MAC Antique Diamond Pro Longwear Paint Pot Review, Photos, Swatches

MAC Antique Diamond Pro Longwear Paint Pot
MAC Antique Diamond Pro Longwear Paint Pot

MAC Antique Diamond Pro Longwear Paint Pot ($18.50 for 0.17 oz.) is described as a “frosted olive silver.” It’s an olive green-tinged brown with a general mutedness and a sprinkling of silver sparkle. MAC Enviable is darker and a powder product. Dior Khaki Design #3 is greener, less metallic, and a powder product. MAC Cakeshop is greener. Benefit Skinny Jeans is similar–it has a more satiny finish than a metallic one (and for the record, Birthday Suit is less green-tinged).

I decided to review each of the shades separately, because the quality varies from shade to shade, and since these are permanent, then it is definitely worth doing to make them easily searched for and read about in the future. I think one of the more frustrating characteristics about any product formula is when it is inconsistent, because then you can’t count on one shade being as good as the first one you tried (or that they’re all as bad as the first you tried).

The Pro Longwear Paint Pot formula is supposed to be “long-wearing,” “highly-pigmented,” and also “[blend] smoothly over the lids.” Where Antique Diamond excels is in overall wear; once it sets, however it does, it stays put and doesn’t fade or have any fall out problems for the next twelve hours. Where it falls short is in its opacity and buildability in color, because when I tried to apply it to the inner half of my lid, it was uneven and a bit patchy. I tried using MAC’s own 242 and 249 for application, as well as using a fluffy brush (217) and my fingertip to try to blend out the color so it would at least be even, if it wasn’t opaque. It has a thin, lightweight consistency that feels creamy and smooth, but it didn’t quite apply that way.

Antique Diamond is the kind of color that works well as a one-and-done color that’s more than just beige.  It can also be used to smoke out the lash line or as a base for a smoky eye.  However, the way this applies, dries down, and generally sits on the lid, it’s not fantastic.  I’d heartily recommend Benefit Skinny Jeans, which has a superior formula and is very comparable in color to this one.

FYI: the ingredient list for the Pro Longwear Paint Pots is the same as for the regular Paint Pots when I compared against the list for Bare Study/Constructivist! It’s off by one ingredient when compared to the Paint Pots from Posh Paradise.

We hope you'll consider supporting Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thanks!

MAC Antique Diamond Pro Longwear Paint Pot
MAC Antique Diamond Pro Longwear Paint Pot

MAC Antique Diamond Pro Longwear Paint Pot
MAC Antique Diamond Pro Longwear Paint Pot

MAC Antique Diamond Pro Longwear Paint Pot
MAC Antique Diamond Pro Longwear Paint Pot

MAC Antique Diamond Pro Longwear Paint Pot
MAC Antique Diamond Pro Longwear Paint Pot

MAC Antique Diamond Pro Longwear Paint Pot
MAC Antique Diamond Pro Longwear Paint Pot

MAC Antique Diamond Pro Longwear Paint Pot
MAC Antique Diamond Pro Longwear Paint Pot

MAC Antique Diamond Pro Longwear Paint Pot
MAC Antique Diamond / Blackground Pro Longwear Paint Pot

We hope you'll consider supporting Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thanks!
We hope you'll consider supporting Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thanks!

21 Comments

Comments that do not adhere to our comment policy may be removed. Discussion and debate are highly encouraged but we expect community members to participate respectfully. Please keep discussion on-topic, and if you have general feedback, a product review request, an off-topic question, or need technical support, please contact us!

Please help us streamline the comments' section and be more efficient: double-check the post above for more basic information like pricing, availability, and so on to make sure your question wasn't answered already. Comments alerting us to typos or small errors in the post are appreciated (!) but will typically be removed after errors are fixed (unless a response is needed).

We appreciate enthusiasm for new releases but ask readers to please hold questions regarding if/when a review will be posted as we can't commit to or guarantee product reviews. We don't want to set expectations and then disappoint readers as even products that are swatched don't always end up being reviewed due to time constraints and changes in priorities! Thank you for understanding!

Comments on this post are closed.
We hope you'll consider supporting Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thanks!

It’s really bad with the limited editions, and even the shimmery champagne one that is permanent (I forget the name- bare something). But lately painterly even does it and nothing changed with anything else around the eye. I was toying with giving my sister them and switch to nars primer and Giorgio Armani ETK or Chanel’s cream shadows since neither of those cause any issues with my eyelids.

Sometimes my eyes get irritated with painterly, and I do not have sensitive skin in the least bit! I think its from my eyes just being irritated when I do a lot of complicated eye looks in a row with lots of blending, combined with (roughly) using makeup remover and washing with soap. I’m heavy handed, so everything I do is a little more rough than it should be…lol.

It look so pretty in the pot, but I don’t like how this applies. I have a lot of paint pot from mac, from posh paradise collection and some permanent paint pots, but I think when they are matte they apply a lot better, like imaginary and hyperviolet, treasure hunt is not a matte, but I love the color payoff. Thank you for your review Christine.

Yeah, some of the shimmery/glittery ones don’t apply as smoothly as others. It’s odd, but I feel like the original launch of PPs were great and a lot of the LE versions since then are less so.

The eye look isn’t really selling the product for me. I feel that I can create this look just as well with my ELF stuff, and for a fraction of the cost.

Essence has/had a cream eyeshadow that is similar named ‘Camp Rock’ and I love it. Anyway perhaps Chanel’s Epatant is a better version?

The first thing I thought when I read about these was I wonder have they printed a new title on an old product, now I see the ingredients are exactly the same?! Is it possible for there to be any difference between both products if there’s no difference in the ingredients? If not then Mac are laughing (at their customers) all the way to the bank harder than ever before.

I really didn’t feel any difference between these and their previously-released versions, and then the ingredient lists being the same as regular PPs was also surprising. I think it would be great for them to just be transparent and say, “Hey! We re-tested our Paint Pot formula, and they are now tested and verified to wear for X hours!”

It would! But I don’t see that happening any time soon :/ I’ve lost almost all faith in Mac. (I wouldn’t be without a lot of their brushes) Their still doing so well but its based on a reputation that’s slipping so fast. I don’t get why their making that happen!
Btw really love the blog Christine,I used to buy so much make-up and was rarely happy but I’ve loved every purchase I’ve made based on your reviews so thanks!

It looks like you are not making any effort to these pp look well applied. I’d never get out of the house (or even stay) with an eyeshadow looking like these. And it’s not the product, it’s the no blending thing… Aren’t you being a little biased against MAC lately, Christine?

Hi Sylvie,

These aren’t looks – I’m applying two colors so I can show what the color looks applied on the skin and testing for wear! HTH!

We try to approve comments within 24 hours (and reply to them within 72 hours) but can sometimes get behind and appreciate your patience! 🙂 If you have general feedback, product review requests, off-topic questions, or need technical support, please contact us directly. Thank you for your patience!