Project Revamp: MAC Mineralize Skinfinish

30
Date: Thursday, July 9th, 2009 Author:

If you could revamp MAC Mineralize Skinfinish, what would you change? What would you keep the same? How would you make it an even better product?

Posted in Weekly Features | 30 Comments

Tags: ,

30 thoughts on “Project Revamp: MAC Mineralize Skinfinish”

  1. Aramis says:
    July 9, 2009 at 11:25 am

    less glittery and a couple of dollars less lol

    Reply
  2. Brooke says:
    July 9, 2009 at 11:27 am

    I would make them a bit more silky on the skin, feeling-wise AND look-wise. I would love a little bit more glow. But really, I can’t complain. I just ordered a few mineralized skinfinishes off MAC yesterday! n_n

    Reply
    • Vivian says:
      July 9, 2009 at 11:52 am

      I agree all the way. A smoother feel would = LOVE!!!!!
      I also hate having to break the bank every time I want one! t_t

      Reply
  3. Lindsey says:
    July 9, 2009 at 11:27 am

    mac some of them have less chunky shimmer, and more finely milled. also for $20 instead

    Reply
  4. Vee says:
    July 9, 2009 at 11:32 am

    More sheen, less glitter! Also, smaller sizes in the coloured MSFs (not the MSF-N) so they’re a little less money. I don’t think I’ll EVER go through Petticoat, Perfect Topping or Redhead!!

    Reply
  5. Rachelle says:
    July 9, 2009 at 11:35 am

    Less chunks of simmer, more sheen, more perm colors, different texturs (frost and matte)

    Reply
  6. Kharina says:
    July 9, 2009 at 11:46 am

    The perfect MSF would be one that is consistent with the same formulation as Petticoat….it’s perfect because it’s a nice rosy sheen wash of color….NO glitter bombs there.

    Reply
  7. nicole says:
    July 9, 2009 at 11:57 am

    more variety of colors that are kept permanent. Also, keep them more of the mono colour with veining because some trios are hard to choose just one color that you want. AND cheaper, PLEASE!

    Reply
  8. Brandon says:
    July 9, 2009 at 12:04 pm

    i wish that they were as soft to the touch as the high light powders from naked honey!I would also love it if more colors were perm, and more msfs with four colors in them a la the BBR Collection.

    Reply
  9. Angie says:
    July 9, 2009 at 12:07 pm

    Keep some permanent damnit! I’m pretty sure they’d get as much sales. Less glitter, and more sheen. I love the size of it. Some people might not get through them, but thats good because since they’re always LE i’d like to not worry about running out of it. :D

    Reply
  10. Sass says:
    July 9, 2009 at 12:09 pm

    I’m on the “less shimmer” bandwagon. The cost is OK, but tone the shimmer down a bit.

    Reply
  11. Kristine says:
    July 9, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    oh..this one is easy..make them less shimmery..like you know…satiny instead…and also i agree with Angie..they should have a lot of them as a permanent in their store!

    Reply
  12. Anitacska says:
    July 9, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    I don’t know if I’d want to change anything, but I wholeheartedly agree with having more permanent colours or regularly bringing back old popular ones like Pleasureflush and Stereo Rose. Of course I wouldn’t say no to a few $’s off the price either. ;)

    Reply
  13. lisa says:
    July 9, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    Where is ur review on colour craft christine? I think we’ve all been waiting

    Reply
  14. Samantha says:
    July 9, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    more pigmentation, less glitter/shimmer. less expensive.

    Reply
  15. Lisa says:
    July 9, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    Take out the bismuth oxychloride!! MAC uses that ingredient in lots of their products I’d like to use but it really irritates my skin.

    Reply
  16. Sanderlees says:
    July 9, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    *permanent
    *less glitter
    *size of mineralized blushes so that they will cost less

    Reply
  17. niknik says:
    July 9, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    Make it so it’s not as fragile! Ahh it crumbles too easily.. =(

    Reply
  18. Mabeth says:
    July 9, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    I think the price should be lower. Also, some of them have really chunky glitter.

    Reply
  19. Melissa says:
    July 9, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    I’d like to see some MSFs come out that are less glittery; I don’t *always* need to look like a disco ball. I’d definitely like to see more permanent colors–I’m a MSF fan but in general I can’t afford to drop $200 with every new collection of them. Instead of resellers getting my money over the long-term, MAC would get it if they were perm.

    Reply
  20. Veronica says:
    July 9, 2009 at 5:54 pm

    The price!!! TOO MUCH. I only have two because their too much.

    Reply
  21. Balqis says:
    July 9, 2009 at 8:23 pm

    cheaper, matte-r, less or no glitter…

    Reply
  22. mm says:
    July 10, 2009 at 6:55 am

    honestly don’t have a problem with them at all except wanting them to repromote a few. I find that there’s a good range of satin-super shimmery sheens. For the people who complain about price- are you serious? MAC has always been the best quality for the price in a cosmetic department. Try heading to Chanel or Dior and see how much $27 will get you.

    Reply
  23. kim says:
    July 10, 2009 at 9:32 am

    maybe they can come up with a matte msf not like their MSF natural like one that is colored but is a lot less glittery or matte…i hope im making sense..lol

    Reply
  24. *RN_2_B* says:
    July 10, 2009 at 11:26 am

    For those of you who hate the glitteriness of them…try applying a little transleusant powder over it. It kind of takes away the extreme glitter but leaves the color. I still wouldn’t change a thing because I love the shimmer…its what gives the glow. The powder helps take away the shimmer when I dont’ want it though.

    Reply
  25. Christy says:
    July 11, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    A bit less glitter would be great. Smaller size, lower price and more permanents would be great too.

    Reply
  26. Amanda says:
    July 11, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    I’d get rid of the chunks of glitter in them…think of naked you. I’d make them cheaper and bring more colors into them, too. I really want a violet/purple one!

    Reply