<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old vs. New MAC Pigment Jar Packaging: A Tale of Comparisons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.temptalia.com/old-vs-new-mac-pigment-jar-packaging-a-tale-of-comparisons/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.temptalia.com/old-vs-new-mac-pigment-jar-packaging-a-tale-of-comparisons</link>
	<description>A beauty blog dedicated to bringing you the latest makeup news, makeup reviews, and beauty tips. We cover MAC makeup news, Urban Decay, Chanel, NARS Cosmetics, and much more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:48:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Hatti</title>
		<link>http://www.temptalia.com/old-vs-new-mac-pigment-jar-packaging-a-tale-of-comparisons/comment-page-2#comment-1027806</link>
		<dc:creator>Hatti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temptalia.com/?p=18187#comment-1027806</guid>
		<description>I actually much prefer the new packaging. How much is in there now doesn&#039;t bother me because i agree with you when you said that nobody could go through one of these even in a whole life time. The new packaging is much sleeker and more dinky, and i link the &quot;clink&quot; of the glass as opposed to the plastic on the old ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually much prefer the new packaging. How much is in there now doesn&#8217;t bother me because i agree with you when you said that nobody could go through one of these even in a whole life time. The new packaging is much sleeker and more dinky, and i link the &#8220;clink&#8221; of the glass as opposed to the plastic on the old ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.temptalia.com/old-vs-new-mac-pigment-jar-packaging-a-tale-of-comparisons/comment-page-2#comment-960795</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temptalia.com/?p=18187#comment-960795</guid>
		<description>I used to buy MAC pigments, and I owned quite a few, but I gave them all away because I could not stand how messy they were! (Black Black Pigment) And I am not a clean freak, but when I apply a pigment to my eye, I should not see it on my cheeks! All of the ones that I gave away, were the old packaging. Since then, I still do not like pigments, but I really LOVE MAC Reflects Glitters. And I will say, that the new packaging is a rip off. It is definitely a price increase. I already used some of Reflects Bronze with some clear lipgloss, and I used some on my cheeks and hair, and it is already half gone!!! It did not even come full to the top, but it was only a little bit more than half full, and that really annoys me! I am sorry, but I feel like MAC is ripping us off. Just like the Dazzleglasses, Cremesheen Glasses, Glimmerglasses.... ect. It is not fair. I work really hard to be able to buy makeup, and I have never been sent anything for free. I do not have a MAC pro card, and MAC is expensive in my opinion. I think it is easier for some people who were sent the product for free, to give a better review on it, because the money did not come out of their pocket. And I think that you have to understand that it is a price increase for consumers, because we pay for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to buy MAC pigments, and I owned quite a few, but I gave them all away because I could not stand how messy they were! (Black Black Pigment) And I am not a clean freak, but when I apply a pigment to my eye, I should not see it on my cheeks! All of the ones that I gave away, were the old packaging. Since then, I still do not like pigments, but I really LOVE MAC Reflects Glitters. And I will say, that the new packaging is a rip off. It is definitely a price increase. I already used some of Reflects Bronze with some clear lipgloss, and I used some on my cheeks and hair, and it is already half gone!!! It did not even come full to the top, but it was only a little bit more than half full, and that really annoys me! I am sorry, but I feel like MAC is ripping us off. Just like the Dazzleglasses, Cremesheen Glasses, Glimmerglasses&#8230;. ect. It is not fair. I work really hard to be able to buy makeup, and I have never been sent anything for free. I do not have a MAC pro card, and MAC is expensive in my opinion. I think it is easier for some people who were sent the product for free, to give a better review on it, because the money did not come out of their pocket. And I think that you have to understand that it is a price increase for consumers, because we pay for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lecayle</title>
		<link>http://www.temptalia.com/old-vs-new-mac-pigment-jar-packaging-a-tale-of-comparisons/comment-page-1#comment-935042</link>
		<dc:creator>Lecayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temptalia.com/?p=18187#comment-935042</guid>
		<description>I think with the Dazzleglasses it isn&#039;t that people didn&#039;t complain about the &quot;increase&quot; in cost vs product, its that it was a new line with new packaging, not a change to something that already existed. If they had introduced a new line  of &quot;Loose Shadow&quot; lets say, I guarantee that an uproar such as this would not have ensued. 

The bottom line is people are resistant to change, yet open to new things. A new product line will be easier to receive than a change to an old one (even if it is an improvement to the quality of packaging, product, etc). I personally disagree with the repackaging of their pigments, but mostly because I like things to match, and the new pigment jars don&#039;t match my old ones. The lack of pigment was a big deal to me in the beginning, and I can see how it would upset certain individuals, especially those that sell sample sizes and now have less to work with, but I got over that aspect of things, because aside from choosing not to buy MAC anymore (something that I cannot even think about doing) there isn&#039;t much I can do but express my opinion. I&#039;m still busy being upset about the fact that the makeup brand created in my country (Canada) costs more here than it does to export it to the US. Now THAT is a kick in the head. 

Also, I dos NOT go unnoticed that most of the collections are simply the same items repackaged and resold with different names as limited edition, and within the community it has also been noted by several beauty gurus I follow that the quality has decreased since the Estee Lauder acquisition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think with the Dazzleglasses it isn&#8217;t that people didn&#8217;t complain about the &#8220;increase&#8221; in cost vs product, its that it was a new line with new packaging, not a change to something that already existed. If they had introduced a new line  of &#8220;Loose Shadow&#8221; lets say, I guarantee that an uproar such as this would not have ensued. </p>
<p>The bottom line is people are resistant to change, yet open to new things. A new product line will be easier to receive than a change to an old one (even if it is an improvement to the quality of packaging, product, etc). I personally disagree with the repackaging of their pigments, but mostly because I like things to match, and the new pigment jars don&#8217;t match my old ones. The lack of pigment was a big deal to me in the beginning, and I can see how it would upset certain individuals, especially those that sell sample sizes and now have less to work with, but I got over that aspect of things, because aside from choosing not to buy MAC anymore (something that I cannot even think about doing) there isn&#8217;t much I can do but express my opinion. I&#8217;m still busy being upset about the fact that the makeup brand created in my country (Canada) costs more here than it does to export it to the US. Now THAT is a kick in the head. </p>
<p>Also, I dos NOT go unnoticed that most of the collections are simply the same items repackaged and resold with different names as limited edition, and within the community it has also been noted by several beauty gurus I follow that the quality has decreased since the Estee Lauder acquisition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luckyyou</title>
		<link>http://www.temptalia.com/old-vs-new-mac-pigment-jar-packaging-a-tale-of-comparisons/comment-page-1#comment-624898</link>
		<dc:creator>luckyyou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 14:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temptalia.com/?p=18187#comment-624898</guid>
		<description>im not agree ... be4 they give us 7.5 g they should keep the same or they should not give 7.5g be4 if they do i think they should keep the same g .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im not agree &#8230; be4 they give us 7.5 g they should keep the same or they should not give 7.5g be4 if they do i think they should keep the same g .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brittany M</title>
		<link>http://www.temptalia.com/old-vs-new-mac-pigment-jar-packaging-a-tale-of-comparisons/comment-page-2#comment-546529</link>
		<dc:creator>Brittany M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 01:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temptalia.com/?p=18187#comment-546529</guid>
		<description>I agree that the Dazzleglass is a bigger rip off. If you guys want the old pigment jars, go to your nearest Cosmetic Company Store, thats where I bought my first MAC pigments lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the Dazzleglass is a bigger rip off. If you guys want the old pigment jars, go to your nearest Cosmetic Company Store, thats where I bought my first MAC pigments lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amber</title>
		<link>http://www.temptalia.com/old-vs-new-mac-pigment-jar-packaging-a-tale-of-comparisons/comment-page-2#comment-500133</link>
		<dc:creator>amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 01:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temptalia.com/?p=18187#comment-500133</guid>
		<description>I hate the new packaging!!! I have the Mac pro kit that has the extending shelves and the old pigments fit in there perfectly standing up, now they dont fit so I have to lay them down and they get cluttered and roll around when I&#039;m driving to shoots. Bummed on it:(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the new packaging!!! I have the Mac pro kit that has the extending shelves and the old pigments fit in there perfectly standing up, now they dont fit so I have to lay them down and they get cluttered and roll around when I&#8217;m driving to shoots. Bummed on it:(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/21 queries in 0.015 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 362/382 objects using memcached

Served from: www.temptalia.com @ 2012-02-12 08:56:04 -->
