MAC Rodarte Collection for Fall 2010 + Official Statements

MAC Cosmetics for Rodarte Collection for Fall 2010

U.S. Date: September 15th, 2010 @ Select Partner Locations & MAC Stores Only
International Date: TBA

Please ensure you’ve also read MAC & Rodarte’s follow-up responses further detailing their actions, including changing product names and MAC’s commitment to donate $100,000 to benefit the women of Juarez.  We have opened a second post on this topic for our readers to discuss on.


We understand that product names in the M·A·C Rodarte collection have offended our consumers and fans. This was never our intent and we are very sorry.  We continue to listen carefully to the comments we have received and have the following plans to address concerns:

  • We are committed to donating $100,000 to a non-profit organization that has a proven, successful track-record helping women in need and that can directly improve the lives of women in Juarez in a meaningful way.
  • We are changing the product names in the M·A·C Rodarte collection.

As we have done in the past, please be assured that we will communicate details regarding our progress in this matter.


We recognize that the violence against women taking place in Juarez needs to be met with proactive action. We never intended to make light of this serious issue and we are truly sorry.

Helping to improve the conditions for women in Juarez is a priority for us and we are thankful for all the comments calling attention to the urgency of addressing this situation.

Temptalia has reached out to MAC for comment on the collaboration with Rodarte, and if and when we receive more information, we will be certain to share with you. We received official statements from MAC and Rodarte @ 11AM (pst), which we share below:


We understand that product names in the M·A·C Rodarte collection have offended some of our consumers and fans.  This was never our intent and we are very sorry.  We are listening carefully to the comments posted and are grateful to those of you who have brought your concerns to the forefront of our attention.  M·A·C will give a portion of the proceeds from the M·A·C Rodarte collection to help those in need in Juarez. We are diligently investigating the best way to do this.  Please be assured that we will keep you posted on the details regarding our efforts. 


Our makeup collaboration with M·A·C developed from inspirations on a road trip that we took in Texas last year, from El Paso to Marfa.  The ethereal nature of this landscape influenced the creative development and desert palette of the collection. We are truly saddened about injustice in Juarez and it is a very important issue to us. The M·A·C collaboration was intended as a celebration of the beauty of the landscape and people in the areas that we traveled.

Please remember to respect your fellow Temptalia readers. I do not tolerate name calling or insults.  Debate and discuss with intelligence and passion but leave out jibes, digs, or other personal attacks.  Everyone is entitled to their opinion, even if you may disagree with it or find it “stupid.” We want to facilitate the discussion and keep it focused on the issues, not to foster attacks on other readers.

After moderating through many, many comments, if you insult anyone, do not expect it to go through.  If you can’t argue intelligently and must attack other people to get your point across, I will not tolerate it.  If you cuss someone out, do not expect it to be approved.  If you call someone “brainless,” “dumbass,” or “bitch,” do not expect it to be approved.  Threats to me or any one else will absolutely not be tolerated and will result in total removal from

Please be mature and respect people’s right to express and hold an opinion that is different than yours.

Lipstick ($14.00 U.S. / $16.50 CDN)

  • Ghost Town Sheer white with white, gold and green pearlized pigment (Frost) (Limited Edition)
  • Rose State Mid-tone blue pink (Lustre) (Limited Edition)
  • Sleepless Light grey taupe (Frost) (Limited Edition)

Lipglass ($18.00 U.S. / $21.50 CDN)

  • Rodarte Pale creamy pink with layers of sparkling white, mint, and pink (Limited Edition)
  • del Norte Light creamy violet with layers of sheer sparkling taupe, pink and grey (Limited Edition)

Lip Erase ($16.00 U.S. / $19.00 CDN)

  • Pale Flesh tone NC 27 Shade (Matte) (PRO)

Mineralize Eyeshadow ($19.50 U.S. / $23.50 CDN)

  • Bordertown Black with red, pale blue, and silver veining (Frost) (Limited Edition)
  • Sleepwalker Beige with copper, pale blue and pale pink veining (Frost) (Limited Edition)

Pigment ($19.50 U.S. / $23.50 CDN)

  • White Gold White pearl with gold duochrome (PRO)
  • Kitschmas Shimmering pink/mauve (Permanent)
  • Mauvement Cool taupe with gold pearl (Limited Edition) (Repromote from Rushmetal, Overrich)
  • Badlands Mid-tone shimmer beige brown (Limited Edition)

Chromographic Pencil ($14.50 U.S. / $17.50 CDN)

  • NW25/NC30 Flesh tone NW25/NC30 shade (Matte) (PRO)

Beauty Powder ($25.00 U.S. / $30.00 CDN)

  • Softly Drifting Pale neutral white-ish pink with soft gold pearl (Limited Edition)

Blush ($18.50 U.S./$22.00 CDN)

  • Quinceanera Shimmery mid-tone blue pink (Limited Edition)

Nail Lacquer ($12.00 U.S. / $14.50 CDN)

  • Juarez Bright opal pink (Frost) (Limited Edition)
  • Factory Light opal mint (Frost) (Limited Edition)

Source, Images

Please remember to respect your fellow Temptalia readers. I do not tolerate name calling or insults.  Debate and discuss with intelligence and passion but leave out jibes, digs, or other personal attacks.  Everyone is entitled to their opinion, even if you may disagree with it or find it “stupid.” We want to facilitate the discussion and keep it focused on the issues, not fostering attacks on other readers.

After moderating through many, many comments, if you insult anyone, do not expect it to go through.  If you can’t argue intelligently and must attack other people to get your point across, I will not tolerate it.  If you cuss someone out, do not expect it to be approved.  If you call someone “brainless,” “dumbass,” or “bitch,” do not expect it to be approved.  Death threats to me or any one else will absolutely not be tolerated and will result in total removal from

Please be mature and respect people’s right to express and hold an opinion that is different than yours.

We hope you'll consider supporting Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thanks!

Compare Any Two Swatches

Curious how two shades compare to each other? Type in the shades below to get instant side-by-side swatches!

We hope you'll consider supporting Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thanks!


Discussion and debate are highly encouraged, and we expect community members to participate respectfully. When asking a question, please check the post above for information regarding pricing, availability, dupes, and availability, and keep discussion on-topic.

Please do not ask if/when a review will be posted as we cannot review everything and often change priorities from day-to-day. If you have general feedback, a product review request, an off-topic question, or need technical support, please contact us. Thank you!

Comments that include advertisements, self-promotion, insults, etc. may be in violation of our comment policy and subject to deletion. Please see our comment policy for more information.

Comments on this post are closed.

You know, it’s rare that the fashion industry’s tendency towards collossal insensitivity, complete lack of cultural awareness, or general look at me I’m so edgy pretensions genuinely shock me any more. I’m just kind of used to a lot of fashion people being smug, ignorant narcissists. But Juarez-themed makeup from MAC? Are you serious?

Thanks for the link to the video. I had no idea what the controversy regarding this collection was about. I had no knowledge about what is going on in Juarez. Now I do!

I think that many of u r missing the point I think that the insame bullying that many have done against the collection actually hurts the cause and the people, for centuries arehas been used to make statements about political and cultural situations it’s obvious that’s what ther are trying to do but now that message will be lost because under informed individuals who don’t recognize that artist like Frida and her husband were revolutionaries which used art with beautiful depictions inorder to make points about the injustices their culture experienced, ibelieve it was irresponsible of people to condemn these companies because many of u have no sense of the various ways in which awareness and attention can be brought to an issue u don’t always need to bash people over the head with a message to get it across MAC and RODARTE were doing whae a fashion line and a cosmetic company should do to make a point but now that point will be lost and many of the self riotous indviduals who blocked this chance for awareness will never again think of the affected women and children again.

Sorry, I disagree with you.
I think that MAC is wrong to give the approach given to this collection. It is offensive and in very poor taste the way they work. I think there are thousands of other ways to want to get a point of view without the need to resort to the obvious and scorn, for it is as they have seen. I’m architecture student and artist I can tell you to go with the obvious to want to address a sensitive issue is a lack of respect.
Very bad for both, Rodarte and MAC. Much worse as they have handled the issue, offer money does not help.

Excuse my English, my first language is Spanish, and I’m Venezuelan.

Yes, Frida and her husband were revolutionaries which used art with beautiful, and sometimes gross depictions in order to make points about the injustices their culture experienced. Juarez is most absolutely NOT MAC’s culture, and definitely NOT a culture they have experienced. What’s more, it’s very hard to believe that Frida herself, painted all those art pieces in order to largely profit from them. It was simply distasteful on their part, and insensitive on the sisters. Shame on them for trying to pull this off. 100 grand is a grain of sand on the MAC empire, and is an insult to Juarez, and Mexicans in general. I for one feel shame for MAC.

I absolutely agree with this. 100k is nothing to them, and using a horrible situation like the one in Juarez to “inspire” a MAKEUP LINE is just insulting.

@Candice totally 100%agree with u. I am Mexican and am not offended by this at all. Instead I laugh at how ridiculous this is. I love m.a.c and will buy this and every collection after.

I’m mexican, and a long time user of MAC… I’m not one of those who say I won’t ever buy MAC again because I want to believe they are trully sorry about it (I feel bad for the heads in charge of this awful idea) I just don’t get how you, mexican as you say you are, can laugh about it….

Let me put two awful examples I don’t think you, or anyone would find amusing either, would you like to see a MATTEL toy line inspired in the 49 scorched children we lost here in Mexico a year ago?? even if the money went to their parents… I don’t think so…

I don’t think Americans would like to see a JENGA game about the twin towers even if the money was meant for charity…

We need to be respectful and understanding about our nation’s tragedies, you never know the pain the victims’ families are going through.

Horrible idea on MAC’s behalf… but then again, we are all human, at least they seem sorry about it.

i would love to see a twin towers jenga game, charity or not, but i am clearly not in tune with most americans. (thats not to say i was not affected by the tragedy, my daughters father worked in the buildings and i live in north jersey and pretty much watched them fall.)

however on a whole i think large companies in general, especially ones with as much influence as MAC, should show more compassion and social responsibility than to draw inspiration from the rapes and murders of nearly five thousand young girls and women. if they truly wanted to make a social impact they should bring their campaign directly to the street.

a line of makeup, even a hundred thousand dollars, is not going to keep those young women alive. the corruptness in mexican authority is absurd and that money will likely do little or nothing but line the pockets of corrupt officials.

I doubt that the sisters of Rodarte or MAC drew any inspiration from the rapes and murders of the city. I believe it is the landscape and ghostly feel of the city, the starkness, that inspired the pallet and collection.

I agree w/ you a 100%
OF COURSE Mac didn’t mean to use the deaths of woman as inspiratiion for makeup. In the other hand they DID were pretty stupid to refer o Juarez and even name the collection after it, in a way that it was very misenterpreted, but still they addressed the issue, gave an apology and decided to take action on it.

Still, i’m glad they made that mistake. I’m latina and had no idea what is happening in Juarez, this was a BIG eye opener for me, and it gave the issue some of the voice it was needing.

Give them a break, they are human, it was a mistake.

They are not stupid. If you google the collection you will see that the blushes are “blood streaked”. Theres a very thin line between “raising awareness” and explotation. I’m afraid MAC has crossed it. If they had gone about this line in a more respectful way, I could see why people are making this situation so light. But they’re trying to profit of others people’s misery

I do not know whether to feel happy or sad about you. It’s a good thing you do not feel offended, however maybe some people just don’t get the point of it all. The situation of Juarez is anything but glamorous as to portray it the way it has been. I am also Mexican and live close to the border, not exactly in Juarez and thank goodness I don’t have to work in one of those factories, but we get some of that violence everyday here as well. We cannot go out without fear of being abducted, there is no respect for women or even children as we see every single day in the news that more and more are raped and killed going to or from the factory where they work for less than three dollars a DAY to feed their families.

TOTALLY agree with you, I live in Juarez and I didn’t find it offensive at all, I actually found it very interesting to let people from other places to know about what happened here once, and that they’re still victims who need help, like the children of many of those unfortunate women that died.

that is your opinion, and i respect it, but at the same time it is your home and people are still suffering from this. this isn’t something that happens and then is forgotten, it is a lot more than that. maybe if mac was only trying to raise awareness it would have been more obvious and not so many complaints had been on here. but it doesn’t sound like raising awareness;it sounds like making money off helpless, suffering people just like you. you may not be offended while safe packing on the makeup at home, but not everyone can be that lucky.

As for the line I am glad for what they are doing. How many people that were looking at the line and then heard about all the controversy surrounding it, then went to go see what the “big problem” was? I for one applaud MAC for what they are doing, which is to bring the horrible things going on to the front line so that more people are aware of it.

they didn’t make this line for the purpose of bring attention to juarez. If that was so they would of offered the proceeds before the controversy not after. And why is the model a dead looking white girl? Mexican women are beautiful, if that was their inspiration why not have them as models? It’s hard to believe nobody from the company saw a problem with this during it’s creation. somebody dropped the ball

Oh man. This sucks. I’ll be away in California at the time this comes out and probably won’t be able to get to a MAC store. Darn it!!!!!! ;0

We have a loooot of MAC stores out here in California ;D I’d be very surprised if you wouldn’t be in range of one!

Rodarte lipglass sounds pretty!

“Ghost Town” lipstick sounds interesting! I’m sure it’ll just be another one like “Bubbles” or “Intricate” (sheer and frosty) but I’m excited to see it anyway 🙂

Christine, do you have “White Gold” pigment? I just picked it up a couple weeks ago in my big pigment haul. It’s interesting! I haven’t quite figured it out yet though… So far I just like to look at it 😉

Completely agree with what You wrote about Ghost Town lipstick! I own Bubbles and Intricate but don’t wear them enough (even though I quite like them, especially layered on top), but the description sounds lush (even if a little voice in my head warns me: lines accentuated/ frost overload)
I really liked the Ungaro collection with it’s soft and bold colours, this seems like something similar along the line. Very feminine and etheral. Loving the concept!

I hear ya! I was expecting Alice + Olivia to have some of the design printed on any part of the packaging but it didn’t seem as special once I took it out of the cardboard sleeve!

I don’t understand why everyone has a problem with just putting images onto regular packaging. They don’t charge us more for LE packaging, so I can see why MAC wouldn’t want to just go crazy changing it up. But that’s just my 2 cents…

OH DOGGONE IT!! MAC YOU ARE KILLING MEEEEE. Another fabulous collection and we haven’t even seen the Feline, Tartan or Venomous Villains items yet. I hate you guys!!! In the best possible light of coruse.
So far I want:
All three lipsticks
Ghost Town Sheer white with white, gold and green pearlized pigment (Frost) (Limited Edition)
Rose State Mid-tone blue pink (Lustre) (Limited Edition)
Sleepless Light grey taupe (Frost) (Limited Edition)
Blush: Quinceanera Shimmery mid-tone blue pink (Limited Edition)
and e/s: Bordertown Black with red, pale blue, and silver veining (Frost) (Limited Edition)

CHristine, do you think if you can’t get to a MAc store Nortdstrom may sell these items online?

Some of the names are lacking in taste.

Juarez? Factory? Really?

Does MAC WANT me to feel too guilty to buy their nail polish?
Do they know about the femicide in Juarez and in other “Bordertowns” (What a great eyeshadow name! not.)? How could they not?!?

Violence against women isn’t sexy. These names make me a little ill.

Well, these designers’ fashions have been “inspired” by border violence, so yes, MAC is fully aware of the meaning behind the names.

This is one collection I will be happy to skip. How incredibly tacky of MAC to launch a collection that is in such a poor taste. That Rodarte fashion show was tacky enough; I can’t imagine what the promo images for this collection will look like.

Sorry, fashion isn’t all about pretty things. Rodarte is dark, and not in a particularly conceptual or unique way (I’m not a huge Rodarte fan myself), so it’s pretty obvious if you look at the most recent collection (the one inspired by border violence and maquiladora workers) that their work is commentary on the violence but not “glamorizing” it.
You’d think after a Target collaboration, Rodarte’s ideas would be more accessible to the masses, but apparently not.

What is the commentary here?
What am I missing?

Because, from where I sit, they are capitalizing on human misery without offering up any real critique.
The MAC line is even worse because makeup is the ultimate tool for “glamorizing.” Maybe this is hipster irony? Making ourselves “pretty” with concepts that are ugly?

Look at the collection in question (Spring/Summer 2010) and read some reviews (better yet, look through the archives to get a sense of Rodarte’s aesthetic). is a good place to start.

This is really condescending. I’ve seen the line. I’ve read the critiques. I know what Rodarte is about. I know they claim Mexican heritage (as if this gives them a sense of authority on Juarez).

You still haven’t told me what the “commentary” is.

I think the problem is, the designers aren’t doing any sort of commentary. (Even if they were, I’d argue that high fashion is a totally inappropriate way to comment on factory workers who have been preyed upon in the hundreds by murderers. It’s a serious, tragic issue, not a commodity that should be bought and sold.)

The piece and a video I’ve seen on people reacting to the show were all about how pretty and “dream-like” the collection was. One fashion editor said it was a “wonderland.” I didn’t see any awareness of feminicidios in the fashion world or even from the designers.

But the intentional ghostlike imagery on the runway and in the promo picture for the MAC collection, I think, makes it troubling because so many of these workers have died over the years. I don’t think the designers set out to be offensive, but that doesn’t make the imagery itself any less creepy or offensive.

I still just don’t understand why Rodarte (and MAC) “went there” — it’s silly that we have to discuss these issues when we’re talking about makeup. For me, makeup is a fun hobby that is supposed to distract me from real life. 🙁

Indeed, fashion isn’t only about pretty things. Alexander McQueen’s work is a great example of it. But, instead of work in the dark side of the human soul or something like that, this collection is too literal. i think they made a mistake. maybe an honest one but a mistake.

I am from El Paso and see first hand what is going on in Juarez, and I am not offended at all by the product names. Maybe this will make more people aware of what’s going on!

I’m not from El Paso but I’m Mexican and I don’t feel offended by the names either and now that MAC said they will donate money to Juarez, I think there’s less reason for people to be offended, I just really hope they do donate money and that it goes to some Mexican organization (no police or government) 🙂

No I do not think she is saying that at all, but I am sure she just wants the money to go to an organization that is trying to help. As for the line I am glad for what they are doing. How many people that were looking at the line and then heard about all the controversy surrounding it then went to go see what the big problem was? I for one applaud MAC for what they are doing, which is to bring the horrible things going on to the front line so that more people are aware of it.

@Mariana I do have family in the Mexican governent and they are not all bad some are actually good.

Im Chicana and live in southern Ca and hear about what goes on from the english and spanish news, i am not particularly offended by the names of the collection, but i wish they had researched more about how the whole situation is not something to glamourize…but i do hope and agree with your that the stir and “drama” it is causing can make people more aware about whats going down there so hopefully it can help us get that much closer to finding justice for these young girls and women.

What is going on in Juarez? I’m sorry, but I don’t watch the news much because of how depressing it always is…..Can someone fill me in on what the drama is all about?

Thank you for bringing this issue up. It’s just tasteless to name cosmetics after someone’s suffering.I am horrified by the names of some of the products that ignorant consumers will buy. If M.A.C wants to show remorse, change the name of the products.

P.S: I love how everyone is so sensitive to Holocaust and not to other incidents of genocide-Why? Because our media concentrates on issues that ONLY is pertaining to us. Guess what? Femicide pertains to all of us and deserves it’s own attention

Agree. People is still thinking and crying about the Holocaust, and what about this maquiladoras en Juarez? what about the victims of malaria In Africa? or terrorism in other countries other than the US?

Violence against women is so common place, so horrid and definitively pertain to all of us.

This is very insensitive of MAC, I will be not buying anything from this line or MAC anymore.

I don’t want to turn this board into a political fight, but as the granddaughter of an Auschwitz survivor, I really have to take issue with this comment:

“P.S: I love how everyone is so sensitive to Holocaust and not to other incidents of genocide”

A few comments:

1) If you follow current affairs, you’ll see that MANY incidents of violence against others receive attention — Darfur, Sudan, honor killings in the Middle East, Taliban violence against women, etc. are all very hot topics with much manpower and money devoted to helping them.

2) Just because people are upset about the Holocaust doesn’t mean they can’t also do something about violence against women in Mexico. It’s not like there’s a limited amount of compassion to go around. In fact, I’d venture to say that if you’re a truly compassionate person, you’ll be upset about all incidents of violence against others.

3) Deriding people because they’re upset about the Holocaust is not only uncool, it seems very much like anti-Semitism.

4) While the danger facing women factory workers in Juarez is lamentable and we should do something about it, comparing that to the wholesale slaughter of over 6 million people from one religion is frankly more offensive than this makeup collection could ever be.

are you kidding me? “comparing that to the wholesale slaughter of over 6 million people from one religion is frankly more offensive”… so you’re classifying the offense based on numbers? human lives are humans lives, they’re all priceless, and what she was saying was that people worry about the holocaust, which as terrible as it was, it’s fortunately over, instead of genocides happenig right NOW. To maquiladoras and others.

in fact, you shouldn’t have felt offended by her comment, because she refers to people whp are sensitive to holocaust and NOT other murders, (and there are a lot of people like that), and you don’t claim to be one of those.

I agree too, wholeheartedly. I am still very sensitive to the Holocaust, what happened years ago should have never happened at all… and it breaks my heart to know, and hear of the stories of the millions of lives lost during that horrible time… But just because that was such an extreme act of hatred doesn’t dismiss what’s going on right next door, on the otherside of that border… the problem is that there isn’t enough compassion…and it always feels like its ok to dismiss the problems that are right next door… a life is a life, and it should be valued as such no matter what the ethnicity.

You do realize that it wasn’t just Jewish people that were killed in concentration camps, right? It was also “Gypsies”, Homosexuals, and I believe some African Americans as well……just wanted to add a reminder, cuz not many people look at all of the people, just the main group of people.

Any type of violence is wrong, killing people because of their religion, their ethnicity, their beliefs, their sex or just for the sake of violence is just as unfair and depresing. The holocaust has always interested me because it’s impresive what people are capable of doing, i’m sorry your grandmother had to experience that but i’m glad she survived. I completely agree with your second point. The thing is I don’t hear about a fashion line or a makeup collection inspired by the holocaust trying to glamorize it because it’s a sensible topic, just as the killings in Juarez is a sensible topic to many. “Backyard” is an interesting movie that exposes this issue and at the end shows interesting statistics, i’ll leave a link about this movie in case anyone is interested

While the danger facing women factory workers in Juarez is lamentable? It’s death facing females period. Well no first their raped, beaten, tortured then murdered. And you have no idea what is more offensive to one person just because it is not as offensive to you

woww! i want almost everything. especially the mineralize e/s, and lipglasses. the descriptions sound kind of like the layered lipglasses from sugarsweet last year, with different colored layers.

okay, thank you so much.i’m so glad your interactive with your followers.its really nice that you make time, even with your busy schedule.

The prices that you have up Christine are correct except the Lipglass which will be $18 and the Lip Erase which will also be $18. I dont know if you also have the exact date but for your subscribers it will be Sept. 15.

that date is interesting as if they were launching it the eve of the Mexican independence day (or “la noche del grito”), it might just be a coincidence though

I’m interested in :

Bordertown & Sleepwalker mineralize eyeshadows
White Gold and Badlands pigments
Quinceanera blush
Juarez nail lacquer

I don’t know what Rodarte is exactly but I do like the the make-up names/colors. I am looking forward to seeing that everything looks like. Then I will decide what I want if anything. I am still holding out for the fab feline collection photos and the disney also. Anywork on itms for the tarnatan tale collection?

LB & Alex why are you both saying that the fashion designers are into Border & women violence? I looked them up on their website & can’t find anything that proves that. Let me know where/how you found this out. The designers happen to be sisters so I can’t understand how any woman would be for violence against women to begin with. Anyhoot. It’s a cosmetic line. I say just pass it over if you aren’t happy & email MAC to let them know. Don’t bring the rest of us down.

as of 2010, juarez is known as the most violent city in the world, dangerous for both men and women. much of this violence is tied to running drugs across the u.s./mexico border, and with the sweatshop like u.s. owned factories located in juarez. it seems as if rodarte/MAC are glamorizing this tragedy through their product names such as “bordertown” and “factory”.

what about names like gun medal and smog? those are both names of cosmeticxs products does that mean those companies are supporting weapons and pollution? No so relax. MAC runs programs like viva glam, where 40 percent of profits automaticly go to women in need. I really don’t think they’re intentionally promoting violence against women, or for anyone in that matter

100 percent of every penny actually goes to the mac aids fund through viva glam lipsticks. mac doesn’t make any profit from the sale of viva glams.

In all fairness, the femicides started in the early 90s, and coincided with the advent of the maquiladoras. The drug cartel situation back then remained somewhat ‘calm’ since the government allowed the cartels to run Mexico. It wasn’t until vincente fox in 2004? 2006? when drug cartel wars started escalating. Essentially, the government under Fox stirred the pot and undermined the cartels’ hierarchy. The names by themselves are not offensive, however, when taken in the context of being a ghastly looking collection, I think it’s insensitive. On the other hand, I think this controversy is good because it gets a dialogue going, as you see here. One of the biggest problems the family members of the femicide victims faced was not having their problems heard; their reports of missing daughters, mothers, sisters, etc were routinely dismissed by local authorities. By naming this collection in honor of these women whom have lost their lives, MAC is bringing the conversation to an entire portion of the population who may have not been previously aware of the situation. Let’s face it, women + makeup is traditionally thought of as shallow. Having a politically charged makeup collection is pretty cool.

That being said, I have no idea what the original designers intended when creating this collection. I don’t know if they thought the names were kitschy or if they thought the names were very feminist. What matters most to me is the ends, not the means; so if MAC created this collection with malicious intent, I don’t care, so long as it has a positive outcome. 100k for anti-femicide organizations, or women’s shelters in general, is a positive outcome for me. As such, I can look the other way in terms of being offended by this collection.

Now that they’ve brought so much attention to the situation, I think it would be better to keep the names of the products as is, and just donate money to some organization(s). I think that MAC likes to associate its image with all happy and positive connotations, and maybe this is because happy connotations = more sales, however, I would not mind seeing a more somber make up collection. They should donate 100k + 10% proceeds of sales or something like that.

Oh… did I bring you down? Well, I’m SO SORRY.

You know what brings ME down? Making light of femicide.

What would you say if MAC named a lipstick “Auschwitz”? What if it came with a lovely eyeshadow called “work camp”? OH, I KNOW… how about a perfume called “gas chamber”? Wouldn’t that be SO avant garde and edgy?

It is COMPLETELY appropriate to react this way… MAC has made a name for itself by catering to “All ages, all colors, all races.” Apparently this “inclusiveness” doesn’t extend to the brown women lost in Juarez.

Compassion is a wonderful quality… we are ugly without it. And no amount of makeup will cover up that kind of ugliness.

It is disgusting to see someone act indignant over this collection’s theme then make light of the Holocaust. Have some respect for the tragedy of the Holocaust.

The death of over 6 million Jews should not be used as a point of comparison for ANYTHING.

You assume it’s making light of femicide. You have read nothing but the names. You are not privy to the backstory. And guess what? Making light of the Holocaust makes your argument weak.

I don’t think they were making light of the Holocaust, I think the comparison shows how important it is to recognize the injustices that are happening and have happened.

This person wasn’t making light of the Holocaust — just to show how horrifying it is to casually toss around names for cosmetics that have a lot of emotional meaning.
Guess what — femicide isn’t ok. The Holocaust only happened because citizens were TOTALLY apathetic to everything that was happening to the Jews. I think this poster is just saying that violence against women if horrifying — it continues to happen and people like yourself jump all over her for bringing it to the attention of others. So maybe you should rethink YOUR argument.

I do not think anyone should ever make a comparison to the Holocaust. I find it disrespectful and tasteless to even make the comparison.

i really love some of these colors but will most likely avoid this collection. Just b/c BROWN, POOR, THIRD WORLD women are the ones getting killed in Juarez doesn’t mean that it is a less significant event from the Holocaust… She made the comparison to show how ridiculous it is to use the names that these products were given. Women are being killed and just because it wont reach the numbers of the Holocaust doesn’t mean it can be used in this manner (in a cosmetic line). As a LATINA I am truly offended…

i wont be buying any of the mac products from this range, what ridiculous names for a make up range, and the girl looks dead in the promo picture. creepy or what.

Patricia, I completely agree with you. People are getting offended when a comparison is made between the femicides in Juarez and the Holocaust because the numbers don’t compare, but it is the same concept. I am surprised that as women we have not considered how offensive it is for MAC to capitalize of the suffering of women. We should stick together and support each other. Violence against women should not be tolerated or glamorized.

Try NOT to be so quick to protect the so-called Nazi victims club. There are so many people who are tortured, abused, killed, violated, etc. that just so happen to be all different kinds of races, sexual orientations, genders, classes, etc. The point is this:

The people who were tortured, abused, used as slaves, killed, etc. are just as important as people who go through the same things in different countries or contexts. The amount of people affected by it, directly or indirectly, is completely irrelevant. We are all important. Whether a large group of people are killed by someone, or just a few……every life is worth saving, and every life is worth grieving over.

We all need to support one another, because as WOMEN, I’m sure that we could at least attempt to identify with these womens hardships…some women reading this forum HAVE suffered from abuse, big or small…it’s all completely tragic.

Sorry if some of what I said makes no sense, I just had to rant 😡

When discussing unrest and injustices, the Holocaust certainly SHOULD be used as a point of comparison to illustrate exactly WHY it is so horrendous to allow people to get away with capitalizing on/allowing the mistreatment of groups of people. The Holocaust should always serve as a reminder as to why we need to be vigilant about human rights and expose issues like what’s going on in Juarez. Obviously the situations are NOT the same, but we still need to speak out against inhumane issues in order to make this world a better, stronger place. People dying because of ignorance or a lack of justice is inexcusable, regardless of historical backgrounds or implications.

I hope you understand that the comparison to the Holocaust was not racially based but rather used to illustrate insensible loss of human life. The comparison could of easily been made to what happened in Rawanda, Bosnia or what is going on Darfur. However, these are less well know examples of genocide. I don’t believe the offense to this line is actually racially motivated but rather that a make-up company and fashion designers are basing a collection and capitalizing off of other’s misfortune. The goal is to make others aware that human suffering is not artistic and glamorizing it shouldn’t be supported.

I actually hadn’t realized that this atrocious situation is what this collection was based on and I would like to thank those who helped me become an informed consumer. I’m refusing to be an apathetic consumer and will also boycott the collection.

unless mac re-names all of the products and donates ALL of the proceeds to a proper charity to help the women of Juarez, I will no purchase anything from this collection at all.

I agree, we Women should stand together and try to make this a better place to live. The situation in Juarez, Chihuahua is horrible. The situation in Mexico is more than horrible. No one should live with fear.
Please Mac Cosmetics please…… change the names of the new line

it’s ignorant to act like the holocaust was the worst thing that’s ever happened and nothing is comparable.

the caparison this person made was completely valid.

You are so right, the comparison was taken way out of context and people need to focus on the real issue and that is the collection. I find it unsettling that MAC would actually go through with the idea of even testing the waters of using Ciudad Juarez as a back drop for a collection UNLESS ALL proceeds would be going toward suffering. Or if they made all the strives to say “This collection is inspired by the murder capitol of the world, please donate to help” or something of the sort.

And i read temptalia’s blog a few days ago and saw this posting, as soon as i saw the haunting face of the main model i quickly skipped over the entire post, did not read the products comments or anything. Because my first thought was “MAC? Who would want to look like an emaciated ghost? What is beautiful about the main model or her makeup?”

To me makeup is all about beauty when the world isnt, so people saying that everything isnt all happy in this world, makeup should ALWAYS be, as unnecessary as makeup the only thing it should do is make the consumer happy.

I think its horrible that MAC would even do this in the first place apology or no apology because it goes to show what companies can get away with when they throw money in people’s faces. People need to stop worrying so much about the Holocust comparison, (which did exactly what it was suppose to and sparked everyones temper JUST AS THIS COLLECTION DID), and worry about the real issue. Regardless if it was an honest one, it was a mistake none the less.

I believe the mentality of “never ever comparing anything to the Holocaust” is wrong.
Especially if it is equated to the Shoah, the mass murder of the European Jews by the Nazis and their Eastern and Western European collaborators (also a much neglected “detail”). Slavic people who were executed, imprisoned in death and coercive work camps, killed as means of collective punishment in the Nazi terror reign roughly equate the numbers of Jews murdered by the Nazis (an estimated 6 million each, although there are less detailed records for the Slavs murdered since this happened less organizedly). Add the 40 million Soviet citizens killed in Hitler’s aggressive and expansive war, and you have a mass murder of Slavs exceeding the numbers of Jews killed by far. Now this is not about belittling the murder on Jews for racist reasons. But firstly, Jews have appropriated the “Holocaust” to equal “Shoah”. I hear no one talk about the racist murder of Slavs, Roma/Sinti (Central European Roma/Sinti have been practically extinct by the Nazis), and of course the political murder on Jehova’s Witnesses, homosexuals, and any kind of dissidents from Christians to communists/socialists, humanists, patriots etc.

To get back to your original saying:
As an Austrian (and descendant of resistants), I am offended and disgusted by both the appropriation of the Holocaust to mean Shoah only, when race laws turned against anyone who was not “Aryan”. Secondly, there have been genocides particularly in Africa that have come very close to the Holocaust. And agreeing with the previous poster, numbers alone do not determine the crime.

So yes, I believe genocides, or femicides in this case, deserve all the same attention as the Holocaust.

The death of over 6 million Jews while tragic was not the worst genocide ever experienced. The Chinese, Armenian, and Russian ethnic purges were far worse. Just because the Holocaust has a well-known history doesn’t not make it above comparison.

And I think that the OP had a very could point. The very thought of a lipstick named Auschwitz makes me nauseous. And now that I know about the violence in Juarez I don’t feel confident in purchasing it.

I think the point here is that everyone is emotionally connected to problems around the world and it’s important that people be sensitive of them. MAC has taken the appropriate steps by donating portions of the money to people in Juarez.

As an El Pasoan and someone with family in Juarez (my cousin was murdered a few years ago) I think it is important to draw more attention to the severity of the issue. Juarez is literally walking distance from El Paso, Texas and so many people do not grasp its proximity to America. The cartel violence and femicide has escalated to unparalleled levels. This region remains to be full of lively culture on both sides of the border. I am not offended by the line, if this is something that will bring focus and help to Juarez. I also don’t mind it honoring our precious and unique cultural landscape. It is important to make historical references to the past, especially the Holocaust. When you have Mexicans shamelessly murdering other Mexicans it is nearly genocide. Something that has occurred and will continue to occur unless we learn from the past, and the most extreme example of this is the Third Reich. As a History major I don’t take this issue lightly and I draw comparisons when needed. Kudos to M.A.C. for stepping up and trying to spread the word!

Very well put. Also, I feel that until America’s incessant need for drugs is quelched, the violence in bordertowns will not end.

while I agree with most of your sentiment I AM offended by the collection (and Rodarte’s fall line too). I find it in very poor taste, especially the (original) names. If MAC and RODARTE really were trying to ‘spread the word’ and ‘shed light’ on the situation in Juarez, they would have actively mentioned the atrocities happening there in their promotional literature which they never did. Only AFTER the poo hit the fan did they try to back peddle and apologize by changing some product names and throwing some money at it (and relatively speaking $100,000 is a drop in the bucket for a multimillion dollar company) hoping it goes away.

That was really beautiful. Regardless of how much good MAC does, if they turn out a line like this, it will continue to make people numb to the real issue of social injustice that no amount of charity can fix.

Please remember to respect your fellow Temptalia readers. I do not tolerate name calling or insults. Debate and discuss with intelligence and passion but leave out jibes, digs, or other personal attacks. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, even if you may disagree with it or find it “stupid.” We want to facilitate the discussion and keep it focused on the issues, not fostering attacks on other readers.

Ok… I understand your upset but you have proven MAC right. I had NO clue as to what anyone was so offended by in the names until I read about it here in the comments. When I came across your posts I felt terrible for those women and I LEARNED about them… The brand is making a difference in letting people know what is going on. I personally will be buying one of them so that when someone asks me the name of it I can tell them and then give the background and help promote awareness about the situation. Without this line I would have been another person completely ignorant but now I can actually help in the battle to let people know.

I have tried to consider the “awareness” factor of this line, but I cannot. I have also thought a lot about “inspiration” and art and responsibility. MAC and Rodarte, if they had wanted to truly foster awareness, would have included their social concern in their initial statements. Proceeds going to charity, etc, would have been a part of this collection from the beginning. Instead, we have backtracking. I don’t believe that MAC and Rodarte were trying to be malicious, but you cannot name a nail polish “Juarez” and feign ignorance. It’s insensitive and foolish and offensive. (It’s compounded by the information that Rodarte has collaborated with Target, meaning they have experience with the realities of garment workers on a global scale.)

While I respect Mandy’s feelings in her plan to wear the nail polish and spread the word, I’m not swayed. I still feel that saying “yeah, thanks, isn’t that a great colour? but listen, it’s so sad, it’s inspired by Juarez” minimizes very real suffering to a cosmetic talking point.

I’ve tried to think of a way that a collection could honour the maquilas and work as an awareness campaign (i.e. different colours, different product names), but at the end I STILL feel like this boils down to exploitation and is too flippant a method to show support/concern or outrage.

I agree with others here that the corpse-like elements of the model exacerbate the issue and add another level of tastelessness.

One could not have a collection inspired by ‘the beauty of the natural landscape of Rwanda’, for example, and get away with naming a colour “machete”. MAC, in all that it has done for the AIDS community, would not name a South African inspired colour-palette “orphan”, right?

Thanks for providing a forum for this discussion.

The thing that bothers me the most is that MAC could have truly raised awareness of this issue by making this campaign about the femicides (rather than just deem it “inspired by a road trip”), and by saying that proceeds of purchases would be donated to the cause, like the Viva Glam campaign.
If anyone wants to learn more about the murders in Juarez, Desert Blood, a novel by Alicia Gaspar de Alba, is a good start.

I don’t think most people are making light of femicide. Naming products “Auschwitz” or “gas chamber” is offensive across the board-the words THENSELVES are offensive. Using the name “factory” is offensive to some in this particular collection because of what it represents. It would not be offensive if separated from this context. A simple word holds more power than most people realize. It is not necessary to make light of one atrocity to convey the importance of another. They are ALL important and should not be compared at all simply out of respect for those who were a part of them. I do not believe we should compare things that we have not been a part of-there is no point of reference. None of us can ever truly know what it was like to live through the Holocaust. You do not need to agree with everyone here, we all have our own opinions but please show some respect.

Wow, you couldn’t have said it better…. i totally agree with you. We live in an era of indifference, where people have lost the sense of wonder and care, everything is like “meh, it’s not my problem” “whatever, it didn’t happen to me” “bleh, i am not mexican anyway”. Maybe they should have named the lipsticks “chopped off leg” or “mexican female blood” or “agony”. Or how about making a collection called “Flaming hot 9/11” with nice red-orangey tones and some silver ones to resemble the airplanes crashed? Here in Mexico we were all shocked, moved, concerned in tears for what happened in USA, the Holocaust (where not only jewish people died but also like 20 million russians, thousands of french people, dutchs, POLISH omg like 25k soldiers and officers where ambushed, ETC), the masacre of millions of muslims in Europe, and many other world tragedies. We are a very forgiving country, but this went too far.
A lot of people can’t believe why MAC or those Rodarte sisters did this. They always cover themselves with the word “ART” hahaha… Well, probably they only wanted to create this big controversy on purpose to acquire even more fame and attention? (don’t know why if MAC doesn’t need it) putting aside any respect or sensibility and actually making profit of an endless tragedy like this. After all, the big target aren’t the actual customers, but the ones to come in the future.
I have principles and moral, i would never buy an item from this collection, or wouldn’t even accept it as a gift.

Sorry, was on vacay while this was posted and never checked back later.

I say that the designers are inspired by border violence because … they apparently ARE. Their collection that was on the runway in February, the one that this MAC collection seems to be based on, was inspired by female factory workers in Juarez, Mexico. Any number of articles on that collection talked about it.

Hundreds, if not thousands (depends on whose numbers you believe) of women who work at the maquiladoras (sweatshops) have been raped and murdered since the early 1990s. Many of the victims were also tortured.

That Rodarte collection was downright creepy — it was all about “ghostly,” “sleepwalking” women. Given the horrible violence, the imagery either had just unfortunate implications (and honestly, I find it VERY hard to believe that someone could be inspired by Juarez, Mexico, and NOT know about the feminicidios, as it has received media attention even in the United States and is all that comes up when you Google women and Juarez) or is just disgusting. And that’s without even going into the creepiness of glamorizing the underbelly (maquiladoras) of the fashion industry and making it “pretty” and “high fashion” while ignoring the irony of the women’s actual, totally non-glamorous working conditions and lives. No matter how it’s looked at, this collection was ill-conceived and downright creepy.

In a way, I find it saddest of all that female designers conceived of this. At the very least, they should have realized that making glamorous fashion out of something that has real-word issues surrounding it is a bad idea. It is just a cosmetics line (and a fashion line) and that’s EXACTLY why the designers shouldn’t have gone there. It’s inappropriate.

And I will be writing to MAC about this. I think it’s disgusting that this collection is being released. At the very least, it’s tacky and offensive. I find it sad that people will be buying these pretty cosmetics inspired by maquiladora workers without even knowing about the very-real and tragic circumstances of those workers. It says nothing good about MAC and nothing good about Rodarte. And I really don’t mean to preach, but I’m incredibly saddened by this. I love MAC, and I think this collection goes against everything they seem to stand for.

That post was really insightful and im inspired to write to MAC about it aswell.
It is indeed tasteless(unless they are planning to help directly w/the tragedy that IS Juarez injustices/murders)and we should all voice our concern w/MAC.

Thank you LB and Alex for such important interventions. I have always been a loyal MAC customer, but will absolutely boycott from now on if this line continues, and will make sure I teach this issue in my classes! I can only imagine how painful it would be for the young women’s mothers to see how the violence against their daughters is now turned into something to wear.

Look up what is going on with women in Juarez and you might get a picture of how tasteless this cosmetic line is, the line was created by Rodarte. Sorry that someone “brings down” the type of women who don’t have to worry about working in an abusive factory job because it’s the only job around, sorry if someone made you feel bad about buying expensive makeup to put on your face. Everything you do has a social and environmental impact “it’s a cosmetic line” makes no sense to me when it is making violence against women glamorous. Educate yourself on REAL issues, instead of finding the “right” color of makeup, otherwise you are just falling right into the capitalistic trap that keeps you ignorant of where your money goes.

Everyone deserves to have their basic human needs met, as well as have beauty in the world, after everyone has those things, then we can share in luxury.

I agree with the argument that these Rodarte + Mac product names are innappropriate and are glamorizing real, horrifying issues women are dealing with. I am astounded that the designers could be so incompassionate and romanticize this sort of subject. I will not support this makeup line. And as for the Holocaust reference, I believe that was made to emphasize how completely innappropriate and tasteless these names truly are. Perhaps you just find the situation less significant.

Holy carp.

So just because a fashion designer based its line on violence, they’re de-sensitizing it to others? Wanna tell any effing artist that has ever painted something tragic into something not that?

It’s a makeup line. If you don’t like it, don’t buy it. MAC knows what it’s doing and it knows the risks it takes.

Also, not cool comparing it to the Holocaust btw.

Designers are edgy and some border on obscene and morbid. Do I always agree? No. Will that stop me from buying some of this? No.

I still don’t understand why you think the femicide in Juarez is so different from the Holocaust. Why CAN’T I compare them? Human misery is human misery. As far as I am concerned, there is no such thing as “different degrees of atrocity.”

You say that “obscene” and “morbid” designs wouldn’t stop you from spending your money.
So, I have to ask, would you buy from a MAC collection called “Concentration Camp?” What if the eyeshadow called “gas chamber” was really hot?

Where do we draw the line and say: “This isn’t OK”?

The women of Juarez are being killed every. single. day. To name a “beauty powder” or lipstick after this place is disgusting, appropriating and sad. I’d expect better from MAC. And how insulting are you to appropriate this type of thing? Would you really be okay if someone put out a blush named after a work camp in South Korea? Or maybe a lipliner called IRA? What about a perfume called Zyklon-B? Would that just be edgy and morbid or just really REALLY insulting?

Anyone who is able to empathize and THINK would say it was insulting.


Please remember to respect your fellow Temptalia readers. I do not tolerate name calling or insults. Debate and discuss with intelligence and passion but leave out jibes, digs, or other personal attacks. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, even if you may disagree with it or find it “stupid.” We want to facilitate the discussion and keep it focused on the issues, not fostering attacks on other readers.

everybody has a right to their own opinions
especially on a website like this
if you don’t agree with mac or don’t like it,
it’s simple, just don’t buy anything from the collection.
temptalia is a place for makeup enthusiasts to find out information, share information, asks and answer questions, and most importantly have fun with their hobby
not to be mean to each other:[

either way, MAC and Rodarte opened a dialog on the subject, and brought it to the forefront of minds that would normally only be concerned with makeup. i applaud them for it. whether we fight over it or get along because of it, they made us aware. and awareness is the beginning of change.

While I may not agree with the names of the products, or glamorizing the issue. I have to agree with you Cara, on the fact that there has been a dialogue opened. The more people that come to this, and other articles, looking to read up on what products they want to buy, will see all of these comments, and be more aware of the torture of women, and femicide in the border towns.

I agree with you for 100%. I don’t believe any make-up line with any common sense would call the products this way because they appreciate violence against women.

I’m kind of surprised no one has objected much to Urban Decay naming their products after drugs and a law that confines a person to a mental hospital. All of this is rather warped, IMHO.

“a law that confines a person to a mental hospital”: i believe you are referring to 5150? it is a law that is in place to protect a person when they are of danger to themselves. unfortunately, people have lots of images that come to mind when they think of psychiatric hospitals and 5150 (and mental illness in general), so i think that’s kinda what urban decay was going for, some kind of “crazy” image.

not the most tactful thing, but i also don’t think it is on the same scale as this rodarte stuff.

while it made me cringe to read the comparisons to the holocaust, i do see the point the commenter was trying to make and where it came from. it is unfortunate that anyone would feel the need to invoke a comparison to something such as the holocaust just to get people to pay attention to the juarez situation, but the fact that they felt the need to do so speaks volumes about the lack of attention it is currently getting. i, quite honestly, was completely unaware of it all until i read through these comments.

but i am quite astounded that a huge company such as mac would go ahead with naming things in such an offensive manner.

I agree with you, the numbness and refusal to see the situation as the horrific one it really is, such that posters need to make the holocaust analogy, is really disturbing. I am sad about this collection.

Wow, I’m really thankful to Alex for bringing this up. I had no idea about the women in Juarez and will not be buying from this collection.. I honestly don’t know how a woman can buy a nail polish, wear it, and be proud while it was named after a feminicide..

Not trying to start anything at all.. But your comment is very interesting… I don’t think people really realize a lot of the meaning behind Urban Decays names “Yeyo” for one most people just look past. However I never took offense because the name “Urban Decay” in itself makes a statement and a lot of the names of the products go along with what contributes to the decay of urban areas. I wish it was more political and they used their brand to help, but we can’t have it all.

As far as MAC goes, I will no longer support them as a brand and I will not purchase their products in the future. I am trying to figure out what I will do with the products I currently own.

I am sick and tired of people capitalizing off of others misfortune. Next we’ll have eye shadows inspired by the NAACP vs the Tea Party, Slavery, Arizona Immigration Law, Genocides in Africa and who know what else. The sad part is, the collection will do phenomenally well and those of us who are against it will be washed out by the people who don’t understand and don’t care. However this is no reason to be discouraged from taking a stand.

You can go ahead and donate the MAC stuff to moi if you’d like for it to go somewhere much needed 😛 I’m a single stay at home mother of a girl who has DS and most of the stuff Temptalia reviews is way too expensive, esp. due to the rising cost of anything having to do with children, doctors visits, etc.

I am offended by Urban Decay’s overt drug references. I feel that an eyeshadow called “Maui Wowie” and an eyeshadow collection called “Smoke Out” do not belong in my cosmetics collection, so I have not purchased them. I think it is classless and there is a fine line between edgy and obscene.

i use ones that are a little darker than me and mix them with lotion to make a “fake tan” for a day! 🙂

or get your bronzer and scrap some out.. works beautiful!

Both lipglasses sound to die for, I cannot wait for this collection you can tell the inspiration is directly from the designers. Imagine a dazzleglass over ghost town. That would look amazing

Looking forward to this collection as well. I am going to be soooooo very broke from MAC it isn’t funny.
And as a Mexican latina woman, I am not offended whatsoever by cosmetic names. It does not mean that MAC and the fashion artists that are women themselves support the horrific things going on in Mexico and/or everywhere else in this world. If you feel that that is what is happening then take it up with the company & fashion people themselves. Do not post on a MAC website that allows fans of the cosmetics to enjoy seeing what is coming out & talk to one another about cosmetics. Political stuff needs to stay off these boards. Sorry that is how I personally feel.

I completely agree. I am a Mexican, Latina woman and am not offended by a name on a collection of cosmetics. If its not controversial, no one would buy it.

The femicide is allowed to continue because privileged Mexicanas remain indifferent to the plight of their poorer, darker sisters. If you choose not to you use your privileges to speak out and demand that something be done to stop the killings, that is your choice. But please don’t use your identities to excuse what MAC has done. You don’t speak for all of us.

And, the idea that if MAC weren’t controversial, no one would buy it is ludicrous. There was NOTHING controversial about Marine Life or Stereo Rose– and yet they sold out in mere hours.

I couldn’t agree with you more. I live in California so I’m not affected by this violence, that doesn’t mean I’m indifferent about the subject. This collection is offensive, the more we don’t care and turn our heads the other way the longer things like these will continue to happen. I think it’s time we open our eyes and see what’s going on around us, it’s nice to stay in our safe homes and ignore all the ugly in the world… But the truth of just how ugly our world can be is not far way. Please, I do Love make up, and I love MAC but there are more important things in life, there are women being tortured and killed. That’s the truth and we can’t ignore it.

I too agree…a Latina woman living in Texas right in the middle of the cartel war in a border city was not offended at all. I agree with Jessie on this one but designers in their own way are a little morbid and dark in their own way. These are just names people nothing for anybody to take all that seriously. As for myself I can not wait for this collection and would not think twice to not buy anything.

Many women look out for our sisters on the other side of the border. I suggest you do more research before making such offensive allegations. It only proves that you don’t know enough about the issues that go on in Juarez. Come to El Paso and point out these privileged Mexican women to me, because I don’t see them; and frankly, what could these women do to stop the corruption? I am eager to hear how these women to stop the violence that occurs 24 hours nonstop.

Just because Latina/Chicana/Mexican women live in the United States doesnt mean
A. they do not care about our ‘sisters’ on the other side of the border
B. they are priveleged
C. that they live in safe homes.

I care about what goes on on the other side of the border, i did not and do not live a priveleged life and did not always live in “safe” areas. Do not assume things.

I have to disagree with you. When you do an excellent work, you provide high quality on things and your creativity is at top that’s all you need to speak for you (or for a company, whatever). If you need controversy to buy things, you gotta ask yourself how good the quality and CREATIVITY these people really have. Especially on a very touchy subject such as Juarez. MAC doesn’t need controversy to sell, they are ultra super multimillionaire. Many other collections haven’t been controversial. What you say it’s only a cheap trick people who lack of talent or quality use to sell.

Interesting collaberation. I never heard of these fashion designers but it sounds fascinating with all the colors. Can’t wait to see pictures.

hi I might have pictures for the rodarte mineralize eyeshadow. I got two yesterday but not sure whether it’s from this collection or not beacause it comes without tags. I want to send you the pictures but don’t have your address.

The lipsticks sound amazing. I never had the bubbles lipstick but heard great things about it. Maybe GhostTown is similar but with all those other colors mixed in it should be a unique color and I love unique color lipsticks!

People. If you have an issue with this collaberation (which I personally feel is ridiculous) than take it up with the company, Mexico and whatever else you need to do to get off your high horse. MAC is a great company. Lots of woman work there. The designers are WOMEN also. I don’t believe for one second that this has anything to do with femicide or anti-women. For Alex who said what if they made a lipstick named Auswetch(sp?) they wouldn’t and that is uncalled for you anti-semite. See how ridiculous that sounded for me to call you that on a public forum? Now stop the hate and take your political views elsewhere.

I’ve debated over wether or not to respond to this because I’m not sure that you understand the issue here.

Either (1) You have NO IDEA what the word “anti-Semitic” means (ironic since you can’t even be bothered to spell Auschwitz correctly– even though I’ve done it FOR YOU above)… or (2) You know exactly what it means and you are offended that I am comparing the loss of Mexican women’s lives to the loss of Jewish lives… as if Mexican women are somehow less human, or worth less than European Jews.

I really hope that it’s the first option, because the second scenario is beyond vile.

For those of you that consider this a “political issue” I have only this to ask:
Why is it OK for us to discuss whether a cosmetic company is “cruelty free” but not OK to point out that MAC/Rodarte are capitalizing on human misery? Are animals more valuable than Mexican women? It would appear so based on some of these comments.

And Gabby,
I am a Mexican woman as well and I AM offended. You don’t get to use your identity to act as a spokesperson to excuse the callous use of border imagery. You don’t speak for all of us. You don’t speak for me.

And for the record, I’m not the only one that has noticed how f-ed up this is:

It is very different.

Makeup is no more “art” than a box of chalk pastels or a set of watercolor paints is.
Makeup does not have a message. It makes no commentary. It holds no critique.

If you are so offended by attempts made to educate the public re: femicide in Juarez, then maybe YOU should just ignore the outrage and go on buying lipgloss as if all is right in the world.

That is absolutely your personal opinion, and it is incredibly rude and close minded. I don’t want to get involved with your Juarez/Holocaust argument and whether any of it is appropriate. However, the fact that you feel that you can determine what is and is not art is ridiculous and insulting. People make art using whatever skills they have, and what ever materials they favor. Art is meant to cause controversy, and create dialog.
I would also like to point out that many of my friends had no idea about the tragedies in Juarez, and only learned about them because of the Rodarte collection. You may think that ridiculous, but fashion is how some people communicate. Just because you feel differently does not mean you have to go after everyone who disagrees.

I totally agree about art and makeup being a dialog.. I just wish that MAC and Rodarte had meant it as a dialog and a way to speak out about what is happening initially. It is one thing if they had come out with this collection seeking awareness and trying to get people to read into the cruelty of this charity line. But it only became a charity line because the public shamed them on their ignorance! Some people may not agree with me but I am only debating different thoughts purely for the dialog! So please don’t be offended that I thought to show you another side of that as well!

alex, while I do agree with your views and opinions on the collection/Rodarte/Juarez and just about everything else you’ve stated I do find it unfair [for lack of a better word] that you claim makeup is not an art. Makeup is an art. As a makeup artist makeup is my form of expressing myself, be it on my own face or on the face of another. Makeup is no different than a painting. The only difference is the canvas.

This is precisely why I compared makeup to pastels or watercolors. In an of itself, it is not art.

What you do with it CAN be… but makeup is just a medium. It doesn’t make a statement while it’s still in the pan or tube.

I just want to point out to you that just because the designers are women does not mean that they can’t glamorize violence against women. Also, how can you say that this collection has NOTHING to do with femicide? The names cannot be linked to anything else.

YOU are the one making the association between femicide and the words. Not everyone makes the same associations; and just because they happen to use the names of those places, it doesn’t necessarily mean that MAC/RODARTE are glamorizing femicide

No, the designers were inspired by what’s going on in Juarez. Just because you hadn’t heard about it doesn’t mean it’s not a very obvious reference.

I really don’t see how you can think that “Factory” and “Juarez” are not associated with the situation in Juarez. Clearly MAC didn’t just “happen” to use the names.

+1 this is ridiculous. i hate our culture of political correctness…every little tiny thing, even a lipstick, is gonna piss someone off. its MAKEUP! LOL

Exactly – the phrase “political correctness” is just a puff phrase to further marginalize important issues like race, sexism, etc. Call it like it is!

I can’t speak for anyone else, but that’s my point — It’s makeup! Real world issues like female factory workers shouldn’t be drawn into it. Rodarte and MAC shouldn’t have gone there. I don’t think it’s political correctness gone crazy to say that makeup shouldn’t be inspired by factory workers who have been raped and murdered by the hundreds. That’s just common sense. This stuff doesn’t belong in makeup or fashion collections!

I hadn’t heard of this collection, and the picture above caused my stomach to churn before I even got to the item descriptions. I share fellow commenters’ dismay with the shameful disregard of the real-world femicide that inspired this line, and I certainly won’t be purchasing any products from it.

But cheers to everyone who condemned the unspeakable violence in Juarez and MAC’s decision to monetize the suffering of so many voiceless women. It’s very heartening to see how compassionate and articulate Temptalia’s readers happen to be!

Amanda I agree with you it just makeup people! People have nothing better to do than complain and get offended about little things now. When the problem is there own people in mexico.MAC is not the ones killing them ok so for all of you that have a problem please go over there and do something about it and stop making a big deal because of a some makeup names. If you don’t like it don’t buy it! that’s why we are in America freedom of speech whether you like it or not. I’m hispanic too I may not be from mexico but you guys are getting too emotional.

This is glamorizing the miserable lives of women who work their fingers to the bone and are often raped and murdered. This is making light of this disgusting situation!

i am not sure if this collection is for me.However , i am quite interested in the blush it sounds very pretty and i think i might get it if this collection comes to where i live.

As of now I have 5 items on my list for this collection which include:
l/s in Ghost Town
l/g in Rodarte
b/p in Softly Drifting
blush in Quinceanera
nail lacquer in Factory
…and I really hope that it doesn’t grow much more, or else i’ll be broke from MAC’s fall collections

ok as a mexican-american woman living in south texas this collection makes me really uncomfortable. it’s appropriating our culture and romanticizing very real problems that plague our community. they just kind of seem like they’re relating mexican=bad

I agree, Chloe. Why did they have to wait for something SO negative to do a mexican inspired collection? Then give it such a dark’s sick.

I’m horrified that MAC found this appropriate and i’m even MORE horrified that some beauty junkies think “it’s okay” because it’s “just makeup”. That is far beyond my comprehension and I can’t even wrap my brain around it. And I agree with Ms. Alex above..why is it okay to stick up for animals that get exploited in the making of some cosmetics but not how they exploit mexicans in the name of “fashion”? And I definitely agree that if it was the Holocaust then people would have been offended, why are thousands of deaths of Mexican women any different? 🙁

It does seem to be equating ‘the colors of Mexico’ with negativity. When I think of Mexican culture, I do not think of these things. It would be different if MAC made a habit of collections used to point out the issues in need of reform in many countries and states (including U.S.), but the fact is that the things which are capitalized upon in more Euro-centric culture are much more positive and actually glamorous. If MAC had issued a release stating that their intention was to increase awareness, I think this whole debate could have been avoided and the job of raising awareness been done more effectively. Political correctness is not pase when it entails respect for human life. Anything less is a travesty, no matter how marginalized or minimalized. Personally I see less than nothing wrong with respect and dignity.

I think if MAC’s intention was to increase awareness, they could have done it in a much better way. I am not Mexican, but I am a Latina and I feel deeply offended by this. Even if I were not Latina, I would be offended as a woman, and even if I were not a woman, I would be offended as a human being!

And I also understand what was meant by the comparison to the Holocaust. Naming a lipstick “Auschwitz” is really the same thing as what MAC is doing by naming a lipstick “Ghost Town” or “Sleepless”.

What I think would be better is that MAC should do a collection inspired by Mexico – the BEAUTY of Mexico, and then as a side note, educate people on the horrific things that are happening in Juarez and then offer to donate a percentage of the proceeds to helping those women. That way, they would be educating the masses on what is happening and people would feel GOOD about buying the products, since the proceeds would be going to HELP women, not make light of their suffering in the name of “fashion.”

Personally i didnt know anything about Rodarte or the issues in Juarez. And honestly, I think this collection, although obviously very offensive to some, has brought a lot of attention to the problem down there. I’m happy MAC has grabbed my attention with this collection but after reading so many of these comments, i believe they could have been a bit more tasteful in doing so. I mean not naming nail polish after the city. i just wish they had celebrated Mexico in a more positive light and maybe given some of the proceeds to uncovering whoever is murdering those women. thats just my 10 cents.

Totally agree with you Aubree.

Its unfortunate that many of the followers think its ‘not a big deal’ that Rodarte has used this topic in such a materialistic way. You cant ever separate hobbies/interests/possessions from the things that are really going on in the world. Makeup may seem far removed but it isnt. Everything touches everything else, so be conscious of the decisions you make with your money ladies, you never know who elses life you could be affecting. Its unfortunate that so many people think they are powerless in the struggle against serious issues like genocide, environmental damage, workers’ conditions in third world countries, sick children, AIDS, etc., but you can. Use your money in a way that you dont contribute to it.

I think this could have been approached a completely different way and have gotten a better response; say if Rodarte had approached MAC to do a collection like VIVA Glam and had money goes to the cause, not merely drawing attention to the topic with the names of the products. Unfortunate.

There is a page article in August Vogue about the collaboration, with a couple sneak peek photos at products- look beautiful!

The women of Juarez are being raped and murdered in their thousands;
they live in shantys and are underpaid and exploited. Naming a makeup collection ‘Factory’ etc is disgusting…. go look into this terrible situation before you rave about MAC. Shame on the Estee Lauder Family.

I think I’d only be interested in the blush and mineralize eyeshadows, maybe some pigments. Everything else sounds too ghostly and pale.

You know, ordinarily, I’d be all over this – but given all the discussion, I’m with those who think it’s in poor taste. Plus – look at the model used. Is she supposed to look like a zombie? She does to me, and given everything else, I think I’ll be taking my money elsewhere.

i didnt think i was going to like this collection .. but there are definitely a few things i need to check out .. the beauty powder sounds very pretty and the eyeshadows look cool .. interested in seeing what they look like all swirled together!

Most of these colours are far too pale. That image of the ghostly white woman with black around her eyes isn’t very appealing at all. She reminds me of a skeleton. Apart from the first 3 of those pigments, which I already have, not one thing interests me. At least I can save my money on this collection!

As for the names, which I’m ashamed to say meant nothing to me before (I live in the UK), having now read about the background and associations they have I don’t think them at all appropriate for a makeup collection.

Really, really poor taste. Plus I buy makeup and fix my hair to NOT look like that “model”.

This is just really awful all around. You couldn’t pay me to touch it.

I usually don’t get excited about pigments, but those colors sound DIVINE.

I’m excited about the blush and the beauty powder too! 🙂

Is it not possible to turn something horrible into something beautiful? That’s what I would like to think that the two women behind Rodarte are doing in this collection for MAC. I don’t think it’s fair to assume that just because of the names of some of the items in this collection that Rodarte or MAC is supporting the events that that are happening in Juarez.
Regardless I think the collection is beautiful, perhaps it would be better received if MAC donated a portion of sales to relief efforts.

What is there to gain by turning femicide– or even exploited factory workers– into something “beautiful”?

If anything, by making this “beautiful,” Rodarte and MAC are enabling the erasure of femicide. As privileged, first-world consumers, we are being given the tools with which to distance ourselves from these atrocities. We shouldn’t see human misery as “beautiful.” There is nothing beautiful about it.

What I find most horrifying is that, for many U.S. women, this line will be the only information they ever have about Juarez. The ongoing femicide is invisible to so many around the world. So much of what is happening there is swept under the rug in order for global consumers to go on comfortably enjoying the fruits of human despair– They don’t want us to know what the real costs of the cheap televisions/computers/cellphones we enjoy are to the people who work in factories to produce these goods.

Women are routinely kidnapped, raped, tortured, mutilated, and buried in the desert. No one with any power want to talk about it because it is “bad for business.” They know that consumers don’t want to ask themselves how they, personally, benefit from what is happening in Juarez.

Being asked to accept all of this as “beautiful” is repugnant.

>”What I find most horrifying is that, for many U.S. women, this line will be the only information they ever have about Juarez.”

This is very true for me – I’d never heard of Juarez until reading these comments. Is there any chance that MAC/Rodarte chose this theme for their collections as a way to draw attention to the horrific situation? Or should we not give them that much credit?

(Just playing devil’s advocate. I agree with everything you’ve said so far.)

Thu, I thought about this before posting, especially given my initial adverse reaction (so rare for cosmetics campaigns!). But what made me so uncomfortable is what other posters have already noted–the aestheticization (all too common in the fashion industry) of violence against women.

Unfortunately, underscoring the horrors in Juarez isn’t likely to move product. I suspect that any silver lining comes from people in the know who are able to point out the dark side of this and similar ad campaigns.

As a MAC fan, this collection really pains me.

I think not knowing MAC’s intent means that they did not put enough thought into its release. Either that implies careless/calousness on their part, or lack of education. 🙁

Yes, Alex, and in that sense, the comparison to the Holocaust is apt: there were many wealthy Germans who looked the other way while Adolf “fixed that problem.” The Shoah is always the extreme example, and I find it sad that you have been criticized for using a fine basis of comparison in your argumentation.

I want to thank you for informing me of this (sadly I did not know and you are right…this collection would be my only information about Juarez) The promo pic made me feel odd and the names of the products sounded wrong. Thank you for connecting everything for me and allowing me to make a sage decision…I will not support this collection and will write to MAC.

MAC is a big company trying to make as much money as they can, right? So why would they make a collection like this? To say femicide is a good thing? Or violence against women? So they would lose a lot of loyal MAC lovers? While on the other hand they make collections like Viva Glam? Well, I don’t think so! It is to draw attention to the horrible situation. Before I read this article, I didn’t knew anything about Juarez, but now I know. And if people now help is needed things can change. And you say the things going on there are invisible? Well not anymore for a lot of readers on here. And if they wouldn’t want us to know the real costs of our cheap TV’s they sure wouldn’t make a collection which would cause this discussion!

And something else. Did you see the promo picture? That is not beauty? That is a women who could have worked in a factory. More death then alive. I think it is common sense they are trying to start awareness and not promoting murder. Come on.

You need to read this…

They’re not promoting murder, they were oblivious to it all. And THAT IS BAD. Perhaps if the designers had bothered to GET OUT OF THE CAR and talk with the locals, they might have realized the reality of the city and acted differently.

Until people pointed out how tasteless this collection seemed, MAC didn’t think to even mention the issues surrounding Juarez, much less choose a charity to help women. If this was to raise awareness, they would’ve had announced the charity long beforehand. Right now they’re trying to cover up their ugly oversight with it like a bandaid.

Of course they knew the issues. You just posted the link of a collection based on the factory workers there. How could they not know the issues? Why do they call there products ‘Ghost town’, ‘Bordertown’, which is also the name of a movie about all the issues in Juarez. And like I said look at the model. She’s a zombie like probably the women in those factories. And I don’t believe MAC will make a collection about Juarez, without doing any research about the topic. And Juarez is the most violent and criminal city in the world? How could they not know and find out?

I’m still not totally sure where I stand on this issue, as I see valid points to both sides. I think you are incredibly well-spoken and obviously informed on this topic.

I did want to add, however, that I think the ‘beauty’ here lies in posts like this one. Maybe using makeup to discuss this topic wasn’t the best medium, but I think it can also be said that it has managed to bring this topic into the limelight, something that may not otherwise have been done. As you have stated, the most horrifying part of all of this is that for many US women, this line will be the only information they ever have about Juarez. While the names of the products may be seen as crude or inappropriate (I agree, not the best judgment on MAC’s part), it was a great way for a medium that seems so far removed to expose the tragedy that’s going on.

The beauty industry doesn’t really have many ways to bring social injustice to the world’s attention without making it fashionable so in a way it seems that’s exactly what was done here. It has given women, who otherwise may have forever remained faceless, the chance to be heard. I totally understand your point, I’m just saying maybe this was one of the ways they thought they could help open the eyes of some who may not otherwise see.

Mmmmm, to be honest I’m not sure if that’s the blush or beauty powder up there… they sound to similar to me right now.

is it just me or does the promo image totally go against the typical rodarte styling?? i always imagine prisms and colors and lines…so that’s missing from the promo image but reflected in the actual products and packaging. i really think those eyeshadows and pigments have cult status potential.

well, if i wasn’t already turned off by the fetishizing of border violence, i would be totally turned off by the promo pic! eep, not pretty or positively eye-catching.

the only good thing i could see coming out of this collection is perhaps bringing awareness to the violence and exploitation suffered by the inhabitants of juarez. let us hope, anyhow.

and christine, thanks for keeping the discussion up!

Definitely won’t be going for the dead carp look. I have very pigmented lips, and light lipsticks look awful on me with my NC20 complexion.

oh my goodness that picture is not my favorite. its a little
creepy/scary/intense. i’m trying to appreciate the artistry but i just can’t and that makes me sad 🙁

I’m really looking forward to this! It’s a nice fresh change from everyone else’s plums for fall. I like the creativity of the concept theme.

Nix that last statement. I didn’t know what Rodarte was until I read the other comments. That is kind of twisted but hopefully MAC will donate profits to help those women.

I have posted this both in the post and in various spots in the comments (placed in hopes of being seen by those intending to join in the discussion).

One more time: Please remember to respect your fellow Temptalia readers. I do not tolerate name calling or insults. Debate and discuss with intelligence and passion but leave out jibes, digs, or other personal attacks. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, even if you may disagree with it or find it “stupid.” We want to facilitate the discussion and keep it focused on the issues, not fostering attacks on other readers.

Thanks so much, Christine, for allowing all of this emotion and opinion to get aired out. You’ve done so much more than just put up pix.

LOVE the packaging! Things that I’m interested in:
-Rose State Lipstick
-Kitschmas pigment (although that is permanent..might not buy)
-Softly Drifing Beauty powder
-Quinceanera Blush

The corpse collection. Well, this one is interesting even though I can see that it has caused controversy. I’m not quite sure I can pull off light grey taupe lipstick but I will definitely check out this collection when it arrives in stores.

I prefer to keep my personal views/political views just that – personal. I do not want this blog to represent a particular viewpoint but to provide an open forum for discussion. I hope you understand!

I can’t help but feel you should comment on this subject Christine.. you easily commented on the OPI situation and told us all how you found them rude and didn’t like the way they did this and that. But, with this MAC collection your keeping your view on your own BLOG personal? This feels very weird as though maybe it is because of your affiliation(being payed or sent promo by them) to MAC. Which is odd because I can usually count on you to say your honest opinion of things regardless of price. But, I can’t help but feel this is YOUR blog not ours! We should know YOUR thoughts!…

This is very, very different. What OPI did was to me/the blog, which was something I personally experienced, and the removal merited explanation to readers. I personally feel that Temptalia is a community, and it is my job to help facilitate a discussion. I don’t get paid by MAC, and ironically, I buy far more MAC than I receive as samples.

I hope you can respect my personal beliefs and my goals for Temptalia as a community.

I’m not asking your political views, but rather your opinion about MAC at this point and time!? Are you happy with them? Are you a bit shocked? I am not wondering if you think it is ok for the women in mexico etc, but I would love to know if you will be boycotting them or if you think they have made a mistake etc.. I suppose it is political, but it also is makeup, and that is the subject of your blog. This is also not just Temptalia the company but christine the makeup blogger. You tell us your opinion of OPI’s way of handling things and now you won’t tell us your opinion on the way MAC is handling things. I’m not attacking you, I don’t want to offend you at all, I do after all love this blog. I just want to know everything your thinking about this… your only being Temptalia the company that is seeing over this dialog.. but I understand OPI was directed to you.. but you have to do with MAC/Rodarte makeup releases and all the information released.. I want to know what you think about all this. If I wanted a press conference amount of information I would be happy with all you have said, but you are a blog!!! You need to be telling us your opinions!!! When I search blog on google I get the result : paraphrased .. Blogger is a free blog publishing tool for easily sharing your thoughts with the world.
I also think it was very grand of you not to remove my comments.

It is with all due respect to your opinion Gaby, but it just not how I feel. If and when I ever discuss my personal/political views (because you cannot separate what MAC has done previously, currently, and in the future in regards to the Rodarte collection without addressing the controversy itself), I will do so because I feel it is the right thing to do.

I want this to be a place where everyone can discuss their opinions–a place that neither side will be favored, so everyone can say what they want without fear of censorship. I hope you can respect my decision. It is extremely important to me to maintain my integrity and stay true to my values and the goals I have for myself and this blog.

If Christine does not want to put her opinion out there, why are you trying to force her? I can’t imagine why she would want to say anything only to have to spend all of her time defending whatever it is she said. I’d rather have her spend that time doing what she loves than that.

I respect her for staying neutral. I think it must be hard not to say anything at all and put up with people pressuring her to say something. She has contacted MAC for us has she not done enough for us?

This is a makeup blog not a political blog. We don’t need her political opinions. Sure I’m curious about what she thinks but her opinion isn’t going to change how I feel about this.

I understand how you feel Aimee, I just feel as though in many blogs, the blogger is usually driven by money and makes decisions based on a bias. I don’t want Temptalia to be a company that only says what is safe because they are the voice of now many “paying” businesses. I say “paying” as in giving free samples, free launch info, direct line to pr etc.
I will cease to pressure Christine though, it is her choice to be neutral for her bloggers. I just thought perhaps she should say something to loyal fans who love her opinion about her thoughts on MAC now.. but it is her choice! She has clearly chosen to stay neutral! I just was also a huge fan of OPI and wished she had stayed neutral when she decided to tell us publicly that they were rude in the manner they conducted themselves and didn’t handle things well but then found it OK to stay neutral with this MAC situation… Anyhow I’m rambling on! The point is, I understand, thanks anyhow! I also will remind that it is very admirable for her to keep my messages up, even though in a sense my comment isn’t directly about the collection, it isn’t a stab though.. I hope it didn’t come out in such.

They can be used to highlight or as all-over powders, BUT it sometimes depends – some are very, very pigmented, so then more like a blush. Generally, they’re soft/sheer, so they can be used all-over.

rodarte pushes boundries. artists for centuries have. its amazing the amount of education and discussion going on about this controversial collaboration & the products they’re producing.

well done rodarte & mac. well done ladies for sparking passion to defend women. now write those letters to someone who can MAKE changes, not mac. or rodarte.

Yes, the amount of education and discussion going on about this controversial collaboration & products…was not brought about by Rodarte, but by the people who were offended by this.

Until a few people who are NOT working for MAC or Rodarte brought it up and provided links…NO ONE WOULD HAVE HAD A CLUE as to the atrocities going on in Juarez. MAC did not make a statement nor did they offer profits to help women….until people complained.

Please give credit to where its due. And its not directly due to Rodarte’s. This has all probably been an accident to them.

need both lipglasses uncompromisable the packaging and layering is fabulous but i especially love the font and little mac rodarte exceprt on the packaging SO CUTE!!! thats whats puushing me over the edge but i want to smack mac in the face!!! WE LOVE YOU BUT YOUR OVERWHELMING US WITH COLLECTIONS LOLOLOLOL were in a recession cut us some slack. hey christine i was thinking about getting hot house deep lipglass from venoumous villans i have dark brown 2 shades away from black hair i have and long edgy haircut so im afraid the bold color will make me look to rocker goth and that is not me but the gloss just looks so fun. any thoughts??????

One way to change your look (away from the rocker goth look you don’t want) is to dress in a more classic/feminine way. You could also style your hair softly (with curls, waves, etc.) to go away from the ultra-edgy look. And lastly, you could try and pair this lipcolor with lighter eyes or turning it into a more classic/pin-up look. But either way you go, it’ll be beautiful. Rocker or Girly.

It’s a name of a product. People come here to intellegently discuss makeup and beauty and to learn and ask questions from others with the same passion everyone has a different point of view but this isn’t where it should be discussed.

Where SHOULD “intellegent” [sic] discussions about MAC’s politics happen?
Why is it cool to talk about (and praise) MAC’s politics when it comes to Viva Glam, but not when there is a critique to be made?

Hi, Halo,

It’s SO much more than the name of a product! The naming of this collection was not completed on a whim – it was meticulously worked-out. Rodarte seems to be trying to make a commentary, or at least provoke chatter regarding the border situation in Juarez. (I haven’t read anything official from them nor MAC, but this is my guess.) If you read any of the links offered throughout this post, it might give you another, different view of the product line and possible motives for their utilizing this macabre inspiration.

However, it’s upsetting to me that there hasn’t yet been any official clarification regarding MAC/Rodarte’s clear illustration/glamorization of Juarez and the women therein. I hope that there is some sort of fund set up to help these victims, though even still I really don’t understand using a beauty collection to make this sort of statement about how dire the border town is. It appears to be exploitative, though I can’t imagine this was the aim…

Additionally, as far as finding proper forums for discussing these sorts of worldly issues, that seemingly have nothing to do with makeup, I respectfully disagree! We are all passionate about make-up, and if a collection comes out that uses makeup to make a statement, I say, debate on! The more aware we become, about all of these inhumane issues, whether we like hearing it or not, the better equipped we will be to make positive choices in our own personal environments, and furthermore, the world. I know it sounds cliché, but even the smallest steps of recognition can bring waves of change!

I think it’s important to discuss the ugly side of makeup, too, even if it’s just the issues associated with collections that are ugly, and NOT the products.

Well, I definitely see why people would get upset over this…it is a very touchy subject. But, I don’t think that MAC is promoting violence and murder. Maybe they’re just making people aware of what’s happening..even though it does seem wrong to do it through makeup. With that being said, I’m interested in some of the products from this collection and so far my list is:
l/s in Ghost Town
l/g in Rodarte
pigment in White Gold
b/p in Softly Drifting
blush Quinceanera
nail lacquer in Juarez(i know, i know; the name causes controversy, but I buy products for the color–not the name)

Hopefully I can keep it under 7 items…:)

I’m actually really glad that I don’t like anything from this collection, because honestly, the whole inspiration for this just makes me a bit sick. I’m not among the squeamish, and I’ll admit, I’m a bit morbid at times, but I don’t want any of that in my makeup. I don’t really see any evidence of this being used to raise awareness or make a statement. If, for example, an artist were to paint something in relation to the border violence (which I’ll admit I’m not very educated or aware about), I’d hope it would do something, say something, about the issue at hand. I do consider make-up and fashion design to be forms of art, so the people behind them, atleast in my eyes, are held up to the sames standards of decency as any other artist in any other field.
I don’t think they’re glamorizing or supporting the problems by basing a line off of them and using relevant names for the products, but in my opinion, it’s not quite right to take this tragedy, dress it up, and sell it.

I have to admit I knew nothing of Juarez, and after reading about it here in the comments just minutes ago, I’m put off by this.

I’ve never been a fan of UD’s names, either. 5150 was especially offensive, like it was mocking Britney Spears’ mental breakdown. Yeyo isn’t much better, IMO.

In all honesty I’d only heard about Juarez a couple times before learning the details here, and I’m glad I did.

As a fan of Urban Decay, I can appreciate the vibe their whole line gives off, but yes, a lot of the names are less than classy. I’m pretty annoyed by 5150 too, because it is, in my opinion, indecent, but the litany of drug names don’t really get to me. I can see that it is in poor taste, though.

Thank you very much for the link, I wanted to learn more and IMO Wikipedia, as a source edited by users, isn’t always completely reliable.

Thank you Evangelia so much for the link. I just checked it out and it is very eye opening. Although many people are offended by this collection, the good is that it illicited a discussion and opened our eyes to what is going on in Juarez, that many of us were ingorant to. I do agree with those that says MAC and Rodarte should both release statements regarding the reasoning behind the collection and where proceeds are going. I think MAC and Rodarte wanted this to be a socially concious collection with the names. But I can see how many might think it is just a means to an end. You guys really have me thinking. There are other tasteful ways to do it.

you’re very welcome! if you really want to read an in-depth (albeit controversial) book about the current state of juarez, i recommend charles bowden’s book, murder city. absolutely chilling:(

its not suppose to be pretty. this collection is inspired by a city where thousand of girls have been killed and dismembered! juarez is know as the city of lost girls

Oh my gosh, this is gonna be a very unique and interesting collection! I already have MAC bubbles lipstick, so I had to stop myself when I saw the description for ghost town. I am excited for the blush and pigments. The collection isn’t very wearable for me personally, but honestly it doesn’t look like any collection I have seen from MAC. I will definitley be looking forward to this collection.

ALEX, can I marry you? You took the words right out of my mouth. Such an intelligent lady. I’m glad someone is looking at the bigger picture, and not just the MAC label stuck on these products.

Like someone said I think I will write a letter to MAC, and count me out from buying anything from this collection. Sick.

I completely agree too!

Thank you Alex for speaking on behalf of those who are against injustice wherever it is, not just the convenient trouble hotspots that the Western media/govts like to highlight and parade for their own economic/political agendas i.e. Darfur (which by the way is an economic conflict, like all conflicts) and of course the US/Europe perpetuated wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan for oil, gas and mineral riches…in this context, it’s fitting that a company like MAC would monetise conflict, sadly I am not surprised at all and it’s put me off MAC a lot.

I wasn’t aware of all the happenings until I saw this post, and I understand how the names are offending but I think that the fact that it’s bringing awareness about what’s going on to everyone is IMO a good thing. If Mac donated some of the profits to helping the women in Juarez, by supporting them they could change this controversy into beauty.

As a Latina I feel so dissapointed in MAC for naming the products in this collection the way they did. Idont believe they did this out of racism or hate but to try to glamourize something so horrible that is happening everyday is just sad. A human life is a human life regardless of race and any tragedy where human lives are being taken for no reason shouldn’t be less important than another

Thank you Christine for allowing the discussions to happen. It’s very eye opening.

If MAC is really just exploiting the tragedies taking place and using the names to sound “kewl” I just don’t know what to say…

I dont see that at all. the collection doesnt come out until september so maybe there will be some awareness. who know maybe some of the proceeds go to helping this. dont be ignorant. its not “kewl”.

If this is released with no statement to increase awareness or as a benefit, the fact is purely that these companies are using the suffering of others to make money.

i hate to say it, but someone was aware when they sat down in front of a panel and persuaded these products go into production.

if u think this many average women are in an uproar over this line, then you’d be the fool to think someone on that panel did not know of this before hand…

whether their intention was to donate BEFORE or AFTER seeing the public response is irrelevant. isn’t it nice to feel your voice has been heard by the brand.

now the off beat questions is, will you still boycott the line now that you know proceeds are going to BENEFIT the women & help stop border violence?

This does bring about awareness about the horrible events going on, but why is it that people always bring up skin color? i hear how people don’t want to be judged by their skin color etc,and how we are supposed to be colorblind, yet i continue to see references to these women as BROWN, poor women. Certainly not only BROWN women are ones being subjected to this kind of violence in Juarez; women of all skin colors live there; from pale, to light tan, to deep dark shades of tan. I just dont understand how we as humans are supposed to be “colorblind” when people always seem to bring it up! Also, how does using these names of products imply that this violence is ok? If you dont like these products then dont buy them, and maybe start donating the money you couldve spent on these products to the cause you guys are “passionate” about. That seems more proactive than trying to ban them being sold

1. No one is trying to ban these products. I don’t know where you got that idea.

2. The names of these products sanitize what is happening in Juarez. They turn human misery into a consumer good. I don’t think that MAC had any intention of raising awareness. Indeed, they seem quite surprised by the uproar.

3. I keep using the word “brown” because the majority of women who have been murdered in Juarez fit a certain physical profile. Most of them have been: short, thin, younger, and darker complected. Color is absolutely essential to the discussion of the femicide in Juarez because the murderers are targeting BROWN women. Many have speculated that they do this, knowing that many see poor brown women as disposable. Their deaths are treated as part of the cost of doing business. By bringing attention to what is happening to them on forums like this, those of us who are outraged are disrupting that notion.

These women are NOT disposable. They ARE valuable. And, as long as I have the privilege of internet access and they do not, I will CONTINUE to speak my outrage on their behalf. The world needs to know what is happening in Juarez.

The people who have been so “outraged” by this “tragedy” have yet to post a link to something they’re doing about it, or somewhere that everyone else can do something about this.

Getting all huffy never changed the world.

Art is different than beauty. Make-up ART cosmetics, sounds to me that their definition of make-up is more than beauty products, but as ART itself. Last time I checked grey taupe lipstick was not the top-selling beauty product. It wasn’t meant for “average” beauty, or for “commercial” beauty, or “glamorous” beauty.
The interesting thing about MAC is their pictures aren’t always pretty. Their models aren’t always perfect. Their products aren’t always happy. Just like how ART and the real WORLD are. Overall, this has raised eyebrows, for the good. People may be outraged but it hopefully will increase the help for this tragedy.

Oh and btw, Venomous Villains condones evil, poison, wicked murderers? No one said a darn thing about that.
I could compare Maleficent to Hitler, but that wouldn’t help anyone in Juarez, now would it?

Seriously, wtf?
The Disney Villans collection is not even remotely comparable to this situation at all!
In Rodarte’s poor attempt to be reverent and worldly, they’re profiteering off the atrocities that have plagued this city for nearly two decades. How could you name a nail polish after a city that’s suffered such egregious crimes against humanity. The imagery of this collection is definitely referencing what’s going on, and while I don’t believe they are glamourizing or promoting the violence, I don’t think they adequately approached the situation.

my point is you can compare anything to anything, anyone can say anything they want on how awful this is, yet nothing is accomplished by those comments. only actions!

Very true. I noticed how people responded about the names of the other collections but they have h=not responded on what they plan to do after the collection is gone. It seems most people want to rant, but like you said they don’t plan to act. Sad that a majority of people are that way. I see it every day… people complain about the problem but never try to help fix the real issue. Also many still haven’t fully researched the issue. Instead I hear a lot of “it was said” or this person told me…” we all can use the internet so why not use google and do your research about on the facts. Talk is cheap and action is deep.

why does color matter? im confused? women being murdered shopuld be the main point, it shouldnt matter their color. murder is murder, whether it be black, white, orange, rainbow colored, etc. and Juarez is a very dangerous town due to the narcos of the world. I had family who lived their and had to abandon it because the drug lords and their corruption ruined it

Other people have also brought up the point that the very paleness of this collection seems like a further insult to those women who have been murdered. Not only do the maquilas not make enough to afford Rodarte or MAC, but even if it was handed out free, it certainly isn’t geared toward their complexions.

because, as a woman of color, my skin is a HUGE part of my identity, it causes me to be treated differently in society than a white person. there is no way to be “colorblind”, that’s just ignoring someone’s very real part of their identity. and because of the colonization of spain indigenous people in Mexico (who are darker) are often kept in poverty BECAUSE they are of indigenous descent and are therefore treated as lower class. don’t put passionate in quotation marks, that’s so insulting.

Agreed. Not to mention that names probably go through a level of copyright lawyers too. (That’s my suspicion, not fact.) Either someone brought this up and was dismissed, or people were reluctant to bring this up (“not my job, I just analyze sales”), or perhaps the boardroom discussion DID include the situation of the women in Juarez, but they felt that because _they_ (the people in the room) were “aware”, then it was okay. That is, everyone was sensitive in the room (maybe), so they did not extrapolate how offensive these colours and colour-names were and would sound to the general public. Still ignorant though & doesn’t make it better in my eyes.

I really like the items on this collection. I can see why it can be offensive for a lot of people, especially those from Juarez or if they know someone or lost someone there. But I do believe that the whole point in this collection is to bring out the city and maybe even help others understand what they are coming from. I highly doubt it that anyone wanted or intended to offend anyone with this collection.

I was super excited about lip erase until I bought it and used it. It’s basically smudgy concealer for your lips. I thought it’d be like a primer and maybe my lipsticks would stick longer. I dont know why I thought that, just did, and it’s just nothing special. Really, just use a bit of foundation on your lips and save your $$.

Am I the only one who thinks everything in this collection is fug? I am so not excited about this collection…better for my wallet I guess.

I won’t be buying from this collection either, BUT I’d also never heard of Juarez or the femicide issue until looking at the ghostly picture and reading all of the comments. While I find it deeply disturbing, I have to wonder if that was the point…to educate and bring awareness? Look how many people are being exposed to the issue just from a “makeup blog”…. It’s not just makeup. Thank you to the readers who took time to post and provide links so that we can now educate ourselves on the issue. Hopefully it will move some to advocate for these women (and men).

At first I was hoping it was maybe an artistic way of honoring the victims. A way raise awareness and somewhat of a memorial. However now I’m reminded of the disgusting shallowness the fashion world won’t abandon.Heroin chic? I can’t imagine how many lives its claimed and still counting. I guess the drug cartel’s devastation would be the their obvious choice. Can’t help but think of zoolander-however a very funny movie-still showcases the shallowness in some parts of the fashion world.Ya can’t buy class

I honestly can’t believe that MAC went there. I really can’t. A company that is so cruelty-free and so giving to the AIDS community cannot possibly be this starved for attention that they would have no problem exploiting the pain of hundreds (if not thousands) of people for profit.

I think I could understand it more if MAC were doing this as a way to bring awareness to those living in this situation and if, like Viva Glam, proceeds were going to organizations that would help these women (and men) get into a better situation.

Yes, I am half Hispanic. And yes, it pains me to see so many people not understand that what is going in Mexico is somehow not as bad as what happens to women in Rwanda, and yes, even the Holocaust. We are ALL people, and instead of bickering and biting here on the site, I will respect Christine (and her wonderful blog) and will go straight to writing and calling MAC to let them know just how disappointed I am that they’ve allowed themselves to stoop this low.

Yes, it is just makeup, but the makeup isn’t the issue. They could have easily called this “Industrial Revolution” and threw the SAME colors out there for us to love, snatch up and adore. Hell, they could’ve picked ANY OTHER INDUSTRIAL TOWN that WASN’T going through a femicide/rape/torture hell and it would’ve been fine.

I’m stepping off my soapbox now. Instead of spending money on this line, I will make a donation to a womens fund that helps those in situations like this. Sorry MAC, you may still have my love, but not for this one.

I completely agree with you, it comes across as incredibly insensitive because it seems like Rodarte/MAC either aren’t fully aware of what is occurring in Juarez or they don’t care enough to think that naming stuff after a place where countless women have been murdered could be offensive. In this age of the internet, it’s really hard for me to be sympathetic to any pleads of ignorance on either party’s part. All I hope is that more people become aware of the atrocities that are occurring in Juarez.

Hi Christine! I’m so sorry about the negative comments you’ve been getting lately. It’s such a shame that people can’t set aside their immaturity to comment on such a nice website such as yours, and I hope that the arguing and insults become overpowered by the compliments and love you get from your readers. Thank you for everything you do, Christine, from taking pictures of 20 lipstick swatches to doing in-depth reviews of products from tried and true brands as well as lesser-known brands. You’re so brave for putting yourself out there and don’t stop doing what you love, because you’re doing one heck of a job!

Tell Mellan and Shaun “hey!” for me 🙂 Bye Christine!!

Thanks, Ali! 🙂 It’s all good — I don’t mind the discussion, just want it to stay on track and not degenerate into a namecalling battle!

I appreciate the props — will say hi to the boys for ya 😀


None of these “negative” comments are directed at Christine. She doesn’t work for MAC. She had nothing to do this line.

And, bringing awareness of social issues to a community like this isn’t “negative.” People come here to be educated about the makeup that they buy. Why can’t that education extend to the social implications of certain lines?

Lastly, being able to discuss the things that outrage us, make us uncomfortable, or pain us is not a sign of immaturity. Quite the opposite. An immature response to this line would be to shut out everything that made us uncomfortable about it in order to [comfortably] focus on whether or not we thought the new lipgloss colors might be “pretty.”

i think it’s kind of ridiculous the uproar that this collection is getting. RODARTE as fashion designers and artists have the liberty to express themselves. they are not glamorizing violence; they do not mention the violence as part of their inspiration. their inspiration was solely based on aesthetics and their goal is to let the observer ponder the meanings of these aesthetics. this is what art is about. art has the ability to inspire and offend. if you live in america, y’all, this is what freedom of expression is about.

They’ve said themselves it’s inspired by all aspects of the city of Juarez, as indicated from this quote from an interview by on their latest collection: “The show ended with a quartet of ethereal, unraveling, rather beautiful white dresses that alternately called to mind quinceañera parties, corpse brides, and, if you wanted to look at it through a really dark prism, the ghosts of the victims of Juárez’s drug wars.”

There’s no doubt where the inspiration is coming from.

Original source for the quote:

it is not solely aimed at just the Juarez violence, as RODARTE is trying to incorporate other images and trying to portray an aesthetic which leaves the observer to interpret it in their own way. just because YOU are offended, does not mean others are. it’s art, and art can be offensive to some.

but basically, if you don’t like it then don’t buy it

It still includes it and in my opinion as well as many others it is highly insensitive. I am all for artist freedom but I also think if Rodarte wanted to make social commentary they didn’t execute it in a way that encouraged further discussion or understanding at all, which is reflected a lot in the attitudes being expressed here of “this doesn’t matter”, “it’s just make-up” etc. This collection is not Picasso’s Guernica, it’s a misappropriation of an incidence that isn’t understood enough.

You’re right, it isn’t. But it does show their, and others, 1st world privilege or perhaps just plain ignorance that it didn’t occur to them it might be at the very least insensitive and offensive to people. Or perhaps they just don’t care and don’t mind trivializing something so brutal and horrific.
It just shows how…removed some people are and it saddens me.
If you are comfortable with it, by all means, buy it. But understand that there are many people with a good reason not to.

No, it’s not Rodarte’s fault I choose to be a socially aware person and actively make decisions to be a conscious consumer. However, we live in a world where people are just as entitled to make reactions and commentary as those who decide to be unmoved by these situations. For me personally, the names were a bad idea but now seeing how indifferent people can be to a situation like this because it’ll possibly make them feel guilty or deprive them of something as trivial as make-up is far more concerning.

The definition of Art-, as you can find in Wikipedia is: ” is the process or product of deliberately arranging elements in a way to affect the senses or emotions.” – I agree with that definition and its art what they are doing it IS their fault if people is offended, because they were looking to arise emotions.
An artists express their opinions and feelings thru their art. And after seeing their insensitivity’s on this subject, and how cold they can be, I don’t think it’s the kind of artist that deserves my admiration. And I didn’t think that the opinions they are portraying on their collection (suffer can be beautiful) matches MAC’s public image

Ironically, Ciudad Juarez is named after Benito Juarez, a zopetec Indiand from Oaxaca who was once President of Mexico

He’s most famous quote is:

“The respect to others people rights is peace”

As artists, they may have the right to express themselves, and anyone in this forum has the right to feel offended by what they are portraing, and explain why.
We may not have the backup of global brand such as MAC, but at least we have this forum. Thanks to Christine we can freely and with respect share our opinions. Personally I don’t appreciate when mine, or other peoples thoughts are demerited in an aggresive manner (or sarcasm)

This isn’t just about self-expression, this about propriety, dignity, and tact.
All of which have been insufficiently approached.

This collection sounds really interesting. Kind of ethereal and almost other worldly. The nail lacquers, Badland pigment, and both mineralized eye shadows sound like they’ll be landing in my stash 🙂

As I believe the saying goes: “Any publicity, is good publicity”. While many may feel this release is in poor taste, try to think about how many people, who were previously oblivious, are now aware of the atrocities associated with this collection. Some may still choose to turn a blind eye to it, but others might actually seek ways to make a change.

I think MAC’s saving grace at this point would be to donate a portion of the proceeds from this collection to help combat the horrible situation, and living conditions, in Juarez, and other “Border Towns”.

i’m not sure why msc should donate anything only to appease those who are ‘offended’ by the choice of the names. if anything, those who are ‘offended’ should donate if they feel so passionately about it.

agreed. MAC has no obligation to donate any money to save themselves. If anyone boycotts, I doubt that it’ll seriously affect MAC’s own profits and reputation. If you feel strongly about this situation, then donate yourself, go out there and make a difference, DON’T expect other people to do it for you.

Boycotting is not always for the purpose of affecting profits or reputation, but can send a message that what the company is doing is not okay.

The reason I made a comment about MAC donating a portion of the proceeds, was because MAC is usually a very socially conscious and responsible company. I never felt they should do it to appease the naysayers, but because it was truly the right thing to do.

Anyways, turns out, as per MAC’s official statement, they will indeed be donating a portion of proceeds to help those in Juarez. I guess my comment/insights were so far-fetched afterall. 😉

Wow Christine when I read your little message to all of your reaaders I thought “wow why would people be arguing?” I just scrolled down and saw the little arguement on the produt names…a little ridiculous if i say so myself. I really love the idea of the limited edition packaging but keeping it clean similar to DSquared or the Alexander McQueen colletion…like with only the name of the designer written on it and no fancy pictures or anything. I’m kind of excited for the pigments and polishes for this collection:)

Wow. “little argument about the product names”. Although I appreciate your opinion about how you find this argument ridiculous (which I do not!), I’m not sure you know or understand what you’re referring to. This discussion is and will be more than just an argument about which names are used!

Personally, I also think it was highly insensitive and horrifying to use this subject (Rhodarte’s mexican road trip/the city Juarez/etc), of which this horrible femicide is an incredibly important part(!), as “ethereal” inspiration.
I am also not convinced that MAC and Rhodarte are using this makeup line to create awareness. Frankly it sounds to me like they didn’t expect the outrage at all. Especially since Mac anounced the donation after people complained about the line. That’s just my opinion.

I totally agree with all the points Alex and several other well-spoken people have put forth. This collection is saddening in its insensitivity to human sorrow and misery.

And I also agree with the point that just talking about it, even though it will inform, educate and create awareness, is not enough. It is up to us, the people who are offended by this line, to speak up and seek ways to take action to hopefully help this horrible story of violence against women.

Christine, thank you for allowing us to discuss this! On a whole other note, you have an amazing website. It’s absolutely my favorite makeup blog.


Many thanks for letting us vent/discuss/enlighten/learn about this issue through your blog! Apparently there’s so much more to make-up than just warm/cool tones!! 🙂

wow. I truly can’t believe that MAC/Rodarte would release products with names such as “Juarez” and “Factory.” Juarez is a region in Mexico notorious for it’s high poverty level and numerous rapes/murders that are committed against teen/young adult girls on their way to and from work in the factories. These crimes go unpunished and unresolved – as police have been pushing the whole situation to the wayside for years.

I’m a huge MAC fan and I certainly love rodarte also but I’m so disappointed in these names being included in this collection. Probably won’t be purchasing from this collection : /

Whoa, I knew nuts bout this till this collection came along and sparked off this whole discussion.

I’d say thumbs up though, I’m sure they knew what they were doing and I personally think they did this to create awareness. Just look at the amount of comments and anger.

Dudes, its makeup. It is not as if every penny you spend is being sent to drug lords to make the situation worse. Also, the colors are not indicative of violence. They are bright, happy, pastels. Mexico has a lot of factories and Juarez is a big city there. Plus, just as many men get killed there are women.
If it is killing you that much, write a letter to MAC. Don’t sit online trying to make everyone else feel the way you do so you can be validated.

The only way the femicide will ever stop is if enough people are made aware of it and DEMAND that the authorities put an end to it. So… we are not trying to educate people about the atrocities in Juarez so that we can “feel validated.” We are doing it to make people aware of the ONGOING violence against women that has “inspired” this line.

It really saddens me that names like factory and Juarez are in this collection….As a mexican american and a woman it just makes me very disappointed. I for one will boycott this collection. As a MAC fanatic im slowly starting to loose interest in their collections, for example: the limited supply of marine life, stereo rose where in some stores only had 3! Im so disappointed in MAC 🙁

I TOTALLY agree with this comment! I am becoming VERY dismayed by MAC as a company, and this is enough to discourage me from wanting to buy anything from them at all in the future.

What offends me the most from reading this discussion so far is, the thought that the atrocities occurring in Juarez SHOULDN’T or CAN’T be compared to the atrocity of the Holocaust. I agree with the comment: human tragedy is human tragedy. I am just curious to know the reasoning behind the thought that the two tragedies are not parallel to one other, other than the race/class of the people being victimized. In my opinion, they are absolutely parallel to one another and equally horrendous. I find it hard to understand how the situation in Juarez is any less abominable than the Holocaust or any other historical incidence of violent human genocide for that matter.

And thank you Christine, for allowing this discussion to continue on your blog. I could understand how someone in your position would be reluctant to allow it, but this has been very enlightening for me, and I respect you for allowing your blog to be a venue for discussing such a highly controversial subject. That’s what makes blogs like yours so great, its not only a site for fanatics to indulge in our common interest, our passion for makeup, but it can also become a global forum for people to voice their opinions and possibly (hopefully), learn from each other and create awareness about our world.

The only thing I’m interested in in this collection is Mauvement pigment but I would have been interested in it if it was in any other collection too. Oh and possibly the beauty powder but it does kinda look like Accentuate shaping powder so I will probably pass on it.

Heroine Chic is not my kind of taste….a lipstick called sleepless? I don´t intentionally want to look as if I had no sleep. I´m a fan of the fresh, healthy face. Although, I am interested in Badlands pigment and the mint nail polish and there are so many LEs that I am happy that I finally don´t like one of them;-).

I’m sorry. I know a lot of the products look beautiful, but all I can think of when I look at the promo ad is, “No thanks. I don’t want to look like a Zombie.” :/

There’s definitely a few things I’ll be picking up! I just don’t like the girl in the promo picture… she looks like she was locked in a cage for seven days sans food.

I’ve read the comments and I’m shocked at the negative feedback. Another reader pointed out that this collection sheds light on the issues in Juarez, that people didn’t know about before. I would say that’s a good thing… right?

If people really want to take it there, remember that when you see movies that are based off of true events, or at least make references to the problems of our world, then perhaps they should be boycotted because they’ll insult someone. Is that realistic? No. American History X, The Da Vinci Code, A Clockwork Orange, United 93, Kids, Philadelphia, Farenheit 9/11 — they’re all controversial films that have and continue to offend people. However, these films (whether they’re fiction or not) puts controversial issues under the microscope. It may make people feel offended, upset, bothered, confused, but it also brings forth attention to those unaware. Sometimes, you just have to take the good with the bad or else you’ll be looking at the glass as half empty.

And if a movie glamourizes it, yes I would boycott it. Just like I’m doing with this collection.
If the point was to raise awareness, there were far better ways to do it.

But the movies are shedding light on things that happen and bringing attention to issues. Makeup is just…having names and being pretty and making money. It’s making money using something tragic without actually SAYING ANYTHING to raise awareness of the issue or help. That’s what’s so sad. If MAC actually issues a statement about the problem or, even better, donated some proceeds to the victims, that would make it look a lot better. I hope they do.

Look at this whole thread… it actually did raise awareness. In fact, I can say that I am now aware. Perhaps MAC should donate proceeds to the cause — that I totally agree with. Still, all I’ve seen is people talk about how bad it is there and how offended they are but instead of complaining about MAC, maybe we should just donate what we would’ve liked to buy into a charitable organization on behalf of the victims in Juarez. Makes perfect sense to me since instead of just talking, we’d actually be doing something productive. In fact, that’s what I’m going to do and I’m certainly not offended by this collection. By the way, movies glamorize all sorts of problems (drugs, violence, sex), yet most of us would just say it was a good movie. Unless you limit yourself to Disney flicks, it’s definitely true.

I think that some people probably *will* consider making donations in lieu of buying the makeup from MAC they might have in September. But that’s a form of protest. I just think that blindly selling stuff without EXPLICITLY calling attention to what it’s about and what the problems are is not what I expect of a socially conscious company like MAC – they are better than this IMO 🙁

Of course movies glamorize problems, and some of them do it blindly, and that sucks, too (e.g., gory “torture porn” type flicks that make entertainment out of gruesome violence without much substance). But a lot of movies are actually made to bring attention and do something about a problem. In fact, a movie was made about this very issue in Ciudad Juarez – it’s called Bordertown. I just think there’s a huge difference between using these terms and images yanked straight from the huge problems there, and not actually TALKING about it. MAC is not talking about it, yet. I want to see them do so by the time they release this collection or I won’t even consider putting my money towards it.

I can see your point, it makes a lot of sense and I hope MAC does have something to say about it. There’s still time; a lot of their collection info isn’t released in its full entirety until usually a week or two prior to launch. Where I see is a problem is that, they based this collection off of a town in Mexico. Yet, the bulk of this makeup seems better suited for a white woman, I’m white by the way, but I find this makes no logical sense….

I would like to confirm that none of the Rodarte information I have posted has come directly from MAC PR. I have sent an inquiry in, and will let you know if I hear anything, but generally speaking, MAC (in the U.S. and with bloggers) doesn’t release information until 2-3 weeks before a collection–max. A lot of information that does come out comes from international web sites or else MAC artists (who go to update every three months).

Just because MAC based the collection off a town in Mexico doesnt mean it suited for anyone in particular. White, Black, Mexican, Asian….ALL AGES, ALL SEXES, ALL RACES, ALL MAC!..

I was definitely not trying to say that the line should revolve around colors for women of Mexican / Hispanic decent. No, no, no. What I meant was that a lot of the colors don’t look like they’re wearable for everyone, like the lipsticks and beauty powder. That’s just my opinion. The collection looks fabulous, though =)

I concur.After reading the statements that MAc/Rodarte put out, i feel a bit appreciative of their effort,but Personally i feel like the damage is done.But never say never.They will really have to redeem themselves on this one.
It’s too bad because im an avid MAC shopper, and i liked a few things from this line, however I won’t go near them.
Bordertown!!Yes that movie(Jennifer Lopez is in it) absolutely shed a whole new light on this issue!!I STRONGLY suggest for anyone planning to purchase anything from this line to watch that movie beforehand.It will truly open your eyes.One thing is to hear about it another is to actually SEE it.It’ll give you a new perspective.

Perhaps it brings awareness to the issue, but if you think about it, the basis of this collection (at least from the promo pic) is dark, tired eyes, and corpse-like mouths. We’re supposed to want to look like this? I feel its glamorizing the issue at hand, and I think that MAC distastefully named the products.

My problem with the collection (and the promo picture) is that the colors seem like they’re made for a white / fair-skinned women (yes, I’m white), but this is all suppose to be based off of a Mexican city. I feel like it lacks diversity for ALL women (and men too!).

That’s a really good point, Katie. If you’re going to be inspired in whatever way by a Mexican city, I’d think they could at least make the colors suitable for a typical Mexican consumer’s skin tone.

I have to agree with you on that; even if I wasn’t sickened by this collection I still wouldn’t buy most of these products, I’m a WOC (North Indian) and there’s no way I could wear any of these colors without looking just gross. When your skin is tan, taupe lips don’t look edgy or heroin-chic, they just look gross, atleast in my opinion.

For the record, I think taupe lips would look gross on 99.9% of people lol

Seriously though, they could’ve done a better job at making this collection well-rounded.

I disagree. Many movies that superficially appear to glamourize drugs and violence are actually trying to prove the opposite. The ones that aren’t I don’t watch. Believe me, I still watch many, many movies. 😉
But there is no deeper meaning here. It is a situation where people took something so horrific and reduced it something superficial to sell clothes and makeup. 🙁

True! Still, my point was leaning more towards how these movies offend people. Passion of the Christ. Remember that one? The way it started HUGE controversy, but now that all is said and done, it’s old news. I feel like, for a lot of people, this’ll become old news too… just like everything else — even if they were deeply offended by it. Sometimes, there’s just things that we have no control over. I do think MAC could’ve worked this A LOT better, but I hope they learn from it… hopefully make a good donation and never cross the line again. As for the movies, they sell tickets and the actors get multi-million dollar contracts. Yet, MOST of these movies, I’m sure, make no charitable contribution. It’s kind of hypocritical.

I had a long talk with dh about this on our way home last night. We don’t always agree on what is insensitive, but we were both in firm agreement that this collection goes way beyond insensitive and is just plain disgusting. Dh made the comment that if they were glamourizing just about any other similiar situation or tragedy it would create an uproar, but for some reason this one people want to brush off as “just makeup”. More people need to step outside of themselves and realize that things are more than “just makeup” or “just clothes”. This collection highlights the ignorance and 1st world privilege that runs rampant in our society.
I am extremely disappointed in MAC and I have to say, it’s changed the way I view the company for the worse. 🙁

i see your point, but i think it is perhaps cynical, or maybe just underestimating all of us, to assume that ANY other tragedy or situation would create an uproar. in fact, i would qualify what is going on now as an uproar, no?

i think the main difference is that if it was an issue more people were aware of, the uproar would be more immediate. with this, people have to learn about it before they can get angry, i know i had to. i think it is common for people to be more sympathetic to issues within their own cultural group (fortunately and unfortunately), but have a little faith in your fellow makeup lovers that it is not always just because of who the tragedy is affecting and not affecting, it’s more about visibility (i believe).

i think if it was another issue the same people would be dismissive towards it and the same people would be angry about it. but people are entitled to their opinions either way.

i really like the idea of taking the money i was planning on putting toward this collection and donating it to an organization that helps these women instead.

hmm…it just doesn’t look like a very women of color friendly collection to me with the exception of the eyeshadows…so I will probably be passing it up.

Meh, what a boring collection! The mineralize eyeshadows seems somewhat interesting though.

I’m really disgusted by the whole theme and the names as well, so I’ll probably pass on this one.

Most eyeshadows, paint pots, fluidlines and pigments are made in Canada. Many of the face powders are made in Italy and many other items in the USA. Estee Lauder has lots of plants and makes lots of stuff all over the world.

Oh boy, that picture is freaking me out. Nearly puts me off the collection just because I’m so freaked out by the girl haha.
Actually, to be honest, apart from the lipsticks (which I still would have to see in person before making a choice) nothing really appeals to me … well, we’ll see !

Okay, after reading the whole lot of comments, I now know it has something to do with Juarez (I actually hadn’t made the link … journalism major FAIL -___- boo me !) and have decided I could never purchase this collection. It is too politically sensitive and unless all profit is directly given to a movement that helps the women in Juarez (I mean, this could be why MAC is doing this, until we have more info we won’t know) it is, in my opinion, just glamorizing some people’s misery and I could never stand by that.
So MAC, unless you do something really good with this money, your collection will never see the inside of my house.

I am SO not artsy enough to appreciate this promo photo. It terrifies me, in fact! But I LOVE the look of the products! WOW! can’t wait to see these and their swatches 🙂

So I just read the previous comments… eee! I’m ashamed to say this but I did not make the connections to the product names and horrific events until people pointed it out. So, thanks for letting the rest of us uninformed know.

This collection and the so-called “inspriration” behind it saddens me being that they are not bringing any awareness to the situation there, just making a profit. As a native Texan, I’m well aware of the situation in the border towns, particularly Jaurez, which is an extremely dangerous place. MAC needs to do better.

The merits of the collection items aside (and I happen to love them), I have to say the controversey stirred up by the subject matter of the collection is probably going to have a positive effect on the real world situation.

Righteous anger fuels activism. Look at the comments, many of the women who commented on this had NEVER EVEN HEARD of Juarez or the plight of the people there. Well, they do now. Does it say something about our society that sometimes a lipstick (or a blog, for that matter) can reveal a human rights crisis happening miles away from the border of the United States?

This is going to make people think and talk about real issues. I agree, makeup is my escape. I like Hello Kitty. But MAC has plenty ofcredibility with me; they were talking about gay rights decades before Ellen and Will and Grace. I’m going to give them the benefit of the doubt for this and be glad that 100 more people are aware of what’s going on because of this collection.

I agree, I hope good action will come of this. Also, while makeup products are more commercial goods than anything, part of fashion is art (especially for a brand like Rodarte that does not produce much for retail), and it would be a sad day if artists couldn’t deal with polemic subject matters in fear of getting boycotted.

I emailed MAC customer service to express my distaste over this collection, and their lack of foresight. The more I look at this model, the more angry I become. So, you have a zombie-like woman, tending to another gray-ghost like woman? This is in really poor taste.

I will not buy anything from this collection because of the names (and it is going to be tough because the beauty powder is just my colour).
I think if MAC wanted to make an audience aware of the problem, they could have done that with a campaign, too (like the MAC Aids-Fund etc) instead of this. I’d say that I would not buy anything else by Rodarte then, too, but that is rather pointless since they are not my price range anyways.
I do like some Goth-Glam, but I think this concept here is tasteless and also not comparable to the Goth/Pale/Rockstar-Look.

I’m so glad to have official statements about the collection. (I like MAC’s words better…) Thanks, Christine, for reaching out to the companies for their response, and for posting it so quickly!!

I’m also SO SO SO glad that MAC will be donating a percent of profits to help those in need in Juarez.

meh, the names don’t bother me – they’re just words
to be honest though although this collection looks super cool theres not a lot in it which is really “wearable” for me. i like the colourful lipglass though, and the blush is pretty. also like the sound of the mint nail varnish but thats it

here’s my thing. had the item not been named Juarez and some article had not been written about the ill practices, i’d be blissfully unaware. i cannot see the naming of these products as grounds for anger or boycotting. if anything, my awareness has been raised. im not mad at it. of course, people will find fault in anything…

Perhaps this collection isn’t making light of a terrible situation but shedding light on it. I had no idea about what was happening in Juarez and thanks to the dialogue opened up between fans of both rodarte and mac I am now aware, as are many other people. And, for the record, using the holocaust as an example in this discussion is absolutely relevant. While the horrible things happening in Juarez may or may not be on such a ma