By Mary 5 years ago.
It was a 4.5 stars product for me, until recently when it was totally altered. The only thing i found in common with the previous edition (before the 2015) is the whole blendable capability, whereas its lightweight texture is now reinforced, making it suitable for the light coverage category, not a light/midium-midium coverage product anymore. :/
To specify on the W3 colour i noticed the following alterations
-colour: it is slightly darker with microscopic gold pearls, making it ideal for medium to light-medium skin with yellow, maybe neutral undertones, not suitable anymore for light to light-medium skin as mine, where W2 was too light to be an option and now (after the product changed) obviously i would go with a colour code inbetween W2 and w3 which actually...do not exist here.
-coverage: good to produce even skin tone and a luminous effect, unsuitable for skin imperfections
-blending: here it takes 5 stars as this must have been the company's intention
-skin type: not for oily skin types or combination anymore, it lost its matte effect. note: My skin is neutral and gets slightly oily on T-zone during summer, but still the product is wearing off soon and produces an oily feeling while sweating.
Overall: medium coverage lovers lost a very very good one, light coverage category earned one.
P.S. Looking forward to see on comments, if there are any other disatisfied by the darker version of W3 and if they suggest a light-medium to light colour dupe of the previous version