Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder Review, Photos, Swatches

01/10

Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder
Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder

Camelia de Chanel

Chanel Camelia de Chanel Illuminating Powder ($70.00 for 0.21 oz.) is a light, golden beige with warm undertones and a soft, sparkling sheen. There was both finer, more luminous shimmer and slightly larger, more noticeable sparkles in this product.

Chanel says the formula is supposed to be a “sheer highlighting powder.” The texture was fairly smooth, not at all dusty or powdery, and denser but not stiff or difficult to get product onto a brush. The included brush certainly worked for applying to the face, though I still preferred a myriad of other highlighting and blush brushes in my arsenal. It had more medium coverage than sheer, though with a lighter touch, sheer coverage was certainly possible. The coverage was also buildable to full with two to three layers, which I think made it a more versatile product. The highlighter didn’t emphasize my skin’s natural texture unless worn at more semi-opaque to opaque coverage, and then there was slight emphasis. On my normal-to-dry skin, it wore well for eight hours before fading noticeably.

We hope you'll consider supporting Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thanks!

Product Availability

Chanel Camelia de Chanel $70.00/0.21 OZ.
When you purchase through our links above, you help support Temptalia. Thank You!

Makeup Look

On face:
  • Guerlain Lingerie de Peau Foundation
  • Laura Mercier Loose Setting Powder
On eyes:
  • Urban Decay Blitz Eyeshadow
  • Urban Decay Spike Eyeshadow
  • Urban Decay Relish Eyeshadow
  • Urban Decay Thunderbird Eyeshadow
  • Urban Decay Punk Eyeshadow
  • Urban Decay Smokeout Eyeshadow
  • Urban Decay ABC Gum Eyeshadow
  • Urban Decay Perversion Eyeliner
On lips:
  • Giorgio Armani Paparazzi Pink Lip Maestro

About the Reviewer

Christine has normal-to-dry skin with areas of dryness (cheeks, nose, and under the eyes). She has a light-medium skintone with subtle, warmer yellow undertones. Her best foundation matches include: Tarte Rainforest of the Sea in Light-Medium Neutral (best match), Estee Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Makeup in Desert Beige 2N1, Giorgio Armani Maestro Glow in 4.0, Hourglass Warm Ivory Vanish Seamless Finish, Laura Mercier Candleglow Soft Luminous in Dusk, MAC NC20/NC25, Make Up For Ever Ultra HD Liquid in Y305 (140). (For more information, please check the FAQ.)

Compare Any Two Swatches

Curious how two shades compare to each other? Type in the shades below to get instant side-by-side swatches!

We hope you'll consider supporting Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thanks!

51 Comments

Discussion and debate are highly encouraged, and we expect community members to participate respectfully. When asking a question, please check the post above for information regarding pricing, availability, dupes, and availability, and keep discussion on-topic.

Please do not ask if/when a review will be posted as we cannot review everything and often change priorities from day-to-day. If you have general feedback, a product review request, an off-topic question, or need technical support, please contact us. Thank you!

Comments that include advertisements, self-promotion, insults, etc. may be in violation of our comment policy and subject to deletion. Please see our comment policy for more information.

Comments on this post are closed.

This seems pretty, but not $70 worth of special to me, lol! That seems to be how I react to a lot of Chanel cosmetic products. Those new lip crayons, though, look like they might be something special.

Funny enough I didn’t find this highlighter to resemble the Filmstar once applied on me! CamΓ©lia appears really beige while Filmstar is more golden. I think my pink undertone must be the reason behind it! ?

That’s wild that Becca Moonstone is LESS shimmery because it’s one that I find quite shimmery. I was hoping this one from Chanel would suck. Still, I’m not sure that it’s $70 worth of wonderful but I might give it a try and a buy if I find it at my local Chanel counter.

Okay, I just looked at this side by side with your swatch of Moonstone and Moonstone actually looks nicer. It’s smoother and when you see the side-by-side swatches in the Dupe List, it’s easy to see the larger glitter particles in the Chanel vs the smoother all-over texture of the Becca.

Oh, the one listed in the top list in the review is for the Poured version, which is the cream compact and definitely is less shimmery! Regular Moonstone (pressed powder) is listed as more shimmery and lighter (85%).

It sure looks lovely…especially the beautiful embossed flower pattern! But I’m not as convinced that it’s $70 worth of lovely or beautiful, however. Unless I never used it so it would be more of a keepsake item, and that’s just not something I would be into doing.

I think you could definitely replicate the effect with lots of other products (including ones I bet you have) for sure πŸ™‚

The design is gorgeous as one would expect from a brand like CHANEL! I got an LE blush (Sunrise) from a collection collections ago but honestly, these LE designs felt more like something to keep and display than use πŸ˜›

I got the Chanel highlighting powder (idk exactly how to spell it “Infiliment Chanel” it is camelia’s plain Jane diminutive little sister; it’s also not much cheaper than camelia; unfortunately it didn’t show up on me.) & Kyoto (I didn’t like this as a blush nor bronzer it was too RosΓ©gold) & returned both (blind bought both of them i got talked into on the phone into the infilliment & Kyoto as consolation prizes by phone operator & gave me gratis overnight shipping to sweeten the pot since I missed the first Camelia). I stayed up til midnight stalking Chanel.com the 2nd time they released more of these 1st time release sold out quick early in the morn, I highly rec’d the camelia Chanel it’s sublime w the Soleil tan de Chanel (I’m speaking of the moussey whipped product) for highlight & contour, be still my beating heart! Tan isn’t too dark, camelia isn’t too disco ball. I’m LLL NC20. They complement each other seamlessly well both warm beigy golden (not RosΓ©gold). If you want a moderate highlight (don’t think becca!!) this is awesome. The brush provided is great! I wish I could afford a back up lol & I hate marring the intricate design but ahhh it must be done. I don’t buy MU to collect pretty things–it has to be practical too! Who doesn’t adore pretty AND practical things?! The packaging is 100%!! the intricate embossing, red racy colored compact, the useful niche for a brush & nice mirror. Best $70 I’ve spent in a very long time. I feel so lux & glamorous using this & it’s not too OTT for everyday luxury Glam. But it can be built up for a gilt evening look. I’m going against the grain I kno when I’m saying this isn’t that easily dupeable. I got Coco Code, 2 lipsticks, 2 e/s quads. **winning!! (I can’t keep up w all of this new stuff!) sorry to see this big B+, I would have personally given it an A+ πŸ™‚

The draw for me was the red compact and the embossed beauty inside but I was reminded this week that I have plenty of gold highlighers. Having recently splurged on the Lumieres de Koyoto and the Coco Codes harmony blushes, I decided to relieve my pocketbook on this one. I am curious about the highlighter in the next collection.

I have the Mary Lou. But I have finished half of it. I would KILL for this!!! It’s so beautiful and stunning oh my gosh.

Decisions, Decisions!! My birthday IS coming up on the 11th. ahah

I went to my local counter to pick up Code Subtils and noticed they had the Plisse Lumiere de Chanel but not this one. I’m in Canada so I’m not sure if we are getting the Camelia one too? Or perhaps the Plisse highlighter is what we get instead? Or maybe Chanel is doing two LE highlighters simultaneously!

J, Canada just released the *next* Chanel collection called ‘Energies et Puretes de Chanel Spring 2017″ and the Plisse Lumiere highlighter is part of that collection. It’s hasn’t been released in the US just yet.

HBC released Coco Codes and Energies within 2-3 weeks of each other. Will ask how Cdns are getting Chanel Camelia and perhaps those on Temptalia can provide some guidance.

I had been told that this is a boutique exclusive like a few other recent beauty items. Perhaps that was why you didn’t see it at your local C counter?

I ordered this from CHANEL, since I’m not sure if Canada will have it. I can’t wait for it to arrive, I loved the bronzer version from two years ago and I’m sure this one will be a go to in the next few months.

It is so pretty!
I won’t be buying it though, I already have four of the dupes. I think right now I am more concerned that I have four products that are so similar to each other! Why have I not caught that?!? πŸ˜‰ Definitely a wake-up call…no more beige highlighters!

If they hadn’t put in the larger sparkly particles I would be tempted, but now.. No. I have nice highlighters and Tarte’s Exposed is also still on my list!

I think that I will stick to my Moonstone and Mary-Lou. At this price I can get both, and I already have them in my collection. Once again, thank you for saving my money.

I purchased for keepsake reasons, and when I swatched it I’m glad that I didn’t intend on using it because it was way to glittery. Even though its has a champagne color, the beige undertones ended up looking ashy on my skin. Chanel doesn’t make products that flatter my skin tone so I wasnt surprised that this product didn’t work out. This will probably be my only Chanel purchase so I was okay taking a spurge. But if you’re looking to use this, I’d say skip it, as mentioned there are better options available.

Thank you for your review! I had been waiting for it for some time bc I have been on the fence about purchasing this…whew! So pretty but I agree with many of your readers that it’s not necessarily worth the $70. That said, still stoked I have the Camelia de Plumes highlighter from a few years ago – lol! πŸ™‚
Thank you, Christine!

Thank the makeup gods I have dupes! It’s lovely and the embossing is just beautiful, but I’m leaving it to the collectors πŸ™‚

I wish they re-promoted Camelia des Plumes, that one was very unique and sophisticated. This one is very dupable, I don’t think it’s worth the splurge

If you don't see your comment yet, it's still in our moderation queue. We try our best to approve comments within 24 hours (and reply to them within 72 hours) but can sometimes get behind. Thank you for your patience!