Chanel Warm Pink Water-Fresh Blush Review & Swatches
Warm Pink
Chanel Warm Pink Water-Fresh Blush ($50.00 for 0.5 oz.) is a light-medium pinkish-coral with warmer undertones and a sat finish (once it dried down). While it did not appear particularly amazing swatched on my arm, it did apply quite well to my cheeks with a brush.
- Sheer coverage, buildable to semi-sheer
- Must be applied to back of hand & swirled together
- Applied evenly with a brush
- Applied unevenly with fingertips
- Long-wearing (8 hours)
FURTHER READING: Formula Overview for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
Top Dupes
- ILIA Ladybird (P, $34.00) is more pigmented, warmer, glossier (90% similar).
- Chanel Intense Coral (P, $50.00) is warmer (90% similar).
- KIKO 102 Natural Pink (P, $12.00) is darker (90% similar).
- Estee Lauder Sensuous Rose (P, $34.00) is more shimmery, more pigmented, warmer (90% similar).
- Sydney Grace Georgia Peach (LE, $9.00) is lighter, more pigmented, warmer (85% similar).
- Rose Inc Heliotrope (P, $18.00) is more shimmery, more pigmented, cooler (85% similar).
- Tarte Mistletoe (LE, ) is more pigmented, warmer (85% similar).
- ColourPop Hen Party (LE, $8.00) is more pigmented, warmer (85% similar).
- ColourPop Between the Sheets (P, $8.00) is more pigmented, warmer (85% similar).
Formula Overview
$50.00/0.5 oz. - $100.00 Per Ounce
The formula is supposed to have a a "sheer touch of colour" with a "natural-loloking flushed effect" that "hydrates" skin for 8-hours. Per the brand, you're supposed to dispense product onto the back of your hand and then use fingertips or a brush.
This is a critical step, though they left out what I think is the most important part of the step/reasoning: the "micro-droplet pigments" must be broken up and blended in with the water base. I found that fingertips did the worst job with this, where as a synthetic stippling brush made short work and diffused the pigments and water together for an even result.
A synthetic brush also worked best for applying the very thin, watery consistency without lifting up base products. Fingertips seemed more prone to moving around base products when I tried patting on the liquid blush.
The coverage was sheer and could be built up to semi-sheer coverage with a second layer. It dried down to a satin finish--not quite matte but not dewy as a lot of the water evaporated. The blush lasted for eight hours on me before fading slightly.
Browse all of our Chanel Water-Fresh Blush swatches.
Ingredients
AQUA (WATER) | HYDROGENATED POLYDECENE | GLYCERIN | METHYL GLUCETH-20 | PENTYLENE GLYCOL | DIGLYCERIN | OCTYLDODECANOL | CITRUS AURANTIUM AMARA (BITTER ORANGE) FLOWER EXTRACT | CHLORPHENESIN | BUTYLENE GLYCOL | CAPRYLYL GLYCOL | CARBOMER | POLYHYDROXYSTEARIC ACID | DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE | POLYGLYCERIN-3 | TAMARINDUS INDICA SEED GUM | ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE | TRISODIUM ETHYLENEDIAMINE DISUCCINATE | PROPYLENE CARBONATE | AMODIMETHICONE | SODIUM HYDROXIDE | SODIUM LAUROYL GLUTAMATE | ALCALIGENES POLYSACCHARIDES | PARFUM (FRAGRANCE) | LYSINE | MAGNESIUM CHLORIDE | [+ / - (MAY CONTAIN) | CI 77007 (ULTRAMARINES) | CI 77491, | CI 77492, | CI 77499 (IRON OXIDES) | CI 77891 (TITANIUM DIOXIDE) | MICA] | IL57A-I
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you're purchasing, or the brand or retailer's website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Very soft, delicate shade of blush on your cheeks, but I doubt that it would even show up on me, though. I’m thinking that Deep Apricot or Deep Bronze may possibly fit the bill for me.
You are so right, Christine – the arm swatches look dreadful and I had to double check that this got such a good rating from you. Then I saw how lovely it looks on your cheeks. I think if I bought this product and didn’t read you much better advice regarding how to apply it, I’d be mighty disappointed!
Ah, nope – I just think it would be too finicky to make it work and the swatch did look uninviting – even though it appeared to work well on your cheeks.