Archived Post

Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad Review, Photos, Swatches

Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad
Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad

Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad ($58.00 for 0.14 oz.) consists of a medium yellowed green, burgundy, mauve-y pink, and shimmery beige. I thought it was an interesting color combination to try, but I was very disappointed in the quality of the eyeshadows in practice. Givenchy describes the formula as having an “intuitive application [that] offers immediate and even coverage for pure, intense color payoff … comfortable to wear and luminous, it stays true all day long.” They swatched with promise, but they just didn’t adhere well, blend easily, or wear for long. The initial application made it look like I had been wearing the eyeshadows for sixteen hours in humid weather–faded, muddied, and uneven, when it was more like five minutes. You know it’s bad when you apply the product, see the end result, apply more, still get the same result, and have ended up packing so much product on that you have more eyeshadow underneath your eye than above it, then say, “screw it!” and remove and try again another day, only to endure the same frustrating, dismal results as before a week later.

Tentation #1 is a medium, yellowed olive green with a smattering of light gold sparkle over a satin finish. It seemed like it had good color payoff, but it sheers out really easily in practice and doesn’t stick to the skin well. I felt like I applied the color, blended carefully, and then it seemed to disappear, like some kind of horrible magic trick. It was noticeably faded and creased after four hours of wear. ColourPop Rebel (P, $5.00) is darker, less shimmery, cream. Hourglass Color Field #4 (P) is cooler-toned, more shimmery. ColourPop Hammered (P, $5.00) is darker. Makeup Geek Poison Ivy (P, $5.99) is less shimmery. Cle de Peau Stardust #2 (P) is more shimmery. MAC Psyche (LE, $15.00) is warmer. theBalm Kawabunga (LE, $16.00) is more shimmery. MAC Marsh (LE, $15.00) is less shimmery. Givenchy Kaki Brocart (6) (P, $23.00) is darker, less shimmery, cream. MAC A Harvest of Greens #3 (P, $21.00) is more shimmery, warmer. Clinique Whopping Willow (P, $17.00) is a cream. MAC Sumptuous Olive (P, $15.00) is more shimmery. Make Up For Ever #148 (DC, $20.00) is darker, less sparkly. See comparison swatches / view dupes.

Tentation #2 is a muted, dark burgundy-brown with a pearly sheen. It had good pigmentation but had a dry, hard-to-blend texture that faded quickly. The color applied and remained uneven on the skin, as it just wouldn’t blend. It showed signs of creasing after six hours of wear. Sephora + Pantone Universe Red Mahogany (LE) is similar. Guerlain Cygne Noir #2 (LE) is cooler-toned. Hello Kitty Celebrate (LE) is lighter. MAC Pink Sensibilities #4 (LE, $21.00) is lighter, warmer. Too Faced Black Forest Truffle (P, $16.00) is less shimmery. Makeup Geek Burlesque (P, $5.99) is lighter. Chanel Seduction #4 (LE) is browner. Urban Decay Roach (P, $18.00) is similar. See comparison swatches / view dupes.

Tentation #3 is a light-medium, pink-mauve with subtle warm undertones and a pearly sheen. It was sheer, firm, and difficult to get color to translate onto the skin, as it went on unevenly and tended to blend away to nothingness. On me, it seemed like it had vanished within four hours of wear. Marc Jacobs Beauty The Enigma #4 (P) is cooler-toned, more shimmery. Chanel Tisse Paris #1 (P) is lighter. Make Up For Ever S812 Tea Pink (P, $21.00) is less shimmery. Chanel Tisse Cambon #3 (P) is brighter. MAC Lingering Dusk (LE, $15.00) is warmer, darker. Chanel Jardin Zen #3 (LE) is lighter. MAC Pink Frontier (P, $21.00) is lighter. See comparison swatches / view dupes.

Tentation #4 is a light, sparkly beige with warm, golden undertones. It had semi-sheer coverage with a firmer texture that didn’t play well with the skin. It sheered out as soon as you went to blend it, and the sparkles got everywhere. It looked like it had totally faded within four hours of wear. MAC Bao Bao’s Jewels #1 (LE) is warmer, darker. Giorgio Armani Gold Ashes (12) (P, $38.00) is a liquid product, less sparkly. Dior Golden Reflections #3 (LE) is similar. Make Up For Ever D716 Crystalline Papaya (P, $21.00) is less sparkly. Too Faced Jingle All the Way Eyeshadow #2 (LE, $16.00) is similar. Clarins Forest #2 (LE) is similar. Bobbi Brown Bone (LE, $28.00) is more sparkly. See comparison swatches / view dupes.

Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad
Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad

Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad
Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad

Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad
Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad

Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad
Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad

Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad
Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad

Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad
Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad

Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad
Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad

Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad
Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad

Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad
Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad

Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad
Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad

Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad
Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad

Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad
Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad

Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad
Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad

Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad
Givenchy Tentation (7) Prisme Quatuor Eyeshadow Quad

96 Comments

Comments that do not adhere to our comment policy may be removed. Discussion and debate are highly encouraged but we expect community members to participate respectfully. Please keep discussion on-topic, and if you have general feedback, a product review request, an off-topic question, or need technical support, please contact us!

Please help us streamline the comments' section and be more efficient: double-check the post above for more basic information like pricing, availability, and so on to make sure your question wasn't answered already. Comments alerting us to typos or small errors in the post are appreciated (!) but will typically be removed after errors are fixed (unless a response is needed).

We appreciate enthusiasm for new releases but ask readers to please hold questions regarding if/when a review will be posted as we can't commit to or guarantee product reviews. We don't want to set expectations and then disappoint readers as even products that are swatched don't always end up being reviewed due to time constraints and changes in priorities! Thank you for understanding!

Comments on this post are closed.
Jessica Avatar

I can totally see how it looks like it disappeared on your lid! I’d noticed this palette earlier and been intrigued by the color combination which is really quite pretty…. but you can’t even see how pretty the combo is once its applied to the lid so it doesn’t matter. Oh well!

Sabrina Avatar

Oh man, those eye shots tho…. Come on Givenchy, wtf is this!! Now I’m afraid that the other quads are gonna suck. Are they even worth my time, ugh.

patsyann Avatar

Why or why do these high end companies put these things out without better product testing? I don’t know what we would do without your reviews, Christine. I guess we would be making a lot of costly mistakes. Thank you!

Rachel R. Avatar

I love the color combos. I saw the top photo and was, “Oooooh!” Then I scrolled down, and went, “Oh.” How can Givenchy sell this kind of crap for $58?

meganlisa Avatar

Why didn’t you add a look? Oh, wait, you did! That’s what you mean about the eye shadow fading away as you put it on. I guess if someone wants a no makeup look for $58 dollars.
I was eyeing these but such a pass. Thanks for bearing the pain and saving the rest of us.

buggsiebee Avatar

Quite frankly, an F is not low enough for this palette. I find it insulting that Givenchy cares so little about its makeup consumers that it would even put this palette out there. They should recall it & refund the customers who they ripped off with this really bottom of the barrel product.

Katherine T. Avatar

OMG, this is so sad 🙁 It’s SO pretty in the pan and swatched, but such a disaster on the eyes. I can’t even tell there’s any purple or green on your lids. I don’t understand how this can even make it out of the QC department, unless there is no QC. For $ 58, I could get almost 12 Colour Pop shadows that outperform this. I thought the Hourglass Modernist shadows were bad, but this is even worse

Kate Avatar

YIKES. This was the colour combination that interested me the most. As others have suggested, I think I’ll just use the colour mix as inspiration and find shades that work in my extensive stash.

I’m sure that you’ve said this before, but I wanted to be certain- Both your swatches and your application are done over bare skin, no primer, correct?

Christine Avatar

Correct, over bare skin! The skin on my forearm (where I swatch) tends to be a bit drier. I am really careful to dry down my arm after I remove the previous swatches (because any dampness or residue from the remover can falsely amplify a powder product OR worsen a cream/liquid product).

MichelleChefNYC Avatar

OUCH! That F though… these look so beautiful in the pan and swatch nicely, such a bummer they don’t apply well on the eye. For a product at the price point, you really expect perfection!

BOTTÂNICA BOTTANIQUE Avatar

First, thank you for your creditable work!
With all due respect and without wishing to cause offence, that is something I regard as unacceptable!!!
Even more important than the relationship between high price and great quality of a product is honoring the brand’s name and the confidence that consumer placed in it. The high-end brands like GIVENCHY, Gucci, Burberry and others should remember this essential point.

Denise Avatar

I saw the photo of this and thought ” Cant wait to see the review” as it looks really nice as a palette. When I got to your rating, I actually gasped out loud! There was almost some wailing and gnashing of teeth. Almost.
I couldn’t believe it! I love Givenchy lipsticks and would have been excited to try their eyeshadows but not after reading this! What a crying shame! My bottom lip will be sticking out so far with disappointment that I’ll have to cart it round in a wheelbarrow…

Christine Avatar

I feel like their eyeshadow products haven’t been great, but I was hoping the reformulation was going to be an improvement – definitely not here. I think there’s just something about how they’re pressed – too firm even though they feel soft.

Karol Avatar

I had the same, sad experience with Frisson. I had it packed up and ready to ship back in minutes. It is definitely the first product I’ve returned in a long time – possibly ever. I’m in awe they they replaced a perfectly lovely product with something that is, let’s face it, unusable. I hope it doesn’t become a pattern! I really love a lot of the other make up they produce.

Chloe Avatar

How horrible is it of me that I see an F and think “this I’ve got to see!” :P.

This is a great reminder to not implicitly trust arm swatches. It’s called EYEshadow, not ARMshadow! Maybe they should remarket it as such! Ohohoho I’m hilarious.

Nicole Avatar

Oh wow! why even bother. I guess some people buy it because it has Givenchy wrote on it. That stinks. I am kinda feeling like the others are not going to do too well now. Thanks for the review and sorry you wasted your time and your eyelids for the day. 🙁

Leslie Avatar

Wow. It is really disappointing to see such horrible products from high-end brands. The colors look so pretty in the compact. Never thought I would see a day when I could consistently choose products at the drugstore that are better in quality than the department store. I have 2 Wet n Wild shadow compacts that look so much better than that.

Jaa Avatar

But the swatches just look SO good and incredibly pigmented!!! Ugh, that’s why it’s important to include photos of you with the product on. Is it weird that I can totally sense your frustration based on your description, like I was there sitting next to you when you were applying it. Haha

Bonnie Rieger Avatar

The color combo is interesting…how disappointing.
Your last 2 pictures tell it all. If you can’t put together a decent look, it’s just not possible.

Alison Avatar

Early on when I really didn’t much understand makeup and was just trying things out, I got quite a few of the Givenchy eye prisms, and with one exception, they were all like that. Dry, flaked off, totally useless. Some friends were into these new shadows, but I was doubtful. The reality is that I cringe when I imagine applying a Givenchy shadow. Love the lip pies though.

EvilsStepQueen Avatar

*blink blink* Is there eyeshadow on in the last pic? You look like you got a tiny bruise, or discoloration. Definitely not a good look. You would think Givenchy would have much higher quality standards. Bleh.

We try to approve comments within 24 hours (and reply to them within 72 hours) but can sometimes get behind and appreciate your patience! 🙂 If you have general feedback, product review requests, off-topic questions, or need technical support, please contact us directly. Thank you for your patience!