Charlotte Tilbury Walk of No Shame Jewel Pots Reviews & Swatches
Walk of No Shame
Charlotte Tilbury Walk of No Shame Jewel Pots ($35.00 for 0.1 oz.) is a medium-dark, reddish-copper with flecks of pink and gold sparkle over a more satiny base. The texture was slightly firmer and stiffer in the jar, and it seemed to work better when it was a little warmer and applied with a fingertip, which was how the brand recommended applying it.
It didn’t feel that much like a cream eyeshadow–it felt more like a cream-powder hybrid–the texture was no where near as emollient as it seemed it would be (from the brand’s descriptions). It never felt like a traditional cream eyeshadow during application, as it applied and felt like a powder and diffused like one. The finish was slightly shinier, so between the sparkles and sheen, it did look somewhat “wet” when worn at full opacity.
The pigmentation was opaque in a single layer, and it could be diffused with a fingertip to more medium coverage. It was more ambiguous whether the brand meant it was buildable with respect to the shimmer/sparkle or the coverage (their demo showed fairly opaque results in “one pass” from what I could tell). The color stayed on well for eight hours before fading a bit, but there was light fallout over time.
Top Dupes
- Phytosurgence Astral Atmosphere (P, $17.07) is lighter (95% similar).
- ColourPop My Prince (LE, $4.50) is less shimmery (95% similar).
- UOMA Beauty Desert Rose (LE, ) is lighter (90% similar).
- Pat McGrath Rose Gold 005 (PiP, $25.00) is more shimmery, cooler (90% similar).
- Clionadh Poinsettia (P, $5.50) is more shimmery, darker (90% similar).
- Lisa Eldridge Lost Summer (P, $16.00) is darker, warmer (90% similar).
- MAC Left You on Red (P, $17.00) is lighter (90% similar).
- UOMA Beauty Songhai (LE, ) is more shimmery, darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Sydney Grace Blaze (P, $6.25) is more shimmery, lighter, cooler (90% similar).
- MAC Let's Roll (P, $18.00) is more shimmery, darker (90% similar).
Ingredients
CALCIUM TITANIUM BOROSILICATE, SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE, DIMETHICONE, CALCIUM SODIUM BOROSILICATE, ISODODECANE, MICA, TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE, ISOHEXADECANE, OCTYLDODECYL STEAROYL STEARATE, POLYMETHYLSILSESQUIOXANE, METHYL TRIMETHICONE, SYNTHETIC WAX, MAGNESIUM STEARATE, DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER, DIISOSTEARYL MALATE, CETYL DIMETHICONE, SORBITAN SESQUIISOSTEARATE, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL, ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN, CETYL PEG/PPG-10/1 DIMETHICONE, LAURYL PEG-8 DIMETHICONE, DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE, PHENOXYETHANOL, SODIUM DEHYDROACETATE, PROPYLENE CARBONATE, TOCOPHERYL ACETATE, DIAMOND POWDER, C10-18 TRIGLYCERIDES, MACADAMIA INTEGRIFOLIA SEED OIL, ARGANIA SPINOSA (ARGAN) KERNEL OIL, ROSA CANINA FRUIT OIL, TOCOPHEROL, SODIUM HYALURONATE, TRIOLEIN, GLYCERYL DIOLEATE, TIN OXIDE, [+/- TITANIUM DIOXIDE (CI 77891), IRON OXIDES (CI 77491, CI 77499), CARMINE (CI 75470)].
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Absolutely stunning red-copper shade! However, I won’t waste my coin or my time on another twist off top eyeshadow unless it’s spectacular. This on IS gorgeous, but not without several dupes in my stash existing already.
I would be really curious about an update when or if the product dries out.
Since it doesn’t seem very wet or creamy anyway, maybe the texture will never change at all?
I would want to buy it but not if it went off within a few months of opening it
A beautiful red copper shade – but there are lots out there in the market and this one, being best applied with fingertips, is a little more fussy than most.
Gosh, that is lovely, but I can powder dupe it.