<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >

<channel>
    <title>Temptalia</title>
    <atom:link href="https://www.temptalia.com/lipstick-comparisons-26-to-34-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <link>https://www.temptalia.com/lipstick-comparisons-26-to-34-part-2/</link>
    <description>In-depth makeup reviews with swatches and dupes, plus what you need to know about new product launches and tips on how to use your makeup!</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 22:27:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
        <item>
        <title>Lipstick Comparisons:  $26 to $34 (Part 2)</title>
        <link>https://www.temptalia.com/lipstick-comparisons-26-to-34-part-2/</link>
        <featuredImage></featuredImage>
        <comments>https://www.temptalia.com/lipstick-comparisons-26-to-34-part-2/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
        		<category><![CDATA[Giorgio Armani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guerlain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lancome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YSL]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temptalia.com/?p=26545</guid>
                <excerpt><![CDATA[Lipstick Comparisons: $26 to $34 (Part 2) Though often lumped into high-end, this is a tier made up of designer brands like Chanel, Dior, and YSL. Most higher-end/designer lipsticks are scented, usually with floral or fruit.]]></excerpt>
                <description><![CDATA[<div><img src="http://www.temptalia.com/images/holiday2010/lipstickcomparisons.jpg" width="250" style="border:1px solid #999999; margin-bottom: 5px;" /></div>Lipstick Comparisons: $26 to $34 (Part 2) Though often lumped into high-end, this is a tier made up of designer brands like Chanel, Dior, and YSL. Most higher-end/designer lipsticks are scented, usually with floral or fruit. Rose seems to be the most prevalent scent found in brands across the board; sometimes it's subtle (Chanel), while other times it's heavy (Dolce &amp; Gabbana). I find designer range lipsticks to be non-drying to moisturizing with more opaque formulas overall. Packaging is often nicer, but it's not always the case and is, inevitably, very personal. Giorgio Armani Rouge d'Armani Lipstick ($30.00) PROS: Creamy, <a href="https://www.temptalia.com/lipstick-comparisons-26-to-34-part-2/"> Continue Reading&hellip; </a>]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img decoding="async" src="https://www.temptalia.com/images/holiday2010/lipstickcomparisons.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<em> </em></p>
<h2>Lipstick Comparisons:  $26 to $34 (Part 2)</h2>
<p>Though often lumped into high-end, this is a tier made up of designer brands like Chanel, Dior, and YSL.  Most higher-end/designer lipsticks are scented, usually with floral or fruit.  Rose seems to be the most prevalent scent found in brands across the board; sometimes it&#8217;s subtle (Chanel), while other times it&#8217;s heavy (Dolce &amp; Gabbana).  I find designer range lipsticks to be non-drying to moisturizing with more opaque formulas overall.  Packaging is often nicer, but it&#8217;s not always the case and is, inevitably, very personal.</p>
<h3><a href="https://www.temptalia.com/search?cx=partner-pub-3982843655561008%3A1ml016-nz44&amp;cof=FORID%3A11&amp;ie=ISO-8859-1&amp;q=giorgio+armani+rouge&amp;sa=Search&amp;siteurl=www.temptalia.com%252F#1327">Giorgio Armani Rouge d&#8217;Armani Lipstick</a> ($30.00)</h3>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>PROS</strong></span>:  Creamy, semi-opaque to opaque, long-wearing (4 to 6 hours)</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>NEUTRAL</strong></span>: 0.14 oz., scent-free, somewhat moisturizing</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>CONS</strong></span>:  May feather/bleed on slightly dry to dry lips</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>MY REC</strong></span>:  I don&#8217;t find them super moisturizing, though they don&#8217;t dry lips out.  Typically, I don&#8217;t find lipsticks bleed on me easily, but I did have some issues with this one feathering on me when I tested them originally (my lips were a bit drier than they normally are during those tests).  Like Burberry lipsticks, there is a magnetic clasp that keeps the lid on.</li>
</ul>
<h3><a href="https://www.temptalia.com/guerlain-kisskiss-lipstick-stick-gloss-extreme-lipstick-swatches" target="_blank">Guerlain KissKiss Lipstick</a> ($31.00)</h3>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>PROS</strong></span>:  Creamy, glossy finish, moisturizing, smooth, opaque, wears for an average of 4 hours</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>NEUTRAL</strong></span>: 0.12 oz., fruit-scented</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>CONS</strong></span>:  Basic shade range of pinks/reds</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>MY REC</strong></span>:  After being spoiled by Guerlain&#8217;s Rouge G lipstick line, despite being $16 more, I feel like if I&#8217;m going to go Guerlain, I better go Rouge G.  KissKiss is actually a nice formula on its own; it&#8217;s creamy, usually pigmented, and moisturizing enough for normal to dry lips.</li>
</ul>
<h3><a href="https://www.temptalia.com/search?cx=partner-pub-3982843655561008%3A1ml016-nz44&amp;cof=FORID%3A11&amp;ie=ISO-8859-1&amp;q=lancome+rouge&amp;sa=Search&amp;siteurl=www.temptalia.com%252F#1375">Lancome L&#8217;Absolu Rouge Lipstick</a> ($29.00)</h3>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>PROS</strong></span>:   Creamy, opaque, moisturizing, long-wearing (4 to 6 hours), minimizes lip lines</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>NEUTRAL</strong></span>:  0.14 oz, rose-scented</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>CONS</strong></span>:  Mostly cream/satin finishes</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>MY REC</strong></span>:  I love how creamy it is without being slippery; it won&#8217;t slide all over the place, so it actually wears well and on the longer side.  It is also a bit pricier than other Lancome lipsticks, which makes it it their top tier lipstick, but at least they give you 0.14 oz., while the average lipstick is 0.12 oz.</li>
</ul>
<h3><a href="https://www.temptalia.com/tag/ysl-rouge-volupte-lipstick">YSL Rouge Volupte Lipstick</a> ($34.00)</h3>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>PROS</strong></span>:  Creamy, opaque, good shade range, moisturizing, wears an average of 4 hours</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>NEUTRAL</strong></span>:  0.12 oz., mango-scented</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>CONS</strong></span>:  Slippery, shades can be stark, heavy</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>MY REC</strong></span>:  YSL has expanded their Rouge Volupte line quite a bit since I originally reviewed the range, and more importantly, I&#8217;ve expanded the range of lipsticks I&#8217;ve tested as well.  I actually find these don&#8217;t wear as well as other lipsticks&#8211;they&#8217;re just too slippery.  It&#8217;s moisturizing but not overly so, but it is also one of the heavier lipsticks I&#8217;ve worn.  If your lips are prone to bleeding, you might experience that with the darker shades, since it has a lot of slip.</li>
</ul>
<h3>YSL Gloss Volupte Lipstick ($30.00)</h3>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>PROS</strong></span>:  Creamy, sheer (supposed to be), glossy finish</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>NEUTRAL</strong></span>:   0.07 oz., mango-scented</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>CONS</strong></span>:  Not very moisturizing, requires frequent reapplication</li>
<li><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>MY REC</strong></span>:  Apparently, I&#8217;ve never done an official review for this, but I distinctly remember being unimpressed by it.  It&#8217;s a very sheer formula, which is fine, but I didn&#8217;t even see any color on my lips, which goes beyond sheer to me.  My lips felt drier after wearing this, and I found myself having to reapply every hour or two.  Also, did you note how little you get for $30?</li>
</ul>
<blockquote><p>The <em><span style="color: #cc3399;"><strong>Lipstick Comparisons series</strong></span></em> is designed to provide a quick reference summary sheet for some of the many available lipstick formulas. It seems like most brands have at least a couple of formulas, if not half a dozen, and it can be difficult to find the formulas that will work best for your budget, coloring, style, or taste.</p>
<p>This is not necessarily a best of list, and it&#8217;s not exhaustive&#8211;it is based on actual lipsticks that I&#8217;ve tried; they are all, however, decent to excellent lipsticks. (And perhaps, some day, it will be an exhaustive list.)  I have summarized my experience based on pros and cons, but also some &#8220;neutral&#8221; factors that may be pros or cons, depending on your preferences.  I will update this series as I try new lipstick formulas.</p></blockquote>
             ]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>https://www.temptalia.com/lipstick-comparisons-26-to-34-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>