<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >

<channel>
    <title>Temptalia</title>
    <atom:link href="https://www.temptalia.com/round-up-natasha-denona-matte-eyeshadows-overview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <link>https://www.temptalia.com/round-up-natasha-denona-matte-eyeshadows-overview/</link>
    <description>In-depth makeup reviews with swatches and dupes, plus what you need to know about new product launches and tips on how to use your makeup!</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 22:27:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
        <item>
        <title>Round-up:  Natasha Denona Matte Eyeshadows + Overview</title>
        <link>https://www.temptalia.com/round-up-natasha-denona-matte-eyeshadows-overview/</link>
        <featuredImage></featuredImage>
        <comments>https://www.temptalia.com/round-up-natasha-denona-matte-eyeshadows-overview/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
        		<category><![CDATA[Natasha Denona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Round-ups]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temptalia.com/?p=225071</guid>
                <excerpt><![CDATA[Natasha Denona Matte Eyeshadow ($25.00 for 0.08 oz.) were consistently, the losers in the range, which seems to be due to how soft, thin, and powdery they are, so they sheer out and perform poorly without a solid base or primer for them to adhere to (they look so uneven when blended without primer). Some of them were decent, and some of the ones that were powdery were still moderately buildable on the skin, so they weren't total losses.]]></excerpt>
                <description><![CDATA[<div><img src="https://www.temptalia.com/wp-content/themes/temptalia-2016/media/images/default.jpg" width="250" style="border:1px solid #999999; margin-bottom: 5px;" /></div>Natasha Denona Matte Eyeshadow ($25.00 for 0.08 oz.) were consistently, the losers in the range, which seems to be due to how soft, thin, and powdery they are, so they sheer out and perform poorly without a solid base or primer for them to adhere to (they look so uneven when blended without primer). Some of them were decent, and some of the ones that were powdery were still moderately buildable on the skin, so they weren't total losses.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bg-gray-lighter p-5 text-xs-left"><strong><a href="http://www.shareasale.com/r.cfm?B=449779&#038;U=843468&#038;M=45474&#038;urllink=" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" >Natasha Denona Matte Eyeshadow</a></strong> ($25.00 for 0.08 oz.) were consistently, the losers in the range, which seems to be due to how soft, thin, and powdery they are, so they sheer out and perform poorly without a solid base or primer for them to adhere to (they look so uneven when blended without primer). Some of them were decent, and some of the ones that were powdery were still moderately buildable on the skin, so they weren&#8217;t total losses.</div>

             ]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>https://www.temptalia.com/round-up-natasha-denona-matte-eyeshadows-overview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>