Pat McGrath Divine Rose II Divine Blush Duo Review & Swatches
Divine Rose II
Pat McGrath Divine Rose II Divine Blush Duo ($44.00 for 0.34 oz.) includes two shades of pink; one lighter and warmer contrasted against a brighter and cooler-toned take. Together, they blended to create a rich, medium-dark pink with subtle, warm undertones and a cooler, very subtle satin sheen.
- Opaque coverage (supposed to be buildable)
- Finely-milled, lightly powdery
- Blendable, picked up evenly with a brush
- Long-wearing (8-9 hours is typical)
Top Dupes
- Kaleidos Ecstasy (LE, $18.00) is darker (95% similar).
- Tarte Decked Out (LE, $29.00) is darker (95% similar).
- Pat McGrath Peony Rose (LE, $38.00) is less shimmery (95% similar).
- ColourPop Freaky Genius Girl (LE, $10.00) is less shimmery, cooler (95% similar).
- NARS Hot Pursuit (LE, $30.00) is darker (95% similar).
- Give Me Glow There Goes Rose (P, $14.00) is less shimmery, darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Kevyn Aucoin Grapevine #2 (PiP, ) is darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Lethal Cosmetics Pansy (P, $15.50) is more shimmery, cooler (90% similar).
- ColourPop Swirled (P, $10.00) is darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Black Opal Tulip (P, $8.95) is lighter (90% similar).
Ingredients
Divine Rose II
LELimited Edition. $44.00.
Divine Rose II (Left)
Divine Rose II (Left) is a brighter, medium pink with warmer undertones and a matte finish.
- Medium, buildable coverage (supposed to be buildable)
- Finely-milled, lightly powdery
- Blendable, picked up evenly with a brush
- Long-wearing (8-9 hours is typical)
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- NARS Hot Pursuit (LE, $30.00) is darker (95% similar).
- Kaleidos Ecstasy (LE, $18.00) is darker (95% similar).
- Tarte Decked Out (LE, $29.00) is darker (95% similar).
- Patrick Ta She's That Girl (Powder) (PiP, ) is more shimmery, cooler (90% similar).
- Tarte Deco (LE, $29.00) is darker (90% similar).
- Marc Jacobs Beauty Exhibitionist (LE, ) is darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Haus Labs Hibiscus Haze (P, $38.00) is cooler (90% similar).
- ColourPop Swirled (P, $10.00) is darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Gucci Beauty Silky Rose (01) (P, $49.00) is more shimmery, lighter (90% similar).
- Makeup Geek XOXO (P, $10.00) is more shimmery, darker, cooler (90% similar).
Formula Overview
$38.00/0.34 oz. - $111.76 Per Ounce
The formula is supposed to be "featherlight, long-wearing" that "build effortlessly from sheer to subversive." The blushes are available in two finishes--demi-matte and satin pearl--and range from more muted to more vivid in color. The biggest "downfall" of the formula was that it was rather pigmented than buildable, so one could use a lighter hand to get more buildable coverage, but I found I had to use a light to moderate hand to ensure I didn't over-apply each shade.
The consistency was smooth, silky, and lightly creamy to the touch; it was a touch powdery in the pan but had more slip than most powder blushes on the market, but it was definitely a powder-based formula. The product applied well to bare skin as well as over foundation, as it diffused well along the edges without picking up base products.
The satin pearl finish was luminous but not overtly shimmery, so it did not emphasize my skin's natural texture. They wore around nine hours on me before fading visibly.
Browse all of our Pat McGrath Divine Blush swatches.
Ingredients
MICA, ALUMINA, ZINC STEARATE, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, METHYLPROPANEDIOL, OCTYLDODECYL STEAROYL STEARATE, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL, ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE, SODIUM DEHYDROACETATE, PHENYLPROPANOL. (+/-) IRON OXIDES (CI 77491, CI 77492, CI 77499), ULTRAMARINES (CI 77007), RED 7 (CI 15850), YELLOW 5 LAKE (CI 19140), MANGANESE VIOLET (CI 77742).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Divine Rose II (Left)
LELimited Edition. $38.00.
Divine Rose II (Right)
Divine Rose II (Right) is a vivid pop of medium-dark pink with cooler undertones and a barely-there lavender sheen.
- Opaque coverage (supposed to be buildable)
- Finely-milled, smooth without being powdery
- Blendable, picked up evenly with a brush
- Long-wearing (8-9 hours is typical)
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- ColourPop Freaky Genius Girl (LE, $10.00) is less shimmery, cooler (95% similar).
- Pat McGrath Peony Rose (LE, $38.00) is less shimmery (95% similar).
- MAC Rosy Does It (LE, $30.00) is darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Charlotte Tilbury Pillow Talk Fair-Medium #4 (PiP, ) is warmer (90% similar).
- Give Me Glow There Goes Rose (P, $14.00) is less shimmery, darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Huda Beauty Charming Cherry (04) (P, $21.00) is darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Makeup by Mario Poppy Pink (P, $24.00) is cooler (90% similar).
- Zoeva PK040 (P, ) is less shimmery (90% similar).
- Kevyn Aucoin Grapevine #2 (PiP, ) is darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Sephora Hey Jealousy (P, $14.00) is less shimmery, cooler (90% similar).
Formula Overview
$38.00/0.34 oz. - $111.76 Per Ounce
The formula is supposed to be "featherlight, long-wearing" that "build effortlessly from sheer to subversive." The blushes are available in two finishes--demi-matte and satin pearl--and range from more muted to more vivid in color. The biggest "downfall" of the formula was that it was rather pigmented than buildable, so one could use a lighter hand to get more buildable coverage, but I found I had to use a light to moderate hand to ensure I didn't over-apply each shade.
The consistency was smooth, silky, and lightly creamy to the touch; it was a touch powdery in the pan but had more slip than most powder blushes on the market, but it was definitely a powder-based formula. The product applied well to bare skin as well as over foundation, as it diffused well along the edges without picking up base products.
The satin pearl finish was luminous but not overtly shimmery, so it did not emphasize my skin's natural texture. They wore around nine hours on me before fading visibly.
Browse all of our Pat McGrath Divine Blush swatches.
Ingredients
TALC, MICA, OCTYLDODECYL STEAROYL STEARATE, DIMETHICONOL STEARATE, DIMETHICONE, TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE, DIISOSTEARYL MALATE, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL, PHENOXYETHANOL, MAGNESIUM MYRISTATE, TIN OXIDE, HEXYLENE GLYCOL, ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE. (+/-) TITANIUM DIOXIDE (CI 77891), IRON OXIDE (77491), RED 7 LAKE (CI 15850), YELLOW 5 LAKE (CI 19140), ULTRAMARINES (CI 77007).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
While I do love the right side shade and the combination of both shades, this one just feels more “generic” than some of the others. It falls in the category of “maybe”?
It has taken me awhile, but I have finally figured out these blushes – one side is warm toned and the other cool toned. I noticed that yesterday and now looking at this set I can see the tonal differences as well.
Hmmm. I just wonder how that would work on a variety of skintones – I guess the difference between the two shades is fairly minimal. The shades all look quite vivid, I think you would have to use a very light hand.
Am I crazy in thinking there used to be a section that showed what other makeup you’re wearing in review photos? And/or am I blind in that I can’t find it anymore? So often (like this one) I find myself thinking, “oooh, what lipstick is that?” 😂
You aren’t wrong! I haven’t had time to add the look to the database yet!
Ah, no worries!! At least I’m not losing my marbles just yet! 😉
Okay, I updated my looks! 🙂 https://www.temptalia.com/members/temptalia/looks/
I was torn between this one and the Night Bloom which I ended up purchasing. I struggle when I can’t swatch in store to the point that I would usually purchase both but the price of these in CAD! I have other things on my shopping list (gas, food, lottery tickets…)
Thanks for the review — I noticed all the new duo blushes are in the B and B+ range while the original Divine blushes are scored A’s. If someone were starting their blush collection off with none of these, would you recommend building from the original set opposed to the duos? Trying to decide between Cherish / Divine Rose vs Divine Rose II. Also between Aphrodite Amour vs. Nymphette. Or Paradise Glow vs Desert Orchid/Paradise Venus. I see the color differences but wondering about the quality, texture, etc. Advice?
These seem more pigmented (overall), which is definitely leading to a slightly lower rating than typical, I’d say, and a little more powdery perhaps. If neither of those are deal-breakers, I still like the duos!
I don’t think Divine Rose II is that interesting since the two shades don’t contrast much, so I feel like you’d just end up using both together more often. Nymphette has more shimmer and is warmer overall, so I’d say that makes more sense mostly if you prefer slightly more glow to the end result (it’s not high shimmer). I think Paradise Glow is a good pick over getting the two Desert Orchid/Paradise Venus shades.
Thx so much Christine! Appreciate the time it takes your to make these reviews and respond.
The description for the second says “vivid poop” instead of Pop and made me laugh harder than i probably should have.
The description for the second says “vivid poop” instead of Pop and made me laugh harder than i probably should have lol