Archived Post

Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette Review, Photos, Swatches

Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette
Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette

Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette ($46.50 for 0.20 oz.) is new for fall, and it is supposed to contain four “highly pigmented” eyeshadows with a “water-resistant” and “long-lasting” formula that is “silky” and “effortless” when applying and blending (per Illamasqua’s website). This is really a product that I think translates better in real life, under normal use, than it does in photos. It’s just not something that looks phenomenal in a close-up; no matter how lovely it seemed in person, the camera made the shades look a little iffy. If you like shimmering, sparkling cream eyeshadows, and you’re not going to be taking macro photos of your eye, I suspect you’ll still enjoy it. If you want your makeup to be immaculate, you’ll want to pass.

Every time I checked it in the mirror, I was struck by how pretty and sparkling the eyeshadows looked, but close-ups show that the product has room for improvement. Primarily, as these blend out, there’s an unevenness in texture that creates an almost patchy-looking appearance at times. I noticed that this happened a lot with Graphica, whereas Acute and Dart were much easier and forgiving. Precipice was a little chunky at times and was always the quickest shade to crease of the four.  They are water-resistant, so they won’t immediately smudge and run if your eyes are watery or water splashes on them, but if you rub at them long enough, they will move.

Precipice is described as a “soft lemon.” It’s a soft, light yellow with a sparkling, shimmering finish. It was semi-opaque when applied, but it is shade that worked best when sheered out. If it was applied in layers or at more semi-opaque coverage (in a single layer), it was quick to crease (two to three hours), but if it was sheered out, it held up better and lasted six and a half hours before creasing. Maybelline Shady Shores is darker, yellower. NYX Hot Yellow is a powder. Make Up For Ever #102 is matte, powder. See comparison swatches.

Acute is described as an “ash taupe.” It’s a subtly warm-toned, taupe (mix of gray and brown, heavier on the brown) with a shimmery, sparkling finish. It had good color payoff, and it could be applied with mostly opaque color in a single layer. This shade wore well with only faint creasing visible after eight hours of wear. Edward Bess Dusk is less sparkly, powder. Urban Decay Lost is a powder. Urban Decay Midnight Rodeo is similar. Urban Decay Rehab is less sparkly. MAC Satin Taupe is darker, powder. Chanel Topkapi #2 is similar, powder. See comparison swatches.

Dart is described as a “toasted bronze.” It’s a medium-dark brown with bronze shimmer. It had mostly opaque color coverage in a single layer, which could be softened slightly. It wore well on without creasing for seven hours, but I saw some faint creasing just before the eight-hour mark. Urban Decay Ambush is more frosted, powder. MAC Divine Decadence is darker, powder. Bobbi Brown Golden Bronze is yellower. Too Faced Gangsta is similar, powder. See comparison swatches.

Graphica is described as a “graphite grey.” It’s a medium-dark gray with silver and teal micro-shimmer. This had semi-opaque color–it was weaker compared to the rest of the palette–and when sheered out tended to look a bit patchy. This shade creased after six hours of wear. Urban Decay Redemption is cooler-toned, powder. MAC Polished Jet is more sparkly. Urban Decay Asphalt is similar, powder. MAC Nighttrain is similar, powder. Make Up For Ever #1 is similar. See comparison swatches.

Precipice

PiPPermanent in Palette.
C
C
7
Product
8
Pigmentation
9
Texture
5.5
Longevity
4.5
Application
76%
Total

Acute

PiPPermanent in Palette.
A
A
9
Product
10
Pigmentation
10
Texture
8
Longevity
5
Application
93%
Total

Dart

PiPPermanent in Palette.
A-
A-
9
Product
10
Pigmentation
10
Texture
7.5
Longevity
5
Application
92%
Total

Graphica

PiPPermanent in Palette.
C-
C-
6.5
Product
7
Pigmentation
8.5
Texture
6
Longevity
4
Application
71%
Total

Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette
Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette

Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette
Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette

Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette
Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette

Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette
Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette

Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette
Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette

Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette
Illamasqua Precipice Eyeshadow

Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette
Illamasqua Precipice Eyeshadow

Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette
Illamasqua Acute Eyeshadow

Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette
Illamasqua Acute Eyeshadow

Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette
Illamasqua Dart Eyeshadow

Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette
Illamasqua Dart Eyeshadow

Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette
Illamasqua Graphica Eyeshadow

Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette
Illamasqua Graphica Eyeshadow

Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette
Illamasqua Reflection Eyeshadow Palette: Acute (inner lid), Dart (outer lid),
Graphica (crease), Precipice (highlight)

10 Comments

Comments that do not adhere to our comment policy may be removed. Discussion and debate are highly encouraged but we expect community members to participate respectfully. Please keep discussion on-topic, and if you have general feedback, a product review request, an off-topic question, or need technical support, please contact us!

Please help us streamline the comments' section and be more efficient: double-check the post above for more basic information like pricing, availability, and so on to make sure your question wasn't answered already. Comments alerting us to typos or small errors in the post are appreciated (!) but will typically be removed after errors are fixed (unless a response is needed).

We appreciate enthusiasm for new releases but ask readers to please hold questions regarding if/when a review will be posted as we can't commit to or guarantee product reviews. We don't want to set expectations and then disappoint readers as even products that are swatched don't always end up being reviewed due to time constraints and changes in priorities! Thank you for understanding!

Comments on this post are closed.
Jade Avatar

I’ve been meaning to ask you for the longest time, Christine – if a products shade description varies considerably from the actual product (and it doesn’t appear to be a mistake/mislabel) do you take that into account for grading?

Christine Avatar

Not really – unless it is something like sheer vs. opaque or finish, but actual color can vary from lighting to lighting, person to person (what you may call taupe, I might call a cool brown, for example), and sometimes the person who writes the copy for the shade may not even have a real product to look at (only a mock, maybe just an image, plastic comp, etc.), so it’s hard to rely exclusively on the description. I mean, I think that’s kind of the reason that blogs exist: because photos, descriptions, etc. are not reliable, so the whole point of blogs is to show them in real photos/swatches. If they were accurate, I’d be out of a job!

Karen Avatar

Hi Christine, I just wanted to note that the shade names are in the correct order. On the label above the names it mentions that the shade names are listed; “clock wise starting from the top left” . 😉

We try to approve comments within 24 hours (and reply to them within 72 hours) but can sometimes get behind and appreciate your patience! 🙂 If you have general feedback, product review requests, off-topic questions, or need technical support, please contact us directly. Thank you for your patience!