Guerlain Extrait de Rose (262) Shine Automatique Lipstick Review, Photos, Swatches
Guerlain Extrait de Rose (262) Shine Automatique Lipstick
Guerlain Extrait de Rose (262) Shine Automatique Lipstick
Guerlain Extrait de Rose (262) Shine Automatique Lipstick ($35.00 for 0.12 oz.) is described as a “fuchsia pink.” It’s a brightened medium pink with silver and fuchsia sparkle. Revlon Lollipop is much more fuchsia and brighter. MAC Pink Burst is similar but a bit brighter. Chanel Belgravia is lighter. It’s almost a neutral pink; it’s very subtly cool-toned, but the brightness counteracts that so it should be wearable across many skin tones.
The formula is supposed to be moisturizing, long-wearing, and full of shine. It’s supposed to be the “sheer and sparkling side” of the Rouge Automatique range, which has a more subdued finish and more opaque color. It is very reminiscent of Guerlain’s Rouge G de Brilliant formula, actually–but with more color payoff.
The sparkling shimmer in Extrait de Rose is fantastic; it looks wet and glistening and eye-catching on the lips. It really is stunning, and it’s something that’s worth seeing in person for that effect alone. It’s reminiscent of Chanel’s Glossimers in that half of what is so appealing is hard to capture in a photo! I can feel all of the sparkle and shimmer from the very beginning of application until the very end. It’s not coarse and gritty, but I do feel it–it feels flat and micro in size but noticeable every time I lightly pressed my lips together. There is a little bit of traveling after three hours of wear.
It’s not long-wearing–this has a very creamy, slippery consistency that allows for easy application and excellent glide, but it is definitely prone to disappearing. On me (and keep in mind, non-long-wearing lipsticks wear four hours on me), it wears for three and a half hours. I’ve also tested some of the lighter shades, and those disappear as quick as two and half hours. Guerlain doesn’t indicate a specific hour of wear claim, but they do say this is long-lasting; by signaling it’s a product meant to be longer-wearing, it should last longer than regular lipsticks. Rouge Automatiques last four to eight hours, depending on the shade.
Shine Automatique has a fair amount of slip–reminiscent of a lip balm. Thankfully, it actually is moisturizing while you wear it; my lips always felt good after wearing these, and I wore several shades back-to-back. Lately, I’ve come across too many of these high-shine formulas that claim to hydrate but end up leaving my lips dehydrated, so I’m very glad to see that there’s no lack of moisturizing elements in this formula. The lipstick feels lightweight and comfortable to wear, and it’s the kind of product that is easily worn alone–it already has the high-shine of a gloss. These have the same scent as Rouge Automatiques and come in the same type of packaging.
Ingredients
Polyglyceryl-2, Triisostearate, Diisostearyl Malate, Hydrogenated Polyisobutene, Polydecene, Synthetic Wax, Methyl Hydrogenated Rosinate, Phenylpropyldimethylsiloxysilicate, Polybutene, Trimethyl Pentaphenyl Trisiloxane, Ozokerite, C10-30 Cholesterol/Lanosterol Esters, Trimethylolpropane Triisostearate, Silica, Calcium Aluminum Borosilicate, Cera Alba (Beeswax), Synthetic Fluorphlogopite, Polyethylene, Parfum (Fragrance), BHT, Tin Oxide, Propyl Gallate, [+/- Mica, CI 77891 (Titanium Dioxide), CI 77491, CI 77492, CI 77499, (Iron Oxides), CI 15850 (Red 6, Red 6 Lake, Red 7, Red 7 Lake), CI 15985(Yellow 6 Lake),CI 19140 (Yellow 5 Lake) CI 42090 (Blue 1 Lake), CI 45380 (Red 21 Lake), CI 45410 (Red 28 Lake), CI 73360 (Red 30 Lake), CI 77163 (Bismuth Oxychloride), CI 77742 (Manganese Violet)].
Extrait de Rose
DCDiscontinued. $35.00.
Guerlain Extrait de Rose (262) Shine Automatique Lipstick
Guerlain Extrait de Rose (262) Shine Automatique Lipstick
Guerlain Extrait de Rose (262) Shine Automatique Lipstick (Diffused Flash)
Guerlain Extrait de Rose (262) Shine Automatique Lipstick (Studio Lighting)
Guerlain Extrait de Rose (262) Shine Automatique Lipstick
I don’t like that it looks somewhat frosty in finish, although it might be because cameras can’t capture the actual shimmer. Being a fan of more pigmented satin or cream finish lip products, I’ll have to pass on these, which is a good thing, wallet-wise. You save me so much money, Christine! 🙂
Wow this is so pretty on you! Plus do more shades of this if possible! 😉
Christine, would you say the formula is comparable to KissKiss Maxi Shine line Guerlain used to have a couple of years ago?
@Galuchka It has been such a long time since I’ve used that product (and I can’t rightfully remember if I ever did!) that I couldn’t tell you. It is very like the Rouge G de Brilliants, though – if you have tried those!
I suspected these wouldn’t be long-lasting but they do look so beautiful that I can forgive them. Definitely interested!
@Kate MacDonald Same — there is just too much slip for it to be THAT long-wearing. Though I figured if anyone could do it, Guerlain would be the one.
Pretty color, but I don’t like the way the shimmer looks on the lips. Almost gritty :S
ack! thanks for the review!!! I am totally buying this colour <3 looooove it <3
This is actually really pretty on the lips, although it looks a bit scary in the tube. Unfortunately, bright pinks aren’t too flattering on me.
I never really thought about it, but now I know. I hate glitter in lipsticks.
It’s so bright wow. I just bought NARS Mexican Rose so I don’t know what I’d do with another bright shade lip product (and I’m trying to decide if I should get NARS Niagara too) this is so hard, lol.
Its pretty! But I think its too sheer. 🙁
Oh this is calling my name! Love the color and the shimmer!
i like it hehe even tho i’m not crazy about shimmer
FYI: there is currently a Sephora coupon code ‘LIPSHINE’ for a free deluxe sample of this exact product! Good through May 22.
♥
Love this color, can’t see spending 35 on one lipstick tho
This color is beautiful!
So pretty!
Christine, do you think the 260 is similar to the Rouge g gabrielle 60 which Guerlain released before? I am thinking whether I should get both or either one …
@glam_umi I haven’t worn that one yet, so I’m not sure!