Lancome Glowing Lights Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter Review, Photos, Swatches

Lancome Glowing Lights Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter
Lancome Glowing Lights Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter

Lancome Glowing Lights Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter ($30.00 for 0.14 oz.) is a medium, rosy copper with warm undertones and a frosted sheen. Colour Pop Wisp (P, $8.00) is brighter, warmer (90% similar). Burberry No. 04 Rose Gold (P, $68.00) is cooler (95% similar). Jouer Topaz (P, $24.00) is more shimmery (90% similar). Cover FX Sunlight (P, $42.00) is more shimmery, cooler (90% similar). Milani Sunset Glow (P, $10.00) is darker (90% similar). Becca Rose Gold (P, $19.00) is more shimmery, warmer (90% similar). Fenty Beauty Champagne Heist (P, $25.00) is more shimmery, darker, cooler (90% similar). Colour Pop Whipped (LE, $8.00) is more shimmery, cooler (90% similar). Laura Geller Ballerina (P, $26.00) is darker (90% similar). Huda Beauty Malibu (LE, ) is more shimmery, lighter (90% similar). Colour Pop Dew Drop (P, $7.00) is darker, brighter, warmer (90% similar). YSL Bronze Gold (P, $42.00) is brighter (90% similar). Urban Decay O.N.S. (LE, $26.00) is more shimmery, darker (90% similar). Marc Jacobs Beauty Tantalize (54) (P, $45.00) is lighter, brighter (90% similar). Colour Pop Padded Down (LE, $8.00) is more shimmery (90% similar). Colour Pop Butterfly Beach (P, $8.00) is warmer (90% similar). Pat McGrath Bronze (Highlighter) (PiP, ) is less shimmery, less pigmented (90% similar). NARS Galet (LE, ) is more shimmery, darker (90% similar). Smashbox Blow a Fuse Pearl (PiP, ) is lighter (90% similar). Bobbi Brown Afternoon Glow (P, $48.00) is darker, cooler (90% similar). Top 20 dupes listed, see the rest. See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

The Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter is a “buildable cream highlighter” that gives a “soft-focused glow.” It’s available in five shades, and I purchased two to review (the other will be reviewed shortly!). The texture is dense, lightly spongy, and very emollient to the touch–it feels quite wet initially–but it goes on smoothly and dries down to a powder-like finish, so it doesn’t look wet or glossy (nor does it slide right off the face, either!). If you thought, “Hey, that looks like ColourPop!” — you’re right on the money; the texture is very much in that vein, and to my knowledge, I’ve really only seen ColourPop use that cream formula in a cheek product (but they were not the first to use it in eyeshadows–Chanel, BUXOM, Dior, and MAC have also used it). I find Lancome’s formula to be more slippery to the touch, but they perform largely the same otherwise. Glowing Lights had semi-sheer, buildable coverage that applied evenly, blended out easily, and lasted for over nine hours.

Also, a note: the interior plastic pan that product actually sits in was offset in both of mine, so that it could pop out, which I do not think was intentional, and I was able to pop it fully in and haven’t had them lift out on their own since.

We hope you'll consider supporting Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thanks!

See more photos & swatches!

Lancome Glowing Lights Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter
Lancome Glowing Lights Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter

Lancome Glowing Lights Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter
Lancome Glowing Lights Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter

Lancome Glowing Lights Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter
Lancome Glowing Lights Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter

Lancome Glowing Lights Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter
Lancome Glowing Lights Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter

Lancome Rose Gold Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter
Example of faulty packaging (Lancome Rose Gold Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter pictured, happened to both of mine)

Lancome Glowing Lights Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter
Lancome Glowing Lights Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter

Lancome Glowing Lights Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter
Lancome Glowing Lights Glow Subtil Silky Creme Highlighter

We hope you'll consider supporting Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thanks!

Where to Buy

Current Sales & Deals

  • Neiman Marcus
    • Receive up to a $500 gift card with your select regular-price purchase with code JULYGC, ends 7/13.
    • Receive up to a $500 gift card with your select regular-price purchase with code JULYGC, ends 7/13.
    • Receive a gift with purchase cosmetic travel bag with 15 samples inside when you spend $225+ in Beauty and Fragrances, ends 7/22.
    • Receive a gift with purchase Le Metier Moisture Matte Lipstick Trio or Ultra Replenishing Solution with your $350 regular-price purchase in select categories with code FALLNM, ends 8/17.
    • Earn up to a $300 gift card, including beauty & fragrance purchases, ends 8/23.
When you purchase through our links above, you help support Temptalia. Thank You!

Makeup Look

On face:
  • Tarte Rainforest of the Sea Foundation
  • Guerlain Les Voilettes Loose Setting Powder
On eyes:
  • Becca Champagne Collection Eyeshadow Palette
On lips:
  • MAC Ravishing Lipstick

About the Reviewer

Reviewer

Christine has normal-to-dry skin with areas of dryness (cheeks, nose, and under the eyes). She has a light-medium skintone with subtle, warmer yellow undertones. Her best foundation matches include: Tarte Rainforest of the Sea in Light-Medium Neutral (best match), Estee Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Makeup in Desert Beige 2N1, Giorgio Armani Maestro Glow in 4.0, Hourglass Warm Ivory Vanish Seamless Finish, Laura Mercier Candleglow Soft Luminous in Dusk, MAC NC20/NC25, Make Up For Ever Ultra HD Liquid in Y305 (140). For more matches, please read our full Foundation FAQ. For more information on our review process, please read our Review FAQ.

Compare Any Two Swatches

Curious how two shades compare to each other? Type in the shades below to get instant side-by-side swatches!

44 Comments

Comments that do not adhere to our comment policy may be removed. Discussion and debate are highly encouraged but we expect community members to participate respectfully. Please keep discussion on-topic, and if you have general feedback, a product review request, an off-topic question, or need technical support, please contact us!

Please help us streamline the comments' section and be more efficient: double-check the post above for more basic information like pricing, availability, and so on to make sure your question wasn't answered already. Comments alerting us to typos or small errors in the post are appreciated (!) but will typically be removed after errors are fixed (unless a response is needed).

We appreciate enthusiasm for new releases but ask readers to please hold questions regarding if/when a review will be posted as we can't commit to or guarantee product reviews. We don't want to set expectations and then disappoint readers as even products that are swatched don't always end up being reviewed due to time constraints and changes in priorities! Thank you for understanding!

Comments on this post are closed.

Not enough mega watts in this puppy for me. Hey shy girl Andrea: here’s a pick for you girlfriend 😛

P.S. I’ll take the Colorpop price thankyouverymuch

I just have to say this, I don’t understand why a global company like Lancôme (or L’Oreal, excuse me) would waste their time, energy and money selling a product that is a direct copycat of a smaller company like Colourpop? Don’t get me wrong, I love Colourpop, they do a VERY good job of keeping up with makeup trends and producing colorful products that speak to an enormous demographic, and they are very affordable. But Lancome is luxury cosmetics, and shouldn’t debase itself to this type of competition, even if they are just trying to reach a younger market or offer to an older market a similar product. I just see it as a little embarrassing, when I think of L’Oreal/Lancôme’s high quality and innovation, that here we have product that is square in line with the performance, packaging, and even color presentation of Colourpop. And, when you said the plastic pan wasn’t even placed correctly and you could just pop it out, that just killed all hopes of even thinking of testing it out in store. And no, QC isn’t perfect even with high end products. But it’s off putting to see a luxury brand knock off a cheap one, and I fail to reason why I would ever buy an identical product when I could get it for about a 1/4 of the price. When I look for dupes, I’m usually looking for a more affordable version of something nearly identical in color and/or performance to a high dollar product, not the other way around. Thank you Christine, your blog is so helpful in saving the people money! At least those juicy shakers were somewhat unique…

It is unusual to see it this direction – normally you’d have a Lancome-esque price point brand first, then L’Oreal or other mass/budget doing it.

I think what confused me so much was why they used extremely similar packaging to CP. I saw it in Sephora and it looked fairly identical, or at the very least the packaging was manufactured by the same factory with slight modifications in the size of the clear portion, colors, etc. I can understand a brand wanting to hop onto a popular new formula type, but I don’t understand why they’d let the packaging be so similar. If your $30 product is packaged the same as an $8 product with the same formula and performance, it’s going to reflect poorly on your product and bring it’s perceived value WAY down (at least in my eyes), especially since the $8 product was already very well established before this one came out.

The wonderful world of patent infringement and corporate espionage! LOL For those of you who don’t know what this is about, Spatz used to be a supplier to L’Oréal. They canceled their contract and then promptly came out with the Kylie Jenner lip kits. L’Oréal contends that Spatz stole their matte formula and used it to create the kits. We shall see . . .

Seed Beauty/ColourPop’s parent company started out as a manufacturer of luxury cosmetics. They don’t talk about which brands they’ve produced product for, but there’s a good chance that Lancome went with Seed for this one. I find it very strange that not much effort was made to conceal this (the packaging, the overall look of the product), but it’s possible they decided that CP and Lancome don’t have enough of an overlapping buyer base to spot the similarities. Women who’ve been buying Lancome in-store for years probably haven’t heard of ColourPop.

I only bothered to take a picture of one to show that the pan had lifted/separated from the base, and the one in the photo is Rose Gold (I only bought two).

OMG, the marble design looks EXACTLY like Colour Pop Churros highlighter!! I just got an email this morning from CP advertising free lip glosses with purchase, and the launch of Churros. Very interesting…….the Lancome one looks really nice, it will be a very flattering color for many people, and the shimmer isn’t OTT. I have a feeling the CP one is going to be more shimmery

Literally my first thought was “hey, Christine snagged one of ColourPop’s Churros!” Lovely highlight though.

Didn’t even bother – no point in working so hard to buy something that can’t be reviewed since it’s gone! There has to at least be a possibility of reviewing it, otherwise I won’t use it since I am focused on testing as much as possible.

Well, while this *looks* lovely, it is a blatant ripoff of the Colourpop formula and design at a MUCH elevated price point. No bueno. ?

Yeah.. This looks a lot like CP. However, Glowing Lights is a beautiful shade as well so thank you for the review!

Actually, I’m not suprised by how similar they are. Lancome is definitely not the first brand out there that was ‘inspired’ by colourpop or has at least similar products. And maybe it’s just me, but I feel like it’s getting a lot harder for such brands to come out with unique products, especially hightlighters. There are only so much shades that we can actually wear on our cheeks (on a every day basis). In my opinion Jeffree Star has changed a lot since he came out with his Skin Frost highlighters; there was a green one that really suprised everyone and one that was really suitable for very pale skin tones. But other than that, I think the only way for companies to distinguish their products from others, is to play around with the formula instead of packaging or colors. And it would’ve been nice if Lancome was more creative; after all it is a high-end brand which we pay a high-end price for. Had they put more thought into it by doing superspecial packaging (which seems to be a trend now) or if they came out with unusual colors that are wearable, I think more people would consider buying theirs instead of the CP for 8 dollars.

I think perhaps the odd part is that even the packaging is very similar, which seems like a miss for Lancome as a higher-end brand (not that it always justifies it, but packaging for higher-end can often be a chunk of the additional cost to make it, though margins are still healthy).

Love it but It looks literally EXACTLY the same as the marbled CP highlighter they just released this week! Crazy! Btw i Looooove your makeup in this picture! That eyeshadow!!! So pretty!!! Ugh! Is that from the Becca palette that they recalled?

ColourPop – it wears the same on me and is a lot cheaper, and I’ve never had packaging issues (for $30, that’s unacceptable, IMO).

Very pretty and it is good to see Lancome producing a great product after so many years in the wilderness. However, like Wwendy said – the Colourpop price is better….

It can’t be beat! The only upside is Lancome is available in-store, so for those who are wary of online only brands, I guess there’s that!

I played with these at sephora and honestly i think if you were blindfolded you wouldn’t be able to tell the difference between these and CP. I wish i would of took a pic of the box to get the ingredients because i can’t find them anywhere. I’m just curious if the ingredients are similar to CP. Do you still have the packaging?

I don’t! I tried to take a photo, but the silver box/black text didn’t come through as readable (no matter how much I tried to edit). The ingredient lists were different from what I could tell, but I’m sure the main ingredients are still similar.

Interesting to see a HE brand “getting inspiration” from a low end product…usually it’s the other way around! I wonder how similar the ingredients are.

HOW does the product know when it is being applied and therefore when to dry down? Would it go powdery in the pan if the ambient temperature were warm enough? A mystery.

I am so sad because I really want to get my hands on this product. I have the CP one and I like it but I can’t say I love it so I am interested to see what this Lancome one is like as Christine is giving it such a high rating. Unfortunately, this product is not available in Canada and it is not even available on Nordstrom website!

I swatched this in Sephora the other day and really liked it. I agree it feels more slick than Colourpop’s formula. I just saw online that Sephora has a great set right now with a FULL size of this product, plus minis of other highlighters from Hourglass, Benefit, Becca, etc… for only $30! That’s the price of the Lancome glowing lights alone! Did I mention it’s full size?! Needless to say I snagged that set! ^_^ I forgot to use my Sephora Play pass for 50 bonus points though. I am always forgetting about that when I order online! Sigh.. Oh well

We try to approve comments within 24 hours (and reply to them within 72 hours) but can sometimes get behind and appreciate your patience! 🙂 If you have general feedback, product review requests, off-topic questions, or need technical support, please contact us directly. Thank you for your patience!