<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >

<channel>
    <title>Temptalia</title>
    <atom:link href="http://www.temptalia.com/2009-readers-choice-awards-results-part-1/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <link>http://www.temptalia.com</link>
    <description>A beauty blog dedicated to bringing you the latest makeup news, makeup reviews, and beauty tips. We cover MAC makeup news, Urban Decay, Chanel, NARS Cosmetics, and much more!</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    
        <item>
        <title>2009 Readers&#8217; Choice Awards &#8212; Results &#8212; Part 1</title>
        <link>http://www.temptalia.com/2009-readers-choice-awards-results-part-1</link>
        <comments>http://www.temptalia.com/2009-readers-choice-awards-results-part-1#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
        		<category><![CDATA[Brand & Product Round-ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 readers' choice awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temptalia beauty awards 2009]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temptalia.com/?p=18128</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.temptalia.com/images/spring2010/readerschoice.jpg" style="margin: 0 auto;display: inline-block;" /></p>2009 Readers&#8217; Choice Awards &#8212; Results &#8212; Part 1 The results are in! It&#8217;s been a really incredible time compiling nominees and then watching the votes come in.  We had some close races in a few categories, with the difference being as little as one (or even tied!) at times.  It&#8217;s always fun to see [...]]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://www.temptalia.com/images/spring2010/readerschoice.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<h2>2009 Readers&#8217; Choice Awards &#8212; Results &#8212; Part 1</h2>
<p><strong>The results are in!</strong> It&#8217;s been a really incredible time compiling nominees and then watching the votes come in.  We had some close races in a few categories, with the difference being as little as one (or even tied!) at times.  It&#8217;s always fun to see how those turn out, because you never really know until the very last vote comes in&#8211;plus, it really shows that every vote counts and may be the one that turns the tide.</p>
<h3>Did your favorites win?  Were you surprised by any of the winners?</h3>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><strong>Best Beauty Brand of the Year</strong>:  <span style="color: #e0208d;"> <strong>MAC Cosmetics</strong></span></span></p>
<blockquote><p>With a crushing 49.0% of the vote, MAC Cosmetics picks up Best Beauty Brand of the Year.  This marks MAC as a three-time winner in this category.  Urban Decay (9.9%) and Make Up For Ever (7.6%) were the second and third, respectively, but it was clear MAC was, again, going to win this category by a landslide.</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><strong>Best New Product of 2009</strong>:  <span style="color: #e0208d;"> <strong>Sigma Brushes</strong></span></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Sigma Brushes really caught your attention this year and 14.4% of you found them the best new product of 2009.  With 11.8% of votes, Chanel Rouge Allure Laques just barely edged out Urban Decay Book of Shadows Vol. II (11.4%) to come in second and third, respectively.</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><strong>Most Surprisingly Amazing Product of 2009</strong>:  <span style="color: #e0208d;"> <strong>Sigma Brushes</strong></span></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Sigma Brushes (15.6%) really caught a lot of you by surprise this year &#8212; but in a good way.  I&#8217;m definitely going to try to give them a test during the new year, since so many of you seemed to enjoy it.  MAC&#8217;s Style Black Mineralized Eyeshadows (10%) were another surprise favorite, along with Chanel Rouge Allure Laque (9.3%) and MAC Perfect Topping Mineralize Skinfinish (7.9%).</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><strong>Most Disappointing Product of 2009</strong>:  <span style="color: #e0208d;"> <strong>MAC Tri-colour Lipglass</strong></span></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Limited edition in nature, but still one of the bigger disappointments of the year, were MAC&#8217;s Sugarsweet Tri-colour Lipglasses &#8212; 16.9% thought so, at least.  Maybelline&#8217;s Lash Stiletto (14.5%) was another product that missed the mark, with CoverGirl&#8217;s LashBlast Length Mascara (9.4%) not working out so well either.</p></blockquote>
<h4>Check out the Best/Worst MAC Collections of 2009, Mascaras, Eyeshadow Base, Eyeshadow, and Eyeliners! <span id="more-18128"></span></h4>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><strong>Best MAC Collection of 2009</strong>:  <span style="color: #e0208d;"> <strong>MAC for Hello Kitty</strong></span></span></p>
<blockquote><p>MAC for Hello Kitty just might have been one of MAC&#8217;s strongest selling collections of all-time, judging by the anticipation over the collection, but also by your vote &#8212; 22.7% favored this over all other MAC launches this year.  Style Black (14.3%) and Blonde, Brunette, Redhead (11.03%) followed in second and third, respectively.</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><strong>Worst MAC Collection of 2009</strong>: <span style="color: #e0208d;"><strong>Baby Bloom<br />
</strong></span></span></p>
<blockquote><p>No love for Baby Bloom this year, as it was considered the worst by 11.8% of voters.  In High Def (8.0%) and Baroque Boudoir (7.6%) followed closely as second and third, respectively.  Interestingly enough, Love That Look was the least likely to win worst, because it barely received any votes for worst &#8212; only two!</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><strong>Best Mascara</strong>:  <span style="color: #e0208d;"> <strong>CoverGirl LashBlast Mascara</strong></span></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Are you surprised that CoverGirl&#8217;s LashBlast Mascara has beaten an eternal crowd-favorite, Dior DiorShow?  Well, that&#8217;s what happened this year, and by no small margin.  CoverGirl LashBlast pulled in 18.5% of the vote, while Dior DiorShow only garnered 9.1% of the vote.  L&#8217;Oreal Carbon Voluminous Mascara (6.0%) came in third.  Last year, LashBlast also took home Best Mascara as voted by readers, but the margin was much, much smaller.  Were you a DiorShow fan who has now switched to LashBlast?  &#8216;fess up!</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><strong>Best Drugstore Mascara</strong>:  <span style="color: #e0208d;"> <strong>CoverGirl LashBlast Mascara</strong></span></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Hey, if CoverGirl LashBlast Mascara wins Best Mascara, period, it better win drugstore, right?  It picked up 30.8% of votes, with L&#8217;Oreal Voluminous Mascara (12.6%) and Maybelline Colossal Mascara (7.7%) coming in second and third, respectively.</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><strong>Worst Mascara</strong>:  <span style="color: #e0208d;"> <strong>Maybelline Great Lash</strong></span></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Two years in a row, Maybelline&#8217;s Great Lash has taken home the not-so-happy award of Worst Mascara.  This year, they do so with 14.7% of the vote with MAC ZoomLash Mascara (10.4%) and Maybelline Lash Stiletto Mascara (10.3%) coming in second and third, respectively.</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><strong>Best Eyeshadow Base</strong>:  <span style="color: #e0208d;"> <strong>Urban Decay Primer Potion</strong></span></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Now a three-time winner, Urban Decay Primer Potion still hung in there with a very strong hold &#8212; 41.8% of votes.  What was interesting about this particular category is that there were three really large vote-getters, while the rest were quite scattered. MAC Paint Pots (20.3%) and Too Faced Shadow Insurance (18.2%) came in second and third, respectively.</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><strong>Best Eyeshadow</strong>:  <span style="color: #e0208d;"> <strong>MAC Eyeshadow</strong></span></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Another win for MAC, the first winner for this newly added category&#8211;they collected a whopping 54.2% of the vote.  Urban Decay (13.2%) and NARS (5.8%) weren&#8217;t able to close the gap and came in second and third, respectively.</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><strong>Best Pencil Eyeliner</strong>:  <span style="color: #e0208d;"> <strong>Urban Decay 24/7 Eyeliner</strong></span></span></p>
<blockquote><p>41.1% of those who voted have fallen for Urban Decay&#8217;s 24/7 Eyeliner for your go-to for pencil eyeliners!  Make Up For Ever AquaEyes Eyeliner (8.9%) and Stila Kajal Liner (6.7%) came in second and third, respectively.</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><strong>Best Gel Eyeliner</strong>:  <span style="color: #e0208d;"> <strong>MAC Fluidline</strong></span></span></p>
<blockquote><p>With 48.0% of the vote, MAC Fluidline really pushed out the rest of the nominees.  Bobbi Brown Gel Eyeliners (12.8%) and Stila Smudge Pots (11.9%) were second and third, respectively.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.temptalia.com/2009-readers-choice-awards-results-part-1/feed</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 5/13 queries in 0.007 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 506/518 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn.temptalia.com

 Served from: www.temptalia.com @ 2013-05-22 10:00:39 by W3 Total Cache -->