<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >

<channel>
    <title>Temptalia</title>
    <atom:link href="https://www.temptalia.com/mac-peacocky-kissable-lipcolour-dupes-comparisons-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <link>https://www.temptalia.com/mac-peacocky-kissable-lipcolour-dupes-comparisons-part-1/</link>
    <description>In-depth makeup reviews with swatches and dupes, plus what you need to know about new product launches and tips on how to use your makeup!</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 22:27:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
        <item>
        <title>MAC Peacocky: Kissable Lipcolour Dupes &#038; Comparisons (Part 1)</title>
        <link>https://www.temptalia.com/mac-peacocky-kissable-lipcolour-dupes-comparisons-part-1/</link>
        <featuredImage></featuredImage>
        <comments>https://www.temptalia.com/mac-peacocky-kissable-lipcolour-dupes-comparisons-part-1/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 19:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
        		<category><![CDATA[MAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAC Launch Reviews]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temptalia.com/?p=27758</guid>
                <excerpt><![CDATA[MAC Peacocky: Kissable Lipcolour Dupes &amp; Comparisons, Part 1 Part one of two for the Kissable Lipcolours! :) The biggest concern regarding finding similar shades is the fact that these are a lipstick/lipgloss hybrid. By comparing it to a lipstick or lip gloss, you are really not getting the same thing.]]></excerpt>
                <description><![CDATA[<div><img src="http://www.temptalia.com/images/spring2011/mac_peacocky003.jpg" width="250" style="border:1px solid #999999; margin-bottom: 5px;" /></div>MAC Peacocky: Kissable Lipcolour Dupes &amp; Comparisons, Part 1 Part one of two for the Kissable Lipcolours! :) The biggest concern regarding finding similar shades is the fact that these are a lipstick/lipgloss hybrid. By comparing it to a lipstick or lip gloss, you are really not getting the same thing. I would say using a lipstick dupe is more similar, because these have the dry down that looks more like a particularly creamy lipstick (think perhaps an Amplified finish) with some slip. This is why I looked more for dupes within similar product types. ENCHANTEE is similar but less <a href="https://www.temptalia.com/mac-peacocky-kissable-lipcolour-dupes-comparisons-part-1/"> Continue Reading&hellip; </a>]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img decoding="async" src="https://www.temptalia.com/images/spring2011/mac_peacocky003.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<em></em></p>
<h2>MAC Peacocky: Kissable Lipcolour Dupes &amp; Comparisons, Part 1</h2>
<p>Part one of two for the Kissable Lipcolours! <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f642.png" alt="🙂" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />  The biggest concern regarding finding similar shades is the fact that these are a lipstick/lipgloss hybrid.  By comparing it to a lipstick or lip gloss, you are really not getting the same thing.  I would say using a lipstick dupe is more similar, because these have the dry down that looks more like a particularly creamy lipstick (think perhaps an Amplified finish) with some slip.  This is why I looked more for dupes within similar product types.</p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>ENCHANTEE</strong></span> is similar but less blue-based as<span style="color: #cc3399;"><em> Snob lipstick</em></span> and <span style="color: #cc3399;"><em>Viva Glam Gaga lipglass</em></span>.</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>EXXXHIBITIONIST</strong></span> is extremely similar to <span style="color: #cc3399;"><em>Viva Glam Cyndi lipglass</em></span> (I would say Exxxhibitionist is probably more pigmented when worn and slightly more orange-based).  <span style="color: #cc3399;"><em>Vegas Volt</em></span> is similar but not quite as intense.  <span style="color: #cc3399;"><em>Illamasqua Temper</em></span> is much, much brighter and more intense.</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>FLAUNTING IT</strong></span> is plummier than <span style="color: #cc3399;"><em>Illamasqua Move</em></span>, while it is more opaque than <span style="color: #cc3399;"><em>Plumful lipstick</em></span>.  I didn&#8217;t have it on hand to swatch, but <span style="color: #cc3399;"><em>Chanel Stunt</em></span> is more neutral, less pink/plum (see my original review <a href="https://www.temptalia.com/chanel-stunt-rouge-allure-laque-review-photos-swatches">here</a>)&#8211;it is nonetheless one of the closer dupes I have come across for Stunt.</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>LOVE PECK</strong></span> is a darker, glossier version of <span style="color: #cc3399;"><em>Dark Side lipstick</em></span>, while it is nothing like <span style="color: #cc3399;"><em>Illamasqua Fume</em></span> (hey, it was worth a shot!).  There have been several vampy-berry glosses released by MAC in the past year, but I felt that most of them lacked the opacity of Love Peck.</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>PEACOCKY</strong></span> is comparable to <span style="color: #cc3399;"><em>OCC Rx Lip Tar</em></span>, which is a brighter, truer blue, while Peacocky appears darker and has shimmer.  I&#8217;m sure it comes as a total shocker that I don&#8217;t have twenty other blues to compare this to&#8230; <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f609.png" alt="😉" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /></li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>SCANDELICIOUS</strong></span> is closest to <span style="color: #cc3399;"><em>Korres #54</em></span>, which is redder.  <span style="color: #cc3399;"><em>Illamasqua Frenzy</em></span> is significantly lighter, so I would not consider comparable at all.  <span style="color: #cc3399;"><em>Illamasqua Petulant</em></span> is a brighter pink.</li>
</ul>
<h4>See swatches! <span id="more-27758"></span></h4>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img decoding="async" src="https://www.temptalia.com/images/spring2011/mac_peacockydupes_enchantee001.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<em>Snob lipstick, Enchantee, Viva Glam Gaga lipglass</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img decoding="async" src="https://www.temptalia.com/images/spring2011/mac_peacockydupes_exxxhibitionist001.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<em>Viva Glam Cyndi lipglass, Exxxhibitionist, Vegas Volt lipstick, Illamasqua Temper</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img decoding="async" src="https://www.temptalia.com/images/spring2011/mac_peacockydupes_flauntingit001.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<em>Illamasqua Move, Flaunting It, Plumful lipstick</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img decoding="async" src="https://www.temptalia.com/images/spring2011/mac_peacockydupes_lovepeck001.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<em>Illamasqua Fume, Love Peck, Dark Side lipstick</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img decoding="async" src="https://www.temptalia.com/images/spring2011/mac_peacockydupes_peacocky001.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<em>Peacocky, OCC Rx</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img decoding="async" src="https://www.temptalia.com/images/spring2011/mac_peacockydupes_scandelicious001.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<em>Illamasqua Frenzy, Illamasqua Petulant, Scandelicious, Korres #54</em></p>
             ]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>https://www.temptalia.com/mac-peacocky-kissable-lipcolour-dupes-comparisons-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>