<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MAC 222 Tapered Blending Brush Photos &amp; Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.temptalia.com/mac-222-tapered-blending-brush-photos-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.temptalia.com/mac-222-tapered-blending-brush-photos-review</link>
	<description>A beauty blog dedicated to bringing you the latest makeup news, makeup reviews, and beauty tips. We cover MAC makeup news, Urban Decay, Chanel, NARS Cosmetics, and much more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:48:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.temptalia.com/mac-222-tapered-blending-brush-photos-review/comment-page-1#comment-1113010</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 05:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temptalia.com/?p=10494#comment-1113010</guid>
		<description>Did MAC just discontinue the 222?  If so, I&#039;m bummed -- I had it on my Christmas wish list :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did MAC just discontinue the 222?  If so, I&#8217;m bummed &#8212; I had it on my Christmas wish list <img src='http://www.temptalia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.temptalia.com/mac-222-tapered-blending-brush-photos-review/comment-page-1#comment-1108992</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 05:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temptalia.com/?p=10494#comment-1108992</guid>
		<description>This brush is the most impressive in all of my mac brush. Not regret at all. love so much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This brush is the most impressive in all of my mac brush. Not regret at all. love so much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.temptalia.com/mac-222-tapered-blending-brush-photos-review/comment-page-1#comment-1037096</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 04:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temptalia.com/?p=10494#comment-1037096</guid>
		<description>222 is easier for the crease!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>222 is easier for the crease!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anna griffith</title>
		<link>http://www.temptalia.com/mac-222-tapered-blending-brush-photos-review/comment-page-1#comment-1025152</link>
		<dc:creator>anna griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temptalia.com/?p=10494#comment-1025152</guid>
		<description>i still cant decide between the 222 and 217 for applying colour to the crease, what differences will it make with the application? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i still cant decide between the 222 and 217 for applying colour to the crease, what differences will it make with the application? <img src='http://www.temptalia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.temptalia.com/mac-222-tapered-blending-brush-photos-review/comment-page-1#comment-373504</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temptalia.com/?p=10494#comment-373504</guid>
		<description>226 is very tapered and shorter -- I prefer it over the 222 and 224.  It&#039;s my favorite brush for the crease!  I&#039;d say it&#039;s not quite as soft as the 222.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>226 is very tapered and shorter &#8212; I prefer it over the 222 and 224.  It&#8217;s my favorite brush for the crease!  I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s not quite as soft as the 222.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ci</title>
		<link>http://www.temptalia.com/mac-222-tapered-blending-brush-photos-review/comment-page-1#comment-373502</link>
		<dc:creator>Ci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temptalia.com/?p=10494#comment-373502</guid>
		<description>I have not tried it yet but it is on my wish list cuz it is so multi functional for people with small eye spaces who wants to create an almost whole eye look that doesn&#039;t require so much precision.

Talking of precision for blending on the other hand, what is the differences between the mac 222 and 226 brushes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not tried it yet but it is on my wish list cuz it is so multi functional for people with small eye spaces who wants to create an almost whole eye look that doesn&#8217;t require so much precision.</p>
<p>Talking of precision for blending on the other hand, what is the differences between the mac 222 and 226 brushes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/17 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 372/384 objects using memcached

Served from: www.temptalia.com @ 2012-02-12 08:07:45 -->
