<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >

<channel>
    <title>Temptalia</title>
    <atom:link href="https://www.temptalia.com/what-eye-product-wasnt-worth-the-splurge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <link>https://www.temptalia.com</link>
    <description>In-depth makeup reviews with swatches and dupes, plus what you need to know about new product launches and tips on how to use your makeup!</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 15:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.13</generator>
        <item>
        <title>What eye product wasn&#039;t worth the splurge?</title>
        <link>https://www.temptalia.com/what-eye-product-wasnt-worth-the-splurge/</link>
        <featuredImage><img width="760" height="625" src="https://www.temptalia.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/natashadenona_purplebluepalette001.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="palette" /></featuredImage>
        <comments>https://www.temptalia.com/what-eye-product-wasnt-worth-the-splurge/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
        		<category><![CDATA[Weekly Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temptalia asks you]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.temptalia.com/?p=472787</guid>
                <excerpt><![CDATA[The original Natasha Denona 28-pan palettes. It's possible they've improved in formula at this point--not quite up to paying that price point AGAIN!]]></excerpt>
                <description><![CDATA[<div><img src="https://www.temptalia.com/wp-content/themes/temptalia-2016/media/images/default.jpg" width="250" style="border:1px solid #999999; margin-bottom: 5px;" /></div>The original Natasha Denona 28-pan palettes. It's possible they've improved in formula at this point--not quite up to paying that price point AGAIN!!! to find out--but they were just so-so. Like the texture and pigmentation of the shimmer shades was really nice, but they didn't wear as long as a lot of other formulas, while the mattes were often disappointing. Natasha Denona's formula has improved a lot over the years, though, so I am a fan of the formulas currently!]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original Natasha Denona 28-pan palettes. It&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve improved in formula at this point&#8211;not quite up to paying that price point AGAIN!!! to find out&#8211;but they were just so-so. Like the texture and pigmentation of the shimmer shades was really nice, but they didn&#8217;t wear as long as a lot of other formulas, while the mattes were often disappointing. Natasha Denona&#8217;s formula has improved a lot over the years, though, so I am a fan of the formulas currently!</p>        <div class="text-right highlight bold">
            <em>&mdash; Christine</em>
        </div>
             ]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>https://www.temptalia.com/what-eye-product-wasnt-worth-the-splurge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>