We hope you'll consider supporting Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thanks!
  • Bergdorf GoodmanEarn up to a $1,000 gift card with your select regular-price purchase, ends 1/22.
  • Kat Von D BeautyMetalMatte back in stock here, while supplies last, ends 1/31.
  • Sephora10% off for VIB/VIB Rouges with code V436CB, one-time use per year (valid each year you reach or renew your VIB status), ends 12/31.

Cle de Peau Golden Apricot Luminizer & Modern Pink (2) Lipgloss

Cle de Peau Golden Apricot Luminizer
Cle de Peau Golden Apricot Luminizer

Cle de Peau Golden Apricot Luminizer ($55.00 for 0.35 oz.) is a light-medium peach with warm, orange undertones and a dusting of warm white shimmer and occasional sparkle. Essence Be My Highlight (P, $4.49) is lighter, more shimmery (90% similar). Charlotte Tilbury Seductive Beauty (Highlight) (LE) is cooler, more shimmery (90% similar). bareMinerals The Brilliant Sunset (LE, $26.00) is more shimmery (90% similar). MAC Ginger Spiked (LE) is less shimmery (90% similar). MAC Summer Opal (LE, $22.00) is less shimmery (90% similar). Tarte Lit (P) is darker, more shimmery (90% similar). Too Faced Sweet Peach Illuminator (P) is lighter, more shimmery (90% similar). Urban Decay Aura (P, $30.00) is more shimmery (90% similar). Charlotte Tilbury Norman Parkinson (LE, $32.00) is darker, more shimmery (90% similar). Colour Pop Yummy Cookies (LE, $8.00) is darker (90% similar). Smashbox Shimmer (LE) is warmer, darker, more shimmery (90% similar). Suqqu Yawakouki (05) (P, $34.00) is warmer (90% similar). MAC Sunny Surprise (LE, $22.00) is darker, less shimmery (85% similar). Colour Pop Highly Waisted (P, $8.00) is cooler, darker (85% similar). bareMinerals The Premiere (LE, $26.00) is darker (85% similar). Urban Decay Twilight (LE) is darker, less shimmery (85% similar). Kevyn Aucoin Starlight (P, $44.00) is darker, more shimmery (85% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Cle de Peau is pretty minimalist when it comes to describing their color products, so there’s not much to this one other than it is a highlighting powder. For anyone new to the brand, the Luminizers are available as refill pans (no compact) for $55, while if you want the compact, it’ll run you $95 (total); I am not personally motivated to spend $40 on a compact myself, so you’ll see I only bought the pan on its own. The texture of the powder is incredibly smooth and finely-milled, though this shade had a little bit more sparkle (not just fine shimmer) in it than some of the other shades in the range (particularly compared to the Gold one). It had good color payoff that could easily be sheered/diffused and blended out for a soft, warming glow with a delicate sheen that didn’t emphasize pores. It wore well for eight and a half hours on me.

Cle de Peau Modern Pink (2) Lip Gloss ($48.00 for 0.21 oz.) is a soft, peachy-pink base with a lot of fine, peachy-gold shimmer. Hourglass Imagine (P, $28.00) is lighter (90% similar). Charlotte Tilbury Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds (L.S.D.) (LE, $22.00) is less shimmery (90% similar). MAC Dynasty at Dusk (P, $20.00) is darker, less shimmery (90% similar). Sephora Fresh Peach (07) (P, $12.00) is glossier, warmer (90% similar). MAC Satin Slip (LE, $20.00) is less shimmery (90% similar). Lancome Mirrored Nude (09) (P, $22.00) is glossier (90% similar). Revlon Peach (P, $7.49) is warmer, darker (90% similar). Chanel Sahara (610) (LE, $30.00) is darker, less shimmery (85% similar). NARS Orgasm (P, $26.00) is warmer (85% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Long-time readers might remember that this was one of my very first luxury purchases, and it still remains one of my favorite glosses of all-time (it’s absolutely dupable by other, less expensive ranges, though!). I recently repurchased it when I picked up the newly-released highlighter shade, so I figured I’d do an updated review. There’s not much to the description–“combines the drama and vibrancy of gloss with enduring deep color.” The texture is lightweight with light tackiness but is not overly sticky or goopy (it seemed tackier than I remember it being, though). It had semi-sheer to semi-opaque coverage with a lot of pearl and light shine. Some of the lighter, peachier base color gathers in lip lines, while the pearl/shimmer disperses evenly across the lips. There was no discernible scent or taste. The gloss lasted for five hours on me and was nicely hydrating over time.

Cle de Peau Luminizing Face Enhancer Golden Apricot
9.5
Product
9
Pigmentation
10
Texture
9
Longevity
5
Application
94%
Total
Cle de Peau Lip Gloss Modern Pink (2)
9
Product
8.5
Pigmentation
8.5
Texture
9.5
Longevity
5
Application
90%
Total

See more photos & swatches!

We hope you'll consider supporting Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thanks!

Dior Shock, Cruise, Diorosphere Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss

Dior Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss
Dior Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss

Dior Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss ($30.00 for 0.21 fl. oz.) was recently reformulated and released in several shades, some familiar from past formulations (Dior seems to update their lip ranges every couple of years). The formula is supposed to be sheer, hydrating, glossy, and plumping using “hyaluronic acid spheres that capture and retain surrounding water … [so lips] appear full with lasting moisture.” I can’t really tell the difference between this formula and past ones in the range; it’s a semi-sheer to semi-opaque formula (from what shades I bought) with a very smooth, lightweight texture that is comfortable to wear, lightly hydrating, and shiny. The non-sticky texture and smooth, gel-like feel are the two highlights of the formula, as they’re just easy to wear and throw on. The formula wore between three and four hours for me. I didn’t notice any scent or taste. They come in three types–sparkling, watery, and iridescent–with varying levels of shimmer and color.

Dior Shock (465) Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss ($30.00 for 0.21 fl. oz.) is a sheer, pink-tinged base with light pink and silver sparkle. It has a “sparkling” finish according to the brand. It accentuated the natural pink tones of my lips while adding evenly dispersed sparkle and glossy shine. The gloss was comfortable to use and wear, though it lasted for two and a half hours. The formula was lightly hydrating while worn. Maybelline Blushing Petal (505) (P, $8.99) is more shimmery (90% similar). Chanel Charming (LE, $30.00) is cooler (90% similar). MAC Pagoda (P, $20.00) is less shimmery (90% similar). Dior Dolly Pink (453) (P, $29.50) is warmer, darker (85% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Dior Cruise (676) Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss ($30.00 for 0.21 fl. oz.) is a bright, medium fuchsia pink with cool, blue undertones and fine, pink pearl. It has a “watery” finish. The color payoff was semi-sheer–a noticeable amount of color (at least on my lips) but not enough to fully cover, so your natural lip color may alter the way this looks compared to how it looks on me. The texture was a little thinner and didn’t leave my lips looking as smooth as some of the other shades did. This shade wore for three hours on me but was hydrating. Chanel Pinctada (214) (LE, $30.00) is brighter, lighter (95% similar). MAC Ceremonial (LE, $20.00) is darker (95% similar). MAC Bubble Butt (LE, $15.00) is darker, more shimmery (90% similar). Dior Hollywood (688) (P, $35.00) is less shimmery (90% similar). Bobbi Brown Electric Violet (P, $24.00) is cooler, more shimmery (90% similar). MAC Vibrant Vibe (P, $22.00) is brighter (90% similar). Maybelline Mystical Magenta (610) (P, $8.99) is warmer, darker (85% similar). Sephora Glossy Pink (16) (P, $12.00) is more pigmented, brighter, lighter (85% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Dior Diorsphere (996) Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss ($30.00 for 0.21 fl. oz.) is a medium-dark, plummy purple with light pink and silver sparkle. It has a “sparkling” finish. The coverage was semi-sheer with enough tint to be noticeable but let a lot of the natural lip color come through. It applied evenly and had a smooth, lightweight consistency that was comfortable to wear. This shade wore for three and a half hours and was moisturizing. Sephora Pretty Princess (LE, $14.00) is warmer (90% similar). NARS Oasis (DC, $25.00) is less shimmery (90% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Dior Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss (2016) Shock (465)
Dior Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss (2016) Cruise (676)
Dior Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss (2016) Diorosphere (996)

See more photos & swatches!

Dior Diorama, Ever Dior, Cosmic Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss

Dior Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss
Dior Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss

Dior Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss ($30.00 for 0.21 fl. oz.) was recently reformulated and released in several shades, some familiar from past formulations (Dior seems to update their lip ranges every couple of years). The formula is supposed to be sheer, hydrating, glossy, and plumping using “hyaluronic acid spheres that capture and retain surrounding water … [so lips] appear full with lasting moisture.” I can’t really tell the difference between this formula and past ones in the range; it’s a semi-sheer to semi-opaque formula (from what shades I bought) with a very smooth, lightweight texture that is comfortable to wear, lightly hydrating, and shiny. The non-sticky texture and smooth, gel-like feel are the two highlights of the formula, as they’re just easy to wear and throw on. The formula wore between three and four hours for me. I didn’t notice any scent or taste. They come in three types–sparkling, watery, and iridescent–with varying levels of shimmer and color.

Dior Diorama (785) Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss ($30.00 for 0.21 fl. oz.) is a soft, medium rosy pink with warm undertones and white sparkle. It has an “iridescent” finish. The consistency had a milkier quality to it, which yielded more opaque coverage with a little bit of color settling into lip lines, but I did not find it overly noticeable from a normal viewing distance (only close-up). The texture was smooth, lightweight, and hydrating over time. The color lasted for three hours. Lancome Magnetic Mauve (04) (P, $22.00) is darker, more shimmery (90% similar). NARS Baby Doll (P, $26.00) is more shimmery (90% similar). MAC Sweet Tooth (LE, $20.00) is cooler, less shimmery (90% similar). Bobbi Brown Pink Sorbet (P, $24.00) is cooler (85% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Dior Ever Dior (643) Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss ($30.00 for 0.21 fl. oz.) is a muted, medium-dark reddish-coral with warm, gold micro-glitter. It had semi-sheer color payoff, which applied evenly and smoothly over the lips, giving them a natural tint/appearance. Despite it seeming more coral in the tube and swatched, the pink tones of my natural lip color made it so the gloss looked like a pink-coral overall–obviously the sheerness of the formulation will make these glosses appear differently from person to person as a result. It has a “sparkling” finish. The gloss lasted for four hours and was comfortable and hydrating while worn. Dior Pink Excess (663) (LE, $29.50) is brighter, lighter (95% similar). Make Up For Ever 205P Pearly Rose (P, $19.00) is warmer, brighter (90% similar). Becca Watermelon/Opal (P, $24.00) is warmer, darker (90% similar). Guerlain Nahema Smack (P, $30.00) is warmer, darker (90% similar). Guerlain Frizzy Mango (LE, $32.00) is more shimmery (90% similar). Revlon Papaya (P, $7.49) is darker, less shimmery (90% similar). Maybelline Pearlescent Peach (520) (P, $8.99) is brighter, lighter (90% similar). Chanel Sahara (610) (LE, $30.00) is cooler, lighter, more shimmery (85% similar). NARS Risky Business (P, $26.00) is more shimmery (85% similar). MAC Bright Pink Bouquet (LE, $28.00) is warmer, darker, more shimmery (85% similar). Dior Paradise (732) (P, $29.50) is warmer, darker (80% similar). Revlon Kiss Me Coral (P, $7.99) is warmer (80% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Dior Cosmic (656) Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss ($30.00 for 0.21 fl. oz.) is a brighter, medium pinky-coral with warm undertones and fine, pink pearl. lines along my bottom lip. It has an “iridescent” finish. It had semi-opaque color payoff–one of the most pigmented shades I bought–with less obvious, finer shimmer than the other shades. It applied fairly evenly, though some of the color seemed to accentuate lip. This shade wore for four hours and was moisturizing while worn. Cle de Peau Deco (16) (P, $48.00) is less shimmery (90% similar). Burberry Cameo Pink (P, $29.00) is more shimmery (90% similar). Dior Paradise (732) (P, $29.50) is darker, more shimmery (85% similar). Guerlain Nahema Smack (P, $30.00) is darker, less shimmery (85% similar). Revlon HD Sunstone (565) (P, $8.99) is warmer, brighter (80% similar). Sephora Nude Alert (08) (P, $12.00) is warmer, more muted (80% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Dior Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss (2016) Diorama (785)
Dior Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss (2016) Ever Dior (643)
Dior Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss (2016) Cosmic (656)

See more photos & swatches!

We hope you'll consider supporting Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thanks!

Tarte Double Tap, Goals, Snap Tarteist Glossy Lip Paints

Tarte Double Tap Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint
Tarte Double Tap Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint

Tarte Double Tap Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint ($20.00 for 0.20 fl. oz.) is described as a “cool mauve.” It’s a muted, medium-dark warm rosy brown with warm undertones and a cream finish. It had mostly opaque pigmentation with a creamy, spreadable texture that was very comfortable to wear and lightly hydrating. The only downside was some of the color gathered in lip lines, though I didn’t find it too noticeable from a normal viewing distance. MAC Anything But Demure (LE, $20.00) is lighter, more shimmery (95% similar). Tarte Snap (P, $20.00) is darker (90% similar). MAC It's a Strike (LE, $20.00) is less pigmented, lighter (90% similar). MAC Deelight (P, $20.00) is warmer, lighter (85% similar). Anastasia Vintage (-, $16.00) is brighter, lighter (80% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Tarte Goals Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint ($20.00 for 0.20 fl. oz.) is described as a “rosy nude.” It’s a muted, medium pinky-coral with warm undertones and a cream finish. It had semi-opaque color coverage with a lightly creamy, gel-like texture on the lips that was moisturizing and comfortable on, though the texture had a tendency to pull into lip lines. This shade lasted for three and a half hours. NARS Chelsea Girls (P, $26.00) is warmer, lighter (90% similar). Stila Guava (P, $22.00) is less pigmented, lighter (90% similar). Too Faced Pure Peach (P, $19.00) is brighter, lighter (90% similar). NARS Stolen Kisses (P, $26.00) is warmer, brighter, lighter (80% similar). MAC Artful (LE, $15.00) is warmer, brighter, lighter (80% similar). MAC Persistent Peach (P, $19.50) is brighter, lighter (80% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Tarte Snap Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint ($20.00 for 0.20 fl. oz.) is described as a “nude mauve.” It’s a muted, dark plummy-brown with warm undertones and a creamy finish. It had mostly opaque pigmentation with a lightly creamy texture that was smooth and easy to spread across the lips evenly. It wore well for four hours and was moisturizing while worn. Urban Decay Wallflower (P, $19.00) is warmer (95% similar). MAC Anything But Demure (LE, $20.00) is lighter, more shimmery (90% similar). MAC Spice (P, $15.00) is warmer (90% similar). Giorgio Armani #524 (P, $29.00) is less pigmented, lighter (90% similar). Tarte Double Tap (P, $20.00) is lighter (90% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

FORMULA OVERVIEW | Tarte Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint ($20.00 for 0.20 fl. oz.) is supposed to be “pigmented” with a “glossy” and “non-sticky” finish and have a hydrating formula to back it up. There are nine shades available, and it is a new, permanent formula. The consistency is light-medium in weight–more gel-like with a very smooth, lightly creamy texture. It’s more like a gloss than merely a liquid lipstick, so it has a glossier finish overall. Most of the shades were semi-opaque to fully opaque, and even the darker shades applied evenly for the most part (that was a surprise!). They’re comfortable to wear, lightly hydrating, and non-sticky over time. The wear varied between three to five hours for me. I didn’t notice any scent or taste when testing these.

Tarte Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint Double Tap
Double Tap
Double Tap
9
Product
9.5
Pigmentation
8
Texture
8.5
Longevity
5
Application
89%
Total
Tarte Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint Goals
Goals
Goals
8
Product
8.5
Pigmentation
8
Texture
8
Longevity
4.5
Application
82%
Total
Tarte Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint Snap
Snap
Snap
9
Product
9.5
Pigmentation
8.5
Texture
8.5
Longevity
5
Application
90%
Total

See more photos & swatches!

Tarte Hella, Obvi, Slay Tarteist Glossy Lip Paints

Tarte Hella Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint
Tarte Hella Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint

Tarte Hella Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint ($20.00 for 0.20 fl. oz.) is described as a “white nude.” It’s a light, warm peach with a cream finish. This was one of the worst shades in the range, as it was uneven and tended to gather in lip lines, so it just didn’t look as smooth applied. It had good color payoff, lasted for three hours, and was hydrating. Too Faced Naked Dolly (LE) is warmer, less pigmented, more muted (90% similar). NARS Unlaced (P, $26.00) is darker (90% similar). Maybelline Life's a Peach (P, $4.49) is cooler, lighter (90% similar). MAC Innocent (LE, $20.00) is less pigmented, more shimmery (90% similar). MAC Lap Dog (LE, $22.00) is less pigmented, more muted, darker (85% similar). Laura Mercier Bare Baby (P, $25.00) is less pigmented, lighter, more shimmery (85% similar). Anastasia Dainty (-, $16.00) is warmer, darker (80% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Tarte Obvi Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint ($20.00 for 0.20 fl. oz.) is described as a “warm nude.” It’s a medium, peachy-brown with warm undertones and a fine, white pearl. It had semi-opaque color payoff that applied evenly but some color sat in lip lines, which became more noticeable as time went on. The gloss lasted for three hours, was lightly moisturizing, and comfortable to wear. Too Faced Peach-sicle (P, $19.00) is cooler, less pigmented, lighter (90% similar). Revlon HD Smoky Topaz (570) (P, $8.99) is darker (90% similar). MAC Spanking Haute (LE, $20.00) is warmer (90% similar). Sephora Cappuccino (02) (P, $12.00) is darker, more shimmery (90% similar). MAC Chic Supremacy (LE, $15.00) is cooler, lighter (90% similar). Maybelline Nude Illusion (060) (P, $8.99) is warmer, darker, less shimmery (85% similar). MAC Overspiced (LE, $15.00) is warmer, darker, less shimmery (85% similar). MAC Keep It Light (LE, $20.00) is darker (85% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Tarte Slay Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint ($20.00 for 0.20 fl. oz.) is described as an “orchid.” It’s a muted, medium-dark plummy purple with subtle, warm undertones and a cream finish. It had nearly opaque color payoff with a smooth, lightly creamy texture that applied well and wore for four hours on me. The formula was moisturizing while worn. MAC Snuggle Up (LE, $20.00) is brighter, lighter (80% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

FORMULA OVERVIEW | Tarte Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint ($20.00 for 0.20 fl. oz.) is supposed to be “pigmented” with a “glossy” and “non-sticky” finish and have a hydrating formula to back it up. There are nine shades available, and it is a new, permanent formula. The consistency is light-medium in weight–more gel-like with a very smooth, lightly creamy texture. It’s more like a gloss than merely a liquid lipstick, so it has a glossier finish overall. Most of the shades were semi-opaque to fully opaque, and even the darker shades applied evenly for the most part (that was a surprise!). They’re comfortable to wear, lightly hydrating, and non-sticky over time. The wear varied between three to five hours for me. I didn’t notice any scent or taste when testing these.

Tarte Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint Hella
Hella
Hella
8
Product
9
Pigmentation
7.5
Texture
7.5
Longevity
3.5
Application
79%
Total
Tarte Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint Obvi
Obvi
Obvi
8.5
Product
9
Pigmentation
8
Texture
7.5
Longevity
4.5
Application
83%
Total
Tarte Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint Slay
Slay
Slay
9
Product
9.5
Pigmentation
9
Texture
8.5
Longevity
5
Application
91%
Total

See more photos & swatches!

Tarte Fave, Poison, WCW Tarteist Glossy Lip Paints

Tarte Fave Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint
Tarte Fave Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint

Tarte Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint ($20.00 for 0.20 fl. oz.) is supposed to be “pigmented” with a “glossy” and “non-sticky” finish and have a hydrating formula to back it up. There are nine shades available, and it is a new, permanent formula. The consistency is light-medium in weight–more gel-like with a very smooth, lightly creamy texture. It’s more like a gloss than merely a liquid lipstick, so it has a glossier finish overall. Most of the shades were semi-opaque to fully opaque, and even the darker shades applied evenly for the most part (that was a surprise!). They’re comfortable to wear, lightly hydrating, and non-sticky over time. The wear varied between three to five hours for me. I didn’t notice any scent or taste when testing these.

Tarte Fave Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint ($20.00 for 0.20 fl. oz.) is described as a “plum berry.” It’s a slightly muted, medium-dark plum with a cream finish. It had mostly opaque color coverage that applied evenly and smoothly. I didn’t experience feathering/bleeding when wearing this shade for the four and a half hours it lasted. Tom Ford Beauty Wet Violet (P, $45.00) is cooler, more shimmery (90% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Tarte Poison Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint ($20.00 for 0.20 fl. oz.) is described as a “black plum.” It’s a dark, purply-plum with subtle, warm undertones and a cream finish. It had mostly opaque color payoff that went on evenly overall, but it wasn’t quite as smooth in appearance (the darker color seemed to highlight lip lines close-up) compared to other shades. It wore for four and a half hours and was lightly hydrating. Too Faced Melted Villain (P, $21.00) is less glossy, cooler (85% similar). Giorgio Armani #604 (P, $29.00) is less pigmented, lighter (85% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Tarte WCW Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint ($20.00 for 0.20 fl. oz.) is described as a “berry.” It’s a medium-dark, reddish plum with subtle, cool undertones and a cream finish. It had semi-opaque pigmentation with even coverage. The texture was smooth, comfortable to wear, but some of the color sat in lip lines noticeably. This shade wore four hours and was moisturizing over time. Anastasia Berry (-, $16.00) is cooler (95% similar). Tom Ford Beauty Orchid Fatale (P, $52.00) is warmer, brighter (95% similar). MAC Perpetual Holiday (P, $24.00) is cooler (90% similar). NARS Plato's (LE, $26.00) is darker (95% similar). MAC Sultana (LE, $20.00) is warmer, lighter (85% similar). MAC Modern Lure (LE, $15.00) is lighter, more shimmery (90% similar). Dior Intrigue (995) (P, $35.00) is lighter (85% similar). Colour Pop Furry (LE) is cooler, more shimmery (90% similar). Maybelline Caviar Couture (050) (P, $8.99) is brighter, lighter (85% similar). MAC Peer Pressure (LE, $20.00) is warmer, lighter (85% similar). Chanel Distinction (21) (P, $34.00) is warmer, lighter (80% similar). Revlon Embellished (P, $7.49) is warmer, lighter (80% similar). See comparison swatches / view dupes side-by-side.

Tarte Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint Fave
Fave
Fave
9
Product
9.5
Pigmentation
10
Texture
9
Longevity
5
Application
94%
Total
Tarte Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint Poison
Poison
Poison
9
Product
9.5
Pigmentation
8.5
Texture
9
Longevity
5
Application
91%
Total
Tarte Tarteist Glossy Lip Paint WCW
WCW
WCW
8.5
Product
8.5
Pigmentation
8.5
Texture
8.5
Longevity
4.5
Application
86%
Total

See more photos & swatches!

Subscribe

Join our newsletter and never miss a post!