Swatches: Sephora Colorful Eyeshadows (2018)

1 of 10
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow
Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow

Sephora Colorful Eyeshadow ($8.00 for 0.042 oz.) recently went through an update and makeover. It now features a range of 80 shades (77 were available when I bought them, and then eight of the 77 I bought arrived broken due to poor packaging on Sephora’s part, so I don’t have all the shades swatched) with three finishes: glitter, matte, and shimmer. The eyeshadows are smaller–0.042 oz. compared to 0.07 oz.–with a price drop from $10.00 to $8.00 (but it is more expensive by the ounce, $142.86/oz. originally and now $190.48/oz.). The eyeshadows have a top “tier” where the clear lid lifts up and reveals the eyeshadow, and then there’s a “bottom” tier where if you lift from the bottom, it reveals the pan of eyeshadow sitting atop a plastic insert for easy removal (it is held in by the plastic rim from the top tier not a magnet).

And I guess we can give Sephora kudos for calling a patchy purple “Very Bad” to begin with? Here’s hoping it at least performs a bit better on the lid but we’ll see…

36 Comments

Comments that do not adhere to our comment policy may be removed. Discussion and debate are highly encouraged but we expect community members to participate respectfully. Please keep discussion on-topic, and if you have general feedback, a product review request, an off-topic question, or need technical support, please contact us!

Please help us streamline the comments' section and be more efficient: double-check the post above for more basic information like pricing, availability, and so on to make sure your question wasn't answered already. Comments alerting us to typos or small errors in the post are appreciated (!) but will typically be removed after errors are fixed (unless a response is needed).

We appreciate enthusiasm for new releases but ask readers to please hold questions regarding if/when a review will be posted as we can't commit to or guarantee product reviews. We don't want to set expectations and then disappoint readers as even products that are swatched don't always end up being reviewed due to time constraints and changes in priorities! Thank you for understanding!

Comments on this post are closed.
kjh Avatar

I had hopes, as the other S product reformulations were going pretty well, but these swatches basically represent what we whine about frequently: patchy, uneven mattes and non-adhering, non-incorporated glitter particles. I get the change in size/price, despite that not being to the consumer’s advantage (never is. Watch what happens with candy downsizing…) Why not a sleeve option or the old compact/smaller, or same size with thinner (less) product? The old one just required a poke. This is making the compact bulkier, to make the product seem bigger than it is, seem equal to the old one. Shadow godets are one place where standard sizing makes sense.

Christina Avatar

Whoo! That’s a lot of swatches, Christine! Great job for getting them out so quickly, and thanks for all the hard work.

It could just be me, but the majority of these don’t look like they swatched very well. I do like “Catch the Moon” strangely enough–something about the very light grey with a golden twinkle that catches my eye. LOL! I loved your comment about “Very Bad.”

thirteenthirteen Avatar

Some of these look nice but overall fairly disappointing. It’s sad, it looks like they’ve discontinued Be on the A-List, which is hardly a unique shade but it’s one of my go-tos for a simple, flattering look, and the quality is there.

kjh Avatar

Pretty much. There are very few ‘continued’ shades. And anyone who draws a comparison to mufe would be correct. Change in sizes, formula, price. In S’s case, from ‘sometimes surprisingly good’ to ‘seldom hitting the “fair” mark.’ Prob will try some of the grays anyways, like Catch the Moon. Hopefully these apply better than they swatch. Agree with you: they had some classics, like A List, Snakeskin Dress, etc by which they were known. Signature shades, if you will. Dumb as a marshmallow to discontinue those. It negates the consumer’s belief that there is a CORE to the Sephora collection. And core is the competency from which the rest of the products flow and evolve.

Morgan Gilders Avatar

Yes, this is exactly what I think. A few very useful transition shades and two or three of the really bright ones look like they might be worth it.

raja Avatar

Ohhh nooooo. These look bad! I have a couple of the original shades and they were actually pretty great. Lucky Penny used to be one of my favorites, and now it looks so flat and basic.

Carrie Avatar

Considering what Colourpop is putting out for $5 a shade, these seem pretty awful for the price! I’ve never been impressed with their shadow and these swatches aren’t helping to change my mind!

Jen Avatar

Absolutely agree, and you can almost always catch a deal of making your own 4 shadow palette for 12 bucks. CP being cruelty free is also a huge reason I’ll continue to support the brand.

Agona Avatar

This is disappointing considering I was impressed with Sephora’s Lip Stories and hauled their metallic palette during the sale (I have yet to play with it). I was hoping they were moving their in-house brand towards more hits than misses.

Jujubes Avatar

I had a few from their old version and they were chalky, powdery and not pigmented…I hope they have improved but I didn’t see anything I really like. Very Bad is aptly named! 😛

Mariella Avatar

I really liked Sephora’s “old” shadows and was sad to see them being phased out. I fear that, like MUFE, this reformulation isn’t an entirely good thing (I wonder if they’re made by the same company/in the same plant; it wouldn’t surprise me and I need to look at the backs of the pans just to pique my curiosity). I did a quick swipe of a few of these last week and some were good (Jump Into the Mud and Bonfire) and Glitter Dress, which looked lovely in the pan and which swatched beautifully for you, Christine, was awful for me. I wonder how much the “duplicated” shades – Girls Night Out, Roasted Chestnuts, etc. – look like the original shades. Finally, these look much harder to de-pot; the originals were designed to be easy to remove from their cases and that was one of the many things I liked about them.

Mariella Avatar

That’s good to know as it wasn’t possible to tell from looking at the photos and in the store, the tester pans had all been put into their little spots in the display. I like being able to move and re-group shadows especially when I’m travelling.

kjh Avatar

None of that is coincidence. Both S and MUFE are LVMH companies, and they undoubtedly have both a finance team and a creative team that report to the same corporate overlords. So, you will see similar strategies by both houses, natch.

lee Avatar

Good lord those are some bleak swatches Dark Ocean looks absurdly different from the pan! There is high quality across majority of brands in all budgets Sephora has no excuses because these look worse than the giant makeup sets released for preteens during the holidays by non-brands.

CeeBee Avatar

Some look OK, most look fairly mediocre and What Happens In Vegas can stay there, as far as I’m concerned. The glitter shadows seem to have some texture issues…

Bonnie Avatar

Jeez I feel bad for you having to test all these less-than-stellar shadows Christine. There’s only like 5 of them I’d even consider buying based on how they swatch. And even then, why bother. There’s much better out there for cheaper. It just begs the question: why did Sephora even bother with these?

kjh Avatar

Decided to do a ‘science experiment.’ Going to take a used tube of primer, an expendable brush, and the hue switching pan to the store display, and see if the ones I like play better with primer, and how they play with each other. If I like how that works, will adopt the practice. I’ve done that with blush before. Quite disappointing , all in all. The CP alternative is usually better, both for l/s and e/s, at present, not even considering the better price. And CP is like New England weather, if you don’t like what you see, wait a minute….

Katherine T. Avatar

OMG, 90% of these look so-so or terrible 🙁 Maybe even worse than when MUFE reformulated their shadows. So glad I picked up some of the old Sephora shadows while they were on clearance

Laura Avatar

Overall these look worse than the original ones they are replacing. That’s an odd business move – let’s update the product with a worse formula. ?

We try to approve comments within 24 hours (and reply to them within 72 hours) but can sometimes get behind and appreciate your patience! 🙂 If you have general feedback, product review requests, off-topic questions, or need technical support, please contact us directly. Thank you for your patience!