (90% similar).
- ColourPop Desert Rose (LE, $12.00) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (90% similar).
- Milani Bella Bellini (P, $7.99) is more shimmery, cooler (90% similar).
- Tom Ford Beauty Frantic Pink (Discontinued) (DC, $60.00) is lighter, warmer (90% similar).
Ingredients
CETEARYL ETHYLHEXANOATE | SILICA | GLYCERIN | CAPRYLYL GLYCOL | POLYSORBATE 80 | ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE | SQUALANE | ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN | 1,2-HEXANEDIOL | CALCIUM CHLORIDE | C12-20 ACID PEG-8 ESTER | CHONDRUS CRISPUS EXTRACT | PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRA-DI-T-BUTYL HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMATE | XANTHAN GUM | DICALCIUM PHOSPHATE | SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE | TOCOPHEROL | TIN OXIDE | [+ / - (MAY CONTAIN) | CI 12085 (RED 36) | CI 15850 (RED 6) | CI 15850 (RED 7 LAKE) | CI 15880 (RED 34) | CI 15985 (YELLOW 6 LAKE) | CI 17200 (RED 33 LAKE) | CI 19140 (YELLOW 5 LAKE) | CI 42090 (BLUE 1 LAKE) | CI 45380 (RED 22 LAKE) | CI 45410 (RED 28 LAKE) | CI 73360 (RED 30 LAKE) | CI 77007 (ULTRAMARINES) | CI 77163 (BISMUTH OXYCHLORIDE) | CI 77491, | CI 77492, | CI 77499 (IRON OXIDES) | CI 77510 (FERRIC FERROCYANIDE) | CI 77742 (MANGANESE VIOLET) | CI 77891 (TITANIUM DIOXIDE) | MICA] | BS000070A
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Wow, that is so pretty. I nearly bought KA Rose Cliff at Winners last year but opted for Grapevine instead because Rose Cliff was oddly warm looking (well, the left hand side of it was). Now I regret that but, oh well…
Just a little too shiny for my already oily skin. This would accent all my pores, I fear.
That looks really pretty, but I can’t imagine spending $80 on a blush unless there was something incredibly unique about it. Sometimes that doesn’t come through in photos. I do like that it comes in more minimal packaging without a brush.
It looks beautiful, but, I can’t justify $80. I wish it was $40-$50.
Pretty shade. It’s certainly different. I’m not sure I’d pay that price though.
I really do like this one – I think it’s my kind of shade.
I have this blush and in my opinion, it is an exact dupe for Haus Labs highlighter in Rose Quartz. I had been using the highlighter as blush for months before this Chanel blush was released. Having both products, with the Haus Labs half the cost and not limited edition, I wish I had passed on the Chanel blush. Maybe I am glad I have both so I wouldn’t be left wondering “what if” but had I known they were identical, I would have not purchased the Chanel blush.
This is so good to know. My nearest Sephora is sold out of Rose Quartz but the other one – still quite near – has it in stock and if I have the time to get there, I’m going to check it out and probably snap it up.
Very pretty. It looks amazing on you. I think you’ve found your match.
How lovely!
Unfortunately I could never justify buying it at the cost it is.
I do, as so many have NARS Orgasm that is listed as a dupe, and I really want Hous Labs Rose Quartz that Leah mentioned so this is a pass.
But it sure is a lovely shade!
Mine was absolute garbage. There was barely any pigment whatsoever. It didn’t matter what I used to try to apply it, it was barely visible on my fair-light skin. I destashed it.
That is so distressing, especially in light of the price (though I hate wasting money on substandard products so even if this were $20, I’d be ticked but at THIS price???? Yikes!)