Are virtual try-ons useful to you?
Nah, I don’t find they are useful personally!
Nah, I don’t find they are useful personally!
We're here to help you make better beauty purchases that you'll enjoy and love! We recommend signing up to take advantage of personalized features like tracking products you own, viewing dupes that you already have, and more!
Here are some useful resources for you:
Curious how two shades compare to each other? Type in the shades below to get instant side-by-side swatches!
Comments that do not adhere to our comment policy may be removed. Discussion and debate are highly encouraged but we expect community members to participate respectfully. Please keep discussion on-topic, and if you have general feedback, a product review request, an off-topic question, or need technical support, please contact us!
Please help us streamline the comments' section and be more efficient: double-check the post above for more basic information like pricing, availability, and so on to make sure your question wasn't answered already. Comments alerting us to typos or small errors in the post are appreciated (!) but will typically be removed after errors are fixed (unless a response is needed).
We appreciate enthusiasm for new releases but ask readers to please hold questions regarding if/when a review will be posted as we can't commit to or guarantee product reviews. We don't want to set expectations and then disappoint readers as even products that are swatched don't always end up being reviewed due to time constraints and changes in priorities! Thank you for understanding!
We try to approve comments within 24 hours (and reply to them within 72 hours) but can sometimes get behind and appreciate your patience! 🙂 If you have general feedback, product review requests, off-topic questions, or need technical support, please contact us directly. Thank you for your patience!
Virtual try-ons never seem to account for skin texture, product texture, or lighting – the idea is nice, but if it doesn’t account for lighting or texture then you can’t determine how it plays with your undertones – so what’s the point?
Not in the least. I think it is the subtle nuances of colour and texture which can transition something from being nice to wow. Virtual try-on does not accomplish this imo. That said, if someone is not particularly well versed in colours, it might be a great starting point to get a general feel whether something will work or not.
No. The lighting is never right in any photo it wants me to take right then and there for their virtual try-on. It almost always makes me incredibly washed out and look lighter than I am or there’s not enough light and makes me look far darker than I actual am and it’s just not…great. The idea is nice in a pinch in lieu of seeing and trying it in person, but honestly, I would just rather they put their effort into getting really good realistic swatch pictures on models of a variety of skintones and undertones.
Yeah on models of a variety of skintones and undertones. If the darkest skin tone I see is “me, but with a bit of a tan”, it’s not helpful.
I like them to get a general idea of what types of colors might look nice on me, but not specific products. So I’ll use them to try on “plum” in general but not a specific product.
Maybe I’m being paranoid, but I feel like it’s not really about being useful for the consumer but rather as a data collection tool (of our faces!) for the companies!!
‘’Just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean people aren’t plotting against you.’ Lol. JD Salinger quote. And agreed. They are phishing.
No, not really. They just don’t look “real” enough to take into account things like my lips original color and how that may affect how a lip product may actually look like on me, or my skin’s undertone for blush, either.
I find your swatches and reviews wayyyy more helpful than virtual tryons. I’ve been following you for long enough (2007!) that I’ve bought products you’ve reviewed, and my impressions generally fall in line with yours. Virtual try ons don’t allow for texture to be taken into account, which is such a big part of your swatch/review process. 🙂
Nope. I don’t think they really account for things like the product’s opacity, or how it will react to the undertones of your skin, or even more complicated things like skin ph, oily vs dry skin, etc. They’re really just an interactive version of those obviously photoshopped swatches brands use.
No; I love the idea, but the colors are so off that it’s pretty much useless. I also find that the colors never apply correctly on my eyes/cheeks/lips. Apparently, my features are wonky and confuse the placement bots.
No, I don’t think they are useful at all and would never try one.
No. I don’t think the kinks have been worked out with lighting, skin tone. No doubt there will be a day when it all works out….not yet.
Not at all there are too many variables.
If nothing else they are a fun amusement for a few minutes, and good for a laugh…especially when I am trying on shades that I would never wear in real life. But I have found some shades that were surprisingly not what I thought they would be, on the good side and on the very bad side.
Not at all. The lighting is never right and the product never lines up with my face! For example, when trying a lippie, it sits somewhere on my mid cheek. Not helpful.
Can’t say, I’ve never tried one.
I think all of the answers above are very good, so I’ll keep this short.
No, but I highly enjoy the Google arts and culture fun page where you take a selfie and GA&C finds many artworks that match (presumably through facial recognition software) your face. That’s hella more fun than virtual try-ons. VTOs would be a nightmare for any base product. Btw, > 80% of my pix are Dutch. And I never thought that was part of my ancestry. Bet my 23 and me is the same, some version of Plattdeutsch. Try the app, people.
No. I don’t find the colors are very accurate, and just passing a color on my face won’t tell me if it will oxidize on me, etc.
Nope. Just looks like another data-mining operation to me.