MAC Spanking Haute Vamplify Lipgloss ($20.00 for 0.16 fl. oz.) is described as a “pinky nude.” It’s a light-medium, pink-tinged peach with a creamy, glossy finish. It had semi-opaque pigmentation with a comfortable-to-wear formula but uneven coverage that was prone to appearing streaky on. It’s not the worst offender I’ve come across, but it has a messy to look to it without a lipstick or liner underneath it. On me, this shade wore for four hours and was lightly hydrating. MAC Fashion Punch (P, $10.00) is warmer (95% similar). MAC Overspiced (LE, $21.00) is lighter (95% similar). Bite Beauty Vanilla Latte (LE, $22.00) is darker (95% similar). Sephora Perfect Nude (04) (P, $12.00) is lighter (90% similar). Maybelline Nude Illusion (060) (P, $8.99) is darker, more muted (90% similar). Jouer Sunset (P, $17.00) is darker, cooler (90% similar). Tarte Obvi (P, $20.00) is cooler (90% similar). ColourPop Attention Haul (LE, $10.00) is lighter, cooler (90% similar). MAC Blissful (P, $21.00) is cooler (90% similar). NARS Vida Loca (LE, $26.00) is darker, cooler (90% similar). MAC Fashion Punch (P, $21.00) is more shimmery, darker, warmer (90% similar). MAC Myth (P, $21.00) is darker, warmer (90% similar). Jouer PCH (P, $17.00) is cooler (90% similar). Chanel Sensuel (11) (P, $34.00) is less pigmented (90% similar). Sephora Cappuccino (02) (P, $12.00) is more shimmery, darker (90% similar). NYX Tres Leches (P, $5.99) is cooler (85% similar). Jouer Maiden Lane (P, $17.00) is darker, cooler (90% similar). ColourPop Dumpling (LE, $10.00) is darker, warmer (85% similar). Anastasia Undressed (P, $16.00) is lighter (90% similar). MAC Pleasure First (LE, $20.00) is lighter, cooler (85% similar). Top 20 dupes listed, see the rest. See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

MAC Tuned In Vamplify Lipgloss ($20.00 for 0.16 fl. oz.) is described as a “mid-tone rosy nude.” It’s a muted, medium-dark rosy plum with warm gold pearl. It had mostly opaque coverage, while the consistency was very smooth and lightweight. The color applied evenly and didn’t settle into lip lines as it wore on. For me, this gloss stayed on well for five hours and was nicely hydrating. Marc Jacobs Beauty Love Drunk (320) (P, $29.00) is lighter, less pigmented (90% similar). NYX Chocolate Crepe (P, $5.99) is less shimmery, lighter, brighter (85% similar). Cle de Peau Chenille (12) (P, $48.00) is less shimmery, cooler (85% similar). MAC Pamela (LE, $20.00) is less shimmery, cooler (90% similar). Chanel Audace (20) (LE, $34.00) is darker, cooler (80% similar). MAC Liqueur (LE, $21.00) is more shimmery (90% similar). Marc Jacobs Beauty Shooting Stars (316) (DC, $28.00) is darker, warmer (85% similar). MAC Looks Like Sin (LE, $20.00) is less shimmery, less pigmented (85% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

MAC Hyper-Fabulous Vamplify Lipgloss ($20.00 for 0.16 fl. oz.) is described as a “mauvey brown.” It’s a muted, dark plummy brown with subtle, warm undertones and very fine lavender pearl. In the tube, it looked rather close to Tuned In, but this shade is definitely darker and doesn’t appear as warm as it doesn’t have all the gold shimmer. It was nearly opaque with a lightweight, spreadable consistency that sat well on the lips for the five hours it lasted. The formula applied evenly and smoothly, while it hydrated lips over time. Cle de Peau Chenille (12) (P, $48.00) is lighter, cooler (90% similar). Urban Decay Shadowheart (DC, $26.00) is more shimmery, darker (90% similar). Chanel Intrigue (P, $30.00) is warmer (85% similar). Guerlain Madame Fascine (863) (LE, $30.00) is lighter, less pigmented (90% similar). MAC Fab Tested (LE, $20.00) is darker, cooler (85% similar). MAC Deep Kiss (LE, $20.00) is less pigmented, cooler (90% similar). Jouer Fifth Ave (P, $17.00) is lighter (85% similar). NARS Asphalt Jungle (LE, $26.00) is more shimmery, cooler (85% similar). Marc Jacobs Beauty Love Drunk (320) (P, $29.00) is lighter (80% similar). Chanel Audace (20) (LE, $34.00) is lighter, cooler (80% similar). Becca Malibu Soleil (LE, $22.00) is lighter, cooler (80% similar). MAC Show Me (DC, $19.50) is less shimmery, lighter (90% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

FORMULA SUMMARY | MAC Vamplify Lipgloss ($20.00 for 0.16 fl. oz.) is supposed to have intense, vivid color paired with a moisturizing, glossy, long-wearing formula. Some shades are very pigmented while others are semi-opaque, and some shades apply evenly while others are more streaky. They have a light-medium thick consistency that’s not heavy or goopy, but it’s not really thin; however, they’re really smooth and creamy, so they feel nice on. There’s no tackiness initially, and it feels a lot like lip balm to me–soft, smooth, and my lips felt supple. I find they develop light to moderate tackiness as they wear on. They wear anywhere from three to five hours and are lightly to moderately hydrating over time. The formula has strong, vanilla scent (stronger than their lipsticks; I can smell it for a bit even when it is applied, not just in the tube) but no discernible taste.

See more photos & swatches!

MAC Spanking Haute Vamplify Lipgloss

MAC Spanking Haute Vamplify Lipgloss

MAC Spanking Haute Vamplify Lipgloss

MAC Spanking Haute Vamplify Lipgloss

MAC Spanking Haute Vamplify Lipgloss

MAC Spanking Haute Vamplify Lipgloss

MAC Tuned In Vamplify Lipgloss

MAC Tuned In Vamplify Lipgloss

MAC Tuned In Vamplify Lipgloss

MAC Tuned In Vamplify Lipgloss

MAC Tuned In Vamplify Lipgloss

MAC Tuned In Vamplify Lipgloss

MAC Hyper-Fabulous Vamplify Lipgloss

MAC Hyper-Fabulous Vamplify Lipgloss

MAC Hyper-Fabulous Vamplify Lipgloss

MAC Hyper-Fabulous Vamplify Lipgloss

MAC Hyper-Fabulous Vamplify Lipgloss

MAC Hyper-Fabulous Vamplify Lipgloss